Multi-period Research Designs for Identifying Causal Effects of Built Environment Characteristics on Travel Behaviour

References

• Aditjandra, P. T., Cao, J., & Mulley, C. (2012). Understanding neighbourhood design impact on travel behaviour: An application of structural equations model to a British metropolitan data. Transportation Research Part A, 46(1), 22–32.
   Google Scholar
• Arentze, T., Borgers, A., Ponjeacute, M., Starns, A., & Timmermans, H. (2001). Assessing urban context-induced change in individual activity travel patterns: Case study of new railway station. Transportation Research Record, 1752, 47–52. doi: 10.3141/1752-07
   Google Scholar
• Babbie, E. (1998). The practice of social research (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bamberg, S. (2006). Is a residential relocation a good opportunity to change people's travel behaviour? Results from a theory-driven intervention study. Environment and Behaviour, 38(6), 820–840. doi: 10.1177/0013916505285091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beenackers, M. A., Foster, S., Kamphuis, C. B. M., Titze, S., Divitini, M., Knuiman, M., … , Giles-Corti, B. (2012). Taking up cycling after residential relocation: Built environment factors. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 42(6), 610–615. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrens, R., & Del Mistro, R. (2010). Shocking habits: Methodological issues in analysing changing personal travel behaviour over time. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 4(5), 253–271. doi: 10.1080/15568310903145170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beige, S., & Axhausen, K. W. (2012). Interdependencies between turning points in life and long-term mobility decisions. Transportation, 39(4), 857–872. doi: 10.1007/s11116-012-9404-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Elia, E., & Ettema, D. (2011). Changing commuters’ behavior using rewards: A study of rush-hour avoidance. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14(5), 354–368. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2011.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boarnet, M. G. (2011). A broader context for land use and travel behavior and a research Agenda. Journal of the American Planning Association, 77(3), 197–213. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2011.593483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boarnet, M. G., Anderson, C. L., Day, K., McMillan, T., & Alfonzo, M. (2005). Evaluation of the California safe routes to school legislation: Urban form changes and children's active transportation to school. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2S2), 134–140. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohnet, M., & Gertz, C. (2010). Model event history of car and license availability: How accessibility shapes acquisition and disposal of cars. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2156, 120–130. doi: 10.3141/2156-14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohte, W. (2010). Residential self-selection and travel: The relationship between travel-related attitudes, BE characteristics and TB (Doctoral dissertation, Sustainable Urban Areas 35). IOS Press, Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. (1997). A practical comparison of modeling approaches for panel data. In T. F. Golob, R. Kitamura, & L. Long (Eds.), Panels for transportation planning (pp. 281–304). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Handy, S. (2007). Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior? A structural equations modeling approach. Transportation, 34(5), 535–556. doi: 10.1007/s11116-007-9132-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Handy, S. (2009). Examining the impact of residential self-selection on travel behavior: A focus on empirical findings. Transport Reviews, 29(3), 359–395. doi: 10.1080/01441640802539195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatman, D. G. (2009). Residential choice, the built environment, and nonwork travel: Evidence using new data and methods. Environment and Planning A, 41(5), 1072–1089. doi: 10.1068/a4114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, K. (2011). Modelling the dynamics of bus use in a changing travel environment using panel data. Transportation, 38(3), 487–509. doi: 10.1007/s11116-010-9312-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., & Chen, J. (2009). What is responsible for the response lag of a significant change in discretionary time use: The built environment, family and social obligations, temporal constraints, or a psychological delay factor? Transportation, 36(1), 27–46. doi: 10.1007/s11116-008-9184-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, P., Ailshire, J. A., & Lantz, P. (2009). Urban built environments and trajectories of mobility disability: Findings from a national sample of community-dwelling American adults (1986–2001). Social Science and Medicine, 69(6), 964–970. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.06.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, K., & Handy, S. (2003). Qualitative methods in TB research. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Coogan, P. F., White, L. F., Adler, T. J., Hathaway, K. M., Palmer, J. R., & Rosenberg, L. (2009). Prospective study of urban form and physical activity in the black women's health study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 170(9), 1105–1117. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, T. (2013). Causal generalization: How Campbell and Cronbach influenced my theoretical thinking on this topic. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots. A wider perspective of theorists views and influences (pp. 88–113). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dargay, J. (2002). Determinants of car ownership in rural and urban areas: A pseudo-panel analysis. Transportation Research E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 38(5), 351–366. doi: 10.1016/S1366-5545(01)00019-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vos, J., Derudder, B., Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F. (2012). Reducing car use: Changing attitudes or relocating? The influence of residential dissonance on travel behaviour. Journal of Transport Geography, 22(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, G. J., Juster, F. T., & Morgan, J. N. (1987). The role of panel studies in research on economic behaviour. Transportation Research Part A: General, 21(4/5), 249–263. doi: 10.1016/0191-2607(87)90049-5
   Google Scholar
• Evenson, K. R., Herring, A. H., & Huston, S. L. (2005). Evaluating change in physical activity with the building of a multi-use trail. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2S2), 177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294. doi: 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gebel, K., Bauman, A. E., Sugiyama, T., & Owen, N. (2011). Mismatch between perceived and objectively assessed neighborhood walkability attributes: Prospective relationships with walking and weight gain. Health & Place, 17(2), 519–524. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, A., Sahlqvist, S., & Ogilvie, D. (2013). Who uses new walking and cycling infrastructure and how? Longitudinal results from the UK iConnect study. Preventive Medicine, 57(5), 518–524. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham-Rowe, E., Skippon, S., Gardner, B., & Abraham, C. (2011). Can we reduce car use and, if so, how? A review of available evidence. Transportation Research Part A, 45(5), 401–418.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S., Cao, X., & Mokhtarian, P. (2005). Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 10(6), 427–444. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2005.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitamura, R. (1990). Panel analysis in transportation planning: An overview. Transportation Research Part A: General, 24(6), 401–415. doi: 10.1016/0191-2607(90)90032-2
   Google Scholar
• Kitamura, R., Yamamoto, T., & Fujii, S. (2003). The effectiveness of panels in detecting changes in discrete travel behaviour. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 37(2), 191–206. doi: 10.1016/S0965-8564(01)00036-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krizek, K. (2003a). Neighborhood services, trip purpose, and tour-based travel. Transportation, 30, 387–410. doi: 10.1023/A:1024768007730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krizek, K. (2003b). Residential relocation and changes in urban travel: Does neighborhood-scale urban form matter? Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(3), 265–281. doi: 10.1080/01944360308978019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krizek, K., Barnes, G., & Thompson, K. (2009). Analyzing the effect of bicycle facilities on commute mode share over time. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 135(2), 66–73. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2009)135:2(66)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, K., Sciara, G.-C., Salon, D., Handy, S., & Mokhtarian, P. (2013). Measuring the impacts of local land-use policies on vehicle miles of travel: The case of the first big-box store in Davis, California. The Journal of Transport and Land Use, 6(1), 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maat, K., & Timmermans, H. (2009). Influence of the residential and work environment on car use in dual-earner households. Transportation Research A: Policy and Practice, 43(7), 654–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee, R., Mutrie, N., Crawford, F., & Green, B. (2007). Promoting walking to school: Results of a quasi-experimental trial. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 61(9), 818–823. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.048181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merom, D., Bauman, A., Vita, P., & Close, G. (2003). An environmental intervention to promote walking and cycling — The impact of a newly constructed Rail Trail in Western Sydney. Preventive Medicine, 36(2), 235–242. doi: 10.1016/S0091-7435(02)00025-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meurs, H. (1991). A panel data analysis of travel demand (Ph.D. thesis). University of Groningen, Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Meurs, H., & Haaijer, R. (2001). Spatial structure and mobility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 6(6), 429–446. doi: 10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00007-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtarian, P. L., & Cao, X. (2008). Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: A focus on methodologies. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 42(3), 204–228. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2007.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2009). Residential self-selection and appropriate control variables in land use: Travel studies. Transport Reviews, 29(3), 293–324. doi: 10.1080/01441640802710812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, D., Bull, F., Cooper, A., Rutter, H., Adams, E., Brand, C., … , Song, Y. (2011). Evaluating the travel, physical activity and carbon impacts of a ‘natural experiment’ in the provision of new walking and cycling infrastructure: Methods for the core module of the iConnect study. BMJ Open, 2, e000694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, D., Griffin, S., Jones, A., Mackett, R., Guell, C., Panter, J., … , Chapman, C. (2010). Commuting and health in Cambridge: A study of a ‘natural experiment’ in the provision of new transport infrastructure. BMC Public Health, 10, Article no. 703. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/703 doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, D., Mitchell, R., Mutrie, N., Petticrew, M., & Platt, S. (2006). Evaluating health effects of transport interventions: Methodologic case study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31(2), 118–126. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.03.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortúzar, J. de D., Armoogum, J., Madre, J.-L., & Potier, F. (2011). Continuous mobility surveys: The state of practice. Transport Reviews, 31(3), 293–312. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2010.510224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remler, D. K., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2010). Research methods in practice: Strategies for description and causation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, D. L., Marka, A. E., Kristjansson, E., Sawadad, M. C., & Reid, R. D. (2013). Neighbourhood walkability and physical activity among family members of people with heart disease who participated in a randomized controlled trial of a behavioural risk reduction intervention. Health and Place, 21, 148–155. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheiner, J. (2010). Interrelations between travel mode choice and trip distance: Trends in Germany 1976–2002. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), 75–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanen, T., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005). What if you live in the wrong neighborhood? The impact of residential neighborhood type dissonance on distance traveled. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 10(2), 127–151. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2004.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seethaler, R., & Rose, G. (2009). Using odometer readings to assess VKT changes associated with a voluntary travel behaviour change program. Transport Policy, 16(6), 325–334. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R. (2011). Randomized controlled studies and alternative designs in outcome studies: Challenges and opportunities. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(6), 636–643. doi: 10.1177/1049731511403324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, R. A. Jr., & Straits, B. C. (2009). Approaches to social research (5th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sommer, B., & Sommer, R. (1997). A practical guide to behavioral research: Tools and techniques (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stopher, P., Clifford, E., Swann, N., & Zhang, Y. (2009). Evaluating voluntary travel behaviour change: Suggested guidelines and case studies. Transport Policy, 16(6), 315–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stopher, P. R., & Greaves, S. P. (2007). Guidelines for samplers: Measuring a change in behaviour from before and after surveys. Transportation, 34(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thøgersen, J. (2009). Promoting public transport as a subscription service: Effects of a free month travel card. Transport Policy, 16(6), 335–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transportation Research Board. (2009). Driving and the built environment: The effects of compact development on motorized travel, energy use, and CO2 emissions (Special Report 298). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Trochim, W. (2000). The research methods knowledge base (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. H., & Mulley, C. (2014). Identifying short-run and long-run public transport demand elasticities in Sydney: A pseudo panel approach. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 48(2), 241–259.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. H., Mulley, C., & Clifton, G. (2014). A review of pseudo panel data approach in estimating short-run and long-run public transport demand elasticities. Transport Reviews, 34(1), 102–121. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2013.875079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wissen, L., & Meurs, H. J. (1989). The Dutch mobility panel: Experiences and evaluation. Transportation, 16(2), 99–119. doi: 10.1007/BF00163111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, M. (2010). Modelling life trajectories and transport mode choice using Bayesian belief networks (Dissertation faculty of architecture building and planning, Bouwstenen nr 143). University of Technology Press Facilities, Eindhoven.
   Google Scholar
• van Wee, B. (2011). Evaluating the impact of land use on travel behaviour: The environment versus accessibility. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1530–1533. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weis, C., & Axhausen, K. W. (2009). Induced travel demand: Evidence from a pseudo panel data based structural equations model. Research in Transportation Economics, 25(1), 8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2009.08.007
   Google Scholar
• Woldeamanuel, M. G., Cyganski, R., Schulz, A., & Justen, A. (2009). Variation of households’ car ownership across time: Application of a panel data model. Transportation, 36(4), 371–387. doi: 10.1007/s11116-009-9210-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanez, M. F., Mansilla, P., & Ortúzar, J. de D. (2010). The Santiago panel: Measuring the effects of implementing Transantiago. Transportation, 37(1), 125–149. doi: 10.1007/s11116-009-9223-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar