Railway station choice modelling: a review of methods and evidence

References

• Adcock, S. J. (1997). A passenger station choice model for the British Rail network. Paper presented at European Transport Conference, Uxbridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Amadeus. (2013). The rail journey to 2020: Facts, figures and trends that will define the future of European passenger rail traffic. Retrieved from http://info.amadeusrail.net/rail-journey-2020-download
   Google Scholar
• Association of Train Operating Companies. (2013). Passenger demand forecasting handbook v5.1. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins Limited. (2011). PLANET long distance framework: Approach to station choice modelling – a report for HS2. Retrieved from http://assets.hs2.org.uk/sites/default/files/inserts/PLANET%20Long%20Distance%20Framework_Approach%20to%20Station%20Choice%20Modelling.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Basar, G., & Bhat, C. (2004). A parameterized consideration set model for airport choice: An application to the San Francisco Bay area. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 38(10), 889–904. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2004.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blainey, S. (2010). Trip end models of local rail demand in England and Wales. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), 153–165. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blainey, S., & Evens, S. (2011). Local station catchments: Reconciling theory with reality. Paper presented at AET European Transport Conference, Glasgow, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Castro, M., Martinez, F., & Munizaga, M. (2009). Calibration of a logit discrete choice model with elimination of alternatives. Paper presented at the International Choice Modelling Conference, Harrogate, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., Round, A., Goldman, T., & Wu, K.-L. (1995). Rail access modes and catchment areas for the BART system (Working Paper No. 307). The University of California Transportation Center. Retrieved from http://www.uctc.net/research/papers/307.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chakour, V., & Eluru, N. (2014). Analyzing commuter train user behavior: A decision framework for access mode and station choice. Transportation, 41(1), 211–228. doi: 10.1007/s11116-013-9509-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., Xia, J. C., Smith, B., & Han, R. (2014). Development of a conceptual framework for modeling train station choice under uncertainty for park-and-ride users. Paper presented at Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., Xia, J. C., Smith, B., Olaru, D., Taplin, J., & Han, R. (2015). Influence of parking on train station choice under uncertainty for park-and-ride users. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 5126–5133. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.537
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, B., & Yang, L. (1999). Modeling of commuter rail station choice and access mode combinations. Paper presented at Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Debrezion, G., Pels, E., & Rietveld, P. (2007a). Choice of departure station by railway users. European Transport, 37, 78–92.
   Google Scholar
• Debrezion, G., Pels, E., & Rietveld, P. (2007b). Modelling the joint access mode and railway station choice (Discussion Paper No. TI 2007-012/3). Tinbergen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Debrezion, G., Pels, E., & Rietveld, P. (2009). Modelling the joint access mode and railway station choice. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 45(1), 270–283. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2008.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desfor, G. (1975). Binary station choice models for a rail rapid transit line. Transportation Research, 9(1), 31–41. doi: 10.1016/0041-1647(75)90018-0
   Google Scholar
• Fan, K.-S., Miller, E. J., & Badoe, D. (1993). Modeling rail access mode and station choice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1413, 49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2005). Modelling park-and-ride in the PRISM Model for the West Midlands region. Paper presented at AET European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, France.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., Daly, A., Patruni, B., & Milthorpe, F. (2011). Extending the Sydney Strategic Model to represent toll road and park-and-ride choices. Paper presented at AET European Transport Conference 2011, Glasgow, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Givoni, M., & Rietveld, P. (2007). The access journey to the railway station and its role in passengers’ satisfaction with rail travel. Transport Policy, 14(5), 357–365. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givoni, M., & Rietveld, P. (2014). Do cities deserve more railway stations? The choice of a departure railway station in a multiple-station region. Journal of Transport Geography, 36, 89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harata, N., & Ohta, K. (1986). Research for tomorrows transport requirements: Proceedings of the World Conference on Transport Research (Vol. 2, pp. 1729–1740). Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005). Applied choice analysis: A primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2015). Applied choice analysis: A primer (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C. Q., & Hensher, D. A. (2016). A workplace choice model accounting for spatial competition and agglomeration effects. Journal of Transport Geography, 51, 193–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47, 263–291. doi: 10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastrenakes, C. R. (1988). Development of a rail station choice model for NJ Transit. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1162, 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Koppelman, F. S., & Bhat, C. (2006). A self-instructing course in mode choice modeling: Multinomial and nested logit models (Prepared for: US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration).
   Google Scholar
• Liou, P. S., & Talvitie, A. P. (1974). Disaggregate access mode and station choice models for rail trips. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 526, 42–65.
   Google Scholar
• Lythgoe, W., & Wardman, M. (2002). Estimating passenger demand for parkway stations. Paper presented at AET European Transport Conference, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Lythgoe, W., & Wardman, M. (2004). Modelling passenger demand for parkway rail stations. Transportation, 31(2), 125–151. doi: 10.1023/B:PORT.0000016468.14434.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lythgoe, W., Wardman, M., & Toner, J. (2004). Enhancing rail passenger demand models to examine station choice and access to the rail network. Paper presented at AET European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, France.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoud, M. S., Eng, P., & Shalaby, A. (2014). Park-and-ride access station choice model for cross-regional commuter trips in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA). Paper presented at Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• MVA Consultancy. (2011). Making better decisions. Assessment of aspirations for track access on the West Coast Main Line (Report for The Office of Rail Regulation). Retrieved from http://orr.gov.uk/data/assets/pdf_file/0010/3007/mva-wcml-assessment-feb11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Openshaw, S. (1984). The modifiable areal unit problem. Norwich: Geo Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ortúzar, J. de. D. (1980). Multimodal choice modelling – some relevant issues (Working Paper No. 138). Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds. Retrieved from http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2395/
   Google Scholar
• Ortúzar, J. de. D., & Willumsen, L. G. (2011). Modelling transport. Oxford: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrini, P. A., & Fotheringham, A. S. (2002). Modelling spatial choice: A review and synthesis in a migration context. Progress in Human Geography, 26(4), 487–510. doi: 10.1191/0309132502ph382ra
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, J. (1991). Passenger demand forecasting for new rail services – manual of advice (Working Paper No. 352). Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds. Retrieved from http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2215/1/ITS255_WP352_uploadable.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Preston, J., & Aldridge, D. (1991). Greater Manchester PTE new railway station demand prediction model. Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• Sener, I. N., Pendyala, R. M., & Bhat, C. R. (2011). Accommodating spatial correlation across choice alternatives in discrete choice models: An application to modeling residential location choice behavior. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(2), 294–303. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2011). New rail station demand forecasting methodologies – a South Wales case study. Paper presented at AET European Transport Conference, Glasgow, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Steer Davies Gleave. (2010). Station usage and demand forecasts for newly opened railway lines and stations (Final Report prepared for Department for Transport). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/new-stations-study
   Google Scholar
• Steyerberg, E. W., Harrell, F. E., Borsboom, G. J., Eijkemans, M., Vergouwe, Y., & Habbema, J. D. F. (2001). Internal validation of predictive models: Efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54(8), 774–781. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00341-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train, K. E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waddell, P., Bhat, C., Eluru, N., Wang, L., & Pendyala, R. M. (2007). Modeling interdependence in household residence and workplace choices. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2003(1), 84–92. doi: 10.3141/2003-11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardman, M., & Whelan, G. (1999). Using geographical information systems to improve rail demand models (Final Report to Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council).
   Google Scholar