Community Severance: Where Is It Found and at What Cost?

References

• Anciaes, P. R. (2011). Urban transport, pedestrian mobility and social justice: A GIS analysis of the case of the Lisbon Metropolitan Area (Doctoral thesis). Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, London. Retrieved from http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/142
   Google Scholar
• Anciaes, P. R. (2013). Examining the influence of political factors on the design of a new road. In D. Vandenbroucke, B. Bucher, & J. Crompvoets (Eds.), Geographic information science at the heart of Europe (pp. 399–413). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Appleyard, D., Gerson, M. S., & Lintell, M. (1981). Livable streets. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appleyard, D., & Lintell, M. (1972). The environmental quality of city streets: the residents’ viewpoint. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 38, 84–101. doi:10.1080/01944367208977410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austroads. (2003). Valuing environmental and other externalities. Sydney: Austroads.
   Google Scholar
• Austroads. (2012). Guide to project evaluation part 4: Project evaluation data. Sidney: Austroads.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomew, K., & Ewing, R. (2011). Hedonic price effects of pedestrian- and transit-oriented development. Journal of Planning Literature, 26, 18–34. doi:10.1177/0885412210386540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BMVBW (Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing—Germany). (2003). Federal transport infrastructure plan 2003: Macroeconomic evaluation methodology. Berlin: BMVBW. Retrieved from http://www.bmvi.de//SharedDocs/EN/Publikationen/federal-transport-infrastructure-plan-2003-methodology-macroeconomic-evaluation.html [in English]
   Google Scholar
• Boeri, M., Scarpa, R., & Chorus, C. G. (2014). Stated choices and benefit estimates in the context of traffic calming schemes: Utility maximization, regret minimization, or both? Transportation Research A, 61, 121–135. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Boon, W., Van Wee, B., & Geurs, K. (2003). Barrièrewerking van infrastructuur: A2 en Amsterdam-Rijnkanaal barrière voor inwoners van Utrecht-Leidsche Rijn? [Severance: Highway A2 and ‘Amsterdam-Rijnkanaal’ a barrier to inhabitants of ‘UtrechtLeidsche Rijn’?]. Paper voor het Colloquium Vervoersplanologisch Speurwerk 2003. Delft: CVS. Retrieved from http://repository.tudelft.nl/assets/uuid:d33764cc-0951-492a-921c-cc4e94f96fed/cvs03_06.pdf [in Dutch]
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, A., Tomlinson, P., & Millington, A. (2007). Understanding the evolution of community severance and its consequences on mobility and social cohesion over the past century. Proceedings of the European Transport Conference 2007. Retrieved from http://abstracts.aetransport.org/paper/index/id/2780/confid/13
   Google Scholar
• Braddock, M. (1979). Evaluation of the severance effects of a proposed rapid transit corridor. Paper presented at the 1979 Australian Transport Research Forum, Sydney. Retrieved from http://www.atrf.info/papers/1979/1979_Braddock.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bretherton, W. M., Edwards, V., & Miao, J. (2000). The economic impact of speed humps on housing values. ITE Journal, 80(1), 50–54. Retrieved from http://www.ite.org/traffic/documents/JAB00A50.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Burton, E., & Mitchell, L. (2006). Inclusive urban design: Streets for life. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, J. S., Han, S., Jung, D., & Kim, D. (2014). Benefits of rerouting railways to tunnels in urban areas: A case study of the Yongsan line in Seoul. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(3), 404–415. doi:10.1080/12265934.2014.934270
   Google Scholar
• Chin, G. K. W., Van Niel, K. P., Giles-Corti, B., & Knuiman, M. (2008). Accessibility and connectivity in physical activity studies: The impact of missing pedestrian data. Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 41–45. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. M., Hutton, B. J., Burnett, N., Hathway, A., & Harrison, A. (1991). The appraisal of community severance ( Contractor Report 135). Crowthorne: Transport and Road Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, S., & Davies, S. (2009). Identifying and prioritising walking investment through the PERS audit tool. Paper presented at the Walk21 2009 Conference, New York. Retrieved from http://www.walk21.com/conferences/conference_papers_detail.asp?Paper=415&Conference=New%20York
   Google Scholar
• Communauté Urbaine de Strasbourg. (2012). Plan piéton: Ville de Strasbourg 2011–2020 [Strasbourg Pedestrian Plan]. Strasbourg: Communauté Urbaine de Strasbourg. Retrieved from http://media.strasbourg.eu/alfresco/d/a/workspace/SpacesStore/9f385910-d805-4864-8ba4-61950febde25/plan-pieton.pdf [in French]
   Google Scholar
