Strategic beliefs of port authorities

References

• Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2011). Dimensions of publicness and organizational performance: A review of the evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Suppl 3), i301–i319. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mur026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, A. J. (1995). Privatisation of trust ports in the United Kingdom: Review and analysis of the first sales. Transport Policy, 2(2), 135–143. doi: 10.1016/0967-070X(95)91993-T
   Google Scholar
• Baird, A. J. (2000). Port privatisation: Objectives, extent, process, and the UK experience. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2(3), 177–194. doi: 10.1057/ijme.2000.16
   Google Scholar
• Baltazar, R., & Brooks, M. R. (2007). Port governance, devolution, and the matching framework: A configuration theory approach. In M. R. Brooks, & K. Cullinane (Eds.), Devolution, port governance and port performance (pp. 379–403). London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. B., & Zajac, E. J. (1994). Competitive organizational behavior: Toward an organizationally-based theory of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 5–9. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250150902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. A. (2004). The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship’s basic “‘why’” questions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 221–239. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00008-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. (1999). Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change: The role of strategic choice and institutionalized practices in organizations. Organization Studies, 5, 777–799. doi: 10.1177/0170840699205004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bichou, K., & Gray, R. (2005). A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(1), 75–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private management: What’s the difference? Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 97–122. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. R. (2004). The governance structure of ports. Review of Network Economics, 3(2), 168–183. doi: 10.2202/1446-9022.1049
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. R., & Cullinane, K. (Eds.). (2006). Devolution, port governance and port performance (Vol. 17). London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. L. (2009). Port administrative structure change worldwide: Its implication for restructuring port authorities in Taiwan. Transport Reviews, 29(2), 163–181. doi: 10.1080/01441640802260248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, S.-L., & Chang, H.-C. (2009). Performance implications of cognitive complexity: An empirical study of cognitive strategic groups in semiconductor industry. Journal of Business Research, 62, 1311–1320. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1177/003803857200600101
   Google Scholar
• Child, J., Rodrigues, S. B., & Tse, K. K. T. (2012). The dynamics of influence in corporate Co-evolution. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1246–1273. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01057.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chlomoudis, C.I., & Pallis, A.A. (2004). Port governance and the smart port authority: Key issues for the reinforcement of quality services in European ports. Proceedings of the 10th world conference on transport research, (CD-Rom), Istanbul, June 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, T. S., & Hambrick, D. C. (2006). Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organization Science, 17(4), 453–469. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1060.0192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coeck, C., Notteboom, T., Verbeke, A., & Winkelmans, W. (1996). A resource-based perspective on strategic port planning. In Smitz, & Thues (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th harbour Congress (pp. 29–41). The Royal Flemish Society of Engineers, Antwerp, June 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearborn, D. C., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Selective perception: A note on the departmental identifications of executives. Sociometry, 21(2), 140–144. doi: 10.2307/2785898
   Google Scholar
• Denktas-Sakar, G., & Karatas-Cetin, C. (2012). Port sustainability and stakeholder management in supply chains: A framework on resource dependence theory. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 28(3), 301–319. doi: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2013.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Donselaar, P. W.-V., & Kolkman, J. (2010). Societal costs and benefits of cooperation between port authorities. Maritime Policy & Management, 37(3), 271–284. doi: 10.1080/03088831003700660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooms, M., van der Lugt, L., & de Langen, P. W. (2013). International strategies of port authorities: The case of the port of Rotterdam authority. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 148–157. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.06.004
   Google Scholar
• Dooms, M., & Verbeke, A. (2007). Stakeholder management in ports: A conceptual framework integrating insights from research in strategy, corporate social responsibility and port management. IAME 2007 annual conference 2007, Athens.
   Google Scholar
• Dooms, M., Verbeke, A., & Haezendonck, E. (2013). Stakeholder management and path dependence in large-scale transport infrastructure development: The port of Antwerp case (1960–2010). Journal of Transport Geography, 27, 15–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, S., & Robinson, R. (1998). Port reform in Australia: Issues in the ownership debate. Maritime Policy and Management, 25(1), 41–62. doi: 10.1080/03088839800000044
   Google Scholar
• Foss, N. J. (1996). Research In strategy, economics, and Michael porter*. Journal of Management Studies, 33(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00796.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, N. J. (1998). The resource-based perspective: An assessment and diagnosis of problems. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 14(3), 133–149. doi: 10.1016/S0956-5221(97)00030-4
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, E. G. (1989). Strategic planning applied to shipping and ports. Maritime Policy and Management, 16(2), 123–132. doi: 10.1080/03088838900000037
   Google Scholar
• Goss, R. O. (1990). Economic policies and seaports: Strategies for PAs. Maritime Policy and Management, 17(4), 273–287. doi: 10.1080/03088839000000033
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. V., & Jacobs, W. (2010). Shifting proximities: The maritime ports sector in an era of global supply chains. Regional Studies, 44(9), 1103–1115. doi: 10.1080/00343400903365110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugstetter, H., & Cahoon, S. (2010). Strategic intent: Guiding port authorities to their new world? Research in Transportation Economics, 27(1), 30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2009.12.005
   Google Scholar
• Hitt, M. A., & Tyler, B. B. (1991). Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 327–351. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250120502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, G. P., & Healey, M. P. (2008). Cognition in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 387–417. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hollen, R.M.A., Van Den Bosch, F.A.J., & Volberda, H.W. (2013). Business model innovation of the Port of Rotterdam Authority (2000–2012). In B. Kuipers & R. Zuidwijk (Eds.), Smart port perspectives: Essays in Honour of Hans Smits (pp. 29–47). Rotterdam: SmartPort. ISBN: 978-90-819767-1-8.
   Google Scholar
• Huff, A. S. (1990). Mapping strategic thought. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ircha, M. C. (2001). Port strategic planning: Canadian port reform. Maritime Policy & Management, 28(2), 125–140. doi: 10.1080/03088830120436
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. (1992). Managing strategic change – strategy, culture and action. Long Range Planning, 25(1), 28–36. doi: 10.1016/0024-6301(92)90307-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. (2011). Research in cognition and strategy: Reflections on two decades of progress and a look to the future. Journal of Management Studies, 48(3), 665–695. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00983.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, J. S. L., & Notteboom, T. (2014). The greening of ports: A comparison of port management tools used by leading ports in Asia and Europe. Transport Reviews, 34(2), 169–189. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2014.891162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Langen, P. W. (2004). The performance of seaport clusters (PhD dissertation). ERIM, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• de Langen, P. W. (2008). Ensuring Hinterland Access: The Role of PAs, Discussion Paper of OECD International Transport Forum, Paris, France, October.
   Google Scholar
• de Langen, P. W., & Haezendonck, E. (2012). Ports as clusters of economic activity. The Blackwell Companion to Maritime Economics, 638–655. doi: 10.1002/9781444345667.ch31
   Google Scholar
• de Langen, P. W., & Pallis, A. A. (2007). Entry barriers in seaports. Maritime Policy & Management, 34(5), 427–440. doi: 10.1080/03088830701585134
   Google Scholar
• de Langen, P. W., & Heij, C. (2014). Corporatisation and performance: A literature review and an analysis of the performance effects of the corporatisation of port of Rotterdam authority. Transport Reviews 34(3), 1–19. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2014.905650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Langen, P. W., Nijdam, M., & van der Horst, M. R. (2007). New indicators to measure port performance. Journal of Maritime Research, IV(1), 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• de Langen, P. W., Van Den Berg, R., & Willeumier, A. (2012). A new approach to granting terminal concessions: The case of the Rotterdam World Gateway terminal. Maritime Policy & Management, 39(1), 79–90. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2011.642311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lugt, L., Dooms, M., & Parola, F. (2013). Strategy making by hybrid organizations: The case of the port authority. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 103–113. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.06.005
   Google Scholar
• van der Lugt, L., Langen, P. D., & Hagdorn, L. (2015). Beyond the landlord: Worldwide empirical analysis of port authority strategies. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 7(5), 570–596. doi: 10.1504/IJSTL.2015.072021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lugt, L. M., Rodrigues, S. B., & Van den Berg, R. (2014). Co-evolution of the strategic reorientation of port actors: Insights from the port of Rotterdam and the port of Barcelona. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 197–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, H., & Fearon, C. (2013). Understanding the development of port and regional relationships: A new cooperation/competition matrix. Maritime Policy & Management, 40(3), 278–294. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2013.782966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. (2007). Mapping the mind of the strategist, a quantitative methodology for measuring the strategic beliefs of executives, ERIM PhD Series Research in Management 106, ISBN: 90-5892-141-3. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.
   Google Scholar
• Monios, J. (2015). Identifying governance relationships between intermodal terminals and logistics platforms. Transport Reviews, 35(6), 767–791. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2015.1053103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, S., & Barr, P. S. (2008). Environmental context, managerial cognition, and strategic action: An integrated view. Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1395–1421. doi: 10.1002/smj.717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanan, V. K., Zane, L. J., & Kemmerer, B. (2011). The cognitive perspective in strategy: An integrative review. Journal of Management, 37(1), 305–351. doi: 10.1177/0149206310383986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, A. K.-Y., & Pallis, A. A. (2010). Port governance reforms in diversified institutional frameworks: Generic solutions, implementation asymmetries. Environment and Planning A, 42(9), 2147–2167. doi: 10.1068/a42514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (1999). Comparing methods for mapping organizational cognition. Organization Studies, 20(5), 833–860. doi: 10.1177/0170840699205006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T. (2006). Concession agreements as port governance tools. Research in Transportation Economics, 17, 437–455. doi: 10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17019-5
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T. E., Pallis, A. A., & Farrell, S. (2012). Terminal concessions in seaports revisited. Maritime Policy & Management, 39(1), 1–5. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2012.644476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T., & Rodrigue, J.-P. (2005). Port regionalization: Towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy and Management, 32(3), 297–313. doi: 10.1080/03088830500139885
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T., De Langen, P., & Jacobs, W. (2013). Institutional plasticity and path dependence in seaports: Interactions between institutions, port governance reforms and port authority routines. Journal of Transport Geography, 27, 26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T., & Winkelmans, W. (2001). Structural changes in logistics: How will PAs face the challenge? Maritime Policy and Management, 28(1), 71–89. doi: 10.1080/03088830119197
   Google Scholar
• Pallis, A. A., Vitsounis, T. K., De Langen, P. W., & Notteboom, T. E. (2011). Port economics, policy and management: Content classification and survey. Transport Reviews, 31(4), 445–471. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2010.530699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A., & Whipp, R. (1991). Managing change for competitive success. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Porac, J. F., & Thomas, H. (2002). Managing cognition and strategy: Issues, trends and future directions. Handbook of Strategy and Management, 165–181.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., Backoff, R. W., & Levine, C. H. (1976). Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 36(2), 233–244. doi: 10.2307/975145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, R. (2002). Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: The new paradigm. Maritime Policy & Management, 29(3), 241–255. doi: 10.1080/03088830210132623
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, R. (2006). Port-oriented landside logistics in Australian ports: A strategic framework. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 8(1), 40–59. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100149
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, J.-P., Debrie, J., Fremont, A., & Gouvernal, E. (2010). Functions and actors of inland ports: European and North American dynamics. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 519–529. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwenk, C. R. (1988). The cognitive perspective on strategic decision making. Journal of Management Studies, 25(1), 41–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00021.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (1995). Organizations and institutions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbart, C. I. (1989). Managerial cognition: A missing link in strategic management research. Journal of Management Studies, 26(4), 326–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1989.tb00732.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, K. M., & Huber, G. P. (1988). Firm and industry as determinants of executive perceptions of the environment. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 793–807. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199808)19:8<793::AID-SMJ980>3.0.CO;2-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. B., Clark, S. M., & Gioia, D. A. (1993). Strategic sense making and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(2), 239–270. doi: 10.2307/256522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. (2000). Capabilities, cognition and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1147–1161. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1147::AID-SMJ128>3.0.CO;2-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, P. (2006). Port management reform in Europe: Is there a role for the EU. Ports are more than piers–Liber Amicorum presented to Prof. Dr. Willy Winkelmans (pp. 35–55). Antwerpen: De Lloyd.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, P. (2010). A review of port authority functions: Towards a renaissance? Maritime Policy & Management, 37(3), 247–270. doi: 10.1080/03088831003700645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira, G. B. B., Kliemann Neto, F. J., & Amaral, F. G. (2014). Governance, governance models and port performance: A systematic review. Transport Reviews, 34(5), 645–662. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2014.946458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, J. P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6(3), 280–321. doi: 10.1287/orsc.6.3.280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. J., Ng, A. K., & Olivier, D. (2004). Port governance in China: A review of policies in an era of internationalizing port management practices. Transport Policy, 11(3), 237–250. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.11.003
   Google Scholar
• de Wit, B., & Meyer, R. (2004). Strategy – process, content, context: An international perspective. Hampshire: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Woo, S.-H., Pettit, S. J., Kwak, D.-W., & Beresford, A. (2011). Seaport research: A structured literature review on methodological issues since the 1980s. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45, 665–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2007). Port reform toolkit (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar