Travel time savings, accessibility gains and equity effects in cost–benefit analysis

References

• Adler, M. D., & Posner, E. A. (1999). Rethinking cost–benefit analysis. The Yale Law Journal, 109(2), 165–247. doi: 10.2307/797489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeten, G. (2000). The tragedy of the highway: Empowerment, disempowerment and the politics of sustainability discourses and practices. European Planning Studies, 8(1), 69–86. doi: 10.1080/096543100110938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2011). The trilogy of distance, speed and time. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 950–959. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatley, T. (1988). Equity and distributional issues in infrastructure planning: A theoretical perspective. In J. M. Stein (Ed.), Public infrastructure planning and management (pp. 208–226). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beckmann, J. Ğ. (2001). Automobility – a social problem and theoretical concept. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19, 593–607. doi: 10.1068/d222t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M., & Lerman, S. R. (1979). Disaggregate travel and mobility choice models and measures of accessibility. In D. A. Hensher, & P. R. Stopher (Eds.), Behavioural travel modelling (pp. 654–679). London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Berechman, J. (2009). The evaluation of transportation investment projects. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L., le Clercq, F., & Kapoen, L. (2005). Sustainable accessibility: A conceptual framework to integrate transport and land use plan-making. Two test-applications in the Netherlands and a reflection on the way forward. Transport Policy, 12(3), 207–220. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyazit, E. (2011). Evaluating social justice in transport: Lessons to be learned from the capability approach. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 31(1), 117–134. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2010.504900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, K., & Walker, G. (2005). Shared visions, unholy alliances: Power, governance and deliberative processes in local transport planning. Urban Studies, 42(12), 2123–2144. doi: 10.1080/00420980500332098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackorby, C., & Donaldson, D. (1990). A review article: The case against the use of the sum of compensating variations in cost–benefit analysis. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 23(3), 471–494. doi: 10.2307/135643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boardman, A. E., Greenberg, D. H., Vining, A. R., et al. (2001). Cost–benefit analysis: Concepts and practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Brent, R. J. (1984). Use of distributional weights in cost–benefit analysis: A survey of schools. Public Finance Review, 12(2), 213–230. doi: 10.1177/109114218401200206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, D., & Ryan, L. (2011). Comparative analysis of evaluation techniques for transport policies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31(3), 226–233. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruun, E. C. (2013). Better public transit systems: Analyzing investments and performance. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau, B., & Glachant, M. (2011). Distributional effects of public transport policies in the Paris region. Transport Policy, 18(5), 745–754. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, L. D. (1979). Transportation: Temporal and spatial components of accessibility. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cascetta, E., Cartenì, A., & Montanino, M. (2016). A behavioral model of accessibility based on the number of available opportunities. Journal of Transport Geography, 51, 45–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. (1996). Paradigm shift: From automobility to accessibility planning. Urban Futures, 22, 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. (2002). Induced travel demand: Research design, empirical evidence, and normative policies. Journal of Planning Literature, 17(1), 3–20. doi: 10.1177/088122017001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crozet, Y., & Marlot, G. (2001). Péage urbain et ville “soutenable”: Figures de la tarification et avatars de la raison économique. Les Cahiers Scientifiques du Transport, 40, 79–113.
   Google Scholar
• Curl, A., Nelson, J. D., & Anable, J. (2011). Does accessibility planning address what matters? A review of current practice and practitioner perspectives. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 2, 3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2011.07.001
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, G., Daly, A., & Pieters, M. (2005). The logsum as an evaluation measure – review of the literature and new results. Amsterdam: European Regional Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Di Ciommo, F., & Lucas, K. (2014). Evaluating the equity effects of road-pricing in the European urban context – the Madrid Metropolitan Area. Applied Geography, 54, 74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, X., Ben-Akiva, M. E., Bowman, J. L., & Walker, J. L. (2006). Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(2), 163–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., & Turner, M. A. (2011). The fundamental law of road congestion: Evidence from US cities. The American Economic Review, 101(6), 2616–2652. doi: 10.1257/aer.101.6.2616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, J. (2007). The new narrative of accessibility: Its potential contribution to discourses in (transport) geography. Journal of Transport Geography, 15, 319–330. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, J., & Farrington, C. (2005). Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: Towards conceptualisation. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A., & Batey, P. (2009). Moving from “transport planning” to “accessibility planning”: Advocating the need for a major policy shift, Paper presented at the 23rd Congress of the Association of European Schools of Planning. Liverpool, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Flügel, S. (2014). Accounting for user type and mode effects on the value of travel time savings in project appraisal: Opportunities and challenges. Research in Transportation Economics, 47, 50–60. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2014.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M. K. S., & Buhl, S. L. (2006). Inaccuracy in traffic forecasts. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 26(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1080/01441640500124779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fol, S., & Gallez, C. (2014). Social inequalities in urban access: Better ways of assessing transport improvements. In E. D. Sclar, M. Lönnroth, & C. Wolmar (Eds.), Urban access for the 21st century: Finance and governance models for transport infrastructure (pp. 46–86). London: Earthscan/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Galvez, T., & Jara-Diaz, S. R. (1998). On the social valuation of travel time savings. International Journal of Transport Economics, 25, 205–219.
   Google Scholar
• Geurs, K., Zondag, B., De Jong, G., & de Bok, M. (2010). Accessibility appraisal of land-use/transport policy strategies: More than just adding up travel-time savings. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15(7), 382–393. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2010.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurs, K. T., Boon, W., & Van Wee, B. (2009). Social impacts of transport: Literature review and the state of the practice of transport appraisal in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Transport Reviews, 29(1), 69–90. doi: 10.1080/01441640802130490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn, H. F. (2000). An introduction to the valuation of travel-time savings and losses. In D. A. Hensher, & K. J. Button (Eds.), Handbook of transport modelling (pp. 433–448). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S. L., & Niemeier, D. A. (1997). Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 29(7), 1175–1194. doi: 10.1068/a291175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25, 73–76. doi: 10.1080/01944365908978307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harberger, A. C. (1978). On the use of distributional weights in social cost–benefit analysis. The Journal of Political Economy, 86(2, Part 2), S87–S120. doi: 10.1086/260696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hau, T. D. (1986). Distributional cost–benefit analysis in discrete choice. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 20(3), 313–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A. (2001). The sensitivity of the valuation of travel time savings to the specification of unobserved effects. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 37(2–3), 129–142. doi: 10.1016/S1366-5545(00)00015-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M. (1973). Planning for multiple objectives: An approach to the evaluation of transportation plans. Philadelphia, PA: Regional Science Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hills, P. J. (1996). What is induced traffic? Transportation, 23, 5–16. doi: 10.1007/BF00166216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupkes, G. (1982). The law of constant travel time and trip-rates. Futures, 14(1), 38–46. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(82)90070-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illich, I. (1974). Energy and equity. London: Marion Boyars.
   Google Scholar
• Jara-Díaz, S. (2007). Transport economic theory. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Jara-Diaz, S. R. (2000). Allocation and valuation of travel time savings. In D. A. Hensher, & K. J. Button (Eds.), Handbook of transport modelling (pp. 303–319). Oxford, Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson-Stenman, O. (2005). Distributional weights in cost–benefit analysis - should we forget about them? Land Economics, 81(3), 337–352. doi: 10.3368/le.81.3.337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, D., Karlström, A., Oshyani, M. F., & Olsson, P. (2014). Reconciling user benefit and time-geography-based individual accessibility measures. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41(6), 1031–1043. doi: 10.1068/b130069p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawabata, M. (2009). Spatiotemporal dimensions of modal accessibility disparity in Boston and San Francisco. Environment and Planning A, 41(1), 183–198. doi: 10.1068/a4068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelman, S. (2002). Cost–benefit analysis: An ethical critique. In T. Donaldson, P. H. Werhane, & M. Cording (Eds.), Ethical issues in business: A philosophical approach (pp. 559–564). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, J. G. (1980). Indicators of urban accessibility: Theory and application. Transportation, 9(2), 145–172. doi: 10.1007/BF00167128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koglin, T., & Rye, T. (2014). The marginalisation of bicycling in modernist urban transport planning. Journal of Transport and Health, 1(4), 214–222. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2014.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, J. (2013). Urban transportation and social equity: Transportation-planning paradigms that impede policy reform. In N. Carmon, & S. S. Fainstein (Eds.), Policy, planning, and people: Promoting justice in urban development (pp. 141–160). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, J., & Garb, Y. (2002). Congestion pricing's conditional promise: Promotion of accessibility or mobility? Transport Policy, 9(3), 179–188.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, D. M., & Krizek, K. J. (2008). Planning for place and plexus: Metropolitan land use and transport. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, D. M., & Kumar, A. (1994). The rational locator: Why travel times have remained stable. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(3), 319–332. doi: 10.1080/01944369408975590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, J. B. (2011). Incorporating distributional issues into benefit cost analysis: Why, how, and two empirical examples using non-market valuation. Journal of Benefit–Cost Analysis, 2(1), 1–24. doi: 10.2202/2152-2812.1044
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, K., Bates, J., Moore, J., & Carrasco, J. A. (2016). Modelling the relationship between travel behaviours and social disadvantage. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 85, 157–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, G., & Urry, J. (2005). Travel time use in the information age. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2/3), 257–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, P. J., Fowkes, A. S., Wardman, M., et al. (2003). Value of travel time savings in the UK: Summary Report. Leeds: Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds/John Bates Services.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, P. J., Jara-Diaz, S., & Fowkes, A. S. (2001). The value of travel time savings in evaluation. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 37(2–3), 91–106. doi: 10.1016/S1366-5545(00)00013-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, K. (2006). Basing transport planning on principles of social justice. Berkeley Planning Journal, 19, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, K. (2011). Substance precedes methodology: On cost–benefit analysis and equity. Transportation, 38(6), 959–974. doi: 10.1007/s11116-011-9372-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, K. (2017a). Transport justice: Designing fair transportation systems. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, K. (2017b). Why accessibility measurement is not merely an option, but an absolute necessity. In C. Silva, L. Bertolini, & N. Pinto (Eds.), Designing accessibility instruments: Lessons on their usability for integrated land use and transport planning practices. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, K., Di Ciommo, F., & Papanikolaou, A. (2014). Incorporating equity into transport planning: Utility, priority and sufficiency approaches. PANAM Conference, Santander, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Masser, I., Sviden, O., & Wegener, M. (1992). From growth to equity and sustainability: Paradigm shift in transport planning. Futures, 24(6), 539–558. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(92)90116-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mees, P. (2010). Transport for suburbia: Beyond the automobile age. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, D. (2008). The myth of travel time saving. Transport Reviews, 28(3), 321–336. doi: 10.1080/01441640701642348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miciukiewicz, K., & Vigar, G. (2013). Encounters in motion: Considerations of time and social justice in urban mobility research. In D. Henckel, S. Thomaier, B. Könecke, R. Zedda, & S. Stabilini (Eds.), Space–time design of the public city (pp. 171–185). Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H. J. (1999). Measuring space–time accessibility benefits within transportation networks: Basic theory and computational procedures. Geographical Analysis, 31, 187–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1999.tb00976.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishan, E. J. (1976). Elements of cost–benefit analysis. London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtarian, P. L., & Chen, C. (2004). TTB or not TTB, that is the question: A review and analysis of the empirical literature on travel time (and money) budgets. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 38(9–10), 643–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morisugi, H., & Hayashi, Y. (2000). Editorial. Transport Policy, 7(1), 1–2. doi: 10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00018-4
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. M., Dumble, P. L., & Wigan, M. R. (1979). Accessibility indicators for transport planning. Transportation Research Part A: General, 13(2), 91–109. doi: 10.1016/0191-2607(79)90012-8
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, M. J. (1979). Accessibility: The rural challenge. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Nahmias–Biran, B.-h., & Shiftan, Y. (2016). Towards a more equitable distribution of resources: Using activity-based models and subjective well-being measures in transport project evaluation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 672–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuburger, H. (1971). User benefits in the evaluation of transport and land use plans. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 5(1), 52–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neutens, T., Schwanen, T., Witlox, F., & De Maeyer, P. (2010). Equity of urban service delivery: A comparison of different accessibility measures. Environment and Planning A, 42, 1613–1635. doi: 10.1068/a4230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeier, D. A. (1997). Accessibility: An evaluation using consumer welfare. Transportation, 24(4), 377–396. doi: 10.1023/A:1004914803019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noland, R. B., & Lem, L. L. (2002). A review of the evidence for induced travel and changes in transportation and environmental policy in the US and the UK. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 7(1), 1–26. doi: 10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00009-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Páez, A., Scott, D. M., & Morency, C. (2012). Measuring accessibility: Positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 141–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recker, W. W., Chen, C., & McNally, M. G. (2001). Measuring the impact of efficient household travel decisions on potential travel time savings and accessibility gains. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35(4), 339–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietveld, P., Rouwendaal, J., & Van Der Vlist, A. (2007). Equity issues in the evaluation of transport policies and transport infrastructure projects. In M. van Geenhuizen, A. Reggiani, & P. Rietveld (Eds.), Policy analysis of transport networks (pp. 19–36). Ashgate/Burlington: Aldershot.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (2006). Freedom as mobility: Implications of the distinction between actual and potential travelling. Mobilities, 1(3), 465–488. doi: 10.1080/17450100600902420
   Google Scholar
• Schade, W., Mackie, P. J., Nellthorp, J., et al. (2004). Methodological Advances in Project Assessment within a European Context, Report within the framework of the FP5 IASON project (Integrated Appraisal of Spatial economic and Network effects of transport investments and policies).
   Google Scholar
• Sclar, E. D. (2014). Towards a political-economics of finance for urban access. In E. D. Sclar, M. Lönnroth, & C. Wolmar (Eds.), Urban access for the 21st century: Finance and governance models for transport infrastructure (pp. 11–45). London: Earthscan/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sclar, E. D., Lönnroth, M., & Wolmar, C., Eds. (2014). Urban access for the 21st century: Finance and governance models for transport infrastructure. London: Earthscan/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Serulle, N. U., & Cirillo, C. (2016). Transportation needs of low income population: A policy analysis for the Washington D.C. Metropolitan region. Public Transport, 8(1), 103–123. doi: 10.1007/s12469-015-0119-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomopoulos, N., & Grant-Muller, S. (2013). Incorporating equity as part of the wider impacts in transport infrastructure assessment: An application of the SUMINI approach. Transportation, 40(2), 315–345. doi: 10.1007/s11116-012-9418-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomopoulos, N., Grant-Muller, S., & Tight, M. R. (2009). Incorporating equity considerations in transport infrastructure evaluation: Current practice and a proposed methodology. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(4), 351–359. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wee, B. (2011). Transport and ethics: Ethics and the evaluation of transport policies and projects. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wee, B. (2016). Accessible accessibility research challenges. Journal of Transport Geography, 51, 9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wee, B., & Roeser, S. (2013). Ethical theories and the cost-benefit analysis-based Ex ante evaluation of transport policies and plans. Transport Reviews, 33(6), 743–760. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2013.854281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcellos, E. A. (2001). Urban transport, environment and equity: The case for developing countries. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Vigar, G. (1999). Transport for people: Accessibility, mobility and equity in transport planning. In C. H. Greed (Ed.), Social town planning (pp. 90–101). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wachs, M., & Kumagai, T. G. (1973). Physical accessibility as a social indicator. Socio-Economic Planning Science, 6, 357–379.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Monzon, A., & Di Ciommo, F. (2015). Assessing the accessibility impact of transport policy by a land-use and transport interaction model – the case of Madrid. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardman, M., & Waters II, W. G. (2001). Advances in the valuation of travel time savings. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 37(2/3), 85–90. doi: 10.1016/S1366-5545(01)00002-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weibull, J. W. (1976). An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 6, 357–379. doi: 10.1016/0166-0462(76)90031-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenglenski, S., & Orfeuil, J.-P. (2004). Differences in accessibility to the job market according to social status and place of residence in the Paris area. Built Environment, 30(2), 116–126. doi: 10.2148/benv.30.2.116.54309
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, Y. (1974). Travel time budgets and mobility in urban areas. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Zelinsky, W. (1971). The hypothesis of the mobility transition. Geographical Review, 61, 219–249. doi: 10.2307/213996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., & Man, J. (2015). Examining job accessibility of the urban poor by urban metro and bus: A case study of Beijing. Urban Rail Transit, 1, 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s40864-015-0004-y
   Google Scholar