2,680
Views
62
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Port choice in container market: a literature review

&
Pages 300-321 | Received 22 Jun 2015, Accepted 27 Aug 2016, Published online: 30 Sep 2016

References

  • Acosta, M., Coronado, D., & Mar Cerban, M. (2007). Port competitiveness in container traffic from an internal point of view: The experience of the Port of Algeciras Bay. Maritime Policy and Management, 34(5), 501–520. doi: 10.1080/03088830701585381
  • Anderson, C. M., Opaluch, J. J., & Grigalunas, T. A. (2009). The demand for import services at US container ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 11(2), 156–185. doi: 10.1057/mel.2009.4
  • Baltazar, R., & Brooks, M. R. (2006). Port governance, devolution and the matching framework: A configuration theory approach. Research in Transportation Economics, 17, 379–403. doi: 10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17017-1
  • Banister, D., & Stead, D. (2004). Impact of information and communications technology on transport. Transport Reviews, 24(5), 611–632. doi: 10.1080/0144164042000206060
  • Brooks, M. R., & Pallis, A. A. (2008). Assessing port governance models: Process and performance components. Maritime Policy and Management, 35(4), 411–432. doi: 10.1080/03088830802215060
  • Brooks, M. R., & Schellinck, T. (2013). Measuring port effectiveness in user service delivery: What really determines users’ evaluations of port service delivery? Research in Transportation Business and Management, 8, 87–96. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.04.001
  • Brooks, M. R., Schellinck, T., & Pallis, A. A. (2011). A systematic approach for evaluating port effectiveness. Maritime Policy and Management, 38(3), 315–334. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2011.572702
  • Caillaux, M. A., Sant'Anna, A. P., & Meza, L. A. (2011). Container logistics in Mercosur: Choice of a transhipment port using the ordinal Copeland method, data envelopment analysis and probabilistic composition. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 13(4), 355–370. doi: 10.1057/mel.2011.20
  • Castillo-Manzano, J. I., González-Laxe, F., & López-Valpuesta, L. (2013). Intermodal connections at Spanish ports and their role in capturing hinterland traffic. Ocean and Coastal Management, 86, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.10.003
  • Chang, Y. T., Lee, S. Y., & Tongzon, J. L. (2008). Port selection factors by shipping lines: Different perspectives between trunk liners and feeder service providers. Marine Policy, 32(6), 877–885. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.01.003
  • Chou, C. C. (2010): AHP model for the container port choice in the multiple-ports region. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 18(2), 211–232.
  • Clark, X., Dollar, D., & Micco, A. (2004). Port efficiency, maritime transport costs, and bilateral trade. Journal of Development Economics, 75(2), 417–450. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.06.005
  • da Cruz, M. R. P., Ferreira, J. J., & Azevedo, S. G. (2013). Key factors of seaport competitiveness based on the stakeholder perspective: An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 15(4), 416–443. doi: 10.1057/mel.2013.14
  • De Langen, P. (2007). Port competition and selection in contestable hinterlands; the case of Austria. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 7(1), 1–14.
  • De Langen, P. W., & Chouly, A. (2004). Hinterland access regimes in seaports. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 4(4), 361–380.
  • Dooms, M., van der Lugt, L., & de Langen, P. W. (2013). International strategies of port authorities: The case of the Port of Rotterdam Authority. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 8, 148–157. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.06.004
  • Ducruet, C., Itoh, H., & Merk, O. (2014, August). Time Efficiency at World Container Ports. In International Transport Forum Discussion Papers (No. 2014-08).
  • Fleming, D. K., & Baird, A. J. (1999). Comment some reflections on port competition in the United States and Western Europe. Maritime Policy and Management, 26(4), 383–394. doi: 10.1080/030888399286817
  • Garcia-Alonso, L., & Martin-Bofarull, M. (2007). Impact of port investment on efficiency and capacity to attract traffic in Spain: Bilbao versus Valencia. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 9(3), 254–267. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100183
  • García-Alonso, L., & Sánchez-Soriano, J. (2010). Analysis of the evolution of the inland traffic distribution and provincial hinterland share of the Spanish Port System. Transport Reviews, 30(3), 275–297. doi: 10.1080/01441640902985983
  • Gunasekaran, A., & Ngai, E. W. (2004). Information systems in supply chain integration and management. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(2), 269–295. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2003.08.016
  • Guy, E., & Urli, B. (2006). Port selection and multicriteria analysis: An application to the Montreal-New York alternative. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8, 169–186. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100152
  • Ha, M. S. (2003). A comparison of service quality at major container ports: Implications for Korean ports. Journal of Transport Geography, 11(2), 131–137. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00069-8
  • Kim, J. Y. (2014). Port user typology and representations of port choice behavior: A Q-methodological study. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 16(2), 165–187. doi: 10.1057/mel.2013.26
  • Lirn, T. C., Thanopoulou, H. A., & Beresford, A. K. (2003). Transhipment port selection and decision-making behaviour: Analysing the Taiwanese case. International Jounrnal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 6(4), 229–244. doi: 10.1080/13675560310001626990
  • Lirn, T. C., Thanopoulou, H. A., Beynon, M. J., & Beresford, A. K. C. (2004). An application of AHP on transhipment port selection: A global perspective. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 6(1), 70–91. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100093
  • Magala, M., & Sammons, A. (2008). A new approach to port choice modelling. Maritime Economics and Logistics. 10, 9–34. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100189
  • Malchow, M., & Kanafani, A. (2001). A disaggregate analysis of factors influencing port selection. Maritime Policy and Management, 28(3), 265–277. doi: 10.1080/03088830110060840
  • Malchow, M. B., & Kanafani, A. (2004). A disaggregate analysis of port selection. Transportation Research Part E, 40, 317–337. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2003.05.001
  • Mangan, J., Lalwani, C., & Garner, B. (2002). Modelling port/ferry choice in RoRo freight transportation. International Journal of Transport Management, 1, 15–28. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4051(01)00003-9
  • Monios, J. (2011). The role of inland terminal development in the hinterland access strategies of Spanish ports. Research in Transportation Economics, 33(1), 59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2011.08.007
  • Murphy, P. R., Daley, J. M., & Dalenberg, D. R. (1992). Port selection criteria: An application of a transportation research framework. Logistics and Transportation Review, 28(3), 237–255.
  • Ng, K. Y. A. (2006). Assessing the attractiveness of ports in the North European container transhipment market: An agenda for future research in port competition. Maritime Economics and Logistics. 8, 234–250. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100158
  • Ng, A. S. F., Sun, D., & Bhattacharjya, J. (2013). Port choice of shipping lines and shippers in Australia. Asian Geographer. 30(2), 143–168. doi: 10.1080/10225706.2013.783304
  • Nir, A.-S., Lin, K., & Liang, G.-S. (2003). Port choice behaviour – from the perspective of the shipper. Maritime Policy and Management, 30(2), 165–173. doi: 10.1080/0308883032000069262
  • Notteboom, T., & Rodrigue, J. P. (2008). Containerisation, box logistics and global supply chains: The integration of ports and liner shipping networks. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 10(1), 152–174. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100196
  • Notteboom, T. E., & Rodrigue, J. P. (2005). Port regionalization: Towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy and Management, 32(3), 297–313. doi: 10.1080/03088830500139885
  • Onut, S., Tuzkaya, U. R., & Torun, E. (2010). Selecting container port via a fuzzy ANP-based approach: A case study in the Marmara Region, Turkey. Transport Policy. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.001
  • Park, B. I., & Min, H. (2011). The selection of transshipment ports using a hybrid data envelopment analysis/analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Transportation Management, 22(1), 47–64.
  • Robinson, R. (2002). Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: The new paradigm. Maritime Policy & Management, 29(3), 241–255. doi: 10.1080/03088830210132623
  • Sánchez, R. J., Hoffmann, J., Micco, A., Pizzolitto, G. V., Sgut, M., & Wilmsmeier, G. (2003). Port efficiency and international trade: Port efficiency as a determinant of maritime transport costs. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 5(2), 199–218. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100073
  • Slack, B. (1985). Containerization, inter-port competition and port selection. Maritime Policy and Management, 12(4), 293–303. doi: 10.1080/03088838500000043
  • Song, D. W., & Panayides, P. M. (2008). Global supply chain and port/terminal: Integration and competitiveness. Maritime Policy and Management, 35(1), 73–87. doi: 10.1080/03088830701848953
  • Song, D. W., & Yeo, K. T. (2004). A comparative analysis of Chinese container ports using the analytic hierarchy process. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 6, 34–52. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100096
  • Song, L., & van Geenhuizen, M. (2014). Port infrastructure investment and regional economic growth in China: Panel evidence in port regions and provinces. Transport Policy, 36, 173–183. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.08.003
  • Steven, A. B., & Corsi, T. M. (2012). Choosing a port: An analysis of containerized imports into the US. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(4), 881–895. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2012.02.003
  • Tai, H. H., & Hwang, C. C. (2005). Analysis of hub port choice for container trunk lines in East Asia. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 907–919.
  • Talley, W. K., & Ng, M. (2013). Maritime transport chain choice by carriers, ports and shippers. International Journal of Production Economics, 142(2), 311–316. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.11.013
  • Tang, L. C., Low, J. M., & Lam, S. W. (2011). Understanding port choice behavior – a network perspective. Networks and Spatial Economics, 11(1), 65–82. doi: 10.1007/s11067-008-9081-8
  • Tiwari, P., Itoh, H., Doi, M. (2003). Shippers’ port and carrier selection behaviour in China: A discrete choice analysis. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 5, 23–39. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100062
  • Tongzon, J., Chang, Y. T., & Lee, S. Y. (2009). How supply chain oriented is the port sector? International Journal of Production Economics, 122(1), 21–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.03.017
  • Tongzon, J., & Heng, W. (2005). Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(5), 405–424.
  • Tongzon, J. L. (1994). Determinants of port performance and efficiency. Transportation Research Part A, 29A(3), 245–252.
  • Tongzon, J. L. (2009). Port choice and freight forwarders. Transportation Research Part E, 45(1), 186–195. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2008.02.004
  • Tongzon, J. L., & Sawant, L. (2007). Port choice in a competitive environment: From the shipping lines’ perspective. Applied Economics, 39(4), 447–492. doi: 10.1080/00036840500438871
  • Ugboma, C., Ugboma, O., Ogwude, I. (2006). An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach to port selection decisions – empirical evidence from Nigerian ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8, 251–266. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100160
  • Van den Berg, R., & De Langen, P. W. (2011). Hinterland strategies of port authorities: A case study of the port of Barcelona. Research in Transportation Economics, 33(1), 6–14. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2011.08.002
  • Van Der Horst, M. R., & De Langen, P. W. (2008). Coordination in hinterland transport chains: A major challenge for the seaport community. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 10(1), 108–129. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100194
  • Veldman, S., Garcia-Alonso, L., & Vallejo-Pinto, J. Á. (2011). Determinants of container port choice in Spain. Maritime Policy and Management, 38(5), 509–522. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2011.597450
  • Veldman, S. J., & Bükmann, E. W. (2003). A model on container port competition: An application for the West European container Hub-ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 5, 3–22. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100058
  • Verhoeven, P. (2009). European ports policy: Meeting contemporary governance challenges. Maritime Policy and Management, 36(1), 79–101. doi: 10.1080/03088830802652320
  • Verhoeven, P. (2010). European Port Governance. European Sea Ports Organization (ESPO).
  • Wiegmans, B. W., Van Der Hoest, A., & Notteboom, T. E. (2008). Port and terminal selection by deep-sea container operators. Maritime Policy and Management, 35(6), 517–534. doi: 10.1080/03088830802469329
  • Wilmsmeier, G., Hoffmann, J., & Sanchez, R. J. (2006). The impact of port characteristics on international maritime transport costs. Research in Transportation Economics, 16, 117–140. doi: 10.1016/S0739-8859(06)16006-0
  • Wu, Y., & Peng, C. (2013). A container port choice model for pearl river delta region in south China. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 96, 1839–1852. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.209
  • Yeo, G. T., Ng, A. K., Lee, P. T. W., & Yang, Z. (2013). Modelling port choice in an uncertain environment. Maritime Policy and Management (ahead-of-print), 1–17.
  • Yeo, G. T., Roe, M., & Dinwoodie, J. (2008). Evaluating the competitiveness of container ports in Korea and China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(6), 910–921.
  • Yeo, G. T., Roe, M., & Dinwoodie, J. (2011). Measuring the competitiveness of container ports: Logisticians’ perspectives. European Journal of Marketing, 45(3), 455–470. doi: 10.1108/03090561111107276
  • Yuen, C. L. A., Zhang, A., & Cheung, W. (2012). Port competitiveness from the users’ perspective: An analysis of major container ports in China and its neighboring countries. Research in Transportation Economics, 35(1), 34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2011.11.005
  • Zondag, B., Bucci, P., Gützkow, P., & De Jong, G. (2010). Port competition modeling including maritime, port and hinterland characteristics. Maritime Policy and Management, 37(3), 179–194. doi: 10.1080/03088831003700579

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.