Visualization of Differences in Treatment of Safety Inspections across Port State Control Regimes: A Case for Increased Harmonization Efforts

References

• Alderton , T. and Winchester , N. 2002 . Flag states and safety: 1997–1999 . Maritime Policy and Management , 29 (2) : 151 – 162 .
   Google Scholar
• Benzécri , J. P. 1973 . L’Analyse des Donnees [Data Analysis] , Paris : Dunod .
   Google Scholar
• Cariou , P. M. , Mejia , Q. and Wolff , F.‐C. 2007a . An econometric analysis of deficiencies noted in port state control inspections . Maritime Policy and Management , 34 : 243 – 258 .
   Google Scholar
• Cariou , P. M. , Mejia , Q. and Wolff , F.‐C. 2007b . On the effectiveness of port state control inspections . Transportation Research Part E , (doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2006.11.005)
   Google Scholar
• Clausen , S. E. 1998 . Applied Correspondence Analysis: An Introduction , (Sage University Paper Series No. 07‐121)
   Google Scholar
• Cuttler , M. 1995 . Incentives for reducing oil pollution from ships: the case for enhanced port state control . Georgetown International Environmental Law Review , 8 (1) : 175 – 204 .
   Google Scholar
• Greenacre , M. J. 1984 . Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis , London : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Greenacre , M. J. 2007 . Correspondence Analysis in Practice, , 2nd edn , London : Chapman & Hall/CRC .
   Google Scholar
• Hare , J. 1997 . Port state control: strong medicine to cure a sick industry . Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law , 26 (3) : 571 – 594 .
   Google Scholar
• IMO Resolution A.682(17) . 1991 . Regional Co‐Operation in the Control of Ships and Discharges , London : IMO . (adopted November 1991)
   Google Scholar
• IMO Resolution A.787(19) and A.822(21) . 2001 . Procedures for Port State Control , London : IMO .
   Google Scholar
• Jobson , J. D. 1992 . Applied Multivariate Data Analysis, Volume II: Categorical and Multivariate Methods , New York : Springer‐Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Kasoulides , G. C. 1993 . Port State Control and Jurisdiction: Evolution of the Port State Regimes , Dordrecht : Kluwer .
   Google Scholar
• Knapp , S. and Franses , P. H. 2007a . A global view on port state control—econometric analysis of the differences across port state control regimes . Maritime Policy and Management , 34 : 453 – 483 .
   Google Scholar
• Knapp , S. and Franses , P. H. 2007b . Econometric analysis on the effect of port state control inspections on the probability of casualty . Marine Policy , 31 (4) : 550 – 563 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp , S. and Franses , P. H. 2007c . Econometric analysis to differentiate effects of various ship safety inspections . Marine Policy , 32 (4) : 653 – 662 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen , P. 1996 . Port state control and ship deficiencies . International Journal of Shipping Law , 5 : 267 – 274 .
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava , C. P. 1989 . Safer ships and cleaner oceans: thirty years work of the international maritime organization . Transport Reviews , 9 (1) : 45 – 57 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talley , W. K. , Jin , D. and Kite‐Powell , H. 2005 . The US Coast Guard vessel inspection program: a probability analysis . Maritime Economics and Logistics , 7 : 156 – 172 .
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD . 2006 . Review of Maritime Transport 2006 Available at: http://www.unctad.org/Templates/Page.asp?intltemlD=2618&ang=1
   Google Scholar