Towards improved port capacity investment decisions under uncertainty: a real options approach

References

• Acciaro, M. (2014a). Real option analysis for environmental compliance: LNG and emission control areas. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 28, 41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acciaro, M. (2014b). A real option application to investment in low-sulphur maritime transport. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 6(2), 189–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguerrevere, F. L. (2003). Equilibrium investment strategies and output price behavior: A real-options approach. The Review of Financial Studies, 16(4), 1239–1272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguerrevere, F. L. (2009). Real options, product market competition, and asset returns. The Journal of Finance, 64(2), 957–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anda, J., Golub, A., & Strukova, E. (2009). Economics of climate change under uncertainty: Benefits of flexibility. Energy Policy, 37(4), 1345–1355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asteris, M., Collins, A., & Jones, D. F. (2012). Container port infrastructure in north-west Europe: Policy-level modeling. Journal of Policy Modeling, 34(2), 312–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, A., & Paxson, D. (2014). Developing real option game models. European Journal of Operational Research, 237(3), 909–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balliauw, M. (2017). An analysis of entry and exit decisions in shipping markets under uncertainty. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 9(5), 527–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Ilan, A., & Strange, W. C. (1999). The timing and intensity of investment. Journal of Macroeconomics, 21(1), 57–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, H., & Turnbull, P. (2002). Labour regulation and competitive performance in the port transport industry: The changing fortunes of three major European seaports. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 8(2), 133–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendall, H. B., & Stent, A. F. (2003). Investment strategies in market uncertainty. Maritime Policy & Management, 30(4), 293–303.
   Google Scholar
• Bendall, H. B., & Stent, A. F. (2005). Ship investment under uncertainty: Valuing a real option on the maximum of several strategies. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 7(1), 19–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bendall, H. B., & Stent, A. F. (2007). Maritime investment strategies with a portfolio of real options. Maritime Policy and Management, 34(5), 441–452.
   Google Scholar
• Bjerksund, P., & Ekern, S. (1995). Contingent claims evaluation of mean-reverting cash flows in shipping. In L. Trigeorgis (Ed.), Real options in capital investment: Models, strategies, and applications (pp. 207–219). Westport, CT: Preager.
   Google Scholar
• Blauwens, G., De Baere, P., & Van de Voorde, E. (2016). Transport economics (6th ed.). Antwerp: De Boeck.
   Google Scholar
• Blonigen, B. A., & Wilson, W. W. (2008). Port efficiency and trade flows. Review of International Economics, 16(1), 21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y. T., Tongzon, J., Luo, M., & Lee, P. T. W. (2012). Estimation of optimal handling capacity of a container port: An economic approach. Transport Reviews, 32(2), 241–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, J. Y. J., & Regan, A. C. (2010). Real option pricing of network design investments. Transportation Science, 45(1), 50–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chronopoulos, M., Hagspiel, V., & Fleten, S. E. (2017). Stepwise investment and capacity sizing under uncertainty. OR spectrum, 39(2), 447–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppens, F., Lagneaux, F., Meersman, H. M., Sellekaerts, N., Van de Voorde, E., van Gastel, G., & Verhetsel, A. (2007, February). Economic impact of port activity: A disaggregate analysis – the case of Antwerp (Working paper document No. 110). National Bank of Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Cucchiella, F., & Gastaldi, M. (2006). Risk management in supply chain: A real option approach. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(6), 700–720.
   Google Scholar
• Cullinane, K., & Bergqvist, R. (2014). Emission control areas and their impact on maritime transport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 28, 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullinane, K., Teng, Y., & Wang, T. F. (2005). Port competition between Shanghai and Ningbo. Maritime Policy and Management, 32(4), 331–346.
   Google Scholar
• Dangl, T. (1999). Investment and capacity choice under uncertain demand. European Journal of Operational Research, 117(3), 415–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Borger, B., Proost, S., & Dender, K. V. (2008). Private port pricing and public investment in port and hinterland capacity. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 42(3), 527–561.
   Google Scholar
• De Langen, P., Turró, M., Fontanet, M., & Caballé, J. (2018). The infrastructure investment needs and financing challenge of European ports (Report). European Seaports Organisation (ESPO). Retrieved from https://www.espo.be/media/Port%20Investment%20Study%202018_FINAL_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• de Neufville, R. (2003). Real options: Dealing with uncertainty in systems planning and design. Integrated Assessment, 4(1), 26–34.
   Google Scholar
• de Neufville, R. (2006). Real options by spreadsheet: Parking garage case example. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 12(2), 107–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Neufville, R. (2016). Airport systems planning and design. In L. Budd & S. Ison (Eds.), Air transport management: An international perspective (pp. 61–78). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Weille, J., & Ray, A. (1974, September). The optimum port capacity. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 8(3), 244–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikos, G. (2008). Real options econometrics for aggregate tanker investment decisions. International Journal of Ocean Systems Management, 1(1), 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Estache, A. (2001). Privatization and regulation of transport infrastructure in the 1990s. The World Bank Research Observer, 16(1), 85–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliano, G. (2007). The changing landscape of transportation decision making. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2036(1), 5–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenadier, S. R. (2002). Option exercise games: An application to the equilibrium investment strategies of firms. Review of Financial Studies, 15(3), 691–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, G. (2012). Uncertainty and the trade-off between scale and flexibility in investment. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36(11), 1718–1728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagspiel, V., Huisman, K. J., & Kort, P. M. (2016). Volume flexibility and capacity investment under demand uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 178, 95–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrald, J. R., Stephens, H. W., & Rene vanDorp, J. (2004). A framework for sustainable port security. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 1(2), Article 12.
   Google Scholar
• Heaver, T. (2011). Co-ordination in multi-actor logistics operations: Challenges at the port interface. In P. Hall, R. J. McCalla, C. Comtoisand & B. Slack (Eds.), Integrating seaports and trade corridors (pp. 155–170). London: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Heaver, T., Meersman, H., & Van de Voorde, E. (2001). Co-operation and competition in international container transport: Strategies for ports. Maritime Policy and Management, 28(3), 293–305.
   Google Scholar
• Herder, P. M., de Joode, J., Ligtvoet, A., Schenk, S., & Taneja, P. (2011). Buying real options – valuing uncertainty in infrastructure planning. Futures, 43(9), 961–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Q., & Zhang, A. (2015). Real option analysis of aircraft acquisition: A case study. Journal of Air Transport Management, 46, 19–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberts, N. F., Huisman, K. J., Kort, P. M., & Lavrutich, M. N. (2015). Capacity choice in (strategic) real options models: A survey. Dynamic Games and Applications, 5(4), 424–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman, K. J. M., & Kort, P. M. (2015). Strategic capacity investment under uncertainty. The RAND Journal of Economics, 46(2), 376–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman, K. J. M., Kort, P. M., & Plasmans, J. (2007). Investment in high-tech industries: An example from the LCD industry (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1026609). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1026609
   Google Scholar
• Hull, J. (2012). Options, futures, and other derivatives (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Jacks, D. S., & Pendakur, K. (2010). Global trade and the maritime transport revolution. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(4), 745–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson, J. O., & Shneerson, D. (1982). Port economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juan, C., Olmos, F., Pérez, J. C., & Casasus, T. (2001). Optimal investment management of harbour infrastructures. A real option viewpoint. 6th International conference on real options. Retrieved from http://realoptionorg.powweb.com/papers2002/juan_realoptions.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kakimoto, R., & Seneviratne, P. N. (2000a). Financial oment. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 126(6), 281–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakimoto, R., & Seneviratne, P. N. (2000b). Investment risk analysis in port infrastructure appraisal. Journal of infrastructure systems, 6(4), 123–129.
   Google Scholar
• Kamoto, S., & Okawa, M. (2014). Market entry, capacity choice, and product differentiation in duopolistic competition under uncertainty. Managerial and Decision Economics, 35(8), 503–522.
   Google Scholar
• Kauppila, J., Martinez, L., Merk, O., & Benezec, V. (2016). Capacity to grow: Transport infrastructure needs for future trade growth (Report). International Transport Forum (ITF). Retrieved from https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/future-growth-transport-infrastructure.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. J., Weiss, M. B., & Morel, B. (2009). Real options and technology management: Assessing technology migration options in wireless industry. Telematics and Informatics, 26(2), 180–192.
   Google Scholar
• Koetse, M. J., & Rietveld, P. (2012). Adaptation to climate change in the transport sector. Transport Reviews, 32(3), 267–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kort, P. M., Murto, P., & Pawlina, G. (2010). Uncertainty and stepwise investment. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 196–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., & Cai, H. (2017). Government incentive impacts on private investment behaviors under demand uncertainty. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 101, 115–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey, R., & De Palma, A. (2014). Cost recovery from congestion tolls with long-run uncertainty. Economics of Transportation, 3(2), 119–132.
   Google Scholar
• Macário, R. (2014). Port capacity benchmarking: Leading or lagging? In T. Vanelslander & C. Sys (Eds.), Port business. Market challenges and management actions (pp. 61–78). Antwerp: University Press Antwerp.
   Google Scholar
• Meersman, H. (2005). Port investments in an uncertain environment. Research in Transportation Economics, 13, 279–298.
   Google Scholar
• Meersman, H., Strandenes, S. P., & Van de Voorde, E. (2015). Port pricing. In C. Nash (Ed.), Handbook of research methods and applications in transport economics and policy (pp. 329–342). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Meersman, H., & Van de Voorde, E. (2014a). Port capacity extension – a trade-off between public investment and ship owner time losses. In R. Funck & W. Rothengatter (Eds.), Man, environment, space and time – economic interactions in four dimensions (pp. 377–394). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Meersman, H., & Van de Voorde, E. (2014b). Predicting the future: How to estimate future demand for port throughput and infrastructure use. In H. Meersman, E. Van de Voordeand & T. Vanelslander (Eds.), Port infrastructure finance (pp. 33–54). New York: Informa Law from Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meersman, H., Van de Voorde, E., & Vanelslander, T. (2010). Port competition revisited. Review of Business and Economic Literature, 55(2), 210–233.
   Google Scholar
• Musso, E., Ferrari, C., & Benacchio, M. (2006). Port investment: Profitability, economic impact and financing. Research in Transportation Economics, 16, 171–218.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T., & Yap, W. Y. (2012). Port competition and competitiveness. In W. K. Talley (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Maritime Economics (pp. 549–570). Informa Law from Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Novaes, A. G., Scholz-Reiter, B., Silva, V. M. D., & Rosa, H. (2012). Long-term planning of a container terminal under demand uncertainty and economies of scale. Pesquisa Operacional, 32(1), 55–86.
   Google Scholar
• Paflioti, P., Roumpis, E., Vitsounis, T., Tsamourgelis, I., & Bell, M. (2015). Characterizing the cycle in seaports: An Australian case study. Proceedings of the IAME conference, August 2015, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Pallis, A. A., Notteboom, T. E., & De Langen, P. W. (2008). Concession agreements and market entry in the container terminal industry. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 10(3), 209–228.
   Google Scholar
• Panayides, P. M. (2006). Maritime logistics and global supply chains: Towards a research agenda. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8(1), 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Rau, P., & Spinler, S. (2016). Investment into container shipping capacity: A real options approach in oligopolistic competition. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 93, 130–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rau, P., & Spinler, S. (2017). Alliance formation in a cooperative container shipping game: Performance of a real options investment approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 101, 155–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, J. P., & Notteboom, T. (2009). The terminalization of supply chains: Reassessing the role of terminals in port/hinterland logistical relationships. Maritime Policy and Management, 36(2), 165–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Aliseda, F., & Wu, J. (2012). Irreversible investment in stochastically cyclical markets. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 21(3), 801–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed, N., & Larsen, O. I. (2010). Container terminal concessions: A game theory application to the case of the ports of Pakistan. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 12(3), 237–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöne, M. (2014). Real options valuation: The importance of stochastic process choice in commodity price modelling. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
   Google Scholar
• Slack, B., & Frémont, A. (2005). Transformation of port terminal operations: From the local to the global. Transport Reviews, 25(1), 117–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit, H. (2003). Infrastructure investment as a real options game: The case of European airport expansion. Financial Management, 32(4), 27–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sødal, S. (2006). Entry and exit decisions based on a discount factor approach. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 30(11), 1963–1986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sødal, S., Koekebakker, S., & Aadland, R. (2008). Market switching in shipping – A real option model applied to the valuation of combination carriers. Review of Financial Economics, 17(3), 183–203.
   Google Scholar
• Stopford, M. (2009). Maritime economics (3rd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strandenes, S. P. (2014). Efficiency-enhancing port pricing models. In T. Vanelslander & C. Sys (Eds.), Port business. Market challenges and management actions (pp. 43–60). Antwerp: University Press Antwerp.
   Google Scholar
• Strandenes, S. P., & Marlow, P. B. (2000). Port pricing and competitiveness in short sea shipping. International Journal of Transport Economics/Rivista internazionale di economia dei trasporti, 27(3), 315–334.
   Google Scholar
• Suykens, F., & Van de Voorde, E. (1998). A quarter a century of port management in Europe: Objectives and tools. Maritime Policy and Management, 25(3), 251–261.
   Google Scholar
• Szymanski, S. (1991). The optimal timing of infrastructure investment. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 25(3), 247–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taneja, P. (2013). The flexible port. Delft: TU Delft. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.4233/uuid:a9f0c128-d4c3-41a2-8790-13aec89dca63
   Google Scholar
• Tibben-Lembke, R. S., & Rogers, D. S. (2006). Real options: Applications to logistics and transportation. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 36(4), 252–270.
   Google Scholar
• Timperman, B. (2017). Walter Van Mechelen: “Uitstel Saeftinghe nefast voor Antwerpen”. Retrieved from http://www.flows.be/nl/shipping/walter-van-mechelen-uitstel-saeftinghe-nefast-voor-antwerpen
   Google Scholar
• Tovar, B., & Trujillo, L. (2007). Econometric estimation of scale and scope economies within the port sector: A review. Maritime Policy and Management, 34(3), 203–223.
   Google Scholar
• Trigeorgis, L. (1996). Real options: Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trigeorgis, L. (2005). Making use of real options simple: An overview and applications in flexible/modular decision making. The Engineering Economist, 50(1), 25–53.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Horst, M. R., & De Langen, P. W. (2008). Coordination in hinterland transport chains: A major challenge for the seaport community. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 10(1–2), 108–129.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Voorde, E., & Vanelslander, T. (2009). Market power and vertical and horizontal integration in the maritime shipping and port industry (OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/workingpaper/227458312782
   Google Scholar
• Vanelslander, T. (2014). Port infrastructure: What are we talking about? In H. Meersman, E. Van de Voorde, & T. Vanelslander (Eds.), Port infrastructure finance (pp. 5–32). New York: Informa Law from Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Putten, A. B., & MacMillan, I. C. (2004). Making real options really work. Harvard business review, 82(12), 134–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldman, S. J., & Bückmann, E. H. (2003). A model on container port competition: An application for the West European container hub-ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 5(1), 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Verbruggen, A. (2008). Economische benadering van milieu en milieubehoud. Antwerp: Garant.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, P. (2015). Economic assessment of management reform in European seaports (PhD thesis). University of Antwerp.
   Google Scholar
• Vilko, J. P. P., & Hallikas, J. M. (2012). Risk assessment in multimodal supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(2), 586–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeds, H. (2002). Strategic delay in a real options model of r&d competition. The Review of Economic Studies, 69(3), 729–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank & PPIAF. (2007). Port reform toolkit (Tech. Rep. No. 2nd ed.). Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, Y. b., Fu, X., Oum, T. H., & Yan, J. (2017). Modeling airport capacity choice with real options. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 100, 93–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, Y. b., Fu, X., & Zhang, A. (2013). Demand uncertainty and airport capacity choice. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 57(C), 91–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, Y. b., Ng, A. K., Yang, H., & Fu, X. (2012). An analysis of the dynamics of ownership, capacity investments and pricing structure of ports. Transport Reviews, 32(5), 629–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, A. (2007). Congestion pricing and capacity investment in a gateway-hinterland intermodal system. International conference on gateways and corridors, Vancouver, BC. Retrieved from http://www.gateway-corridor.com/roundconfpapers/documents/Zhang_Anming_Vancouver.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, A. (2008). The impact of hinterland access conditions on rivalry between ports (OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/workingpaper/235411150338
   Google Scholar
• Zhuang, W., Luo, M., & Fu, X. (2014). A game theory analysis of port specialization – implications to the Chinese port industry. Maritime Policy and Management, 41(3), 268–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar