Identifying Governance Relationships Between Intermodal Terminals and Logistics Platforms

References

• Allen, J., & Cochrane, A. (2007). Beyond the territorial fix: Regional assemblages, politics and power. Regional Studies, 41, 1161–1175. doi: 10.1080/00343400701543348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J., Massey, D., Thrift, N. with Charlesworth, J., Court, G., Henry, N., & Sarre, P. (1998). Rethinking the region. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, P., Peeters, D., & Thomas, I. (2004). Modelling a rail/road intermodal transportation system. Transportation Research Part E, 40, 255–270. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2003.08.005
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, A. J. (2000). Port privatisation: Objectives, extent, process and the UK experience. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 2, 177–194. doi: 10.1057/ijme.2000.16
   Google Scholar
• Baird, A. J. (2002). Privatization trends at the world's top-100 container ports. Maritime Policy & Management, 29, 271–284. doi: 10.1080/03088830210132579
   Google Scholar
• Ballis, A., & Golias, J. (2002). Comparative evaluation of existing and innovative rail–road freight transport terminals. Transportation Research Part A, 36, 593–611. doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(01)00020-0
   Google Scholar
• Baltazar, R., & Brooks, M. R. (2001). The governance of port devolution: A tale of two countries. Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Transport Research, Seoul, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, A. K. C., Gardner, B. M., Pettit, S. J., Naniopoulos, A., & Wooldridge, C. F. (2004). The UNCTAD and WORKPORT models of port development: Evolution or revolution? Maritime Policy & Management, 31, 93–107. doi: 10.1080/0308883042000205061
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, A. K. C., Pettit, S., Xu, Q., & Williams, S. (2012). A study of dry port development in China. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 14, 73–98. doi: 10.1057/mel.2011.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergqvist, R. (2008). Realising logistics opportunities in a public-private collaborative setting: The story of Skaraborg. Transport Reviews, 28, 219–237. doi: 10.1080/01441640701581496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergqvist, R., Falkemark, G., & Woxenius, J. (2010). Establishing intermodal terminals. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, 3, 285–302. doi: 10.1504/WRITR.2010.034667
   Google Scholar
• Bichou, K., & Gray, R. (2005). A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39, 75–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, J. (2008). Moving places: The geography of warehousing in the US. Journal of Transport Geography, 16, 379–387. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowersox, D. J., Daugherty, P. J., Dröge, C. L., Rogers, D. S., & Wardlow, D. L. (1989). Leading edge logistics: Competitive positioning for the 1990s. Oak Brook, IL: Council of Logistics Management.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (1999). Beyond state-centrism? Space, territoriality, and geographical scale in globalization studies. Theory and Society, 28, 39–78. doi: 10.1023/A:1006996806674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces; Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. R. (2004). The governance structure of ports. Review of Network Economics, 3, 168–183. doi: 10.2202/1446-9022.1049
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. R., & Cullinane, K. (Eds.). (2007). Devolution, port governance and port performance. London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, M., & Pallis, A. A. (2008). Assessing port governance models: Process and performance components. Maritime Policy & Management, 35, 411–432. doi: 10.1080/03088830802215060
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., Daugherty, P. J., & Roath, A. S. (2009). Defining and operationalizing supply chain process integration. Journal of Business Logistics, 30, 63–84. doi: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2009.tb00099.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choong, S. T., Cole, M. H., & Kutanoglu, E. (2002). Empty container management for intermodal transportation networks. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 38, 423–438. doi: 10.1016/S1366-5545(02)00018-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cidell, J. (2010). Concentration and decentralization: The new geography of freight distribution in US metropolitan areas. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 363–371. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
   Google Scholar
• Cruijssen, F., Dullaert, W., & Fleuren, H. (2007). Horizontal cooperation in transport and logistics: A literature review. Transportation Journal, 46, 22–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullinane, K., & Song, D. W. (2002). Port privatisation policy and practice. Maritime Policy and Management, 22, 55–75.
   Google Scholar
• Dablanc, L., & Ross, C. (2012). Atlanta: A mega logistics center in the Piedmont Atlantic Megaregion (PAM). Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 432–442. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75, 332–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Langen, P. (2004). Governance in seaport clusters. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 6, 141–156. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100100
   Google Scholar
• De Langen, P. W., & Chouly, A. (2004). Hinterland access regimes in seaports. EJTIR, 4, 361–380.
   Google Scholar
• Debrie, J., Gouvernal, E., & Slack, B. (2007). Port devolution revisited: The case of regional ports and the role of lower tier governments. Journal of Transport Geography, 15, 455–464. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debrie, J., Lavaud-Letilleul, V., & Parola, F. (2013). Shaping port governance: The territorial trajectories of reform. Journal of Transport Geography, 27, 56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducruet, C., & Van der Horst, M. (2009). Transport integration at European ports: Measuring the role and position of intermediaries. EJTIR, 9, 121–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dussauge, P., & Garrette, B. (1997). Anticipating the evolutions and outcomes of strategic alliances between rival firms. International Studies of Management & Organization, 27, 104–126.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eng-Larsson, F., & Kohn, C. (2012). Modal shift for greener logistics – the shipper's perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 42, 36–59. doi: 10.1108/09600031211202463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, S., & Robinson, R. (1998). Port reform in Australia: Issues in the ownership debate. Maritime Policy & Management, 25, 41–62. doi: 10.1080/03088839800000044
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, S. E., Magnan, G. M., & McCarter, M. W. (2008a). A three-stage implementation model for supply chain collaboration. Journal of Business Logistics, 29, 93–112. doi: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2008.tb00070.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, S. E., Magnan, G. M., & McCarter, M. W. (2008b). Benefits, barriers and bridges to effective supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13, 35–48. doi: 10.1108/13598540810850300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari, C., & Musso, E. (2011). Italian ports: Towards a new governance? Maritime Policy & Management, 38, 335–346. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2011.572698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flämig, H., & Hesse, M. (2011). Placing dryports. Port regionalization as a planning challenge – the case of Hamburg, Germany, and the Süderelbe. Research in Transportation Economics, 33, 42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2011.08.005
   Google Scholar
• Gangwar, R., Morris, S., Pandey, A., & Raghuram, G. (2012). Container movement by rail in India: A review of policy evolution. Transport Policy, 22, 20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimenez, C., & Ventura, E. (2005). Logistics-production, logistics-marketing and external integration. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25, 20–38. doi: 10.1108/01443570510572222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golicic, S. L., & Mentzer, J. T. (2006). An empirical examination of relationship magnitude. Journal of Business Logistics, 27, 81–108. doi: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2006.tb00242.x
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M., Jones, M., & Jones, R. (2005). Devolution, constitutional change and economic development: Explaining and understanding the new institutional geographies of the British state. Regional Studies, 39, 421–436. doi: 10.1080/00343400500128432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouvernal, E., Debrie, J., & Slack, B. (2005). Dynamics of change in the port system of the western Mediterranean. Maritime Policy & Management, 32, 107–121. doi: 10.1080/03088830500083539
   Google Scholar
• Grawe, S. J., Daugherty, P. J., & Dant, R. P. (2012). Logistics service providers and their customers: Gaining commitment through organizational implants. Journal of Business Logistics, 33, 50–63. doi: 10.1111/j.0000-0000.2011.01037.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groothedde, B., Ruijgrok, C., & Tavasszy, L. (2005). Towards collaborative, intermodal hub networks: A case study in the fast moving consumer goods market. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 41, 567–583. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2005.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, W., & Rehme, J. (2012). Vertical integration in supply chains: Driving forces and consequences for a manufacturer's downstream integration. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17, 187–201. doi: 10.1108/13598541211212915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. V. (2003). Regional institutional convergence? Reflections from the Baltimore waterfront. Economic Geography, 79, 347–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00218.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. V., & Jacobs, W. (2010). Shifting proximities: The maritime ports sector in an era of global supply chains. Regional Studies, 44, 1103–1115. doi: 10.1080/00343400903365110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halldórsson, A., & Skjøtt-Larsen, T. (2006). Dynamics of relationship governance in TPL arrangements – a dyadic perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 36, 490–506. doi: 10.1108/09600030610684944
