The Increasing Role of Latent Variables in Modelling Bicycle Mode Choice

References

• Aarts, M., Mathijssen, J. J., van Oers, J. A., & Schuit, A. J. (2013). Associations between environmental characteristics and active commuting to school among children: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 20, 538–555. doi:10.1007/s12529-012-9271-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akar, G., & Clifton, K. J. (2009). Influence of individual perceptions and bicycle infrastructure on decision to bike. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2140, 165–172. doi:10.3141/2140-18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akar, G., Fischer, N., & Namgung, M. (2013). Bicycling choice and gender case study: The Ohio State University. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7, 347–365. doi:10.1080/15568318.2012.673694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balsas, C. J. (2003). Sustainable transportation planning on college campuses. Transport Policy, 10, 35–49. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00028-8
   Google Scholar
• Baltes, M. R. (1996). Factors influencing nondiscretionary work trips by bicycle determined from 1990 US census metropolitan statistical area data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1538, 96–101. doi:10.3141/1538-13
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D., Gärling, T., Gopinath, D., Walker, J., Bolduc, D., … Morikawa, T. (1999). Extended framework for modeling choice behavior. Marketing Letters, 10, 187–203. doi:10.1023/A:1008046730291
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D., Train, K., Walker, J., Bhat, C., Bierlaire, M., … Munizaga, M. A. (2002). Hybrid choice models: Progress and challenges. Marketing Letters, 13, 163–175. doi:10.1023/A:1020254301302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M., Walker, J., Bernardino, A. T., Gopinath, D. A., Morikawa, T., & Polydoropoulou, A. (2002). Integration of choice and latent variable models. In H. S. Mahmassani (Ed.), In perpetual motion: Travel behaviour research opportunities and application challenges (pp. 431–470). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R., & Dubey, S. K. (2014). A new estimation approach to integrate latent psychological constructs in choice modeling. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 67, 68–85. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2014.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolduc, D., Ben-Akiva, M. E., Walker, J., & Michaud, A. (2005). Hybrid choice models with logit kernel: Applicability to large scale models. In M. E. H. Lee-Gosselin, & S. T. Doherty (Eds.), Integrated land-use and transportation models: Behavioural foundations (pp. 275–302). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equation models. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Börjesson, M., & Eliasson, J. (2012). The value of time and external benefits in bicycle appraisal. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46, 673–683. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2012.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehler, R. (2012). Determinants of bicycle commuting in the Washington, DC region: The role of bicycle parking, cyclist showers, and free car parking at work. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17, 525–531. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehler, R., & Pucher, J. (2012). Cycling to work in 90 large American cities: New evidence on the role of bike paths and lanes. Transportation, 39, 409–432. doi:10.1007/s11116-011-9355-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., & Duncan, M. (2003). Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1478–1483. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorus, C. G., & Kroesen, M. (2014). On the (im-) possibility of deriving transport policy implications from hybrid choice models. Transport Policy, 36, 217–222. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, G., Kremers, S. P., Schaalma, H., Van Mechelen, W., & Brug, J. (2005). Determinants of adolescent bicycle use for transportation and snacking behavior. Preventive Medicine, 40, 658–667. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Geus, B., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Jannes, C., & Meeusen, R. (2008). Psychosocial and environmental factors associated with cycling for transport among a working population. Health Education Research, 23, 697–708. doi:10.1093/her/cym055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A., Bordagaray, M., & Ortúzar, J. d. D. (2014). Modeling the effects of pro bicycle infrastructure and policies toward sustainable urban mobility. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 140(2). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A., & Moura, J. L. (2011). Implementing bike-sharing systems. Proceedings of the ICE-Municipal Engineer, 164, 89–101. doi:10.1680/muen.2011.164.2.89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dill, J., & Carr, T. (2003). Bicycle commuting and facilities in major US cities: If you build them, commuters will use them. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1828, 116–123. doi:10.3141/1828-14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufour, D. (2010). Cycling policy guide: General framework (Report No. 1). Retrieved from European Commission. PRESTO project (Promoting Cycling for Everyone as a Daily Transport Mode). Retrieved from http://www.polisnetwork.eu/uploads/Modules/PublicDocuments/presto_cycling-policy-guide-general-framework_english.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Emond, C. R., & Handy, S. L. (2012). Factors associated with bicycling to high school: Insights from Davis, CA. Journal of Transport Geography, 20, 71–79. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engbers, L. H., & Hendriksen, I. J. (2010). Characteristics of a population of commuter cyclists in the Netherlands: Perceived barriers and facilitators in the personal, social and physical environment. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 7, 89. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-7-89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Heredia, A., Jara-Díaz, S., & Monzon, A. (2016). Modelling bicycle use intention: The role of perceptions. Transportation, 43, 1–23. doi:10.1007/s11116-014-9559-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Heredia, A., Monzon, A., & Jara-Díaz, S. (2014). Understanding cyclists’ perceptions, keys for a successful bicycle promotion. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 63, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flay, B. R., Snyder, F., & Petraitis, J. (2009). The theory of Triadic influence. In R. J. DiClemente, M. C. Kegler, & R. A. Crosby (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research (2nd ed., pp. 451–510). New York: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, L., Bradley, M., Kavage, S., Chapman, J., & Lawton, T. K. (2008). Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice. Transportation, 35, 37–54. doi:10.1007/s11116-007-9136-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrke, S., & Clifton, K. (2014). Operationalizing land use diversity at varying geographic scales and its connection to mode choice: Evidence from Portland, Oregon. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2453, 128–136. doi:10.3141/2453-16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetzke, F., & Rave, T. (2011). Bicycle use in Germany: Explaining differences between municipalities with social network effects. Urban Studies, 48, 427–437. doi:10.1177/0042098009360681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, S. A. (1992). National bicycling and walking study. Case study no.1: Reasons why bicycling and walking are and are not being used more extensively as travel modes (Report No. FHWA-PD-92-041). Retrieved from FHWA website: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/docs/case1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Habib, K. M. N., & Zaman, M. H. (2012). Effects of incorporating latent and attitudinal information in mode choice models. Transportation Planning and Technology, 35, 561–576. doi:10.1080/03081060.2012.701815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, K. N., Mann, J., Mahmoud, M., & Weiss, A. (2014). Synopsis of bicycle demand in the City of Toronto: Investigating the effects of perception, consciousness and comfortability on the purpose of biking and bike ownership. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 70, 67–80. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamre, A., & Buehler, R. (2014). Commuter mode choice and free car parking, public transportation benefits, showers/lockers, and bike parking at work: Evidence from the Washington, DC Region. Journal of Public Transportation, 17(2), 67–91. doi:10.5038/2375-0901.17.2.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, S. L., & Xing, Y. (2010). Factors correlated with bicycle commuting: A study in six small U.S. cities. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 5, 91–110. doi:10.1080/15568310903514789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen, E., Maat, K., & van Wee, B. (2011). The role of attitudes toward characteristics of bicycle commuting on the choice to cycle to work over various distances. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16, 102–109. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2010.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen, E., Maat, K., & van Wee, B. (2012). The effect of work-related factors on the bicycle commute mode choice in the Netherlands. Transportation, 40, 23–43. doi:10.1007/s11116-012-9399-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen, E., van Wee, B., & Maat, K. (2010). Commuting by bicycle: An overview of the literature. Transport Reviews, 30, 59–96. doi:10.1080/01441640903187001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamargianni, M., Bhat, C. R., Polydoropoulou, A., & Dubey, S. (2015). Investigating the subjective and objective factors influencing teenagers’ school travel mode choice–an integrated choice and latent variable model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 473–488. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamargianni, M., & Polydoropoulou, A. (2013). Hybrid choice model to investigate effects of teenagers’ attitudes toward walking and cycling on mode choice behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2382, 151–161. doi:10.3141/2382-17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, R. (1995). Modeling bicycle demand as a mainstream transportation planning function. Transportation Research Record, 1502, 22–28. Retrieved from http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=453067
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. (1996). Demand for bicycle use: A behavioural framework and empirical analysis for urban NSW (Unpublished doctoral thesis). The Graduate School of Business, University of Sydney, NSW (Australia).
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. (2001). Forecasting demand for bicycle facilities (Report No. AP–R194/01). Retrieved from Austroads website: https://www.onlinepublications.austroads.com.au/items/AP-R194-01
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I., Park, H., & Sohn, K. (2011). Increasing the number of bicycle commuters. Proceedings of the ICE-Transport, 165, 63–72. doi:10.1680/tran.10.00024
   Google Scholar
• Lorenc, T., Brunton, G., Oliver, S., Oliver, K., & Oakley, A. (2008). Attitudes to walking and cycling among children, young people and parents: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62, 852–857. doi:10.1136/jech.2007.070250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L., & Dill, J. (2015). Associations between the objective and perceived built environment and bicycling for transportation. Journal of Transport & Health, 2, 248–255. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2015.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Hinarejos, M. R., Sivakumar, A., & Polak, J. W. (2014). Exploring the role of individual attitudes and perceptions in predicting the demand for cycling: A hybrid choice modelling approach. Transportation, 41, 1287–1304. doi:10.1007/s11116-014-9551-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moudon, A. V., Lee, C., Cheadle, A. D., Collier, C. W., Johnson, D., Schmid, T. L., … Weather, R. D. (2005). Cycling and the built environment, a US perspective. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 10, 245–261. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2005.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhs, C. D., & Clifton, K. J. (January, 2014). Bicycling is different: Built environment relationships to non-work travel. Paper presented at the meeting of Transportation Research Board (TRB) 93rd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (USA).
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, B., Daziano, R. A., & Monzon, A. (2016). Modelling the effect of policy measures for improving cycling for urban transport. Transyt-UPM Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, B., Monzon, A., & Lois, D. (2013). Cycling habits and other psychological variables affecting commuting by bicycle in Madrid, Spain. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2382, 1–9. doi:10.3141/2382-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C., & Allen, D. (1997). If you build them, commuters will use them: Association between bicycle facilities and bicycle commuting. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1578, 79–83. doi:10.3141/1578-10
   Google Scholar
• Noland, R. B., & Kunreuther, H. (1995). Short-run and long-run policies for increasing bicycle transportation for daily commuter trips. Transport Policy, 2, 67–79. doi:10.1016/0967-070X(95)93248-W
   Google Scholar
• Ortúzar, J. de D., Iacobelli, A., & Valeze, C. (2000). Estimating demand for a cycle-way network. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 34, 353–373. doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00040-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panter, J., & Jones, A. (2010). Attitudes and the environment as determinants of active travel in adults: What do and don’t we know? Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 7, 551–561. Retrieved from http://www.americankinesiology.org/AcuCustom/Sitename/Documents/DocumentItem/16_panter_JPAH_2008_0265_551-561.pdf
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panter, J. R., Jones, A. P., van Sluijs, E. M., & Griffin, S. J. (2010). Attitudes, social support and environmental perceptions as predictors of active commuting behaviour in school children. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 64, 41–48. doi:10.1136/jech.2009.086918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin, J., Ryley, T., & Jones, T. (2007). Barriers to cycling: An exploration of quantitative analyses. In D. Horton, P. Rosen, & P. Cox (Eds.), Cycling and society (pp. 67–82). Hampshire: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, J., Wardman, M., & Page, M. (2008). Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data. Transportation, 35, 93–109. doi:10.1007/s11116-007-9137-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, P. O. (2005). Non-motorized commuting in the US. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 10, 347–356. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2005.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, C., Suhrbier, J., & Schwartz, W. L. (1999). Forecasting bicycle and pedestrian travel: State of the practice and research needs. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1674, 94–101. doi:10.3141/1674-13
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C. C., Harris, M. A., Teschke, K., Cripton, P. A., & Winters, M. (2009). The impact of transportation infrastructure on bicycling injuries and crashes: A review of the literature. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 8, 47. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-8-47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietveld, P., & Daniel, V. (2004). Determinants of bicycle use: Do municipal policies matter? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 38, 531–550. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, D. A., & Joo, J. (2004). The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 9, 151–173. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2003.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roorda, M. J., Passmore, D., & Miller, E.J. (2009). Including minor modes of transport in a tour-based mode choice model with household interactions. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 135, 935–945. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G., & Marfurt, H. (2007). Travel behaviour change impacts of a major ride to work day event. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41, 351–364. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2006.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryley, T. (2006). Estimating cycling demand for the journey to work or study in West Edinburgh, Scotland. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1982, 187–193. doi:10.3141/1982-24
   Google Scholar
• Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., & Frank, L. D. (2003). Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 80–91. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallis, J. F., Owen, N., & Fisher, E. B. (2008). Ecological models of health behavior. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 465–485). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schoner, J. E., & Levinson, D. M. (2014). The missing link: Bicycle infrastructure networks and ridership in 74 US cities. Transportation, 41, 1187–1204. doi:10.1007/s11116-014-9538-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, W., Porter, C., Payne, G., Suhrbier, J., Moe, P., & Wilkinson III, W. (1999). Guidebook on methods to estimate non-motorized travel: Supporting documentation (Report No. FHWA-RD-98-166). Retrieved from FHWA website: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/docs/guidebook2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sigurdardottir, S. B., Kaplan, S., Møller, M., & Teasdale, T. W. (2013). Understanding adolescents’ intentions to commute by car or bicycle as adults. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 24, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2013.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirard, J. R., & Slater, M. E. (2008). Walking and bicycling to school: A review. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 2, 372–396. doi:10.1177/1559827608320127
   Google Scholar
• Stinson, M. A., & Bhat, C. R. (2003). Commuter bicyclist route choice: Analysis using a stated preference survey. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1828, 107–115. doi:10.3141/1828-13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, D., & Mahmassani, H. (1996). Analysis of stated preferences for intermodal bicycle-transit interfaces. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1556, 86–95. doi:10.3141/1556-11
   Google Scholar
• Titze, S., Stronegger, W., Janschitz, S., & Oja, P. (2007). Environmental, social, and personal correlates of cycling for transportation in a student population. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 4, 66–79. Retrieved from http://www.humankinetics.com/acucustom/sitename/Documents/DocumentItem/6632.pdf
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Titze, S., Stronegger, W. J., Janschitz, S., & Oja, P. (2008). Association of built-environment, social-environment and personal factors with bicycling as a mode of transportation among Austrian city dwellers. Preventive Medicine, 47, 252–259. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train, K. E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenbulcke, G., Dujardin, C., Thomas, I., Geus, B. d., Degraeuwe, B., Meeusen, R., … Panis, L. I. (2011). Cycle commuting in Belgium: Spatial determinants and ‘re-cycling’ strategies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45, 118–137. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2010.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2002). Generalized random utility model. Mathematical Social Sciences, 43, 303–343. doi:10.1016/S0165-4896(02)00023-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardman, M., Hatfield, R., & Page, M. (1997). The UK national cycling strategy: Can improved facilities meet the targets? Transport Policy, 4, 123–133. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(97)00011-5
   Google Scholar
• Wardman, M., Page, M., Tight, M., & Sin, Y. (2000). Cycling & Urban commuting: Results of behavioural mode and route choice models (Report No. 548). Retrieved from White Rose Research Online website: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2074/1/ITS209_WP548_uploadable.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wardman, M., Tight, M., & Page, M. (2007). Factors influencing the propensity to cycle to work. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41, 339–350. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2006.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, D., Manaugh, K., & El-Geneidy, A. (2015). Cycling under influence: Summarizing the influence of attitudes, habits, social environments and perceptions on cycling for transportation. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 9, 565–579. doi:10.1080/15568318.2013.827285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, M., Brauer, M., Setton, E. M., & Teschke, K. (2010). Built environment influences on healthy transportation choices: Bicycling versus driving. Journal of Urban Health, 87, 969–993. doi:10.1007/s11524-010-9509-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahran, S., Brody, S. D., Maghelal, P., Prelog, A., & Lacy, M. (2008). Cycling and walking: Explaining the spatial distribution of healthy modes of transportation in the United States. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 13, 462–470. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2008.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar