The “Ubernomics” of ridesourcing: the myths and the reality

References

• Aarhaug, J., & Olsen, S. (2018). Implications of ridesourcing and self-driving vehicles on the need for regulation in unscheduled passenger transport. Research in Transportation Economics, 69, 573–582. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2018.07.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham, K. G., Haltiwanger, J. C., Sandusky, K., & Spletzer, J. R. (2018). Measuring the gig economy: Current knowledge and open issues (Working Paper 24950). Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for ‘lemons’: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500. doi: 10.2307/1879431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrick, P. (2019, July 15). Data-crunching economists flock to Amazon. Times.
   Google Scholar
• Athey, S., & Luca, M. (2018). Economists (and economics) in tech companies (Working Paper 25064). Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Barrios, J. M., Hochberg, Y. V., & Yi, H. L. (2018). The cost of convenience: Ridesharing and traffic fatalities (Working Paper. 2018-80). Becker Friedman Institute for Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Beesley, M. E. (1973). Regulation of taxis. Economic Journal, 83, 150–172. doi: 10.2307/2231106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, T., Benedikt Frey, C., Levin, G., & Danda, S. R. (2018). Uber happy? Work and well-being in the ‘gig economy’. Oxford: Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, T., Chen, C., & Frey, C. B. (2018). Drivers of disruption? Estimating the Uber effect. European Economic Review, 110, 197–210. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard Business Review, 73, 43–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazil, N., & Kirk, D. S. (2016). Uber and metropolitan traffic fatalities in the United States. American Journal of Epidemiology, 84, 192–198. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calo, R., & Rosenblat, A. (2017). The taking economy: Uber, information, and power. Columbia Law Review, 117, 1623–1690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetina, T., & Deakin, E. (2019). Regulation of taxis and the rise of ridesharing. Transport Policy, 76, 145–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. E., & McDonald, R. (2015, December). What is disruptive innovation? Harvard Business Review, pp. 44–53.
   Google Scholar
• Clapham, J. H. (1922). Of empty economic boxes. Economic Journal, 32, 305–314. doi: 10.2307/2222943
   Google Scholar
• Clewlow, R. R., & Mishra, G. S. (2017). Disruptive transportation: The adoption, utilization, and impacts of ride-hailing in the United States (Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-17-07). Davis, CA: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, P., Hahn, R., Hall, J., Levitt, S., & Metcalfe, R. (2016). Using big data to estimate consumer surplus: The case of Uber (Working Paper 22627). Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, C., Diamond, R., Hall, J., List, J. A., & Oyer, P. (2018). The gender earnings gap in the gig economy: Evidence from over a million rideshare drivers (Working Paper 24732). Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, J., & Krueger, A. B. (2016). Disruptive change in the taxi business: The case of Uber. American Economic Review, 106, 177–182. doi: 10.1257/aer.p20161002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney, K. J. (2006). Hoping to overtake its rivals, Yahoo stocks up on academics. Economists and search gurus fill new research team; data-rich fantasy land. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB115646646975445112
   Google Scholar
• Dills, A. K., & Mulholland, S. E. (2018). Ride sharing, fatal crashes, and crime. Southern Economic Journal, 84, 965–991. doi: 10.1002/soej.12255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubal, V. B. (2017). The drive to precarity: A political history of work, regulation and labor advocacy in San Francisco's taxi and Uber economies. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 38, 73–135.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, R. D., & Hilton, G. W. (1972). The jitneys. Journal of Law and Economics, 15, 293–325. doi: 10.1086/466738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckhardt, G. M., & Bardhi, F. (2015). The sharing economy isn’t about sharing at all. Harvard Business Business School Case Studies. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/01/the-sharing-economy-isnt-about-sharing-at-all
   Google Scholar
• Edgeworth, F. Y. (1881). Mathematical Physics. New York: Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Eskew, R. (2015). The sharing economy is a lie: Uber, Ayn Rand and the truth about tech and libertarians. Salon. Retrieved from https://www.salon.com/2015/02/01/the_sharing_economy_ is_a_lie_uber_ayn_rand_and_the_truth_about_tech_and_libertarians/
   Google Scholar
• Farber, H. S. (2015). Why you can’t find a taxi in the rain and other labor supply lessons from cab drivers. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130, 1975–2026. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjv026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, D., & Greig, F. (2016). Paychecks, paydays, and the online platform economy. New York: J.P. Morgan Chase Institute Report.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, D., Greig, F., & Hamoudi, A. (2018). The online platform economy in 2018 drivers, workers, sellers, and lessors. New York: JPMorgan Chase Institute Report.
   Google Scholar
• Floresa, O., & Rayle, L. (2017). How cities use regulation for innovation: The case of Uber, Lyft and Sidecar in San Francisco. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 3756–3768. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.232
   Google Scholar
• Gabel, D. (2016). Uber and the persistence of market power. Journal of Economic Issues, 50, 527–534. doi: 10.1080/00213624.2016.1179060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görög, G. (2018). The definitions of sharing economy: A systematic literature review. Management, 13, 175–189. doi: 10.26493/1854-4231.13.175-189
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, B., & Wattal, S. (2017). Show me the way to go home: An empirical investigation of ride sharing and motor vehicle homicides. MIS Quarterly, 41, 163–187. doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griswold, A. (2018). Uber’s secret weapon is its team of economists. Retrieved from https://qz.com/1367800/ubernomics-is-ubers-semi-secret-internal-economics-department/
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, R., & Metcalfe, R. (2017). The ridesharing revolution: Economic survey and synthesis. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. D., Palsson, C., & Price, J. (2018). Is Uber a substitute or complement for public transit? Journal of Urban Economics, 108, 36–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2018.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. V., Horton, J. J., & Knoepfle, D. T. (2018). Pricing efficiently in designed markets: Evidence from ride-sharing. Retrieved from https://john-joseph-horton.com/papers/uber_price.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. V., & Krueger, A. B. (2017). An analysis of the labor market for Uber’s driver-partners in the United States. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 71, 705–732. doi: 10.1177/0019793917717222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harshbarger, R. (2014, November 2). Uber’s claim of $90k average pay for drivers is overestimated. New York Post.
   Google Scholar
• Issac, M. (2019). Super pumped: The battle for Uber. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Kathan, W., Matzler, K., & Veider, V. (2016). The sharing economy: Your business model’s friend or foe?’. Business Horizons, 59, 663–672. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2016.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2017). The role of unemployment in the rise in alternative work arrangements. American Economic Review, 107, 388–392. doi: 10.1257/aer.p20171092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2016). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology, 32, 61–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komanduri, A., Wafa, Z., Proussaloglou, K., & Jacobs, S. (2018). Assessing the impact of app-based ride share systems in an urban context: Findings from Austin. Transportation Research Record, 2672, 34–46. doi: 10.1177/0361198118796025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., Loginova, O., & Wang, X. H. (2017). The impact of multi-homing in a ride-hailing market. mimeo: University of Missouri.
   Google Scholar
• Luca, M. (2017). Designing online marketplaces: Trust and reputation mechanisms. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 17, 77–93. doi: 10.1086/688845
   Google Scholar
• Malos, S., Lester, G. V., & Virick, M. (2018). Uber drivers and employment status in the gig economy: Should corporate social responsibility tip the scales? Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 30, doi: 10.1007/s10672-018-9325-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee, C. (2017). Only 4 percent of Uber drivers remain after a year says report. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/20/only-4-percent-of-uber-drivers-remain-after-a-year-says-report.html
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, C. N., Jacoby, S. F., Dong, B., Delgado, M. K., & Wiebe, D. J. (2018). Ridesharing and motor vehicle crashes in 4 US cities: An interrupted time-series analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 187, 224–232. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayle, L., Dai, D., Chan, N., Cervero, R., & Shaheen, S. (2016). Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco. Transport Policy, 45, 168–178. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 990–1029. doi: 10.1162/154247603322493212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, B. (2015). The social costs of Uber. University of Chicago Law Review Online, 82(1), Article 6.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblat, A., & Stark, L. (2016). Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758–3784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaller Consulting. (2017). Unsustainable? The growth of App-based ride services and traffic, travel and the future of New York city. New York: Schaller Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, H. (2017). Uber innovation in society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S., & Cohen, A. (2019). Shared ride services in North America: Definitions, impacts, and the future of pooling. Transport Reviews, 39, 427–442. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2018.1497728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shreiber, C. (1975). The economic reasons for price and entry regulation of taxicabs. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 9, 268–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press edition., 1976
   Google Scholar
• Staley, S. R., Annis, C., & Kelly, M. (2018). Regulatory overdrive: Taxi regulations, market concentration and service availability. Arlington: Institute for Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H. (2016). Behavioral economics: Past, present, and future. American Economic Review, 106, 1577–1600. doi: 10.1257/aer.106.7.1577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirole, J. (2015). Market failures and public policy. American Economic Review, 105, 1665–1682. doi: 10.1257/aer.15000024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uber and Mothers Against Drunk Driving. (2015). More options. Shifting mindsets. Driving better choices. Retrieved from https://newsroom.uber.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/UberMADD-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zoepf, S., Chen, S., Adu, P., & Pozo, G. (2018). The economics of ride-hailing: Driver revenue, expenses and taxes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Energy and Environmental policy research.
   Google Scholar