Impacts of automated vehicles on travel behaviour and land use: an international review of modelling studies

References

• Alessandrini, A., Campagna, A., Delle Site, P., Flilippi, F., & Persia, L. (2015). Automated vehicles and the rethinking of mobility and cities. Transportation Research Procedia, 5, 145–160. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2015.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Ambühl, L., Ciari, F., & Menendez, M. (2016). What about space? A simulation based assessment of AVs impact on road space in urban areas. Paper presented at the 16th Swiss transport research conference.
   Google Scholar
• Auld, J., Sokolov, V., & Stephens, T. S. (2017). Analysis of the effects of connected-automated vehicle technologies on travel demand. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2625, 1–8. doi: 10.3141/2625-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auld, J., Verbas, O., Javanmardi, M., & Rousseau, A. (2018). Impact of privately-owned level 4 CAV technologies on travel demand and energy. Procedia Computer Science, 130, 914–919. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.089
   Google Scholar
• Axhausen, K. W., & Gärling, T. (1992). Activity-based approaches to travel analysis: Conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems. Transport Reviews, 12(4), 323–341. doi: 10.1080/01441649208716826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangemann, C. (2017). Simulation einer urbanen Mobilitätslösung basierend auf autonom fahrenden E-Robotaxen in München. TU München: Berylls Strategy Advisors.
   Google Scholar
• Beiker, S. (2018). Deployment of automated driving as an example for the San Francisco Bay area. In G. Meyer & S. Beiker (Eds.), Road vehicle automation 5 (pp. 117–129). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L. (2012). Integrating mobility and urban development agendas: A manifesto. Disp – The Planning Review, 48(1), 16–26. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2012.702956
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L. (2017). Planning the mobile metropolis. Transport for people, places and the planet. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bischoff, J., & Maciejewski, M. (2016). Simulation of city-wide replacement of private cars with autonomous taxis in Berlin. Procedia Computer Science, 83, 237–244. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.121
   Google Scholar
• BlaBlaCar. (2018). How chatty are you in the car? Retrieved from: https://www.blablacar.com/blog/blablalife/travel-tips/chatty
   Google Scholar
• Boesch, P., Ciari, F., & Axhausen, K. (2018). Transport policy optimization with AVs. Paper presented at the TRB annual meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Boesch, P. M., Ciari, F., & Axhausen, K. W. (2016). Autonomous vehicle fleet sizes required to serve different levels of demand. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2542, 111–119. doi: 10.3141/2542-13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burghout, W., Rigole, P. J., & Andreasson, I. J. (2014). Impacts of shared autonomous taxis in a metropolitan area. Paper presented at the TRB annual meeting, Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, L. D., Jordan, W. C., & Scarborough, B. A. (2013). Transforming personal mobility. New York, NY: Earth Institute Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D., Hanna, J., & Kockelman, K. M. (2016). Operations of a shared, autonomous, electric 36 vehicle (SAEV) fleet: Implications of vehicle & charging infrastructure decisions. Transport Research Part A, 94, 243–254.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D., & Kockelman, K. M. (2016). Management of a shared autonomous electric vehicle fleet. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2572, 37–46. doi: 10.3141/2572-05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childress, S., Nichols, B., Charlton, B., & Coe, S. (2015). Using an activity-based model to explore possible impacts Of automated vehicles. Paper presented at the TRB annual meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Correia, G., Milakis, D., van Arem, B., & Hoogendoorn, R. (2015). Vehicle automation and transport system performance. In M. Bliemer, C. Mulley, & C. J. Moutou (Eds.), Handbook on transport and urban planning in the developed world (pp. 498–516). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Correia, G., & van Arem, B. (2016). Solving the user optimum privately owned automated vehicles assignment problem (UO-POAVAP): A model to explore the impacts of self-driving vehicles on urban mobility. Transportation Research Part B, 87, 64–88. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Cyganski, R., Fraedrich, E., & Lenz, B. (2015). Travel-Time valuation for automated driving: A Use-case-driven study. Paper presented at the TRB annual meeting.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016). Gear 2030 discussion paper. Roadmap on highly automated vehicles. Directorate-general for internal market, industry, entrepreneurship and SMEs.
   Google Scholar
• Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. M. (2014). The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 40, 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. M. (2016). Dynamic ride-sharing and fleet sizing for a system of shared autonomous vehicles in Austin, Texas. Transportation. doi: 10.1007/s11116-016-9729-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagnant, D., Kockelman, K. M., & Bansal, P. (2015). Operations of shared autonomous vehicle fleet for Austin, Texas, market. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2536, 98–106. doi: 10.3141/2536-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich, M., & Hartl, M. (2016). Schlussbericht MEGAFON – Modellergebnisse geteilter autonomer Fahrzeugflotten des öffentlichen Nahverkehrs. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart, Institute for Road and Transport Science.
   Google Scholar
• Gelauff, G., Ossokina, I., & Teulings, C. (2017). Spatial effects of automated driving: Dispersion, concentration or both. The Hague: KIM – Netherlands Institute for Transport Policy Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Gucwa, M. (2014). Mobility and energy impacts of automated cars. Analysis using MTC travel model One. Paper presented at the automated vehicle symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land Use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2), 73–76. doi: 10.1080/01944365908978307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, J., & Habib, K. N. (2018). Integrated models of land use and transportation for the autonomous vehicle revolution. Transport Reviews.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilig, M., Hilgert, T., Mallig, N., Kagerbauer, M., & Vortisch, P. (2017). Potentials of autonomous vehicles in a changing private transportation system – a case study in the Stuttgart region. Transportation Research Procedia, 26, 13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Hörl, S., Erath, A., & Axhausen, K. W. (2016). Simulation of autonomous taxis in a multi-modal traffic scenario with dynamic demand. Zurich: Institute for Transport Planning and Systems. ETH Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• ITF (International Transport Forum). (2015). Urban mobility system. Upgrade. How shared self-driving cars could change city traffic. Corporate Partnership Board Report. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. M., Dix, M. C., Clarke, M. I., & Heggie, I. G. (1983). Understanding travel behaviour. Aldershot: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Kasraian, D., Maat, K., Stead, D., & van Wee, B. (2016). Long-term impacts of transport infrastructure networks on land-use change: An international review of empirical studies. Transport Reviews, 36(6), 772–792. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2016.1168887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., Rousseau, G., Freedman, J., & Nicholson, J. (2015a). The travel impact of autonomous vehicles in metro Atlanta through activity-based modeling. Paper presented at the 15th TRB national transportation planning applications conference.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H., Yook, D. H., Ko, Y. S., & Kim, D. H. (2015b). An analysis of expected effects of the autonomous vehicles on transport and land use in Korea. Anyang: New York University, Marron Institute of Urban Management.
   Google Scholar
• Kitamura, R. (1988). An evaluation of activity-based travel analysis. Transportation, 15, 9–34. doi: 10.1007/BF00167973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornhauser, A. L. (2013). Smart driving cars: Transit opportunity of NHTSA level 4 driverless vehicles. Paper presented at the TRB automated vehicle workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Kröger, L., Kuhnimhof, T., & Trommer, S. ( in press). Does context matter? A comparative study modelling autonomous vehicle impact on travel behaviour for Germany and the USA. Transportation Research Part A.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, M. W., Kockelman, K. M., Boyles, S. D., & Li, T. (2017). A general framework for modeling shared autonomous vehicles with dynamic network-loading and dynamic ride-sharing application. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 64, 373–383. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Vine, S., Zolfaghari, A., & Polak, J. (2015). Autonomous cars: The tension between occupant experience and intersection capacity. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 52, 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2015.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Kockelman, K. M., Boesch, P. M., & Ciari, F. (2017). Tracking a system of shared autonomous vehicles across the Austin, Texas network using agent-based simulation. Transportation. doi: 10.1007/s11116-017-9811-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llorca, C., Moreno, A. T., & Moeckel, R. (2017). Effects of shared autonomous vehicles on the level of service in the greater Munich metropolitan area. Paper presented at the international conference on intelligent transport systems in theory and practice, Mobil.TUM, Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, L. M., & Viegas, J. M. (2017). Assessing the impacts of deploying a shared elf-driving urban mobility system: An agent-based model applied to the city of Lisbon, Portugal. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 6, 13–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtst.2017.05.005
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., Becker, H., Boesch, P. M., & Axhausen, K. W. (2017). Autonomous vehicles: The next jump in accessibilities? Research in Transportation Economics, 62, 80–91. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2017.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milakis, D., van Arem, B., & van Wee, B. (2017). Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(4), 324–348. doi: 10.1080/15472450.2017.1291351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, A. T. (2017, April 10–13). Autonomous vehicles: Implications on an integrated land-use and transport modelling suite. Paper presented at the 11th AESOP young academics conference in Munich.
   Google Scholar
• SAE International. (2018). Surface vehicles recommended practice. J3016. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles.
   Google Scholar
• Spieser, K., Treleaven, K., Zhang, R., Frazzoli, E., Morton, D., & Pavone, M. (2014). Toward a systemic approach to the design and evaluation of automated mobility-on-demand systems: A case study in Singapore. In G. Meyer, & S. Beiker (Eds.), Road vehicle automation. Lecture notes in mobility (pp. 229–245). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stocker, A., & Shaheen, S. (2017). Shared automated vehicles. A review of business models. International Transport Forum Discussion Paper 09/2017.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur, P., Kinghorn, R., & Grace, R. (2016). Urban form and function in the autonomous era. Australasian transport research forum proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, M., & Fürst, F. (1999). Land-use transport interaction: State of the art. Deliverable D2a of the project TRANSLAND (integration of transport and land use planning). Dortmund: University of Dortmund.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. (2017). The interaction between land use and transportation in the era of shared autonomous vehicles: A simulation model (Dissertation). Georgia Institute of Technology
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., & Guhathakurta, S. (2017). Parking spaces in the age of shared autonomous vehicles Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2651, 80–91. doi: 10.3141/2651-09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Guhathakurta, S., & Fang, J. (2015). Exploring the impact of shared autonomous vehicles on urban parking demand: An agent-based simulation approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 19, 34–45. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2015.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Guhathakurta, S., & Khalil, E. B. (2018). The impact of private autonomous vehicles on vehicle ownership and unoccupied VMT generation. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 90, 156–165. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., & Kockelman, K. M. (2017). Anticipating the regional impacts of connected and automated vehicle travel in Austin, Texas. Paper presented at the TRB annual meeting.
   Google Scholar