• CPB (Centraal Planbureau) and NEI (Nederlands Economisch Instituut). (2000). Evaluatie van infrastructuurprojecten leidraad voor kosten-batenanalyse [Evaluation of infrastructural projects: guide for cost-benefit analysis]. Den Haag/Rotterdham: CBP/NEI. Retrieved from http://www.cpb.nl/sites/default/files/publicaties/download/evaluatie-van-infrastructuurprojecten-leidraad-voor-kosten-batenanalyse-samenwerking-met.pdf [in Dutch]
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. (1992). Livable streets and perceived accident risk: Quality-of-life issues for residents and vulnerable road-users. Traffic Engineering and Control, 33, 374–387.
   Google Scholar
• Dekoninck, L., Gillis, D., Botteldooren, D., & Lauwers, D. (2010). Methodologie voor het objectief meten van de effecten van verkeer op de leefbaarheid [Methodology for an objective measurement of the effect of traffic on the quality of life]. Diepenbeek: Steunpunt Mobiliteit en Openbare Werken. Retrieved from http://www.steunpuntverkeersveiligheid.be/sites/default/files/RA-MOW-2010-007.pdf [in Dutch]
   Google Scholar
• Ecoplan. (2010). Manuel eNISTRA. Berne/Altdorf: Office Féderel Des Routes. Retrieved from http://www.astra.admin.ch/dienstleistungen/00129/00183/00187/index.html?lang=fr [in French]
   Google Scholar
• Ecoplan-INFRAS. (2014). Externe effekte des verkehrs 2010: Monetarisierung von umwelt-, unfall- und gesundheitseffekten [External effects of transport 2010: Monetization of environmental, accident and health effects] (Report to the Swiss Federal Office for Spatial Development). Retrieved from http://www.are.admin.ch/themen/verkehr/00252/00472/index.html?lang=en [in German]
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (1983). Sour grapes: Studies in the subversion of rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emond, C. R., & Handy, S. L. (2012). Factors associated with bicycling to high school: Insights from Davis, CA. Journal of Transport Geography, 20(1), 71–79. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, L. D., Schmid, T. L., Sallis, J. F., Chapman, J., & Saelens, B. E. (2005). Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: Findings from SMARTRAQ. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28, S117–S125. Retrieved from http://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797%2804%2900325-3/fulltext doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrod, G. D., Scarpa, R., & Willis, K. G. (2002). Estimating the benefits of traffic calming on through routes: A choice experiment approach. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 36, 211–231. doi:10.2139/ssrn.222149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, J. (1977). Pedestrian delay and traffic management (Supplementary Report 356). Crowthorne: Transport and Road Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, M. R., & Renne, J. (2005). Where does walkability matter the most? An environmental justice interpretation of New Jersey data. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 82(1), 90–100. doi:10.1093/jurban/jti011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisolía, J. M., López, F., & Ortúzar, J de D. (2015). Burying the highway: The social valuation of community severance and amenity. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 9(4), 298–309. doi:10.1080/15568318.2013.769038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grudemo, S., Ivehammar, P., & Sandsröm, J. (2002). Beräkningsmodell för infrastrukturinvesteringars intrångskostnader [Calculation model for the encroachment costs of infrastructure investments] (VTI meddelande 939 – 2002). Linköping: VTI. Retrieved from http://www.vti.se/en/publications/calculation-model-for-encroachment-costs-of-infrastructure-investments [in Swedish]
   Google Scholar
• Guo, X., Black, J., & Dunne, M. (2001). Crossing pedestrians and dynamic severance on urban main roads. Road and Transport Research, 10(3), 84–98.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Z. (2009). Does the pedestrian environment affect the utility of walking? A case of path choice in downtown Boston. Transportation Research, 14(5), 343–352. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2009.03.007
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S. (2003). Amenity and severance. In D. A. Hensher & K. J. Button (Eds.), Handbook of transport and the environment (pp. 117–140). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S. L., & Clifton, K. J. (2001). Local shopping as a strategy for reducing automobile travel. Transportation, 28(4), 317–346. doi:10.1023/A:1011850618753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2), 73–76. doi:10.1080/01944365908978307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héran, F. (2000). Transports en milieu urbain: Les effets externes négligés — Monétarisation des effets de coupure, des effets sur l'affectation des espaces publics et des effets sur les paysages [Urban transport: The neglected external effects. Monetisation of barrier effects, effects on public space and on the landscape]. Paris: La Documentation Française [in French].
   Google Scholar
• Héran, F. (2009). Des distances à vol d'oiseau aux distances réelles ou de l'origine des détours [From as-the-crow-flies distances to real distances, or the origin of detours]. Flux, 76/77, 110–121. Retrieved from http://www.cairn.info/revue-flux-2009-2-page-110.htm [in French]
   Google Scholar
• Héran, F. (2011a). La ville morcelée. Effets de coupure en milieu urbain [The fragmented city: Barrier effects in urban contexts]. Paris: Economica [in French].
   Google Scholar
• Héran, F. (2011b). Pour une approche systémique des nuisances liées aux transports en milieu urbain [A systematic approach to the nuisances of urban transport]. Les Cahiers Scientifiques du Transport, 59, 83–112. Retrieved from http://afitl.ish-lyon.cnrs.fr/tl_files/documents/CST/N59/Heran59.pdf [in French]
   Google Scholar
• Hess, P. M. (1997). Measures of connectivity. Places, 11(2), 58–65. Retrieved from https://placesjournal.org/print-archive/streets-old-paradigm-new-investment
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, M., Adams, J., & Whitelegg, J. (1990). One false move: A study of children's independent mobility. London: Policy Studies Institute. Retrieved from http://john-adams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/one%20false%20move.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hine, J. (1996). Pedestrian travel experiences—Assessing the impact of traffic on behaviour and perceptions of safety using an in-depth interview technique. Journal of Transport Geography, 4, 179–199. doi:10.1016/0966-6923(96)00003-8
   Google Scholar
• Hine, J., & Russell, J. (1993). Traffic barriers and pedestrian crossing behaviour. Journal of Transport Geography, 1, 230–239. doi:10.1016/0966-6923(93)90047-4
   Google Scholar
• Hine, J., & Russell, J. (1996). The impact of traffic on pedestrian behaviour—2. Assessing the traffic barrier on radial routes. Traffic Engineering and Control, 37, 81–85.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, J., & Williams, S. (1982). Delays to pedestrians crossing the road at a random point. Traffic Engineering and Control, 23, 216–221.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, M., Krizek, K. J., & El-Geneidy, A. (2010). Measuring non-motorized accessibility: Issues, alternatives, and execution. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), 133–140. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• James, E., Millington, A., & Tomlinson, P. (2005). Understanding community severance part 1: Views of practitioners and communities (Report for UK Department for Transport). Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dft.gov.uk/adobepdf/163944/Understanding_Community_Sev1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• James, E., Tomlinson, P., & Reid, S. (2004). Divided we fall. Surveyor, 5772, 22–23.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P., Wixey, S., Titheridge, H., & Christodoulou, G. (2005). Measuring accessibility and experiences by different socially disadvantaged groups. Working Paper 6: Developing accessibility planning tools. London: Transport Studies Group, University of Westminster. Retrieved from http://home.wmin.ac.uk/transport/download/SAMP_WP6_DevelopAccessibilityTools.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kang, C. D., & Cervero, R. (2009). From elevated freeway to urban greenway: Land value impacts of CGC project in Seoul, Korea. Urban Studies, 46, 2771–2794. doi:10.1177/0042098009345166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamura, K., & Mahajan, S. (2005). Hedonic analysis of impacts of traffic volumes on property values. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1924, 69–75. doi:10.3141/1924-09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, C. E., Tight, M. R., Hodgson, F. C., & Page, M. W. (2011). A comparison of three methods for assessing the walkability of the pedestrian environment. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1500–1508. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, R. A. R., & Blackmore, K. L. (2013). Physical and political boundaries as barriers to the continuity of social vulnerability. Applied Geography, 44, 79–87. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzmyak, J. R., Baber, C., & Savory, D. (2006). Use of walk opportunities index to quantify local accessibility. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1977, 145–153. doi:10.3141/1977-19
   Google Scholar
• Lahrmann, H., & Leleur, S. (Eds.). (1994). Vejtrafik: Trafikteknik & trafikplanlægning [Road traffic: Traffic engineering and planning]. Lyngby: Polyteknisk Forlag [in Danish].
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Sohn, K. (2014). Identifying the impact on land prices of replacing at-grade or elevated railways with underground subways in the Seoul metropolitan area. Urban Studies, 51, 44–62. doi:10.1177/0042098013484543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T., & Tagg, S. (1976). The social severance effects of major urban roads. In P. Stringer & H. Wenzel (Eds.), Transportation planning for a better environment (pp.267–281). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lerväg, H. (1984). Vegen som barriere for fotgjengere: Metodebeskrivelser [Roads as barriers for pedestrians: A description of methods]. (NIBR Report 1984:13). Oslo: NIBR. Retrieved from http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-nb_digibok_2012062608144 [in Norwegian]
   Google Scholar
• Litman, T. (2012). Barrier effect. In Transportation cost and benefit analysis: Techniques, estimates and implications (2nd ed.). (Chapter 5.13). Victoria: Victoria Policy Transport Institute. Retrieved from http://www.vtpi.org/tca/tca0513.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Loir, C., & Icher, J. (1983). Les effets de coupure de voies routières et autoroutières en milieu urbain et périurbain [Barrier effects on urban and suburban roads]. Bordeaux: CETUR—CETE de Bordeaux. Retrieved from http://temis.documentation.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/document.xsp?id=Temis-0002768 [in French]
   Google Scholar
• LVM (Liikenne- ja viestintäministeriö) [Ministry of Transport and Communications — Finland]. (2003). Guidelines for the assessment of transport infrastructure projects in Finland. Helsinki: LVM. Retrieved from http://www.lvm.fi/fileserver/41_2003.pdf [in English]
   Google Scholar
• Mackett, R. L., Achutan, K., & Titheridge, H. (2008). AMELIA: A tool to make transport policies more socially inclusive. Transport Policy, 15(6), 372–378. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manaugh, K., & El-Geneidy, A. (2011). Validating walkability indices: How do different households respond to the walkability of their neighbourhood? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16, 309–315. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2011.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltofte, K. R., & Nørby, L. E. (2012). Over vejen: Vejen som trafikal barriere for fodgængere [On the road: The road as a traffic barrier for pedestrians] (Master's thesis). Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. Retrieved from http://projekter.aau.dk/projekter/da/studentthesis/over-vejen%281a8858f4-bc06-4d2f-ad62-addf968104da%29.html [in Danish]
   Google Scholar
• Meltofte, K. R., & Nørby, L. E. (2013). Vejen som barriere for fodgængere [The road as a barrier for pedestrians]. Trafikdage på Aalborg Universitet 2013 [Proceedings from the Aalborg University Annual Transport Conference]. Retrieved from http://www.trafikdage.dk/td/papers/papers13/KatrineRabjergMeltofte.pdf [in Danish]
   Google Scholar
• Mindell, J. S., & Karlsen, S. (2012). Community severance and health: What do we actually know? Journal of Urban Health, 89, 232–246. doi:10.1007/s11524-011-9637-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mindell, J. S., & Watkins, S. J. (2011). Stress, social support and community severance. In J. S. Mindell, S. J. Watkins, & J. M. Cohen (Eds.), Health on the move 2: Policies for health promoting transport. The policy statement of the transport and health study group (2nd ed.). (Chapter 5). Stockport: Transport and Health Study Group. Retrieved from http://www.transportandhealth.org.uk/?page_id=32
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R., & Lee, D. (2014). Is there really a “wrong side of the tracks” in urban areas and does it matter for spatial analysis? Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104, 432–443. doi:10.1080/00045608.2014.892321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MIT (Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti) [Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport – Italy]. (2008). Linee guida per la misura dei costi esterni nell'ambito del PON Trasporti 2000–2006 [Guidelines for the measurement of external costs as part of the 2000–2006 national operational programme for transport]. Quaderni del PON Trasporti 8. Roma: MIT. [In Italian].
   Google Scholar
• Montel, M. C., Brenac, T., Granié, M. A., Millot, M., & Coquelet, C. (2013). Urban environments, pedestrian-friendliness and crossing decisions. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/84/13/35/PDF/doc00013604.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mouette, D., & Waisman, J. (2004). Proposta de uma metodologia de avaliação do efeito barreira [A proposed method for evaluating the barrier effect]. Revista dos Transportes Públicos, 102, 33–54. Retrieved from http://www.antp.org.br/_5dotSystem/download/dcmDocument/2013/01/10/B9BD823A-1D2B-4ED2-80F9-A44BB52404F6.pdf [in Portuguese]
   Google Scholar
• Mullan, E. (2003). Do you think that your local area is a good place for young people to grow up? The effects of traffic and car parking on young people's views. Health and Place, 9, 351–360. doi:10.1016/S1353-8292(02)00069-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neckerman, K. M., Lovasi, G. S., Davies, S., Purciel, M., Quinn, J., Feder, E., … Rundle, A. (2009). Disparities in urban neighborhood conditions: Evidence from GIS measures and field observation in New York City. Journal of Public Health Policy, 30, S264–S285. doi:10.1057/jphp.2008.47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. P. (2010). Hedonic property value studies of transportation noise: Aircraft and road traffic. In A. Baranzini, J. Ramirez, C. Schaerer, & P. Thalmann (Eds.), Hedonic methods in housing markets: Pricing environmental amenities and segregation (pp. 57–82). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• NZTA (New Zealand Transport Agency). (2009). Pedestrian planning and design guide. Wellington: New Zealand Transport Agency. Retrieved from http://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/pedestrian-planning-guide
   Google Scholar
• NZTA (New Zealand Transport Agency). (2013). Economic evaluation manual. Wellington: New Zealand Transport Agency. Retrieved from http://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/economic-evaluation-manual/economic-evaluation-manual/eem.html
   Google Scholar
• Olszewski, P., & Wibowo, S. S. (2005). Using equivalent walking distance to assess pedestrian accessibility to transit stations in Singapore. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1927, 38–45. doi:10.3141/1927-05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, N., Humpel, N., Lesli, E., Bauman, A., & Sallis, J. F. (2004). Understanding environment influences on walking – Review and research agenda. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27(1), 67–76. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, D., Atkinson, G., & Mourato, S. (2006). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: Recent developments. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, A. (2003). Measuring accessibility in scheme appraisal. Proceedings of the European Transport Conference 2003. Retrieved from http://abstracts.aetransport.org/conference/index/id/9
   Google Scholar
• Porta, S., & Renne, J. L. (2005). Linking urban design to sustainability: Formal indicators of social urban sustainability field research in Perth, Western Australia. Urban Design International, 10(1), 51–64. doi:10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000136
   Google Scholar
• Quigley, R., & Thornley, L. (2011). Literature review on community cohesion and community severance: Definitions and indicators for transport planning and monitoring (Report for the New Zealand Transport Agency). Wellington: Quigley and Watts. Retrieved from http://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/community-cohesion-and-community-severance
   Google Scholar
• Rajé, F. (2004). Engineering social exclusion? Poor transport links and severance. Proceedings of the ICE – Municipal Engineer, 157, 267–273. doi:10.1680/muen.2004.157.4.267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, M. D., & Cramphorn, B. (2001). Quantifying the impact of social severance caused by roads (Research Report 201). Wellington: Transfund New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, S. H., Gardner, K. H., & Carlson, C. H. (2013). Social capital and walkability as social aspects of sustainability. Sustainability, 5, 3473–3483. doi:10.3390/su5083473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J., & Hine, J. (1996). The impact of traffic on pedestrian behaviour—1. Measuring the traffic barrier. Traffic Engineering and Control, 37, 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Sælensminde, K. (2002). Gang-og sykkelvegnett i norske byer nytte: Kostnadsanalyser inkludert helseeffekter og eksterne kostnader av motorisert vegtrafikk [Walking and cycling track networks in Norwegian cities—Cost-benefit analyses including health effects and external costs of road traffic] (TØI rapport 567/2002). Oslo: TØI. Retrieved from https://www.toi.no/publications/walking-and-cycling-track-networks-in-norwegian-cities-cost-benefit-analyses-including-health-effects-and-external-costs-of-road-traffic-article17775-29.html [in Norwegian, with English summary]
   Google Scholar
• Sælensminde, K. (2004). Cost-benefit analyses of walking and cycling track networks taking into account insecurity, health effects and external costs of motorised traffic. Transportation Research A, 38, 593–606. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Sauter, D., & Huettenmoser, M. (2008). Livable streets and social inclusion. Urban Design International, 13, 67–79. doi:10.1057/udi.2008.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlossberg, M., & Brown, N. (2004). Comparing transit-oriented development sites by walkability indicators. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1887, 34–42. doi:10.3141/1887-05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEU (Social Exclusion Unit). (2003). Making the connections: Final report on transport and social exclusion. London: Stationery Office. Retrieved from http://assets.dft.gov.uk/statistics/series/accessibility/making-the-connections.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Silva, Jr., S. B., & Ferreira, M. A. G. (2008). Rodovias em areas urbanizadas e seus impactos na percepção dos pedestres [Impacts of highways in urban sites—The pedestrians’ perception]. Sociedade e Natureza, 20(2), 221–237. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1982-45132008000100015 [in Portuguese]
   Google Scholar
• Sisiopiku, V. P., & Akin, D. (2003). Pedestrian behaviors at and perceptions towards various pedestrian facilities: an examination based on observation and survey data. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 6, 249–274. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2003.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. D., & Gurney, A. (1992). Community effects of traffic congestion: A review of the London assessment study data (Contractor Report 314). Crowthorne: Transport Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Soguel, N. C. (1995). Costing the traffic barrier: A contingent valuation survey. Environmental and Resource Economics, 6, 301–308. doi:10.1007/BF00705983
   Google Scholar
• SSB (Statistisk Sentralbyrå) [Statistics Norway]. (2012). Tilgang til rekreasjonsareal og nærturterreng i tettsteder — Resultater og metode [Access to recreation areas and areas for recreational walking — Results and methodology]. Rapport 2012/28. Oslo–Kongsvinger: SSB. Retrieved from http://www.ssb.no/emner/01/01/rapp_201228/rapp_201228.pdf [in Norwegian]
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, J., & Rattray, A. (1978). Social severance. In D. W. Pearce (Ed.), The valuation of social cost (pp. 141–163). London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Tal, G., & Handy, S. (2012). Measuring non-motorized accessibility and connectivity in a robust pedestrian network. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2299, 48–56. doi:10.3141/2299-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, F. N. (1995). Severance: The perception of danger from road traffic. In IPENZ (Ed.), Proceedings of the Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand 1993: Sustainable development (pp. 408–419). Wellington: IPENZ.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, F. N. (1997). Social severance (Research Report No.80). Wellington: Transfund New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, P., & James, E. (2005). Understanding community severance part 2: Monetisation of severance impacts (Report for the UK Department of Transport). Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dft.gov.uk/adobepdf/163944/Understanding_Community_Sev2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Trafikministeriet [Danish Ministry of Transport]. (2003). Manual for samfundsøkonomisk analyse: Anvendt metode og praksis på transportområdet [Manual for socio-economic analysis: Applied methods and practices in the transport sector]. København: Trafikministeriet. Retrieved from http://www.trm.dk/~/media/Files/Publication/2003/samfundsokonomisk_analyse.pdf [in Danish]
   Google Scholar
• Trafikverket [Swedish Transport Administration]. (2011). Environmental impact assessment: Roads and rail handbook methodology (Publication No. 2011:155). Borlänge: Trafikverket. Retrieved from http://publikationswebbutik.vv.se/upload/6819/2011_155_environmental_impact_assesment_roads_and_rail_handbook.pdf [in English]
   Google Scholar
• UK DFT (UK Department for Transport). (2014a). Social impact appraisal (TAG Unit A4.1.). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/webtag-tag-unit-a4-1-social-impact-appraisal
   Google Scholar
• UK DFT (UK Department for Transport). (2014b). Distributional impact appraisal (TAG Unit A4.2.). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/webtag-tag-unit-a4-2-distributional-impact-appraisal
   Google Scholar
• UK DFT (UK Department for Transport). (2014c). Active mode appraisal (TAG Unit A5.1.). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/275394/webtag-tag-unit-a5-1-active-mode-appraisal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UK DOT (UK Department of Transport). (1983). Manual of environmental appraisal. London: Department of Transport; Assessments, Policy and Methods Division.
   Google Scholar
• UK HA (UK Highways Agency). (1993). Pedestrians, cyclists, equestrians and community effects. In Design manual for roads and bridges (vol. 11 , section 3, part 8). London: Stationery Office. Retrieved from http://www.dft.gov.uk/ha/standards/dmrb/vol11/section3/11s3p08.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UK MOT (UK Ministry of Transport). (1963). Traffic in towns: A study of the long term problems of traffic in urban areas. London: Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• US DOT (US Department of Transport). (1996). Community impact assessment: A quick reference for transportation. Washington: US Department of Transport. Retrieved from http://www.ciatrans.net/CIA_Quick_Reference/CIA_QuickRef.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vägverket [Swedish National Road Administration]. (1986). Project analysis. Calculation guide for investments in roads and streets (Report 1986:15E) Borlänge: Vägverket, [in English].
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, L. (2007). The spatial syntax of urban segregation. Progress in Planning, 67(3), 205–294. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2007.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vejdirektoratet [Danish Road Directorate]. (1992). Undersøgelse af større hovedlandevejsarbejder. Metode for effektberegninger og økonomisk vurdering [Evaluation of highway investment projects]. København: Vejdirektoratet [in Danish].
   Google Scholar
• Vegdirektoratet [Norwegian Public Roads Administration]. (2014). Konsekvensanalyser—Veiledning [Impact—Guidance]. Håndbok V712. Oslo: Vegdirektoratet. Retrieved from http://www.vegvesen.no/_attachment/704540/binary/1006228?fast_title=H%C3%A5ndbok+V712+Konsekvensanalyser.pdf [in Norwegian]
   Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organisation). (2011). Health economic assessment tools (HEAT) for walking and for cycling—Economic assessment of transport infrastructure and policies—Methodology and user guide. Copenhagen: WHO. Retrieved from http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/environment-and-health/Transport-and-health/publications/2011/health-economic-assessment-tools-heat-for-walking-and-for-cycling.-methodology-and-user-guide
   Google Scholar