Designing computable general equilibrium models for transportation applications

References

• Adams, P. D., Horridge, J. M., & Parmenter, B. R. (2000). MMRF-GREEN: A dynamic, multi-sectoral, multi-regional model of Australia (Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Paper No. op-94). Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cop/wpaper/op-94.html
   Google Scholar
• Anas, A. (2015). Why are urban travel times so stable? Journal of Regional Science, 55(2), 230–261. doi: 10.1111/jors.12142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anas, A., & Hiramatsu, T. (2012). The effect of the price of gasoline on the urban economy: From route choice to general equilibrium. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(6), 855–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anas, A., & Kim, I. (1996). General equilibrium models of polycentric urban land use with endogenous congestion and job agglomeration. Journal of Urban Economics, 40(2), 232–256. doi: 10.1006/juec.1996.0031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anas, A., & Liu, Y. (2007). A regional economy, land use, and transportation model (relu-Tran©): Formulation, algorithm design, and testing*. Journal of Regional Science, 47(3), 415–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2007.00515.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anas, A., & Rhee, H.-J. (2006). Curbing excess sprawl with congestion tolls and urban boundaries. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(4), 510–541. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anas, A., & Xu, R. (1999). Congestion, land use, and job dispersion: A general equilibrium model. Journal of Urban Economics, 45(3), 451–473. doi: 10.1006/juec.1998.2104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ando, A., & Meng, B. (2009). The transport sector and regional price differentials: A spatial CGE model for Chinese provinces. Economic Systems Research, 21(2), 89–113. doi: 10.1080/09535310903009627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnott, R. J., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1977). The effects of urban transportation changes: A general equilibrium simulation. Journal of Public Economics, 8(1), 19–36. doi: 10.1016/0047-2727(77)90026-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avetisyan, M., Heatwole, N., Rose, A., & Roberts, B. (2015). Competitiveness and macroeconomic impacts of reduced wait times at U.S. Land freight border crossings. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 84–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydın, L. (2016). Potential economic and environmental implications of diesel subsidy: A computable general equilibrium analysis for Turkey. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 6(4), 771–781.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann, C. (2017). Modeling the impacts of free trade agreements on domestic transportation gateways, corridors, and ports. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2611, 1–10. doi: 10.3141/2611-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, C., Kennedy, C., & Roorda, M. J. (2014). Applications of random-utility-based multi-region input–output models of transport and the spatial economy. Transport Reviews, 34(4), 418–440. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2014.907369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, C. (2007). Household transport demand in a CGE-framework. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37(3), 573–597. doi: 10.1007/s10640-006-9050-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrittella, M. (2010). A macroeconomic analysis of the public investments in European combined transport. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 167–181. doi: 10.1007/s00181-009-0299-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröcker, J. (1995). Chamberlinian spatial computable general equilibrium modelling: A theoretical framework. Economic Systems Research, 7(2), 137–150. doi: 10.1080/09535319500000017
   Google Scholar
• Bröcker, J. (1998a). How would an EU-membership of the Visegrád- countries affect Europe’s economic geography? EU-membership of the Visegrád-countries. The Annals of Regional Science, 32(1), 91–114. doi: 10.1007/s001680050064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröcker, J. (1998b). Operational spatial computable general equilibrium modeling. The Annals of Regional Science, 32(3), 367–387. doi: 10.1007/s001680050079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröcker, J. (1998c). Spatial effects of transeuropean networks: Preliminary results from a spatial computable general equilibrium analysis. Dresden: Diskussionsbeiträge aus dem Institut für Wirtschaft und Verkehr.
   Google Scholar
• Bröcker, J. (1998d). Spatial effects of transport infrastructure: The role of market structure. Dresden: Diskussionsbeiträge aus dem Institut für Wirtschaft und Verkehr, Technische Universität Dresden.
   Google Scholar
• Bröcker, J. (2000). Assessing spatial economic effects on transport by CGE analysis: State of the art and possible extensions. In First international ITEM workshop (Vol. 19). Monteal: First International ITEM Workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Bröcker, J. (2002). Passenger flows in CGE models for transport-project evaluation. In Institute for Regional Research Christian-Albrechts-Universitaet Kiel, paper to be presented to the ERSA Congress. Dortmund: ERSA Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Bröcker, J. (2004). Computable general equilibrium analysis in transportation economics. Chapter, 16, 269–289.
   Google Scholar
• Bröcker, J., Kancs, A., Schürmann, C., Wegener, M., & Spiekermann, K. (2001). Methodology for the assessment of spatial economic impacts of transport projects and policies. IASON Deliverable, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Bröcker, J., & Korzhenevych, A. (2013). Forward looking dynamics in spatial CGE modelling. Economic Modelling, 31, 389–400. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.11.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröcker, J., Korzhenevych, A., & Schürmann, C. (2010). Assessing spatial equity and efficiency impacts of transport infrastructure projects. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 44(7), 795–811. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2009.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröcker, J., & Mercenier, J. (2011). General equilibrium models for transportation economics. A Handbook of Transport Economics, 21–45.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, P. H. (1992). A transportation-oriented interregional computable general equilibrium model of the United States. The Annals of Regional Science, 26(4), 331–348. doi: 10.1007/BF01581865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspersen, S., Eriksen, L., & Larsen, M. M. (2000). The BROBISSE model: A spatial general equilibrium model to evaluate the great belt link in Denmark. Odense: AKF Forlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., & Haynes, K. E. (2013). Transportation capital in the United States: A multimodal general equilibrium analysis. Public Works Management and Policy, 19(2), 97–117. doi: 10.1177/1087724X13507899
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., & Haynes, K. E. (2015). Multilevel assessment of public transportation infrastructure: A spatial econometric computable general equilibrium approach. The Annals of Regional Science, 54(3), 663–685. doi: 10.1007/s00168-015-0671-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., Rose, A. Z., Prager, F., & Chatterjee, S. (2017). Economic consequences of aviation system disruptions: A reduced-form computable general equilibrium analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 95, 207–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., Xue, J., Rose, A. Z., & Haynes, K. E. (2016). The impact of high-speed rail investment on economic and environmental change in China: A dynamic CGE analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 92, 232–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, C. W., & Douglas, P. H. (1928). A theory of production. The American Economic Review, 18(1), 139–165.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, K. (1997). Traffic, transportation, infrastructure and externalities A theoretical framework for a CGE analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, 31(4), 369–389. doi: 10.1007/s001680050054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, K., & Heng, S. (2002). Financing road infrastructure by savings in congestion costs: A CGE analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, 36(1), 107–122. doi: 10.1007/s001680100063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte Access Economics. (2014). Economic impact of state infrastructure strategy – rebuilding NSW. Sydney: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, P. B., & Rimmer, M. T. (2001). Dynamic general equilibrium modelling for forecasting and policy: A practical guide and documentation of MONASH. Bingley: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Doi, M., Itoh, H., Tiwari, P., & Doi, M. (2006). A computable general equilibrium analysis of efficiency improvements at Japanese ports. Computable General Equilibrium Approaches in Urban and Regional Policy Studies, 13, 115–137. doi: 10.1142/9789812707116_0007
   Google Scholar
• Duffy-Deno, K. T., & Eberts, R. W. (1991). Public infrastructure and regional economic development: A simultaneous equations approach. Journal of Urban Economics, 30(3), 329–343. doi: 10.1016/0094-1190(91)90053-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economics Frontier. (2008). Modeling climate change impacts using CGE models: A literature review. A Report Prepared for the Garnaut Climate Change Review.
   Google Scholar
• Elshahawany, D. N., Haddad, E. A., & Lahr, M. L. (2016). The economic analysis of transportation projects in Egypt: Application of an interregional CGE model on the proposed development corridor. Pittsburgh: American Economic Association.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, K. J. (2009). The normalized quadratic expenditure function. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Gallen, T., & Winston, C. (2016). The effect of transportation on the performance of the US economy: A general equilibrium approach. West Lafayette: Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• GTAP Models: Current GTAP Model. (2017). Global Trade Analysis Program (GTAP), Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad, E. A., & Hewings, G. J. (2001). Transportation costs and regional development: An interregional CGE analysis. Policies of Regional Competition, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlag, 83–101.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad, E. A., Hewings, G. J. D., Perobelli, F. S., & dos Santos, R. A. C. (2010). Regional effects of port infrastructure: A spatial CGE application to Brazil. International Regional Science Review, 33(3), 239–263. doi: 10.1177/0160017610368690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad, E. A., Hewings, G. J. D., Porsse, A. A., Van Leeuwen, E. S., & Vieira, R. S. (2015). The underground economy: Tracking the higher-order economic impacts of the São Paulo subway system. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 73, 18–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadj-Salem, H., El-Mehdi, A., Jayet, H., David, Q., Hammadou, H., & Kilani, M. (2016). Using a CGE model for analyzing the macroeconomic impact of the grand Paris express project on the Ile-de-France region. Northampton, MA: EcoMod.
   Google Scholar
• Hanoch, G. (1971). CRESH production functions. Econometrica, 39(5), 695–712. doi: 10.2307/1909573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, W. (2010). Developing a new spatial computable general equilibrium model for Norway. European transport conference, Glasgow, Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2), 73–76. doi: 10.1080/01944365908978307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., Truong, T. P., Mulley, C., & Ellison, R. (2012). Assessing the wider economy impacts of transport infrastructure investment with an illustrative application to the north-west rail link project in Sydney, Australia. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 292–305. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgs, P. J., Parmenter, B. R., & Rimmer, R. J. (1988). A hybrid top-down, bottom-up regional computable general equilibrium model. International Regional Science Review, 11(3), 317–328. doi: 10.1177/016001768801100308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horridge, M. (1994). A computable general equilibrium model of urban transport demands. Journal of Policy Modeling, 16(4), 427–457. doi: 10.1016/0161-8938(94)90037-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosny, A. S. (2013). Survey of recent literature on CGE trade models: With special reference to the case of Egypt. Journal of World Economic Research, 2(1), 9–19. doi: 10.11648/j.jwer.20130201.12
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, M., Levinson, D., & El-Geneidy, A. (2008). Models of transportation and land use change: A guide to the territory. CPL Bibliography, 22(4), 323–340.
   Google Scholar
• Imdad, H., & Westin, L. (1998). Network benefits from transport investments under increasing returns to scale. A SCGE analysis. Vti Saertryck, 432(299).
   Google Scholar
• Ishiguro, K., & Inamura, H. (2005). Identification and elimination of barriers in the operations and management of maritime transportation. Research in Transportation Economics, 13, 337–368. doi: 10.1016/S0739-8859(05)13015-7
   Google Scholar
• Itakura, K., & Lee, H. (2015). The implications of the trans-pacific partnership for Japan: Agricultural policy reforms and productivity gains. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, Y., Echenique, M., & Hargreaves, A. (2013). A recursive spatial equilibrium model for planning large-scale urban change. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 40(6), 1027–1050. doi: 10.1068/b39134
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, L. (1960). A multi-sectoral study of economic growth (Vol. 82). London: Wiley on behalf of The London School of Economics and Political Science and The Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, B. G., & Hansen, W. (2016). Predicting market allocations, user benefits and wider economic impacts of large infrastructure investments for freight transportation. Transportation Research Procedia, 16, 146–157. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.11.015
   Google Scholar
• Johnsson, R. (2005). Road wear and the kilometre charge: A computable general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP), 39(1), 53–74.
   Google Scholar
• Kalinowska, D., & Steininger, K. W. (2009a). Car road charging: Impact assessment on German and Austrian households (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1492704). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Kalinowska, D., & Steininger, K. W. (2009b). Distributional impacts of car road pricing: Settlement structures determine divergence across countries. Ecological Economics, 68(12), 2890–2896. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karplus, V. J., Paltsev, S., Babiker, M., & Reilly, J. M. (2013). Applying engineering and fleet detail to represent passenger vehicle transport in a computable general equilibrium model. Economic Modelling, 30, 295–305. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato, H., Fujiwara, H., & Ieda, H. (n.d.). Inter-regional freight transport model based on spatial price equilibrium: Empirical analysis of Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Kawakami, T., Tiwari, P., & Doi, M. (2004). Assessing impact of its on Japan’s economy using a computable general equilibrium model. Research in Transportation Economics, 8, 525–547. doi: 10.1016/S0739-8859(04)08023-0
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E. (1998). Economic gain and loss from public infrastructure investment. Growth and Change, 29(4), 445–469. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.1998.tb00029.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E., & Hewings, G. J. (2003). An application of integrated transport network-multiregional CGE model II: Calibration of network effects of highway. The 42nd Southern Regional Science Association, 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E., & Hewings, G. J. D. (2009). An application of an integrated transport network – multiregional CGE model to the calibration of synergy effects of highway investments. Economic Systems Research, 21(4), 377–397. doi: 10.1080/09535310903444758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E., Hewings, G. J., & Amir, H. (2017). Economic evaluation of transportation projects: An application of financial computable general equilibrium model. Research in Transportation Economics, 61, 44–55. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2016.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E., Hewings, G. J. D., & Hong, C. (2004). An application of an integrated transport network– multiregional CGE model: A framework for the economic analysis of highway projects. Economic Systems Research, 16(3), 235–258. doi: 10.1080/0953531042000239356
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E., & Kim, K. (2002). Impacts of regional development strategies on growth and equity of Korea: A multiregional CGE model. The Annals of Regional Science, 36(1), 165–180. doi: 10.1007/s001680100071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E., Kim, H. S., & Hewings, G. J. D. (2011). An application of the integrated transport network–multi-regional CGE model an impact analysis of government-financed highway projects. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP), 45(2), 223–245.
   Google Scholar
• Knaap, T., & Oosterhaven, J. (2011). Measuring the welfare effects of infrastructure: A simple spatial equilibrium evaluation of Dutch railway proposals. Research in Transportation Economics, 31(1), 19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2010.11.004
   Google Scholar
• Knaap, T., Oosterhaven, J., Ruijgrok, C., & Tavasszy, L. (2001). On the development of RAEM: The Dutch spatial general equilibrium model and it's first application to a new railway link. Paper presented to the 41th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, Zagreb, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Koike, A., Tavasszy, L., & Sato, K. (2009). Spatial equity analysis on expressway network development in Japan. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2133, 46–55. doi: 10.3141/2133-05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konan, D., & Kim, K. (2003). Transportation and tourism in Hawaii: Computable general equilibrium model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1839, 142–149. doi: 10.3141/1839-16
   Google Scholar
• Lahr, M. L., Haddad, E. A., Elshahawany, D. N., & Vassallo, M. D. (2016). Regional analysis of domestic integration in Egypt.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, M. M., Madsen, B., & Jensen-Butler, C. (2005). Modelling transport in an interregional general equilibrium model with externalities (pp. 1–11). Amsterdam: European Regional Science Association. ERSA conference paper No. ersa05p198.
   Google Scholar
• Lennox, J., & Adams, P. (2016). Residential land use, transport and congestion in a computable general equilibrium model. In 19th annual conference on global economic analysis, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Leontief, W. W. (1936). Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 18(3), 105–125. doi: 10.2307/1927837
   Google Scholar
• Leontief, W. W. (1951). The structure of American economy, 1919–1939: An empirical application of equilibrium analysis (No. HC106. 3 L3945 1951).
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y. (2015). Public infrastructure investment in China: A recursive dynamic CGE analysis. Ottawa: University of Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Lofgren, H., & Robinson, S. (1999). Spatial networks in multi-region computable general equilibrium models. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
   Google Scholar
• Lowty, I. (1964). A model of metropolis. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Mayeres, I. (2000). The efficiency effects of transport policies in the presence of externalities and distortionary taxes. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 34(2), 233–259.
   Google Scholar
• Mayeres, I. (2001). Equity and transport policy reform. Leuven: Center for Economic Studies, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Mayeres, I., & Proost, S. (2001). Marginal tax reform, externalities and income distribution. Journal of Public Economics, 79(2), 343–363. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00100-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayeres, I., & Proost, S. (2004). Testing alternative transport pricing strategies: A CGE analysis for Belgium. In Paper to be presented at the conference on input-output and general equilibrium: Data, modelling and policy analysis (pp. 2–4). Brussels: Citeseer.
   Google Scholar
• Mayeres, I., Proost, S., & Dender, K. V. (2005). The impacts of marginal social cost pricing. Research in Transportation Economics, 14, 211–243. doi: 10.1016/S0739-8859(05)14008-6
   Google Scholar
• McKitrick, R. R. (1998). The econometric critique of computable general equilibrium modeling: The role of functional forms. Economic Modelling, 15(4), 543–573. doi: 10.1016/S0264-9993(98)00028-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra-Kahn, B. H. (2008). Debunking the myths of computable general equilibrium models. New York: Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis Department of Economics The New School for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Mittal, S., Dai, H., Fujimori, S., Hanaoka, T., & Zhang, R. (2016). Key factors influencing the global passenger transport dynamics using the AIM/transport model. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 55, 373–388. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2016.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyagi, T. (1998). A spatial computable general equilibrium approach for measuring multiregional impacts of large scale transportation projects. In Network infrastructure and the urban environment (pp. 224–241). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Miyagi, T. (2001). Economic appraisal for multi regional impacts by a large scale expressway project. Amsterdam: Tinbergen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Munk, K. J. (2006). Assessment of the introduction of road pricing using a computable general equilibrium model. Aarhus University Economics Paper, (2005–23).
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. T., & Wigle, R. M. (2011). Border delays re-emerging priority: Within-country dimensions for Canada. Canadian Public Policy, 37(1), 49–59. doi: 10.3138/cpp.37.1.49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitzsche, E., & Tscharaktschiew, S. (2013). Efficiency of speed limits in cities: A spatial computable general equilibrium assessment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 56, 23–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordman, N. (1998). Increasing returns to scale and benefits to traffic : A spatial general equilibrium analysis in the case of two primary inputs. Umeå: Centre for Regional Science, Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterhaven, J., & Knaap, T. (2003). Spatial economic impacts of transport infrastructure investments. In A. Pearman, P. Mackie, J. Nellthorp, & L. Giorgi (Eds.), Transport projects, programmes and policies: Evaluation needs and capabilities (pp. 87–105). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterhaven, J., Knaap, T., Rijgrok, C., & Tavasszy, L. (2001). On the development of RAEM: The Dutch spatial general equilibrium model and its first application to a new railway link. Paper presented to the 41th Congress of the European Regional Science Association (Vol. 29), Zagreb.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, I. W. H., & Bento, A. (2001). Revenue recycling and the welfare effects of road pricing. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 103(4), 645–671. doi: 10.1111/1467-9442.00264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primo Central Index. (2017). Primo Central Index, University of Waterloo.
   Google Scholar
• Proost, S., & Van Dender, K. (1999). TRENEN II STRAN final report for publication, models for transport, environment and energy–version II-strategic transport policy analysis. Leuven: European Commission under the Transport RTD Programme of the 4th Framework Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Rioja, F. K. (1999). Productiveness and welfare implications of public infrastructure: A dynamic two-sector general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Development Economics, 58(2), 387–404. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3878(98)00118-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, B., Rose, A., Heatwole, N., Wei, D., Avetisyan, M., Chan, O., & Maya, I. (2014). The impact on the US economy of changes in wait times at ports of entry. Transport Policy, 35, 162–175. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, E., & Dixit, V. (2015). A review of computable general equilibrium modelling for transport appraisal. Conference of Australian Institutes of Transport Research, Melbourn (pp. 1–12).
   Google Scholar
• Robson, E., & Dixit, V. V. (2016). Accounting for transport impacts on the economy: An integrated computable general equilibrium and transport model. Proceeding of Transportation Research Board 95th annual meeting, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://amonline.trb.org/16-5035-1.2981047?qr=1
   Google Scholar
• Roson, R. (1996). The macroeconomic impact of traffic congestion: A CGE analysis. In Recent advances in spatial equilibrium modelling (pp. 261–277). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roson, R., & Dell’Agata, G. (1996). Environmental externalties, transport costs and interregional trade in a general equilibrium model. In Economic modelling under the applied general equilibrium approach (pp. 32–46). Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, T. F., & van Nieuwkoop, R. (2011). An integrated transport network-computable general equilibrium models for Zurich. Swiss transport research conference, Monte Verità, Ascona, Switzerland (Vol. 29).
   Google Scholar
• Sakamoto, H. (2011). CGE analysis of transportation cost and regional economy: East Asia and Northern Kyushu. ICSEAD Working Paper 2011–04.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. (1952). The transfer problem and transport costs: The terms of trade when impediments are absent. The Economic Journal, 62(246), 278–304. doi: 10.2307/2227005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarf, H. (1967). On the computation of equilibrium prices. New Haven, CT: Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics at Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Scarf, H., & Shoven, J. (1984). Applied general equilibrium analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, A., & Jacoby, H. D. (2005). Technology detail in a multisector CGE model: Transport under climate policy. Energy Economics, 27(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2004.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seung, C. K., & Kraybill, D. S. (2001). The effects of infrastructure investment: A two-sector dynamic computable general equilibrium analysis for Ohio. International Regional Science Review, 24(2), 261–281. doi: 10.1177/016001701761013150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoven, J. B., & Whalley, J. (1984). Applied general-equilibrium models of taxation and international trade: An introduction and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 22(3), 1007–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoven, J. B., & Whalley, J. (1992). Applying general equilibrium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shunsuke, S. P., Anderson, W., & Maureen, C. (2015). Economic impacts of reduced wait time at Canada-US border crossing: Integrating CGE model and cross-border transportation. Windsor: Cross-Border Institute University of Windsor.
   Google Scholar
• Siegesmund, P., Luskin, D., Fujiwara, L., & Tsigas, M. (2008). A computable general equilibrium model of the U.S. economy to evaluate maritime infrastructure investments. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2062, 32–38. doi: 10.3141/2062-05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steininger, K. W. (2002). The foreign trade and sectoral impact of truck road pricing for cross-border trade. Environmental and Resource Economics, 23(2), 213–253. doi: 10.1023/A:1021263213158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steininger, K. W., Friedl, B., & Gebetsroither, B. (2007). Sustainability impacts of car road pricing: A computable general equilibrium analysis for Austria. Ecological Economics, 63(1), 59–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steininger, K. W., Schmid, C., & Tobin, A. (2012). Regional and environmental impacts of expanding the heavy duty vehicle charge to the secondary road network in Austria. Empirica, 39(2), 261–278. doi: 10.1007/s10663-012-9184-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg, M. (2010a). Dynamic spatial CGE frameworks – specifications and simulations. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, M. (2010b). Economic effects of the Öresund bridge – a spatial computable general equilibrium analysis. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Takeda, S. (2010). A computable general equilibrium analysis of the welfare effects of trade liberalization under different market structures. International Review of Applied Economics, 24(1), 75–93. doi: 10.1080/02692170903424307
   Google Scholar
• Tatano, H., & Tsuchiya, S. (2008). A framework for economic loss estimation due to seismic transportation network disruption: A spatial computable general equilibrium approach. Natural Hazards, 44(2), 253–265. doi: 10.1007/s11069-007-9151-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavasszy, L., & De Jong, G. (2013). Modelling freight transport. London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Tavasszy, L. A., Thissen, M., Muskens, A. C., & Oosterhaven, J. (2002). Pitfalls and solutions in the application of spatial computable general equilibrium models for transport appraisal. 42nd Congress of the European Regional Science Association, Dortmund, Germany (pp. 27–31).
   Google Scholar
• Tavasszy, L. A., Thissen, M. J. P. M., & Oosterhaven, J. (2011). Challenges in the application of spatial computable general equilibrium models for transport appraisal. Research in Transportation Economics, 31(1), 12–18. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2010.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Thissen, M. (2004). The indirect economic effects of a terrorist attack on transport infrastructure: A proposal for a Sage. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 13(4), 315–322. doi: 10.1108/09653560410556537
   Google Scholar
• Thissen, M. J. P. M. (1998). A classification of empirical CGE modelling. Groningen: University of Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Thissen, M., Limtanakool, N., & Hilbers, H. (2011). Road pricing and agglomeration economies: A new methodology to estimate indirect effects applied to the Netherlands. The Annals of Regional Science, 47(3), 543–567. doi: 10.1007/s00168-010-0394-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirasirichai, C., & Enke, D. (2007). Case study: Applying a regional CGE model for estimation of indirect economic losses due to damaged highway bridges. The Engineering Economist, 52(4), 367–401. doi: 10.1080/00137910701686996
   Google Scholar
• TRELLIS. (2017). The TriUniversity Group of Libraries | TriUniversity Group of Libraries.
   Google Scholar
• Truong, T. P., & Hensher, D. A. (2012). Linking discrete choice to continuous demand within the framework of a computable general equilibrium model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 46(9), 1177–1201. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2012.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tscharaktschiew, S., & Hirte, G. (2012). Should subsidies to urban passenger transport be increased? A spatial CGE analysis for a German metropolitan area. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(2), 285–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuchiya, S., Tatano, H., & Okada, N. (2007). Economic loss assessment due to railroad and highway disruptions. Economic Systems Research, 19(2), 147–162. doi: 10.1080/09535310701328567
   Google Scholar
• Ueda, T., Koike, A., & Iwakami, K. (2001). Economic damage assessment of catastrophe in high speed rail network. Proceedings of 1st workshop for comparative study on urban earthquake disaster management, Tokyo, Japan (pp. 13–19).
   Google Scholar
• Ueda, T., Koike, A., Yamaguchi, K., & Tsuchiya, K. (2005). Spatial benefit incidence analysis of airport capacity expansion: Application of SCGE model to the Haneda project. Research in Transportation Economics, 13, 165–196. doi: 10.1016/S0739-8859(05)13008-X
   Google Scholar
• Van Dender, K. (2003). Transport taxes with multiple trip purposes. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 105(2), 295–310. doi: 10.1111/1467-9442.00010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandyck, T., & Rutherford, T. F. (2013). Regional labor markets, commuting and the economic impact of road pricing. Istanbul: Fifth World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists.
   Google Scholar
• Van Steenbergen, A., Vandresse, M., & Mayeres, I. (2011). A computable general equilibrium for Belgium with a special focus on transport policies. Brussels: Federal Planning Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Van Truong, N., & Shimizu, T. (2017). The effect of transportation on tourism promotion: Literature review on application of the computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 3096–3115. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.336
   Google Scholar
• Venables, A. J. (1996). Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries. International Economic Review, 37(2), 341–359. doi: 10.2307/2527327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verikios, G., & Zhang, X. (2015). Reform of Australian urban transport: A CGE-microsimulation analysis of the effects on income distribution. Economic Modelling, 44, 7–17. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vold, A., & Jean-Hansen, V. (2007). PINGO: A model for prediction of regional and interregional freight transport in Norway. Oslo: Transportøkonomisk institutt.
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, M. (2004). Overview of land use transport models. In Handbook of transport geography and spatial systems (Vol. 5, pp. 127–146). Bingley: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, P., & Peeta, S. (2011). A generalized modeling framework to analyze interdependencies among infrastructure systems. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 45(3), 553–579. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2010.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, P., & Peeta, S. (2014). Dynamic and disequilibrium analysis of interdependent infrastructure systems. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 67, 357–381. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar