A review of input–output models on multisectoral modelling of transportation–economic linkages

References

• Alises, A., & Vassallo, J. M. (2015). Comparison of road freight transport trends in Europe. Coupling and decoupling factors from an input–output structural decomposition analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 82, 141–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, G. J. (2015). The regional economic impacts of biofuels: A review of multisectoral modelling techniques and evaluation of applications. Regional Studies, 49(4), 615–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, C., Kennedy, C., & Roorda, M. J. (2014). Applications of random-utility-based multi-region input–output models of transport and the spatial economy. Transport Reviews, 34(4), 418–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, C., Roorda, M. J., & Kennedy, C. (2016). Global trade creation, trade diversion, and economic impacts from changing global transport costs. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2598, 46–57. doi: 10.3141/2598-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatta, S. D., & Drennan, M. P. (2003). The economic benefits of public investment in transportation: A review of recent literature. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(3), 288–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y.-T., Shin, S.-H., & Lee, P. T.-W. (2014). Economic impact of port sectors on South African economy: An input–output analysis. Transport Policy, 35, 333–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, J., Gordon, P., II, J. E. M., Pan, Q., Park, J., & Richardson, H. W. (2015). TransNIEMO: Economic impact analysis using a model of consistent inter-regional economic and network equilibria. Transportation Planning and Technology, 38(5), 483–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defourny, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). Structural path analysis and multiplier decomposition within a social accounting matrix framework. The Economic Journal, 94(373), 111–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietzenbacher, E. (1997). In vindication of the ghosh model: A reinterpretation as a price model. Journal of Regional Science, 37(4), 629–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doll, C., & Schaffer, A. (2007). Economic impact of the introduction of the German HGV toll system. Transport Policy, 14(1), 49–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, X., & Kockelman, K. (2012). Tracking transportation and industrial production across a nation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2269, 99–109. doi: 10.3141/2269-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Hodiri, M. A., & Nourzad, F. (1988). A note on leontief technology and input substitution. Journal of Regional Science, 28(1), 119–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq, U., Hardy, J. L., Gao, L., & Siddiqui, M. A. (2008). Economic impact/forecast model of intelligent transportation systems in michigan: An input output analysis. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12(2), 86–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, A. (1958). Input–output approach to an allocative system. Economica, 25, 58–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, J., & Planting, M. A. (2000). Using input-output analysis to measure the U.S. economic structural change over a 24 year period (BEA Paper No. 4). Bureau of Economic Analysis. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bea/papers/0004.html
   Google Scholar
• Guzman, A., & Vassallo, J. (2013). Methodology for assessing regional economic impacts of charges for heavy-goods vehicles in Spain: An integrated approach through random utility-based multiregional input-output and road transport network models. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2378, 129–139. doi: 10.3141/2378-14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman, A. F., Vassallo, J. M., & Hortelano, A. O. (2016). A methodology for assessing the regional economy and transportation impact of introducing longer and heavier vehicles: Application to the road network of Spain. Networks and Spatial Economics, 16(3), 957–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham, H., Kim, T. J., & Boyce, D. (2005). Assessment of economic impacts from unexpected events with an interregional commodity flow and multimodal transportation network model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(10), 849–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, G. (2001). Rural inland waterways economic impact kit: A synopsis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1747, 114–119.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, W., Corbett, J. J., & Jin, D. (2015). Regional economic and environmental analysis as a decision support for marine spatial planning in Xiamen. Marine Policy, 51, 555–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono, M., & Levinson, D. M. (2015). Methods for estimating the economic impacts of transportation improvements: An interpretive review. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/180056.
   Google Scholar
• Isard, W. (1951). Interregional and regional input-output analysis: A model of a space-economy. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 33(4), 318–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T. J., Ham, H., & Boyce, D. E. (2002). Economic impacts of transportation network changes: Implementation of a combined transportation network and input-output model. Papers in Regional Science, 81(2), 223–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kockelman, K. M., Jin, L., Zhao, Y., & Ruíz-Juri, N. (2005). Tracking land use, transport, and industrial production using random-utility-based multiregional input–output models: Applications for Texas trade. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(3), 275–286.
   Google Scholar
• Lakshmanan, T. (2011). The broader economic consequences of transport infrastructure investments. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M.-K., & Yoo, S.-H. (2016). The role of transportation sectors in the Korean national economy: An input-output analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 93, 13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leontief, W. W. (1936). Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 18(3), 105–125.
   Google Scholar
• Lofgren, H., & Robinson, S. (2002). Spatial-network, general-equilibrium model with a stylized application. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 32(5), 651–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loveridge, S. (2004). A typology and assessment of multi-sector regional economic impact models. Regional Studies, 38(3), 305–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maoh, H., Kanaroglou, P., & Woudsma, C. (2008). Simulation model for assessing the impact of climate change on transportation and the economy in Canada. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2067, 84–92. doi: 10.3141/2067-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009). Input-output analysis: Foundations and extensions. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrissey, K., & O’Donoghue, C. (2013). The potential for an Irish maritime transportation cluster: An input–output analysis. Ocean & Coastal Management, 71, 305–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moses, L. N. (1955). The stability of interregional trading patterns and input-output analysis. The American Economic Review, 45(5), 803–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okuyama, Y., & Santos, J. R. (2014). Disaster impact and input–output analysis. Economic Systems Research, 26(1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterhaven, J. (1988). On the plausibility of the supply-driven input-output model. Journal of Regional Science, 28(2), 203–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterhaven, J. (1989). The supply-driven input-output model: A new interpretation but still implausible. Journal of Regional Science, 29(3), 459–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J., Cho, J., Gordon, P., MooreIIJ. E., Richardson, H. W., & Yoon, S. (2011). Adding a freight network to a national interstate input–output model: A TransNIEMO application for California. Special Section on Alternative Travel Futures, 19(6), 1410–1422.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., Kwon, C., & Son, M. (2014). Economic implications of the Canada–U.S. Border bridges: Applying a binational local economic model for international freight movements. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 11(0), Retrieved from https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1320345
   Google Scholar
• Partridge, M. D., & Rickman, D. S. (1998). Regional computable general equilibrium modeling: A survey and critical appraisal. International Regional Science Review, 21(3), 205–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge, M. D., & Rickman, D. S. (2010). Computable general equilibrium (CGE) modelling for regional economic development analysis. Regional Studies, 44(10), 1311–1328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyatt, G., & Round, J. I. (1979). Accounting and fixed price multipliers in a social accounting matrix framework. The Economic Journal, 89(356), 850–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyatt, G., & Round, J. I. (1985). Social accounting matrices: A basis for planning. Washington, D.C., United States: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, S. J. (2000). Integrated regional econometric+input-output modeling: Issues and opportunities. Papers in Regional Science, 79(3), 271–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz Juri, N., & Kockelman, K. M. (2006). Evaluation of the trans-texas corridor proposal: Application and enhancements of the random-utility-based multiregional input–output model. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 132(7), 531–539.
   Google Scholar
• Seetharaman, A., Kawamura, K., & Bhatta, S. (2003). Economic benefits of freight policy relating to trucking industry: Evaluation of regional transportation plan freight policy for a six-county region, Chicago, illinois. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1833, 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, R. (1964). Multiple classifications in social accounting. Cambridge, United Kingdom: University of Cambridge, Department of Applied Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Turner, K., & Barrett, J. (2007). Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities – part 2: Review of input–output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., & Kockelman, K. M. (2004). The random-utility-based multiregional input–output model: Solution existence and uniqueness. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 38(9), 789–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar