516
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Book Review

Public private partnerships in transport: trends and theory

ORCID Icon

References

  • De Schepper, S., Dooms, M., & Haezendonck, E. (2014). Stakeholder dynamics and responsibilities in public-private partnerships: A mixed experience. International Journal of Project Management, 32(7), 1210–1222. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.01.006
  • European PPP Expertise Centre. (2016). Market update: Review of the European PPP market in 2015. Luxembourg: European Investment Bank.
  • Hodge, G. A., Greve, C., & Boardman, A. E. (Eds.). (2010). International handbook on public-private partnerships. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Hueskes, M., Koppenjan, J. F. M., & Verweij, S. (2016). Publiek-private samenwerking in Nederland en Vlaanderen: Een review van veertien proefschriften. Bestuurskunde, 25(2), 90–104. doi: 10.5553/Bk/092733872016025002009
  • Jeffares, S., Sullivan, H., & Bovaird, T. (2013). Beyond the contract: The challenge of evaluating the performance(s) of public-private partnerships. In C. Greve & G. A. Hodge (Eds.), Rethinking public-private partnerships: Strategies for turbulent times (pp. 166–187). New York: Routledge.
  • Jordan, E., Gross, M. E., Javernick-Will, A. N., & Garvin, M. J. (2011). Use and misuse of qualitative comparative analysis. Construction Management and Economics, 29(11), 1159–1173. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2011.640339
  • Roumboutsos, A. (2015). Public private partnerships in transport infrastructure: An international review. Transport Reviews, 35(2), 111–117. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2015.1017025
  • Verweij, S. (2015). Achieving satisfaction when implementing PPP transportation infrastructure projects: A qualitative comparative analysis of the A15 highway DBFM project. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 189–200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.05.004
  • Verweij, S., & Gerrits, L. M. (2013). Understanding and researching complexity with qualitative comparative analysis: Evaluating transportation infrastructure projects. Evaluation, 19(1), 40–55. doi: 10.1177/1356389012470682

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.