Classifying Ports for Efficiency Benchmarking: A Review and a Frontier-based Clustering Approach

References

• Abonyi, J., & Feil, B. (2007). Cluster analysis for data mining and system identification. Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J., (1995). Model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20, 325–332. doi: 10.1007/BF01205442
   Google Scholar
• Bichou, K. (2013). An empirical study of the impacts of operating and market conditions on container-port efficiency and benchmarking. Research in Transportation Economics, 42, 28–37. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2012.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, V., & Tovar, B. (2014). Efficiency and productivity changes for Peruvian and Chilean ports terminals: A parametric distance functions approach. Transport Policy, 31, 83–94. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheon, S. (2009). Impact of global terminal operators on port efficiency: A tiered data envelopment analysis approach. International Journal of Logistics: Research and applications, 12(2), 85–101. doi: 10.1080/13675560902749324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheon, S., Dowall, D., & Song, D-W. (2010). Evaluating impacts of institutional reforms on port efficiency changes: Ownership, corporate structure, and total factor productivity changes of world container ports. Transportation Research Part E, 46, 546–561. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2009.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Cullinane, K., & Wang, T. (2010). The efficiency analysis of container port production using DEA panel data approaches. OR Spectrum, 32(3), 717–738. doi: 10.1007/s00291-010-0202-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullinane, K. P. B., & Song, D. W. (2006). Estimating the relative efficiency of European container ports: A stochastic frontier analysis. In K. P. B. Cullinane, & W. K. Talley (Eds.), Port economics. Research in transport economics (pp. 85–115). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., & Stork, D. G. (2000). Pattern classification. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Everitt, B., Landau, S., Leese, M., & Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster analysis (5th ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H., (1993). The econometric approach to efficiency analysis. In Hal O. Fried, C. A. Knox Lovell, & Shelton S. Schmidt (Eds.), The measurement of productive efficiency (pp. 68–119). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guironnet, J-P., Peypoch, N., & Solonandrasana, B. (2009). A note on productivity change in French and Italian seaports. International Journal Shipping and Transport Logistics, 1(3), 216–226. doi: 10.1504/IJSTL.2009.027531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, S.-W., Lu, W.-M., & Wang, T.-P. (2010). Benchmarking the operating efficiency of Asia container ports. European Journal of Operational Research, 203, 706–713. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, A. (2012). A decision aid for finding performance groups. Benchmarking: An international journal, 19(3), 325–339. doi: 10.1108/14635771211242987
   Google Scholar
• Kaisar, E., Pathomsiri, S., & Haghani, A. (2006). Efficiency measurement of US ports using data envelopment analysis. National urban freight conference, Long Beach, CA, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kohonen, T. (1982). Self-Organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics, 43(1), 59–69. doi: 10.1007/BF00337288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster, M. B. M., Balk, B. M., & van Nus, W. T. I. (2009). On using DEA for benchmarking container terminals. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(11), 1140–1155. doi: 10.1108/01443570911000168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letunic, I., & Bork, P., 2007. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics, 23(1), 127–128. Retrieved from http://itol.embl.de/
   Google Scholar
• Martín-del-Brío, B., & Serrano-Cinca, C. (1993). Self-organizing neural networks for the analysis and representation of data: Some financial cases. Neural Computing & Applications, 1(2), 193–206. doi: 10.1007/BF01414948
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Budria, E., Diaz-Armas, R., Navarro-Ibanez, M., & Ravelo-Mesa, T. (1999). A study of the efficiency of Spanish port authorities using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Transport Economics, XXVI(2), 237–253.
   Google Scholar
• Medal-Bartual, M. A., & Sala-Garrido, R. (2011). Análisis de la Eficiencia del Sistema Portuario Español: estructura, evolución y perspectivas. Edita: Fundacion VALENCIAPORT. Serie Planificción y gestión portuaria. España.
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, G., & Cooper, M. (1985). An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrica, 50(2), 159–179. doi: 10.1007/BF02294245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T., Coeck, C., & Van Den Broeck, J. (2000). Measuring and explaining the relative efficiency of container terminals by means of Bayesian stochastic frontier models. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2, 83–106. doi: 10.1057/ijme.2000.9
   Google Scholar
• Pallis, A., Vitsounis, T., De Langen, P., & Notteboom, T. (2011). Port economics, policy and management: Content classification and survey. Transport Reviews, 31, 445–471. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2010.530699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panayides, P., Maxoulis, C., Wang, T-F., & Koi Yu, A. (2009). A critical analysis of DEA application to seaport economic efficiency measurement. Transport Reviews, 29(2), 183–206. doi: 10.1080/01441640802260354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaresma Dias, J. C., Garrido Azevedo, S., & Ferreira, J. (2009). A comparative benchmarking analysis of main Iberian container terminals: A DEA approach. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 1(3), 260–275. doi: 10.1504/IJSTL.2009.027534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Álvarez, A., & Tovar, B. (2012). Have Spanish port reforms during the last two decades been successful? A cost frontier approach. Transport Policy, 24, 73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Déniz, H., & Voltes-Dorta, A. (2014). A frontier-based hierarchical clustering for airport efficiency benchmarking. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 21(4), 486–508. doi: 10.1108/BIJ-09-2012-0057
   Google Scholar
• Sarlin, P. (2013). Self-organizing time map: An abstraction of temporal multivariate patterns. Neurocomputing, 99, 496–508. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2012.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiff, J. L. (2008). Cellular automata: A discrete view of the world. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, J., & Yu, S. (2009). Performance based stratification and clustering for benchmarking of container terminals. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 5016–5022. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simar, L., & Wilson, P. (2000). A general methodology for bootstrapping in nonparametric frontier models. Journal of applied Statistics, 27(6), 779–802. doi: 10.1080/02664760050081951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simoes, P., & Marques, R. C. (2010). Influence of congestion efficiency on the European seaports performance: Does it matter? Transport Reviews, 30, 517–539. doi: 10.1080/01441640903175592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokal, R., & Rohlf, F. (1962). The comparison of dendrograms by objective methods. Taxon, 11, 33–40. doi: 10.2307/1217208
   Google Scholar
• Tovar, B., & Wall, A. (2015). Can ports increase traffic while reducing inputs? Technical efficiency of Spanish port authorities using a directional distance function approach. Transport Research Part A, 71, 128–144.
   Google Scholar
• Ultsch, A., & Siemon, H. P. (1990, July 1990). Kohonen's self organizing feature maps for exploratory data analysis. In B. Widrow, & B. Angeniol (Eds.), Proceedings of the international neural network conference (INNC-90). Paris, France 1 (pp. 305–308). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., & Schmidt, P. (2002). One-Step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 18(2), 129–144. doi: 10.1023/A:1016565719882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanke, P., Barbastefano, R., & Hijar, M. (2011). Determinants of efficiency at major Brazilian port terminals. Transport Reviews, 31, 653–677. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2010.547635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmsmeier, G., Tovar, B., & Sanchez, R. J. (2013). The evolution of container terminal productivity and efficiency under changing economic environments. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 50–66. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.07.003
   Google Scholar
• Woo, S., Pettit, S., Beresford, A., & Kwak, D. (2012). Seaport research: A decadal analysis of trends and themes since the 1980s. Transport Reviews, 32, 351–377. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2012.660996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y-C., & Goh, M., (2010). Container port efficiency in emerging and more advance markets. Transportation Research Part E, 46, 1030–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2010.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Xu, R., & Wunsch, D. (2005). Survey of clustering algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 16(3), 645–678. doi: 10.1109/TNN.2005.845141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar