A serving innovation typology: mapping port-related innovations

References

• Acciaro, M., Ferrari, C., Lam, J. S. L., Macário, R., Roumboutsos, A., Sys, C., … Vanelslander, T. (2018). Are the innovation processes in seaport terminal operations successful? Maritime Policy & Management, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2018.1466062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acciaro, M., Vanelslander, T., Sys, C., Ferrari, C., Roumboutsos, A., Giuliano, G., … Kapros, S. (2014). Environmental sustainability in seaports: A framework for successful innovation. Maritime Policy & Management, 41(5), 480–500. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2014.932926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allarakhia, M., & Walsh, S. T. (2011). Managing knowledge assets under conditions of radical change: The case of the pharmaceutical industry. Technovation, 31, 105–117. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2010.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosino, D., Caballini, C., & Siri, S. (2013). A mathematical model to evaluate different train loading and stacking policies in a container terminal. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 15(3), 292–308. doi: 10.1057/mel.2013.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosino, D., Ferrari, C., Sciomachen, A., & Tei, A. (2018). Ports, external costs, and Northern Italian transport network design: Effects for the planned transformation. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(6), 803–818. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2018.1448475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arduino, G., Aronietis, R., Crozet, Y., Frouws, K., Ferrari, C., Guihéry, L., … Vanelslander, T. (2013). How to turn an innovative concept into a success? An application to seaport-related innovation. Research in Transport Economics, 42(1), 97–107. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2012.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydogdu, Y. V., & Aksoy, S. (2015). A study on quantitative benefits of port community systems. Maritime Policy & Management, 45, 1–10. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2013.825053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D., & Stead, D. (2004). Impact of information and communications technology on transport. Transport Reviews, 24(5), 611–632. doi: 10.1080/0144164042000206060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barras, R. (1986). Towards a theory of innovation in services. Research Policy, 15, 161–173. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90012-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407–429. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bontekoning, Y., & Priemus, H. (2004). Breakthrough innovations in intermodal freight transport. Transportation Planning and Technology, 27(5), 335–345. doi: 10.1080/0308106042000273031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booz, Allen & Hamilton. (1982). New products management for the 1980s. New York, NY: Booz, Allen & Hamilton.
   Google Scholar
• Bourreau, M., Gensollen, M., & Moreau, F. (2012). The impact of a radical innovation on business models: Incremental adjustments or big bang? Industry and Innovation, 19(5), 415–435. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2046991 doi: 10.1080/13662716.2012.711026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmen, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31(2), 233–245. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00138-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, S.-L., & Yu, H.-C. (2012). Repositioning empty containers in East and North China ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 14(4), 435–454. doi: 10.1057/mel.2012.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H.-C., & Liu, S.-M. (2015). Optimal concession contracts for landlord port authorities to maximize traffic volumes. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(6), 11–25. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2013.863435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, M., Laursen, K., Magnusson, M., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2011). Organizing inter- and intra-firm networks: What is the impact on innovation performance? Industry and Innovation, 18(6), 531–538. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2011.601958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordero, R., Walsh, S., & Kirchhoff, B. (2005). Motivating performance in innovative manufacturing plants. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 16, 89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.hitech.2005.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Crozet, Y. (2010). Driving forces of innovation in the transport sector (p. 25). Retrieved from http://www.internationaltransportforum.org/Pub/pdf/10FP06.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dang, Q.-V., Nielsen, I., & Yun, W.-Y. (2013). Replenishment policies for empty containers in an inland multi-depot system. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 15(1), 120–149. doi: 10.1057/mel.2012.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defilippi, E. (2012). Good regulations, bad regulation: A Peruvian port case. Maritime Policy & Management, 39(6), 641–651. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2012.728725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Langen, P., Van den Berg, R., & Willeumier, A. (2013). A new approach to granting terminal concessions: The case of the Rotterdam world gateway terminal. Maritime Policy & Management, 39(1), 79–90. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2011.642311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Martino, M., Errichiello, L., Marasco, A., & Morvillo, A. (2013). Logistics innovation in seaports: An inter-organizational perspective. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 123–133. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Do, N.-H., Nam, K.-C., & Ngoc Le, Q.-L. (2013). A consideration for developing a dry port system in Indochina area. Maritime Policy & Management, 38(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2010.533712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. F. (1985). The discipline of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 63(3), 67–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fancello, G., Pani, C., Pisano, M., Serra, P., Zuddas, P., & Fadda, P. (2011). Prediction of arrival times and human resources allocation for container terminal. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 13(2), 142–173. doi: 10.1057/mel.2011.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flint, D. J., Larsson, E., Gammelgaard, B., & Mentzer, J. T. (2005). Logistics innovation: A customer value-oriented social process. Journal of Business Logistics, 26(1), 113–147. doi: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2005.tb00196.x
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (1982). The economics of industrial innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garg, A., Vijayaraghavan, V., Lam, J. S. L., Singru, P. M., & Guo, L. (2015). A molecular simulation based computational intelligence study of a nano-machining process with implications on its environmental performance. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 21, 54–63. doi: 10.1016/j.swevo.2015.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gharehgozli, A., Roy, D., & De Koster, R. (2016). Sea container terminals: New technologies and OR models. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 18(2), 103–140. doi:10.1057/s41278-017-0069-5 doi: 10.1057/mel.2015.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golias, M. (2011). A bi-objective berth allocation formulation to account for vessel handling time uncertainty. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 13(4), 419–441. doi: 10.1057/mel.2011.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golias, M., & Haralambides, H. (2011). Berth scheduling with variable cost functions. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 13(2), 174–189. doi: 10.1057/mel.2011.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groen, A., & Walsch, S. (2013). Introduction to the field of emerging technology management. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(1), 1–5. doi: 10.1111/caim.12019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habbay, S. (2012). A firm-level analysis on the relative difference between technology-driven and market-driven disruptive business model innovations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(3), 290–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00628.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemphälä, J., & Magnusson, M. (2012). Networks for innovation – but what networks and what innovation? Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(1), 3–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00625.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9–30. doi: 10.2307/2393549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintjens, J. (2018). A conceptual framework for cooperation in hinterland development between neighbouring seaport authorities. Maritime Policy & Management, 45, 819–836. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2018.1495343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintjens, J., Vanelslander, T., Kuipers, B., & Van der Horst, M. (2015). The evolution of the economic centre of gravity and the consequences for gateway ports and hinterland connections – the case of the Flemish-Dutch Delta. Proceedings of the IAME 2015 Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Hollanders, H., Rivera, L., & Roman, L. (2012). Regional innovation scoreboard 2012 (p. 76). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/ris-2012_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Iannone, F. (2012). A model optimizing the port-hinterland logistics of containers: The case of the Campania region in Southern Italy. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 14(1), 33–72. doi: 10.1057/mel.2011.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Transport Forum. (2010). Transport and innovation: Unleashing the potential. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Jenssen, J. (2003). Innovation, capabilities and competitive advantage in Norwegian shipping. Maritime Policy & Management, 30, 93–106. doi: 10.1080/0308883032000084841
   Google Scholar
• Kautt, M., Walsh, S., & Bittner, K. (2007). Global Distribution of micro–nano technology and Fabrication Centers: A Portfolio analysis approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 1697–1717. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2007.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaveshgar, N., & Huynh, N. (2015). A genetic algorithm heuristic for solving the quay crane scheduling problem with time windows. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 17(4), 515–537. doi: 10.1057/mel.2014.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keceli, Y. (2011). A proposed innovation strategy for Turkish port administration policy via information technology. Maritime Policy & Management, 38(2), 151–167. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2011.556676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klerides, E., & Hadjiconstantinou, E. (2011). Modelling and solution approaches to the multi-load AGV dispatching problem in container terminals. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 13(4), 371–386. doi: 10.1057/mel.2011.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klopott, M. (2013). Restructuring of environmental management in Baltic ports: Case of Poland. Maritime Policy & Management, 40(5), 439–450. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2013.798440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koski, H., & Kretschmer, T. (2004). Survey on competing in network industries: Firm strategies, market outcomes, and policy implications. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 4(1), 5–31. doi: 10.1023/B:JICT.0000029239.55756.e6
   Google Scholar
• Kramberger, T., Monios, J., Strubelj, G., & Rupnik, B. (2018). Using dry ports for port co-opetition: The case of Adriatic ports. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 10(1), 18–44. doi: 10.1504/IJSTL.2018.088319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, J. S. L., & Gu, Y. (2013). Port hinterland intermodal container flow optimisation with green concerns: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 5(3), 257–281. doi: 10.1504/IJSTL.2013.054190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, J. S. L., & Van de Voorde, E. (2011). Scenario analysis for supply chain integration in container shipping. Maritime Policy & Management, 38(7), 705–725. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2011.625988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantada, A. D., Piotter, V., Plewa, K., Barié, N., Guttmann, M., & Wissmann, M. (2015). Toward mass production of microtextured microdevices: Linking rapid prototyping with microinjection molding. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 76(5-8), 1011–1020. doi:10.1016/0041-2678(74)90119-5 doi: 10.1007/s00170-014-6333-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, P. T.-W., Lam, J. S. L., Lin, C. W., Hu, K. C., & Cheong, I. (2018). Developing the fifth generation port concept model: An empirical test. International Journal of Logistics Management, 29(3), 1098–1120. doi: 10.1108/IJLM-10-2016-0239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marenco, L., & Cantillo, V. (2015). A framework to evaluate particulate matter emissions in bulk material ports: Case study of Colombian coal terminals. Maritime Policy & Management, 45, 335–361. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2013.877171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marianos, N., Lambrou, M., Nikitakos, N., & Vaggelas, G. (2011). Managing port e-services in a socio-technical context. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 3(1), 27–56. doi: 10.1504/IJSTL.2011.037818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37(4), 596–615. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, H., Ahn, S.-B., Lee, H.-S., & Park, H. (2017). An integrated terminal operating system for enhancing the efficiency of seaport terminal operators. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 19(3), 428–450. doi: 10.1057/s41278-017-0069-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaco, F., & Sammarra, M. (2011). Quay crane scheduling with time windows, one-way and spatial constraints. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 3(4), 454–474. doi: 10.1504/IJSTL.2011.041137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monios, J., & Wilmsmeier, G. (2013). Port-centric logistics, dry ports and offshore logistics hubs: Strategies to overcome double peripherality? Maritime Policy & Management, 39(2), 207–226. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2011.650720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, H.-S., & Song, D.-W. (2013). Defining maritime logistics hub and its implication for container port. Maritime Policy & Management, 38(3), 269–292. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2011.572705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD Publishing. (2005). The measurement of scientific and technological activities Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Olivo, A., Di Francesco, M., & Zuddas, P. (2013). An optimization model for the inland repositioning of empty containers. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 15(3), 309–331. doi: 10.1057/mel.2013.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osthorst, W., & Mänz, C. (2012). Types of cluster adaptation to climate change. Lessons from the port and logistics sector of Northwest Germany. Maritime Policy & Management, 39(2), 227–248. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2011.650724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagoropoulos, A., Maier, A., & McAloone, T. C. (2017). Assessing transformational change from institutionalising digital capabilities on implementation and development of Product-Service Systems: Learnings from the maritime industry. Journal of cleaner production, 166, 369–380. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, N., Park, U., & Lee, J. (2012). Do the Performances of innovative firms differ depending on market-oriented or technology-oriented Strategies? Industry and Innovation, 19(5), 391–414. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2012.711024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remneland-Wikhamn, B., & Knights, D. (2012). Transaction cost Economics and open innovation: Implications for Theory and practice. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(3), 277–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00639.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roumboutsos, A., Kapros, S., Polydoropoulou, A., Lambrou, M., Lloyd, M., Frouws, K., … Aronietis, R. (2011). Scenario framework for successful innovation, InnoSuTra project deliverable 6 (p. 155). Retrieved from http://www.transport-research.info/Upload/Documents/201205/20120514_093325_67925_Annex620-%20D6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schiff, J. B. (2014). Building a sustainable cost leadership culture. Strategic Finance, 96(9), 47–51.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1912/1983). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. (1939). Business cycles. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sharif, O., & Huynh, N. (2013). Yard crane scheduling at container terminals: A comparative study of centralized and decentralized approaches. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 14(2), 139–161. doi:10.1504/IJSTL.2012.044135 doi: 10.1057/mel.2012.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sys, C., Vanelslander, T., Acciaro, M., Ferrari, C., Roumboutsos, A., Giuliano, G., … Lam, J. S. L. (2015). Executive summary (p. 26). Antwerp: University of Antwerp. Retrieved from https://www.uantwerpen.be/images/uantwerpen/container2629/files/BNPPF/Sys_Executive%20summary_19092015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thai, V. (2012). Competencies required by port personnel in the new era: Conceptual framework and case study. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 4(1), 49–77. doi: 10.1504/IJSTL.2012.044135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, P. H., & Liao, C. H. (2015). Supply chain integration, information technology, market orientation and firm performance in container shipping firms. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 26(1), 82–106. doi: 10.1108/IJLM-09-2012-0088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Horst, M., & Van der Lugt, L. (2013). Coordination mechanisms in improving hinterland accessibility: Empirical analysis in the port of Rotterdam. Maritime Policy & Management, 38(4), 415–435. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2011.588257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Geenhuizen, M., Geerlings, H., & Priemus, H. (2003). Transport innovation: Coping with the future. Transportation Planning and Technology, 26(6), 437–447. doi: 10.1080/0308106032000167346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenstra, A., Zuidwijk, R., & van Asperen, E. (2012). The extended gate concept for container terminals: Expanding the notion of dry ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 14(1), 14–32. doi: 10.1057/mel.2011.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivanco, D. F., Kemp, R., & van der Voet, E. (2015). The relativity of eco-innovation: Environmental rebound effects from past transport innovations in Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 71–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojdani, N., Lootz, F., & Rösner, R. (2013). Optimizing empty container logistics based on a collaborative network approach. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 15(4), 467–493. doi: 10.1057/mel.2013.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Chen, Q., & Huang, R. (2018). Locating dry ports on a network: A case study on Tianjin port. Maritime Policy & Management, 45, 71–88. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2017.1330558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K. M., Heller-Schuh, B., Godoe, H., & Roeste, R. (2014). ICT-enabled system innovations in public services: Experiences from intelligent transport systems. Telecommunications Policy, 38(5), 539–557. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2013.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, H., Sheng, Z., & Lee, P. T.-W. (2018). The role of dry port in hub-and-spoke network under belt and road initiative. Maritime Policy & Management, 45, 370–387. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2017.1396505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2013). Reforming the Indian ports sector. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/06/20225824/reforming-indian-ports-sector
   Google Scholar
• Yang, W.-S., Liang, G.-S., & Ding, J.-F. (2013). Identifying solutions for adding service value to international port logistics centers in Taiwan. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 15(4), 395–415. doi: 10.1057/mel.2013.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, Q., Diabat, A., & Zhang, Q. (2018). A simulation optimization approach for solving the dual-cycling problem in container terminals. Maritime Policy & Management, 45, 806–826. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2015.1043362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., Ruan, X., Xia, Y., & Feng, X. (2018). Foldable container in empty container repositioning in intermodal transportation network of belt and road initiative: Strengths and limitations. Maritime Policy & Management, 45, 351–369. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2017.1400699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, W., & Goodchild, A. (2013). Using the truck appointment system to improve yard efficiency in container terminals. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 15(1), 101–119. doi: 10.1057/mel.2012.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar