In search of surrogate safety indicators for vulnerable road users: a review of surrogate safety indicators

References

• Alhajyaseen, W. K. M. (2015). The integration of conflict probability and severity for the safety assessment of intersections. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 40(2), 421–430. doi: 10.1007/s13369-014-1553-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, Brian, Shin, Tom, & Cooper, Peter. (1978). Analysis of traffic conflicts and collisions. Transportation Research Record, 667, 67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Alsop, J., & Langley, J. (2001). Under-reporting of motor vehicle traffic crash victims in New Zealand. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 33(3), 353–359. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00049-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoros, E., Martin, J.-L., & Laumon, B. (2006). Under-reporting of road crash casualties in France. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(4), 627–635. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagdadi, O. (2013). Estimation of the severity of safety critical events. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 50, 167–174. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baguley, C. J. (1984). The British traffic conflicts technique. NATO advanced research workshop on international calibration study of traffic conflict techniques, Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, William T. (1972). An evaluation of the traffic conflicts technique. 51st Annual Meeting of the Highway Research Board. Washington District of Columbia, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Balasha, D., Hakkert, A. S., & Livneh, M. (1979). A quantitative definition of the near accident concept. Second International Traffic Conflicts Technique Workshop, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. R. (1994). Traffic conflicts for road user safety studies. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(5), 1–15. doi: 10.1139/l94-001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Chau, A., DeCastilho, B., & Navin, F. (1984). Land transport safety series, The University of British Columbia, Department of Civil Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Cafiso, S., García, A. G., Cavarra, R., & Rojas, M. A. R. (2011). Crosswalk safety evaluation using a Pedestrian Risk Index as traffic conflict measure. 3rd International Conference on Road Safety and Simulation, Indianapolis, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, H. C., & Quek, S. T. (1997). Measurement of traffic conflicts. Safety Science, 26(3), 169–185. doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00041-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, H. C., Quek, S. T., & Cheu, R. L. (1992). Quantitative examination of traffic conflicts. Transportation Research Record, 1376, 86–91.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, P. J. (1973). Predicting intersection accidents: The use of conflicts and other models based on traffic flow parameters to predict accident experience at non-signalised intersections, Ottawa, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, P. J. (1984). Experience with traffic conflicts in Canada with emphasis on “post encroachment time” techniques. In E. Asmussen (ed.) International Calibration Study of Traffic Conflict Techniques. NATO ASI Series (Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences) (Vol. 5). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. A., Hourdos, J., Xiong, H., & Chatterjee, I. (2011). Outline for a causal model of traffic conflicts and crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(6), 1907–1919. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Basyouny, K., & Sayed, T. (2013). Safety performance functions using traffic conflicts. Safety Science, 51(1), 160–164. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elvik, R. (1988). Some difficulties in defining populations of “entities” for estimating the expected number of accidents. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 20(4), 261–275. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(88)90054-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elvik, R. (2009). The non-linearity of risk and the promotion of environmentally sustainable transport. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41(4), 849–855. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elvik, R., Høye, A., Vaa, T., & Sørensen, M. (2009). The handbook of road safety measures. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Elvik, R., & Mysen, A. (1999). Incomplete accident reporting: Meta-analysis of studies made in 13 countries. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1665, 133–140. doi: 10.3141/1665-18
   Google Scholar
• Englund, A., Gregersen, N. P., Hydén, C., Lövsund, P., & Åberg, L. (1998). Trafiksäkerhet – en kunskapsöversikt [Traffic safety – a knowledge review]. Lund: KFB, Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Erke, H. (1984). The traffic conflict technique of the Federal Republic of Germany. NATO Advanced Research Workshop on International Calibration Study of Traffic Conflict Techniques, Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Gettman, D., & Head, L. (2003). Surrogate safety measures from traffic simulation models (Report No. FHWA-RD-03-050).
   Google Scholar
• Grayson, G. B. (1984). The Malmö study: a calibration of traffic conflict techniques (Report No. R-84-12).
   Google Scholar
• Güttinger, V. A. (1982). From accidents to conflicts: Alternative safety measurement. Third International Workshop on Traffic Conflicts Techniques, Leidschendam.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, A. (1975). Studies in driver behaviour, with applications in traffic design and planning. Two examples (Report No. Bulletin 11).
   Google Scholar
• Hauer, E., & Gårder, P. (1986). Research into the validity of the traffic conflicts technique. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 18(6), 471–481. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(86)90020-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauer, E., & Hakkert, A. S. (1988). Extent and some implications of incomplete accident reporting. Transportation Research Record, 1185, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, J. C. (1971). Near misses as a measure of safety at urban intersections (Master thesis). The Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Hupfer, C. (1997). Deceleration to Safety Time (DST) – a useful figure to evaluate traffic safety? 10th ICTCT Workshop, Lund.
   Google Scholar
• Hydén, C. (1977). A traffic conflict technique for determining risk (Report No. LUTVDG/(TVTT-3005)/1-95/(1977) & Bulletin 15 B).
   Google Scholar
• Hydén, C. (1987). The development of a method for traffic safety evaluation: The Swedish traffic conflict technique (Doctoral thesis). Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, K., Sayed, T., & Saunier, N. (2010). Automated analysis of pedestrian-vehicle conflicts: Context for before-and-after studies. Transportation Research Record, 2198, 52–64. doi: 10.3141/2198-07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail, K., Sayed, T., & Saunier, N. (2011). Methodologies for aggregating indicators of traffic conflict. Transportation Research Record, 10–19. doi: 10.3141/2237-02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaparias, I., Bell, M. G. H., Greensted, J., Cheng, S., Miri, A., Taylor, C., & Mount, B. (2010). Development and implementation of a vehicle–pedestrian conflict analysis method: Adaptation of a vehicle–vehicle technique. Transportation Research Record, 75–82. doi: 10.3141/2198-09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocárková, D. (2012). Traffic conflict techniques in Czech Republic. SIIV – 5th International Congress – Sustainability of Road Infrastructures, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Kraay, J. H. (1987). The Dutch conflict observation method “doctor”. Retrieved from http://trid.trb.org/view/291273
   Google Scholar
• Kraay, J. H., van der Horst, A. R. A., & Oppe, S. (2013). Manual conflict observation technique doctor. Foundation Road Safety for All.
   Google Scholar
• Kruysse, H. W. (1991). The subjective evaluation of traffic conflicts based on an internal concept of dangerousness. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 23(1), 53–65. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(91)90035-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruysse, H. W., & Wijlhuizen, G. J. (1992). Why are experts not better in judging the danger of filmed traffic conflicts? Accident Analysis & Prevention, 24(3), 227–235. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(92)90002-Z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuang, Y., Qu, X., & Wang, S. (2015). A tree-structured crash surrogate measure for freeways. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 77, 137–148. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laureshyn, A., De Ceunynck, T., Karlsson, C., Svensson, Å., & Daniels, S. (2017). In search of the severity dimension of traffic events: Extended Delta-V as a traffic conflict indicator. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 98, 46–56. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laureshyn, A., Johnsson, C., De Ceunynck, T., Svensson, Å, de Goede, M., Saunier, N., … Daniels, S. (2016). Review of current study methods for VRU safety. Appendix 6 – Scoping review: surrogate measures of safety in site-based road traffic observations (Report No. Deliverable 2.1 – part 4).
   Google Scholar
• Laureshyn, A., Svensson, Å., & Hydén, C. (2010). Evaluation of traffic safety, based on micro-level behavioural data: theoretical framework and first implementation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42, 1637–1646. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.03.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, D. (1996). Analysis of pedestrian conflicts with left-turning traffic. Transportation Research Record, 1538, 61–67. doi:10.3141/1538-08 doi: 10.1177/0361198196153800108
   Google Scholar
• Lu, G., Liu, M., Wang, Y., & Yu, G. (2012). Quantifying the severity of traffic conflict by assuming moving elements as rectangles at intersection. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 43, 255–264. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.098
   Google Scholar
• Migletz, D. J., Glauz, W. D., & Bauer, K. M. (1985). Relationships between traffic conflicts and accidents (Report No. FHWA/RD-84/042).
   Google Scholar
• Minderhoud, M. M., & Bovy, P. H. L. (2001). Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 33(1), 89–97. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00019-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed, M. G., & Saunier, N. (2013). Motion prediction methods for surrogate safety analysis. Transportation Research Record, 2386, 168–178. doi: 10.3141/2386-19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhlrad, N., & Dupre, G. (1984). The French conflict technique. NATO Advanced Research Workshop on International Calibration Study of Traffic Conflict Techniques, Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Ogawa, K. (2007). An analysis of traffic conflict phenomenon of bicycles using space occupancy index. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 7, 1820–1827.
   Google Scholar
• Paddock, R. D., & Spence, D. E. (1973). The conflicts technique: An accident prediction method. Transportation Research Record 486 (pp. 1–10). Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, M. R., & Zegeer, C. V. (1989). Traffic conflict techniques for safety and operation (Report No. FHWA-IP-88-027).
   Google Scholar
• Peesapati, L. N., Hunter, M. P., & Rodgers, M. O. (2013). Evaluation of postencroachment time as surrogate for opposing left-turn crashes. Transportation Research Record, 2386, 42–51. doi: 10.3141/2386-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, S. R., & Harris, J. I. (1967). Traffic conflict characteristics: Freeway curve and exit area F1, December, 1966. Retrieved from: http://trid.trb.org/view/618537.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, D. E., & Halpin, T. J. (1974). Traffic conflicts in Washington State. Washington State Department of Highways, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Risser, R., & Schutzenhofer, A. (1984). Application of traffic conflict technique in Austria. NATO Advanced Research Workshop on International Calibration Study of Traffic Conflict Techniques, Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Sacchi, E., & Sayed, T. (2016). Conflict-based safety performance functions for predicting traffic collisions by type. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2583, 50–55. doi: 10.3141/2583-07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacchi, E., Sayed, T., & de Leur, P. (2013). A comparison of collision-based and conflict-based safety evaluations: The case of right-turn smart channels. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 59, 260–266. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunier, N., Mourji, N., & Agard, B. (2011). Mining microscopic data of vehicle conflicts and collisions to investigate collision factors. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board (2237), 41–50. doi: 10.3141/2237-05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayed, T., & Zein, S. (1999). Traffic conflict standards for intersections. Transportation Planning & Technology, 22, 309–323. doi: 10.1080/03081069908717634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shbeeb, L. (2000). Development of a traffic conflicts technique for different environments – a comparative study of pedestrian conflicts in Sweden and Jordan (Doctoral thesis). University of Lund, Lund Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Shelby, S. G. (2011). Delta-V as a measure of traffic conflict severity. 90th TRB Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Shinar, D. (1984). The traffic conflict technique: A subjective vs. objective approach. Journal of Safety Research, 15, 153–157. doi: 10.1016/0022-4375(84)90046-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songchitruksa, P., & Tarko, A. (2006). The extreme value theory approach to safety estimation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38, 811–822. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spicer, B. R. (1973). A study of traffic conflicts at six intersections (Report No. Report LR551). Retrieved from http://trid.trb.org/view/129891.
   Google Scholar
• St-Aubin, P., Saunier, N., & Miranda-Moreno, L. F. (2014). Road user collision prediction using motion patterns applied to surrogate safety analysis. 93rd TRB Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, Å. (1992). Vidareutveckling och validering av den svenska konflikttekniken (Report No. (unpublished)).
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, Å. (1998). A method for analysing the traffic process in a safety perspective (Doctoral thesis), University of Lund, Lund Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, Å., & Hydén, C. (2006). Estimating the severity of safety related behaviour. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(2), 379–385. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tageldin, A., & Sayed, T. (2016). Developing evasive action-based indicators for identifying pedestrian conflicts in less organized traffic environments. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 50, 1193–1208. doi: 10.1002/atr.1397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tageldin, A., Sayed, T., & Wang, X. (2015). Can time proximity measures be used as safety indicators in all driving cultures? A case study of motorcycle safety in China. 94th TRB Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• TRRL. (1980). Traffic conflicts and accidents at road junctions. TRRL Leaflet LF918.
   Google Scholar
• van der Horst, A. R. A. (1990). A time-based analysis of road user behaviour in normal and critical encounters (Doctoral thesis), Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• van der Horst, A. R. A. (1991). Time-to-Collision as a cue for decision making in braking. In A. G. Gale (Ed.), Vision in vehicles – III (pp. 19–26). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• van der Horst, A. R. A. (2013). Video-recording of accidents, conflicts and road user behaviour: A step forward in traffic safety research. 8. Gemeinsames Symposium der DGVM und DGVP, Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• van der Horst, A. R. A., Rook, A. M., Amerongen, P. J. M. v., & Bakker, P. J. (2007). Video-recorded accidents, conflicts and road user behaviour: Integral Approach Analysis of Traffic Accidents (IAAV). TNO Defence, Security and Safety.
   Google Scholar
• van der Horst, A. R. A., Thierry, M. C., Vet, J. M., & Rahman, A. F. (2016). An evaluation of speed management measures in Bangladesh based upon alternative accident recording, speed measurements, and DOCTOR traffic conflict observations. Transportation Research Part F. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2016.05.006
   Google Scholar
• Várhelyi, A. (1998). Driver's speed behaviour at a zebra crossing: a case study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 30(6), 731–743. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(98)00026-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., & Stamatiadis, N. (2014). Evaluation of a simulation-based surrogate safety metric. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 71, 82–92. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, L., Ismail, K., & Meng, X. (2014a). Freeway safety estimation using extreme value theory approaches: A comparative study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 62, 32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, L., Ismail, K., & Meng, X. (2014b). Shifted Gamma-Generalized Pareto Distribution model to map the safety continuum and estimate crashes. Safety Science, 64, 155–162. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, L., Ismail, K., & Meng, X. (2014c). Traffic conflict techniques for road safety analysis: open questions and some insights. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 41(7), 633–641. doi: 10.1139/cjce-2013-0558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar