Transition between Signal Timing Plans: A Methodological and Analytical Overview

References

• Abbas, M., Bullock, D., Head, L. & TRB. (2001). Real-time offset transitioning algorithm for coordinating traffic signals. Advanced Traffic Management Systems and Vehicle-Highway Automation 2001: Highway Operations Capacity and Traffic Control, 1748, 26–39.
   Google Scholar
• Balke, K., Rao, K., & Husted, M. (1998). Incorporing the effects of signal transitions in the selection of timing plans in traffic responsive signal systems. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, S., Alan, M. V. A. A., & United States. Federal Highway Administration. Traffic Systems, D. (1981). A study of the factors influencing the number of signal timing plans required for UTCS first generation traffic control systems. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration Offices of Research & Development Traffic Systems Division.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg, L., & Dale, J. (2000). A comparison of the VISSIM and CORSIM traffic simulation models. Institute of Transportation Engineers Annual Meeting, 1727, 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bretherton, R. D. (1979). Five methods of changing fixed-time traffic signal plans. Crowthorne: Traffic Engineering Dep., Transport and Road Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, E. C -P. (1987). Signal transition interval for computerized traffic signal systems. Yün Shu Chi Hua = Transportation Planning Journal, 16, 527–553.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D., Head, L., & Shelby, S. G. (2007). Performance analysis of coordinated traffic signals during transition. Transportation Research Record, 2035, 19–31. doi: 10.3141/2035-03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehon, K., & Peters, J. (2010). Adaptive traffic signals comparison and case studied. San Francisco, CA: Western ITE Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, S. R., & Trombly, J. (2011). Deployment of ITS: A summary of the 2010 National Survey Results. Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. L. (2000). Evaluation of traffic signal controller transition methods (Master's thesis). Texas A&M University. Retrieved from http://repository.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2000-THESIS-H352.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Williams, B. M. (2011). Fundamental insight into signal plan transition methods. Journal of Transportation Engineering — ASCE, 137, 676–686. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Williams, B. M. (2012). Development and evaluation of a constrained optimization model for traffic signal plan transition. Transportation Research Part C — Emerging Technologies, 20, 185–198. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2011.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Lu, H., & Zhang, W. (2005). A new optimization method for time-of-day signal timing transition of arterial traffic. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 5, 1352–1357.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, E., & Wicks, D. (1974). A rapid signal transition algorithm. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 509, 158–168.
   Google Scholar
• Mcgowan, C. (1980). Traffic signal transition in computerized systems. Proceedings of Computing in Civil Engineering, Baltimore, MD, ASCE, New York (pp. 505–529).
   Google Scholar
• Mcshane, W. R., & Roess, R. P. (2011). Traffic engineering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Messer, C. J., Fambro, D. B., Turner, J. M., Texas. State Dept. of Highways and Public, T., & United States. Federal Highway, A. (1976). Analysis of diamond interchange operation and development of a frontage road level of service evaluation program — PASSER III: Final report. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A & M University.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. Transportation Research, Board. (2010). HCM 2010: Highway capacity manual. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. Retrieved from http://www.hcm2010.org/
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E. J., & Bullock, D. (2000). Impact of emergency vehicle preemption on signalized corridor operation: An evaluation. Transportation Research Record, 1727, 1–11. doi: 10.3141/1727-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obenberger, J., & Collura, J. (2001). Transition strategies to exit preemption control: State-of-the-practice-assessment. Transportation Research Record, 1748, 72–79. doi: 10.3141/1748-09
   Google Scholar
• Obenberger, J., & Collura, J. (2007). Methodology to assess traffic signal transition strategies for exit preemption control. Transportation Research Record, 2035, 158–168. doi: 10.3141/2035-18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, B., Yun, I., Best, M., Mcghee, C. C., University of Virginia. Center for transportation, S., Virginia Transportation Research, C. & Virginia. Dept. OF, T. (2008). Evaluation of pre-emption and transition strategies for Northern Virginia Smart Traffic Signal Systems (NVSTSS). Charlottesville, VA.: Virginia Transportation Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Rodegerdts, L. A., Nevers, B., Robinson, B., Ringert, J., Koonce, P., Bansen, J., … Suggett, J. (2004). Signalized intersections: Informational guide. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration Offices of Research & Development Traffic Systems Division.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, P. (1977). An evaluation of network signal timing transition algorithms. Transportation Engineering, 47, 17–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrank, D. L., Lomax, T. J., Texas Transportation, I., Texas Transportation Institute. University Transportation Center for, M., American, R., Transportation Builders Association. Transportation Development, F., & American Public Transportation, A. (2011). 2011 urban mobility report. College Park, TX.: Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A & M University.
   Google Scholar
• Selekwa, M. F., Mussa, R. N., & Chiteshe, A. (2003). Application of LQ modelling and optimization in urban traffic control. Optimal Control Applications & Methods, 24, 331–345. doi: 10.1002/oca.735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelby, S., Bullock, D., & Gettman, D. (2006). Transition methods in traffic signal control. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1978, 130–140. doi: 10.3141/1978-18
   Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, A. (2010). Adaptive traffic control systems: Domestic and foreign state of practice. Transportation Research Board. Retrieved from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_syn_403.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sunkari, S. R., Engelbrecht, R. J., Balke, K. N., Texas. Dept. of transportation. Research and Technology Implementation, O., & Texas Transportation, I. (2004). Evaluation of advance coordination features in traffic signal controllers. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A & M University System; Available through the National Technical Information Service.
   Google Scholar
• Yun, I., Best, M., & Brian Park, B. (2008). Evaluation of transition methods of the 170E and 2070 ATC traffic controllers after emergency vehicle preemption. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 134, 423–431. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2008)134:10(423)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, I., Best, M., & Park, B. (2008). Traffic controller performance during Time-of-Day transition at coordinated actuated signal systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2080, 92–99. doi: 10.3141/2080-11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlatkovic, M., Martin, P. T., & Tasic, I. (2011). Implementation of transit signal priority and predictive priority strategies in ASC/3 software-in-the-loop simulation. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on, Washington, DC, pp. 2130–2135. doi:10.1109/ITSC.2011.6082847
   Google Scholar