Autonomous technologies in short sea shipping: trends, feasibility and implications

References

• Akyuz, E., Celik, M., & Cebi, S. (2016). A phase of comprehensive research to determine marine-specific EPC values in human error assessment and reduction technique. Safety Science, 87, 8763–8775. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderton, T. (2004). The global seafarer: Living and working conditions in a globalized industry. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Arnsdorf, I. (2014). Rolls-Royce drone ships challenge $375 billion industry: Freight. Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-02-25/rolls-royce-drone-ships-challenge-375-billion-industryfreight
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J., Burgess, A., & Henstra, D. (2004). Short sea shipping policy from a community perspective. European transport conference, Strasbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Bendall, H. B., & Brooks, M. R. (2011). Short sea shipping: Lessons for or from Australia. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 3(4), 384–405. doi: 10.1504/IJSTL.2011.041134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, S. K., Fridell, E., & Andersson, K. E. (2014). Fuels for short sea shipping: A comparative assessment with focus on environmental impact. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 228(1), 44–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BITRE. (2009). Road and Rail Freight: Competitors or Complements? Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Blidberg, D. R. (2001). The development of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV); a brief summary. Seoul: IEEE ICRA.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. R. (2014). The changing regulation of coastal shipping in Australia. Ocean Development & International Law, 45(1), 67–83. doi: 10.1080/00908320.2014.867191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. R., & Frost, J. D. (2004). Short sea shipping: A Canadian perspective. Maritime Policy & Management, 31(4), 393–407. doi: 10.1080/0308883042000304881
   Google Scholar
• Burmeister, H.-C., Bruhn, W., Rødseth, Ø, & Porathe, T. (2014). Autonomous unmanned merchant vessel and its contribution towards the e-navigation implementation: The MUNIN perspective. International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 1, 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.enavi.2014.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. (1995). Development of short sea shipping in Europe: Prospects and challenges. Luxembourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Crew Pacific. (2018). Australian crew salary guidelines for 2018. http://www.crewpacific.com.au/crew-information/worldwide-salary-guidelines/australia
   Google Scholar
• Cullinane, K., & Khanna, M. (2000). Economies of scale in large containerships: Optimal size and geographical implications. Journal of Transport Geography, 8(3), 181–195. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(00)00010-7
   Google Scholar
• Downard, J. M. (1981). Running cost. Surrey: Ship management series. Surrey: Fairplay Publications.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1998). CODISSSART – comparison of documentation in short Sea shipping and road transport. United Kingdom: Maritime Research Centre, Southampton Institute.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1999). The development of SSS in Europe: A dynamic alternative in sustainable transport chain. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• EUROSTAT. (2018a). Glossary: Short sea shipping (SSS). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:Short_sea_shipping_(SSS)
   Google Scholar
• EUROSTAT. (2018b). Maritime Transport Statistics – Short Sea Shipping of Goods. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Maritime_transport_statistics_-_short_sea_shipping_of_goods#Short_sea_shipping_by_type_of_cargo, Accessed 7th June 2018
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. E. M. (2004). An investigation into the design of an unmanned ship. London: University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Fusillo, M. (2004). Is liner shipping supply fixed? Maritime Economics & Logistics, 6(3), 220–235. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100110
   Google Scholar
• Fusillo, M. (2006). Some notes on structure and stability in liner shipping. Maritime Policy & Management, 33(5), 463–475. doi: 10.1080/03088830601020653
   Google Scholar
• Futurenautics. (2016). Autonomous ships – white paper. London.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaderi, H., Dullaert, W., & van Amstel, W. P. (2016). Reducing lead-times and lead-time variance in cooperative distribution networks. International Journal Shipping and Transport Logistics, 8(1), 51–65. doi: 10.1504/IJSTL.2016.073316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosso, M., Lynce, A., Silla, A., & Vaggelas, G. (2008). Parameters influencing short sea shipping pricing scheme: Italian operator’s point of view. Proceedings of 8th Swiss transport research conference, Ascona.
   Google Scholar
• Hamann, R., & Peschmann, J. (2013). Goal-based standards and risk-based design. Ship Technology Research, 60(2), 46–56. doi: 10.1179/str.2013.60.2.001
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, T., & Ghosh, S. (2016). Autonomous merchant vessels: Examination of factors that impact the effective implementation of unmanned ships. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 8(3), 206–222. doi: 10.1080/18366503.2016.1229244
   Google Scholar
• IMO. (2007). Strategy for the development and implementation of E-navigation. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• IMO. (2011). Principles of minimum safe manning: Resolution 1047. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H., Johansson, M., & Andersson, K. (2014). Barriers to improving energy efficiency in short sea shipping: An action research case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 317–327. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H., & Styhre, L. (2015). Increased energy efficiency in short sea shipping through decreased time in port. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 71, 167–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsikas, S. K. (2017). Cyber security of the autonomous ship. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM workshop on cyber-physical system security (pp. 55–56), Abu Dhabi.
   Google Scholar
• Kretschmann, L., Burmeister, H.-C., & Jahn, C. (2017). Analyzing the economic benefit of unmanned autonomous ships: An exploratory cost-comparison between an autonomous and a conventional bulk carrier. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 25, 76–86. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2017.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretschmann, L., Rødseth, Ø, Sage Fuller, B., Noble, H., Horahan, J., & McDowell, H. (2015). MUNIN deliverable 9.3: Quantitative assessment. MUNIN project. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, J. T., & Vepsäläinen, A. P. (1994). Economies of speed in sea transportation. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 24(8), 33–41. doi: 10.1108/09600039410071280
   Google Scholar
• Landamore, M., Cabezas-Basurko, O., Wright, P., & Birmingham, R. (2009). Create3: An outline of the concept and overview of possible solution routes for the hull form. Journal of Maritime Research, 6(1), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Leggate, H. (2004). The future shortage of seafarers: Will it become a reality? Maritime Policy & Management, 31(1), 3–13. doi: 10.1080/03088830310001642049
   Google Scholar
• Lekakou, M. B. (2007). The eternal conundrum of Greek coastal shipping. Research in Transportation Economics, 21, 257–296. doi: 10.1016/S0739-8859(07)21008-X
   Google Scholar
• Marinetraffic. (2018). Vessels database. Retrieved from www.marinetraffic.com
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-López, A., Kronbak, J., & Jiang, L. (2015). Cost and time models for the evaluation of intermodal chains by using short sea shipping in the North Sea Region: The Rosyth-Zeebrugge route. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 7(4), 494–520. doi: 10.1504/IJSTL.2015.069692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medda, F., & Trujillo, L. (2010). Short-sea shipping: An analysis of its determinants. Maritime Policy & Management, 37(3), 285–303. doi: 10.1080/03088831003700678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOL. (2017). MOL launches R & D on autonomous ocean transport system. Retrieved from http://www.mol.co.jp/en/pr/2017/17031.html
   Google Scholar
• MUNIN. (2015). Research in maritime autonomous systems. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Musso, E., & Marchese, U. (2002). Economics of shortsea shipping. In C. T. Grammenos (Ed.), Handbook of maritime economics and business (pp. 280–304). London: Lloyd’s of London Press.
   Google Scholar
• NFAS. (2017). Definition for autonomous merchant ships. Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian Forum for Autonomous Ships .
   Google Scholar
• Ng, A. K. Y. (2009). Competitiveness of short sea shipping and the role of port: The case of north Europe. Maritime Policy & Management, 36(4), 337–352. doi: 10.1080/03088830903056983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. T., Ghaderi, H., Caesar, L. D., & Cahoon, S. (2014). Current challenges in the recruitment and retention of seafarers: An industry perspective from Vietnam. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 30(2), 217–242. doi: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2014.09.005
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2001). Short sea shipping in Europe. Paris: European Conference of Ministers of Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Österman, C., & Hult, C. (2016). Administrative burdens and over-exertion in Swedish short sea shipping. Maritime Policy & Management, 43(5), 569–579. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2016.1154994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paixão, A. C., & Marlow, P. B. (2001). A review of the European Union shipping policy. Maritime Policy & Management, 28(2), 187–198. doi: 10.1080/03088830118389
   Google Scholar
• Paixão, A. C., & Marlow, P. B. (2002). Strengths and weaknesses of short sea shipping. Marine Policy, 26(3), 167–178. doi: 10.1016/S0308-597X(01)00047-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paixão Casaca, A. C., & Marlow, B. P. (2005). The competitiveness of short sea shipping in multimodal logistics supply chains: Service attributes. Maritime Policy & Management, 32(4), 363–382. doi: 10.1080/03088830500301469
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, H., Cruz, A. R., & Combe, C. (2015). Cooperation and the emergence of maritime clusters in the Atlantic: Analysis and implications of innovation and human capital for blue growth. Marine Policy, 57, 167–177. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polo, S. G. (2000). Sobre la estructura de costes en el transporte marítimo en españa. Estudios e Investigaciones Marinas, 1(1), 27–45.
   Google Scholar
• Porathe, T., Prison, J., & Man, Y. (2014). Situation awareness in remote control centres for unmanned ships. Proceedings of human factors in ship design & operation, London.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, J.-P., Comtois, C., & Slack, B. (2013). The geography of transport systems. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rødseth, Ø. J. (2014). The autonomous ship – where does it go? Marinetek Review, 6–7(2), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Rolls-Royce. (2014). Remote and autonomous ships – the next steps. London: Rolls-Royce Marine.
   Google Scholar
• Saldanha, J., & Gray, R. (2002). The potential for British coastal shipping in a multimodal chain. Maritime Policy & Management, 29(1), 77–92. doi: 10.1080/03088830110067339
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, J., Wastell, D. G., Hockey, G. R. J., Crawshaw, C. M., Ishak, M., & Downing, J. C. (2002). Effects of display design on performance in a simulated ship navigation environment. Ergonomics, 45(5), 329–347. doi: 10.1080/00140130110116128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauri, S., & Spunch, B. (2009). Long-run marginal cost in the Ro-Ro industry. Proceedings of 88th TRB annual meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Silos, J. M., Piniella, F., Monedero, J., & Walliser, J. (2012). Trends in the global market for crews: A case study. Marine Policy, 36(4), 845–858. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SRB. (2017). China’s autonomous cargo shipping alliance. Retrieved from https://www.silkroadbriefing.com/news/2017/08/03/chinas-autonomous-cargo-shipping-alliance-digital-unmanned-obor-maritime-deliveries/
   Google Scholar
• Stopford, M. (2009). Maritime economics 3e. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strandenes, S. P., & Marlow, P. B. (2000). Port pricing and competitiveness in short sea shipping. International Journal of Transport Economics/Rivista Internazionale di Economia dei Trasporti, 27(3), 315–334.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez-Alemán, A., Trujillo, L., & Medda, F. (2015). Short sea shipping as intermodal competitor: A theoretical analysis of European transport policies. Maritime Policy & Management, 42(4), 317–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, S. K. (2016). Review of the development of seafarers in Hong Kong. Maritime Business Review, 1(2), 149–162. doi: 10.1108/MABR-05-2016-0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thai, V. V., Balasubramanyam, L., Yeoh, K. K. L., & Norsofiana, S. (2013). Revisiting the seafarer shortage problem: The case of Singapore. Maritime Policy & Management, 40(1), 80–94. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2012.744480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tvete, H. A. (2014). The next ReVOlt (Vol. 2-14, pp. 18–23). Hamburg, Germany: DNV GL Maritime. http://production.presstogo.com/fileroot7/gallery/dnvgl/files/original/45d2c331e48c4c71b4b4315a49725a04/45d2c331e48c4c71b4b4315a49725a04_low.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Hooydonk, E. (2014). The law of unmanned merchant shipping – an exploration. The Journal of International Maritime Law, 20(3), 403–423.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlström, M., Hakulinen, J., Karvonen, H., & Lindborg, I. (2015). Human factors challenges in unmanned ship operations – insights from other domains. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 1038–1045. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.167
   Google Scholar
• Wijnolst, N., & Wergeland, T. (2009). Shipping innovation. Delft: Delft University Press.
   Google Scholar