Automated vehicles: exploring possible consequences of government (non)intervention for congestion and accessibility

References

• Alessandrini, A., Campagna, A., Site, P. D., Filippi, F., & Persia, L. (2015). Automated vehicles and the rethinking of mobility and cities. Transportation Research Procedia, SIDT Scientific Seminar 2013, 5, 145–160. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2015.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. M., Kalra, N., Sorensen, P., Samaras, C., & Oluwatola, O. A. (2014). Autonomous vehicle technology: How to best realize its social benefits.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. M., Kalra, N., Stanley, K. D., Sorensen, P., Samaras, C., & Oluwatola, O. A. (2014). Autonomous vehicle technology: A guide for policymakers. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, G. (2010). Rise in UK car CO2 emissions largely a result of increasing SUV sales, not declining diesel | transport & environment [WWW Document]. Transport and Environment. Retrieved from https://www.transportenvironment.org/newsroom/blog/rise-uk-car-co2-emissions-largely-result-increasing-suv-sales-not-declining-diesel
   Google Scholar
• Arnott, R., & Small, K. (1994). The economics of traffic congestion. American Scientist, 82, 446–455.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins. (2016). Research on the impacts of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow: summary report. © Atkins Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, M. M., & Coleman, W. D. (1992). Policy networks, policy communities and the problems of governance. Governance, 5, 154–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.1992.tb00034.x
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D., Stead, D., Steen, P., Akerman, J., Dreborg, K., Nijkamp, P., & Schleicher-Tappeser, R. (2000). European transport policy and sustainable mobility. London; New York: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bansal, P., Kockelman, K. M., & Singh, A. (2016). Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 67, 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg, D. (2014). A 2050 vision for London: What are the implications of driverless transport. London: Transport Times.
   Google Scholar
• Bierstedt, J., Gooze, A., Gray, C., Peterman, J., Raykin, L., & Walters, J. (2014). Effects of next-generation vehicles on travel demand and highway capacity, FP think. Washington, DC: Fehr & Peers.
   Google Scholar
• Bohm, F., & Häger, K. (2015). Introduction of autonomous vehicles in the Swedish traffic system: Effects and changes due to the new self-driving car technology. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Bonneau, V., Yi, H., Probst, L., Pedersen, B., & Lonkeu, O. (2017). Autonomous cars: A big opportunity for European industry. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnefon, J.-F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2016). The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, 352, 1573–1576. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P.-M. (2014). Autonomous vehicles: A thought leadership review of how the UK can achieve a fully autonomous future. Stevenage: The Institution of Engineering and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Calvert, S. C., Schakel, W. J., & van Lint, C. J. W. (2017). Will automated vehicles negatively impact traffic flow? Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2017(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1155/2017/3082781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, P. (2017). General motors aims to run fleets of self-driving taxis by 2019. London: Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Cavoli, C., Phillips, B., Cohen, T., & Jones, P. (2017). Social and behavioural questions associated with automated vehicles. A literature review. London: Department for Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C.-Y. (2017). Advancements, prospects, and impacts of automated driving systems. International journal of transportation science and technology. Safer Road Infrastructure and Operation Management, 6, 208–216. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtst.2017.07.008
   Google Scholar
• Christidis, P., & Ibáñez Rivas, J. (2012). Measuring road congestion. Sevilla: European Commission, Joint Research Centre. doi:10.2791/15282
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B., Parkhurst, G., & Ricci, M. (2016). The potential impact of autonomous vehicles on transport systems and society: A review and future prospects. Presented at the 48th universities’ transport studies group conference, 48th universities’ transport studies group conference, Bristol, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, T., Jones, P., & Cavoli, C. (2017). Social and behavioural questions associated with automated vehicles. Scoping study by UCL Transport Institute (Final report). London: Department for Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, T., & Shrewsbury, J. (Forthcoming). A novel metric for responding to transport inequality.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, T., Stilgoe, J., & Cavoli, C. (2018). Reframing the governance of automotive automation: Insights from UK stakeholder workshops. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 5, 1–23. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2018.1495030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çolak, S., Lima, A., & González, M. C. (2016). Understanding congested travel in urban areas. Nature Communications, 7, Article no 10793. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyganski, R., Fraedrich, E., & Lenz, B. (2015). Travel-time valuation for automated driving: A use-case-driven study. Presented at the transportation research board 94th annual meetingtransportation research board.
   Google Scholar
• de Almeida Correia, G. H., & van Arem, B. (2016). Solving the user optimum privately owned automated vehicles assignment problem (UO-POAVAP): A model to explore the impacts of self-driving vehicles on urban mobility. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 87, 64–88. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Transport. (2015). The pathway to driverless cars summary report and action plan.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Transport. (2016). Dft single departmental plan: Summary of the metrics used, how frequently the metric will be updated and its source. London: Department for Transport.
   Google Scholar
• DiClemente, J., Mogos, S., & Wang, R. (2014). Autonomous car policy report 2014. Carnegie Mellon University new technology commercialization project class, Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Enoch, M. (2015). How a rapid modal convergence into a universal automated taxi service could be the future for local passenger transport. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(8), 910–924. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2015.1024646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism / Gøsta Esping-Andersen. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). White Paper: Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system.
   Google Scholar
• Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. (2015). Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 167–181. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration. (2005). Traffic congestion and reliability: Linking solutions to problems. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S. J. (2016). Planning for density in a driverless world. Georgetown: Georgetown University Law Center.
   Google Scholar
• Fraedrich, E., Beiker, S., & Lenz, B. (2015). Transition pathways to fully automated driving and its implications for the sociotechnical system of automobility. European Journal of Futures Research, 3, 91. doi: 10.1007/s40309-015-0067-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisoni, R., Dall’Oglio, A., Nelson, C., Long, J., Vollath, C., Ranghetti, D., & McMinimy, S. (2016). Self-Piloted cars: the future of road transport? Steer Davies Gleave & European Parliament, committee on transport and tourism.
   Google Scholar
• Geurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12, 127–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Greater London Assembly Transport Committee. (2017). London stalling. Reducing traffic congestion in London. London: Greater London Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra, E. (2016). Planning for cars that drive themselves: Metropolitan planning organizations, regional transportation plans, and autonomous vehicles. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36, 210–224. doi: 10.1177/0739456X15613591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. (2014). Understanding ‘anticipatory governance’. Social Studies of Science, 44, 218–242. doi: 10.1177/0306312713508669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. (2018). Are autonomous cars really safer than human drivers? [WWW Document]. The Conversation. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/are-autonomous-cars-really-safer-than-human-drivers-90202
   Google Scholar
• Harper, C. D., Hendrickson, C. T., Mangones, S., & Samaras, C. (2016). Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 72, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2016.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. (2001). Multi-level governance and European integration (1st ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, D., & Dai, D. (2013). Public perceptions of self-driving cars: the case of Berkeley, California. In: 93rd annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington DC, USA, 12–16 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2009). Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sciences, 42, 73–89. doi: 10.1007/s11077-009-9079-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITF. (2015). Automated and autonomous driving. Regulation under uncertainty. Paris: International Transport Forum, OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Kockelman, K., Avery, P., Bansal, P., Boyles, S. D., Bujanovic, P., Choudhary, T., … Stewart, D. (2016). Implications of connected and automated vehicles on the safety and operations of roadway networks: A final report.
   Google Scholar
• KonSULT. (2016). Policy Guidebook [WWW Document]. Retrieved from http://www.konsult.leeds.ac.uk/pg/
   Google Scholar
• KPMG International. (2018). Autonomous vehicles readiness index.
   Google Scholar
• Le Vine, S., & Polak, J. (2014). Automated cars: A smooth ride ahead? (No. Number Five), ITC Occasional Papers London: Independent Transport Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23, 161–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luetge, C. (2017). The German ethics code for automated and connected driving. Philosophy & Technology, 30, 547–558. doi: 10.1007/s13347-017-0284-0
   Google Scholar
• Maia, S. C., & Meyboom, A. (2018). Understanding the effects of autonomous vehicles on urban form. In G. Meyer & S. Beiker (Eds.), Road vehicle automation 4, lecture notes in mobility (pp. 201–221). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-60934-8_17
   Google Scholar
• Milakis, D., Kroesen, M., & van Wee, B. (2018). Implications of automated vehicles for accessibility and location choices: Evidence from an expert-based experiment. Journal of Transport Geography, 68, 142–148. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milakis, D., Snelder, M., van Arem, B., van Wee, G. P., & Homem de Almeida Correia, G. (2017). Development and transport implications of automated vehicles in the Netherlands: Scenarios for 2030 and 2050. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 17, 63–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milakis, D., van Arem, B., & van Wee, B. (2017). Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21, 324–348. doi: 10.1080/15472450.2017.1291351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mladenovic, M. N., & McPherson, T. (2016). Engineering social justice into traffic control for self-driving vehicles? Science and Engineering Ethics, 22, 1131–1149. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9690-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, J. (2018). Look, Ma, No Steering Wheel Or Pedals In GM’s Robo-Taxi, Coming In 2019. Forbes.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A. J. (2000). Freedom with responsibility: The social market economy in Germany 1918-1963. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papa, E., & Ferreira, A. (2018). Sustainable accessibility and the implementation of automated vehicles: Identifying critical decisions. Urban Science, 2, 5. doi: 10.3390/urbansci2010005
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2008). Remaking laissez-faire. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 3–43. doi: 10.1177/0309132507084816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAE International. (2016). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. Warrendale, PA: SAE international.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, H. (1948). Economic policy for a free society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. W. (2012). Managing autonomous transportation demand. Santa Clara Law Review, 52(4), 1401–1422.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J. (2018). Machine learning, social learning and the governance of self-driving cars. Social Studies of Science, 48(1), 25–56. doi: 10.1177/0306312717741687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomopoulos, N., & Givoni, M. (2015). The autonomous car—a blessing or a curse for the future of low carbon mobility? An exploration of likely vs. Desirable outcomes. European Journal of Futures Research, 3, 31. doi: 10.1007/s40309-015-0071-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ticoll, D. (2015). Driving changes: Automated vehicles in toronto. Toronto: University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Vojnovic, I. (2003). Laissez-faire governance and the archetype Laissez-faire city in the USA: Exploring Houston. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 85, 19–38. doi: 10.1111/1468-0467.00128
   Google Scholar
• Wadud, Z., MacKenzie, D., & Leiby, P. (2016). Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impact of highly automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 86, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, J., Baker, T., Goodin, G., & Maddox, J. (2014). Automated vehicles: Policy implications scoping study.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C., & Quddus, M. (2009). Impact of traffic congestion on road accidents: A spatial analysis of the M25 motorway in England. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41(4), 798–808. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittneben, B., Bongardt, D., Dalkmann, H., Sterk, W., & Baatz, C. (2009). Integrating sustainable transport measures into the clean development mechanism. Transport Reviews, 29, 91–113. doi: 10.1080/01441640802133494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakharenko, R. (2016). Self-driving cars will change cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 61, 26–37. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Guhathakurta, S., Fang, J., & Zhang, G. (2015). Exploring the impact of shared autonomous vehicles on urban parking demand: An agent-based simulation approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 19, 34–45. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2015.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmud, J., Goodin, G., Moran, M., Kalra, N., & Thorn, E. (2017). Advancing automated and connected vehicles: Policy and planning strategies for state and local transportation agencies. doi: 10.17226/24872
   Google Scholar