   Google Scholar
• Hanaoka, S., & Regmi, M. B. (2011). Promoting intermodal freight transport through the development of dry ports in Asia: An environmental perspective. IATSS Research, 35, 16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.iatssr.2011.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Espallardo, M., Rodríguez-Orejuela, A., & Sánchez-Pérez, M. (2010). Inter-organizational governance, learning and performance in supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15, 101–114. doi: 10.1108/13598541011028714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, M. (2004). Land for Logistics: Locational dynamics, real estate markets and political regulation of regional distribution complexes. Tijdschrift voor Sociale en Economische Geografie, 95, 162–173. doi: 10.1111/j.0040-747X.2004.t01-1-00298.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, M., & Rodrigue, J-P. (2004). The transport geography of logistics and freight distribution. Journal of Transport Geography, 12, 171–184. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.12.004
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, J. (2001). Latin American ports: Results and determinants of private sector participation. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 3, 221–241. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ijme.9100010
   Google Scholar
• Höltgen, D. (1996). Intermodal Terminals in the Trans-European Network (Discussion Paper). Rotterdam: European Centre for Infrastructure Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level governance and European integration. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Humphries, A. S., Towriss, J., & Wilding, R. (2007). A taxonomy of highly interdependent supply chain relationships. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 18, 385–401. doi: 10.1108/09574090710835129
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, W. (2007). Port competition between Los Angeles and Long Beach: An institutional analysis. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98, 360–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00403.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, W., & Notteboom, T. (2011). An evolutionary perspective on regional port systems: The role of windows of opportunity in shaping seaport competition. Environment & Planning A, 43, 1674–1692. doi: 10.1068/a43417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janic, M. (2007). Modelling the full costs of an intermodal and road freight transport network. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 12, 33–44. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2006.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (1990). State theory: Putting capitalist states in their place. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2001). Institutional (re)turns and the strategic-relational approach. Environment & Planning A, 33, 1213–1235. doi: 10.1068/a32183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R., Goodwin, M., Jones, M., & Simpson, G. (2004). Devolution, state personnel and the production of new territories of governance in the United Kingdom. Environment & Planning A, 36, 89–109. doi: 10.1068/a3685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K., & Zito, A. (2005). The rise of ‘new’ policy instruments in comparative perspective: Has governance eclipsed government? Political Studies, 53, 477–496. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00540.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, N. S., & Wee, B. V. (2011). The relative importance of factors that influence the break-even distance of intermodal freight transport systems. Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 859–875. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klint, M. B., & Sjöberg, U. (2003). Towards a comprehensive SCP-model for analysing strategic networks/alliances. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33, 408–426. doi: 10.1108/09600030310481988
   Google Scholar
• Konings, R. (2007). Opportunities to improve container barge handling in the port of Rotterdam from a transport network perspective. Journal of Transport Geography, 15, 443–454. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konings, R., Kreutzberger, E., & Maraš, V. (2013). Major considerations in developing a hub-and-spoke network to improve the cost performance of container barge transport in the hinterland: The case of the port of Rotterdam. Journal of Transport Geography, 29, 63–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutzberger. E. D. (2008). Distance and time in intermodal goods transport networks in Europe: A generic approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice, 42, 973–993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, D. M., Emmelhainz, M. A., & Gardner, J. T. (1999). Building successful logistics partnerships. Journal of Business Logistics, 20, 165–181.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, D. M., García-Dastugue, S. J., & Croxton, K. L. (2008). The role of logistics managers in the cross-functional implementation of supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 29, 113–132. doi: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2008.tb00071.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31, 638–58. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.21318922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liedtke, G., & Carillo Murillo, D. G. (2012). Assessment of policy strategies to develop intermodal services: The case of inland terminals in Germany. Transport Policy, 24, 168–178. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limbourg, S., & Jourquin, B. (2009). Optimal rail-road container terminal locations on the European network. Transportation Research Part E, 45, 551–563. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2008.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Macharis, C., & Pekin, E. (2009). Assessing policy measures for the stimulation of intermodal transport: A GIS-based policy analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 17, 500–508. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, G. (1997). ‘Institutional thickness’ and industrial governance in Lowland Scotland. Area, 29, 299–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.1997.tb00032.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, G. (1993). Structural policy and multilevel governance in the EC. In A. Cafruny & G. Rosenthal (Eds.), The state of the European community (pp. 391–411). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Martí-Henneberg, J. (2013). European integration and national models for railway networks (1840–2010). Journal of Transport Geography, 26, 126–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2000). Institutional approaches in economic geography. In E. Sheppard & T. J. Barnes (Eds.), A companion to economic geography (pp. 77–94). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon, A. (2009). The present and future land requirements of logistical activities. Land Use Policy, 26, S293–S301. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363. doi: 10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Scott, R. S. (1983). Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. In J. W. Meyer & R. S. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 199–215). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Min, S., Roath, A. S., Daugherty, P. J., Genchev, S. E., Chen, H., Arndt, A. D., & Richey, R. G. (2005). Supply chain collaboration: What's happening? The International Journal of Logistics Management, 16, 237–256. doi: 10.1108/09574090510634539
   Google Scholar
• Monios, J. (2011). The role of inland terminal development in the hinterland access strategies of Spanish ports. Research in Transportation Economics, 33, 59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2011.08.007
   Google Scholar
• Monios, J. (in press). Intermodal transport as a regional development strategy: The case of Italian freight villages. Growth and Change.
   Google Scholar
• Monios, J., & Lambert, B. (2013). The heartland intermodal corridor: Public-private partnerships and the transformation of institutional settings. Journal of Transport Geography, 27, 36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monios, J., & Wang, Y. (2013). Spatial and institutional characteristics of inland port development in China. GeoJournal, 78(5), 897–913. doi: 10.1007/s10708-013-9473-2
   Google Scholar
• Monios, J., & Wilmsmeier, G. (2012a). Giving a direction to port regionalisation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice, 46, 1551–1561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monios, J., & Wilmsmeier, G. (2012b). Port-centric logistics, dry ports and offshore logistics hubs: Strategies to overcome double peripherality? Maritime Policy and Management, 39, 207–226. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2011.650720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, A. K. Y., Padilha, F., & Pallis, A. A. (2013). Institutions, bureaucratic and logistical roles of dry ports: The Brazilian experience. Journal of Transport Geography, 27, 46–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, A. K. Y., & Pallis, A. A. (2010). Port governance reforms in diversified institutional frameworks: Generic solutions, implementation asymmetries. Environment & Planning A, 42, 2147–2167. doi: 10.1068/a42514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, K. Y. A., & Cetin, I. B. (2012). Locational characteristics of dry ports in developing economies: Some lessons from Northern India. Regional Studies, 46, 757–773. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.532117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, K. Y. A., & Gujar, G. C. (2009a). Government policies, efficiency and competitiveness: The case of dry ports in India. Transport Policy, 16, 232–239. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, K. Y. A., & Gujar, G. C. (2009b). The spatial characteristics of inland transport hubs: Evidences from Southern India. Journal of Transport Geography, 17, 346–356. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T., de Langen, P., & Jacobs, W. (2013). Institutional plasticity and path dependence in seaports: Interactions between institutions, port governance reforms and port authority routines. Journal of Transport Geography, 27, 26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T. E., & Rodrigue, J. (2005). Port regionalization: Towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy & Management, 32, 297–313. doi: 10.1080/03088830500139885
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T. E., & Rodrigue, J-P. (2009). Inland terminals within North American & European Supply Chains. UNESCAP Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific. No. 78: Development of Dry Ports, New York, United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Padilha, F., & Ng, A. K. Y. (2012). The spatial evolution of dry ports in developing economies: The Brazilian experience. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 14, 99–121. doi: 10.1057/mel.2011.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallis, A. A. (2006). Institutional dynamism in EU policy-making: The evolution of the EU maritime safety policy. Journal of European Integration, 28, 137–157. doi: 10.1080/07036330600615797
   Google Scholar
• Pallis, A. A., & Syriopoulos, T. (2007). Port governance models: Financial evaluation of Greek port restructuring. Transport Policy, 14, 232–246. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panayides, P. M. (2002). Economic organisation of intermodal transport. Transport Reviews, 22, 401–414. doi: 10.1080/01441640210124523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkhe, A. (1991). Interfirm diversity, organizational learning, and longevity in global strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, 22, 579–601. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2001). Neoliberalizing states: Thin policies/ hard outcomes. Progress in Human Geography, 25, 445–455. doi: 10.1191/030913201680191772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, N. J., Hofstetter, J. S., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2011). Institutional entrepreneurship capabilities for interorganizational sustainable supply chain strategies. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 22, 52–86. doi: 10.1108/09574091111127552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfohl, H-C., & Buse, H. P. (2000). Inter-organizational logistics systems in flexible production networks. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 30, 388–408. doi: 10.1108/09600030010336153
   Google Scholar
• Proost, S., Dunkerley, F., De Borger, B., Gühneman, A., Koskenoja, P., Mackie, P., & Van der Loo, S. (2011). When are subsidies to trans-European network projects justified? Transportation Research Part A, 45, 161–170.
   Google Scholar
• Racunica, I., & Wynter, L. (2005). Optimal location of intermodal freight hubs. Transportation Research Part B, 39, 453–477.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1994). The Hollowing out of the state: The changing nature of the public service in Britain. The Political Quarterly, 65, 138–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-923X.1994.tb00441.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richey, R. G., Roath, A. S., Whipple, J. M., & Fawcett, S. E. (2010). Exploring a governance theory of supply chain management: Barriers and facilitators to integration. Journal of Business Logistics, 31, 237–256. doi: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00137.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinehart, L. M., Eckert, J. A., Handfield, R. B., Page, T. J., & Atkin, T. (2004). Structuring supplier-customer relationships. Journal of Business Logistics, 25, 25–62. doi: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2004.tb00169.x
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, J-P. (2006). Transport geography should follow the freight. Journal of Transport Geography, 14, 386–388. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, J-P., Debrie, J., Fremont, A., & Gouvernal, E. (2010). Functions and actors of inland ports: European and North American dynamics. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 519–529. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, J-P., & Notteboom, T. (2009). The terminalisation of supply chains: Reassessing the role of terminals in port/hinterland logistical relationships. Maritime Policy & Management, 36, 165–183. doi: 10.1080/03088830902861086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, J-P., & Notteboom, T. (2010). Comparative North American and European gateway logistics: The regionalism of freight distribution. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 497–507. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, J-P, & Wilmsmeier, G. (2013). The benefits of logistics investments: Opportunities for Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Gill, N. (2003). The global trend towards devolution and its implications. Environment & Planning C, 21, 333–351. doi: 10.1068/c0235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, M. (2007). Shipping, policy & multi-level governance. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 9, 84–103. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100173
   Google Scholar
• Roe, M. (2009). Multi-level and polycentric governance: Effective policymaking for shipping. Maritime Policy & Management, 36, 39–56. doi: 10.1080/03088830802652296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roso, V. (2008). Factors influencing implementation of a dry port. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38, 782–798. doi: 10.1108/09600030810926493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roso, V., Woxenius, J., & Lumsden, K. (2009). The dry port concept: Connecting container seaports with the hinterland. Journal of Transport Geography, 17, 338–345. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runhaar, H., & van der Heijden, R. (2005). Public policy intervention in freight transport costs: Effects on printed media logistics in the Netherlands. Transport Policy, 12, 35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2004.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez, R., & Wilmsmeier, G. (2010). Contextual port development: A theoretical approach. In P. Coto-Millán, M. Pesquera, J. Castanedo (Eds.), Essays on port economics (pp. 19–44). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schmoltzi, C., & Wallenburg, C. M. (2011). Horizontal cooperations between logistics service providers: Motives, structure, performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41, 552–575. doi: 10.1108/09600031111147817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1983). The organization of societal sectors. In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 129–153). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Simatupang, T. M., & Sridharan, R. (2002). The collaborative supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 13, 15–30. doi: 10.1108/09574090210806333
   Google Scholar
• Skjoett-Larsen, T. (2000). Third party logistics – from an interorganizational point of view. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 30, 112–127. doi: 10.1108/09600030010318838
   Google Scholar
• Slack, B. (1999). Satellite terminals: A local solution to hub congestion? Journal of Transport Geography, 7, 241–246. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(99)00016-2
   Google Scholar
• Slack, B., & Vogt, A. (2007). Challenges confronting new traction providers of rail freight in Germany. Transport Policy, 14, 399–409. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spekman, R. E., Kamauff, J. W., & Myhr, N. (1998). An empirical investigation into supply chain management: A perspective on partnerships. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 28, 630–650. doi: 10.1108/09600039810247542
   Google Scholar
• Stank, T. P., Keller, S. B., & Daugherty, P. J. (2001). Supply chain collaboration and logistical service performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 22, 29–48. doi: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00158.x
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither global nor local: ‘Glocalisation’ and the politics of scale. In K. Cox (Ed.), Spaces of globalization (pp. 137–166). New York, NY: Guildford.
   Google Scholar
• Todeva, E., & Knoke, D. (2005). Strategic alliances and models of collaboration. Management Decision, 43, 123–148. doi: 10.1108/00251740510572533
   Google Scholar
• Trip, J., & Bontekoning, Y. (2002). Integration of small freight flows in the intermodal transport system. Journal of Transport Geography, 10, 221–229. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00008-X
   Google Scholar
• Tsamboulas, D. A., & Kapros, S. (2003). Freight village evaluation under uncertainty with public and private financing. Transport Policy, 10, 141–156. doi: 10.1016/S0967-070X(03)00002-7
   Google Scholar
• UN-ESCAP. (2006). Cross-cutting issue for managing globalization related to trade and transport: Promoting dry ports as a means of sharing the benefits of globalization with inland locations. UNESCAP. Bangkok, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berg, R., De Langen, P. W., & Costa, C. R. (2012). The role of port authorities in new intermodal service development: The case of Barcelona Port Authority. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 5, 78–84. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2012.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Van den Heuvel, F. P., de Langen, P. W., van Donselaar, K. H., & Fransoo, J. C. (2013). Regional logistics land allocation policies: Stimulating spatial concentration of logistics firms. Transport Policy, 30, 275–282. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Horst, M. R., & De Langen, P. W. (2008). Coordination in hinterland transport-chains: A major challenge for the seaport community. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 10, 108–129. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100194
   Google Scholar
• Van der Horst, M. R., & Van der Lugt, L. M. (2011). Coordination mechanisms in improving hinterland accessibility: Empirical analysis in the port of Rotterdam. Maritime Policy & Management, 38, 415–435. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2011.588257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Horst, M. R., & Van der Lugt, L. M. (2014). An institutional analysis of coordination in liberalized port-related railway chains: An application to the port of Rotterdam. Transport Reviews, 34(1), 68–85. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2013.874379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Klink, H. A. (1998). The port network as a new stage in port development: The case of Rotterdam. Environment and Planning A, 30, 143–160. doi: 10.1068/a300143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Schijndel, W. J., & Dinwoodie, J. (2000). Congestion and multimodal transport: A survey of cargo transport operators in the Netherlands. Transport Policy, 7, 231–241. doi: 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00023-8
   Google Scholar
• Van Schuylenburg, M., & Borsodi, L. (2010). Container transferium: An innovative logistic concept. Paper presented at the Port Infrastructure Seminar, Delft, Netherlands, 22 June 2010. Retrieved April 9, 2013, from http://www.citg.tudelft.nl/fileadmin/Faculteit/CiTG/Over_de_faculteit/Afdelingen/Afdeling_Waterbouwkunde/sectie_waterbouwkunde/chairs/ports_and_waterway/Port_Seminar_2010/Papers_and_presentations/doc/Paper_Schuylenburg_-_Container_Transferium_Port_Seminar__2_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Veenstra, A., Zuidwijk, R., & van Asperen, E. (2012). The extended gate concept for container terminals: Expanding the notion of dry ports. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 14, 14–32. doi: 10.1057/mel.2011.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, P. (2009). European ports policy: Meeting contemporary governance challenges. Maritime Policy & Management, 36, 79–101. doi: 10.1080/03088830802652320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, P., & Vanoutrive, T. (2012). A quantitative analysis of European port governance. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 14, 178–203. doi: 10.1057/mel.2012.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K., Ng, A. K. Y., Lam, J. S. L., & Fu, X. (2012). Cooperation or competition? Factors and conditions affecting regional port governance in South China. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 14, 386–408. doi: 10.1057/mel.2012.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. J., Ng, A. K. Y., & Olivier, D. (2004). Port governance in China: A review of policies in an era of internationalizing port management practices. Transport Policy, 11, 237–250. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. J., & Slack, B. (2004). Regional governance of port development in China: A case study of Shanghai International Shipping Centre. Maritime Policy & Management, 31, 357–373. doi: 10.1080/0308883042000304467
   Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250050207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whipple, J. M., & Frankel, R. (2000). Strategic alliance success factors. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 36, 21–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2000.tb00248.x
   Google Scholar
• Whipple, J. M., & Russell, D. (2007). Building supply chain collaboration: A typology of collaborative approaches. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 18, 174–196. doi: 10.1108/09574090710816922
   Google Scholar
• Wilding, R., & Humphries, A. S. (2006). Understanding collaborative supply chain relationships through the application of the Williamson organisational failure framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 36, 309–329. doi: 10.1108/09600030610672064
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilmsmeier, G., Monios, J., & Lambert, B. (2011). The directional development of intermodal freight corridors in relation to inland terminals. Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 1379–1386. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmsmeier, G., Monios, J., Rodrigue, J-P. (2015). Drivers for Outside-In port hinterland integration in Latin America: The case of Veracruz, Mexico. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 14, 34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2014.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmsmeier, G., & Notteboom, T. (2011). Determinants of liner shipping network configuration: A two-region comparison. GeoJournal, 76, 213–228. doi: 10.1007/s10708-009-9333-2
   Google Scholar
• Witte, P. A., Wiegmans, B. W., van Oort, F. G., & Spit, T. J. M. (2014). Governing inland ports: A multi-dimensional approach to addressing inland port-city challenges in European transport corridors. Journal of Transport Geography, 36, 42–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodburn, A. (2003). A logistical perspective on the potential for modal shift of freight from road to rail in Great Britain. International Journal of Transport Management, 1, 237–245. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtm.2004.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Woodburn, A. (2011). An investigation of container train service provision and load factors in Great Britain. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 11, 147–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2007). Port reform toolkit (2nd ed). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Zacharia, Z. G., Sanders, N. R., & Nix, N. W. (2011). The emerging role of the third-party logistics provider (3PL) as an orchestrator. Journal of Business Logistics, 32, 40–54. doi: 10.1111/j.2158-1592.2011.01004.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar