A literature review of mobility services: definitions, modelling state-of-the-art, and key considerations for a conceptual modelling framework

References

• Adnan, M., Pereira, F. C., Azevedo, C. L., Basak, K., Lovric, M., Feliu, S. R., … Ben-Akiva, M. E. (2015, January). SimMobility: A multi-scale integrated agent-based simulation platform. The 95th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Afeche, P., Liu, Z., & Maglaras, C. (2018). Ride-hailing networks with strategic drivers: The impact of platform control capabilities on performance. SSRN, 1–56. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3120544
   Google Scholar
• Alisoltani, N., Leclercq, L., Zargayouna, M., & Krug, J. (2019, January). Optimal fleet management for real-time ride-sharing service considering network congestion. The 98th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso-mora, J., Wallar, A., Frazzoli, E., Rus, D., Alonso-mora, J., Samaranayake, S., … Rus, D. (2017). On-demand high-capacity ride-sharing via dynamic trip-vehicle assignment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(3), 462–467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611675114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshalalfah, B. W. (2009). Planning, design and scheduling of flex-route transit service (Doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, C. L., Marczuk, K., Raveau, S., Soh, H., Adnan, M., Basak, K., … Ben-Akiva, M. (2016). Microsimulation of demand and supply of autonomous mobility on demand. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2564, 21–30. doi: 10.3141/2564-03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babicheva, T., Burghout, W., Andreasson, I., & Faul, N. (2018). The matching problem of empty vehicle redistribution in autonomous taxi systems. Procedia Computer Science, 130, 119–125. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.020
   Google Scholar
• Bai, J., So, K. C., Tang, C. S., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018). Coordinating supply and demand on an on-demand service platform with impatient customers. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 1–15. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3657
   Google Scholar
• Balac, M., Ciari, F., & Axhausen, K. W. (2015). Carsharing demand estimation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2536, 10–18. doi: 10.3141/2536-02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, R., Araldo, A., Akkinepally, A., Basak, K., Seshadri, R., Nahmias, B., … Ben-Akiva, M. (2018, January). Implementation & policy applications of AMoD in multi-modal activity-driven agent-based urban simulator simmobility. The 97th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Brendel, A. B., Brennecke, J. T., & Nastjuk, I. (2018). Applying econophysics in the context of carsharing – Development of a vehicle relocation algorithm and decision support system. In Thirty ninth international conference on information systems (pp. 1–17). San Francisco, CA: Association for Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Calderón, F., & Miller, E. J. (2019). A new outlook on ridehailing: Spatiotemporal patterns and commuting analysis from the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area. Procedia Computer Science, 151, 745–750. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.100
   Google Scholar
• Ciari, F., Balac, M., & Balmer, M. (2015). Modelling the effect of different pricing schemes on free-floating carsharing travel demand: A test case for Zurich, Switzerland. Transportation, 42(3), 413–433. doi: 10.1007/s11116-015-9608-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciari, F., Bock, B., & Balmer, M. (2014). Modeling station-based and free-floating carsharing demand. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2416, 37–47. doi: 10.3141/2416-05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cich, G., Knapen, L., Maciejewski, M., Yasar, A. U. H., Bellemans, T., & Janssens, D. (2017). Modeling demand responsive transport using SARL and MATSim. Procedia Computer Science, 109, 1074–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.387
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A., & Shaheen, S. (2018). Planning for shared mobility. APA planning advisory service reports. https://doi.org/10.7922/G2NV9GDD
   Google Scholar
• Djavadian, S., & Chow, J. Y. J. (2017a). Agent-based day-to-day adjustment process to evaluate dynamic flexible transport service policies. Transportmetrica B, 5(3), 286–311. doi: 10.1080/21680566.2016.1190674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djavadian, S., & Chow, J. Y. J. (2017b). An agent-based day-to-day adjustment process for modeling ‘Mobility as a Service’ with a two-sided flexible transport market. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 104, 36–57. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2017.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, M., & Jakob, M. (2016). Market mechanism design for profitable on-demand transport services. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 89, 178–195. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Expósito-Izquierdo, C., Expósito-Márquez, A., & Brito-Santana, J. (2017). Mobility as a Service. In Smart cities: Foundations, principles, and applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119226444.ch15
   Google Scholar
• Ferrero, F., Perboli, G., Rosano, M., & Vesco, A. (2018). Car-sharing services: An annotated review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 37, 501–518. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finger, M., Bert, N., & Kupfer, D. (2015). Mobility-as-a-Service: From the Helsinki experiment to a European model? European Transport Regulation Observer, 1, 2–13.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, L., Mason, J., & Meroux, D. (2017). Three revolutions in urban transportation. Retrieved from https://steps.ucdavis.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ITDP-3R-Report-v6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Giesecke, R., Surakka, T., & Hakonen, M. (2016). Conceptualising Mobility as a Service: A user centric view on key issues of mobility services. Eleventh international conference on ecological vehicles and renewable energies (EVER).
   Google Scholar
• Gurley, B. (2014). A deeper look at Uber’s dynamic pricing model. Retrieved from http://abovethecrowd.com/2014/03/11/a-deeper-look-at-ubers-dynamic-pricing-model/
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, J. P., Albert, M., Chen, D., & Stone, P. (2016). Minimum cost matching for autonomous carsharing. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(15), 254–259. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.757
   Google Scholar
• Hebenstreit, C., & Fellendorf, M. (2018). A dynamic bike sharing module for agent-based transport simulation, within multimodal context. Procedia Computer Science, 130, 65–72. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.013
   Google Scholar
• Hu, B., Hu, M., & Zhu, H. (2018). Surge pricing and two-sided temporal responses in ride-hailing. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3278023
   Google Scholar
• Illgen, S., & Höck, M. (2018). Electric vehicles in car sharing networks – Challenges and simulation model analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 63, 377–387. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jittrapirom, P., Caiati, V., Feneri, A.-M., Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S., González, M. J. A., & Narayan, J. (2017). Mobility as a Service: A critical review of definitions, assessments of schemes, and key challenges. Urban Planning, 2(2), 13. doi: 10.17645/up.v2i2.931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorge, D., Molnar, G., & de Almeida Correia, G. H. (2015). Trip pricing of one-way station-based carsharing networks with zone and time of day price variations. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 81, 461–482. doi: 10.1016/J.TRB.2015.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamargianni, M., Li, W., Matyas, M., & Schäfer, A. (2016). A critical review of new mobility services for urban transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 14(0), 3294–3303. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.277
   Google Scholar
• Kamargianni, M., Yfantis, L., Muscat, J., Azevedo, C. L., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2019, January). Incorporating the Mobility as a Service concept into transport modelling and simulation frameworks. The 98th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Kamau, J., Ahmed, A., Rebeiro-H, A., Kitaoka, H., Okajima, H., & Ripon, Z. (2016). Demand responsive Mobility as a Service. In 2016 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (pp. 1741–1746). Budapest, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Korolko, N., Woodard, D., Yan, C., & Zhu, H. (2018). Dynamic pricing and matching in ride-hailing platforms. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3258234
   Google Scholar
• Laporte, G., Meunier, F., & Wolfler Calvo, R. (2018). Shared mobility systems: An updated survey. Annals of Operations Research, 271(1), 105–126. doi: 10.1007/s10479-018-3076-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, J., Pourquier, J. C., Feng, F., Hammel, H., & Shaheen, S. (2019, January). Bikesharing evolution and expansion: Understanding how docked and dockless models complement and compete – A case study of San Francisco. The 98th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, C., Jiang, Z., & Ouyang, Y. (2019, January). Dynamic resource management for ridesharing systems in urban transportation networks. The 98th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Q., Liao, F., Timmermans, H. J. P., Huang, H., & Zhou, J. (2018). Incorporating free-floating car-sharing into an activity-based dynamic user equilibrium model: A demand-side model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 107, 102–123. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2017.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisson, C., Roedder, N., Stroehle, P., & Weinhardt, C. (2016). Decisions in mobility service networks-coordinating demand and supply using a mechanism design approach. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2016-March, pp. 1606–1614. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.203
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Bansal, P., Daziano, R., & Samaranayake, S. (2018). A framework to integrate mode choice in the design of mobility-on-demand systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.09.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Z., Koutsopoulos, H. N., & Zheng, Y. (2019, January). Evaluation of on-demand ridesplitting services. The 98th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Maciejewski, M. (2016). Dynamic transport services. In A. Horni, K. Nagel, & K. W. Axhausen (Eds.), The multi-agent transport simulation MATSim (pp. 145–152). Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/baw.23
   Google Scholar
• Marczuk, K. A., Soh, H. S. H., Azevedo, C. M. L., Lee, D.-H., & Frazzoli, E. (2016). Simulation framework for rebalancing of autonomous mobility on demand systems. MATEC Web of Conferences, 81, 01005. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/20168101005
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, L. M., de Almeida Correia, G. H., Moura, F., & Mendes Lopes, M. (2017). Insights into carsharing demand dynamics: Outputs of an agent-based model application to Lisbon, Portugal. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(2), 148–159. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2016.1226997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masuch, N., Lützenberger, M., & Keiser, J. (2013). An open extensible platform for intermodal mobility assistance. Procedia Computer Science, 19, 396–403. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.06.054
   Google Scholar
• Meurs, H., & Timmermans, H. (2017, January). Mobility as a Service as a multi-sided market: Challenges for modeling. The 96th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. (2008). Mobility on demand: Future of transportation in cities. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology https://smartcities.media.mit.edu/pdf/Mobility_on_Demand_Introduction.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nahmias-Biran, B. H., Oke, J., Kumar, N., Basak, K., Araldo, A., Seshadri, R., … Ben-Akiva, M. (2019, January). From traditional to automated mobility on demand: A comprehensive framework for modelling on demand services in SimMobility. The 98th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, K., & Kalanick, T. (2013). System and method for dynamically adjusting prices for services. US Patent Application Publication. United States.
   Google Scholar
• Pal, A., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Free-floating bike sharing: Solving real-life large-scale static rebalancing problems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 80, 92–116. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronald, N., Thompson, R. G., & Winter, S. (2015). Comparison of constrained and Ad Hoc demand-responsive transportation systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2536, 44–51. doi: 10.3141/2536-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayarshad, H. R., & Chow, J. Y. J. (2017). Non-myopic relocation of idle mobility-on-demand vehicles as a dynamic location-allocation-queueing problem. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 106, 60–77. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2017.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuijbroek, J., Hampshire, R. C., & van Hoeve, W. J. (2017). Inventory rebalancing and vehicle routing in bike sharing systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 257(3), 992–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S., Chan, N., Bansal, A., & Cohen, A. (2015). Shared mobility a sustainability & technologies workshop: Definitions, industry and early understanding. California. Retrieved from http://innovativemobility.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/SharedMobility_WhitePaper_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sochor, J., Karlsson, M., & Strömberg, H. (2016). Trying out Mobility as a Service: Experiences from a field trial and implications for understanding demand. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2542, 57–64. doi: 10.3141/2542-07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spieser, K., Samaranayake, S., Gruel, W., & Frazzoli, E. (2015, January). Shared-vehicle mobility-on-demand systems: A fleet operator‘s guide to rebalancing empty vehicles. The 95th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Sprei, F. (2018). Disrupting mobility. Energy Research and Social Science, 37, 238–242. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed, A. A., Irina, G., & Bogenberger, K. (2019, January). Neural network based metaheuristic parameterization, with application to vehicle matching problem in on demand mobility services. The 98th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Uber. (2019). What is surge? | Uber Partner Help. Retrieved from https://help.uber.com/partners/article/what-is-surge?nodeId=e9375d5e-917b-4bc5-8142-23b89a440eec
   Google Scholar
• Vyas, G., Vovsha, P., Famili, P., Fay, D., Kulshrestha, A., Giaimo, G., & Anderson, R. (2019, January). Incorporating features of autonomous vehicles in activity-based travel demand model for Columbus, OH. the 98th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, S., Brandt, T., & Neumann, D. (2016). In free float: Developing business analytics support for carsharing providers. Omega (United Kingdom), 59, 4–14. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weikl, S., & Bogenberger, K. (2013). Relocation strategies and algorithms for free-floating car sharing systems. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 5(4), 100–111. doi: 10.1109/MITS.2013.2267810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, Y. Z., Hensher, D. A., & Mulley, C. (2018). Emerging transport technologies and the modal efficiency framework: A case for Mobility as a Service (MaaS). Sydney, Australia: Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/17503
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., Danaf, M., Azevedo, C. L., Prakash, A. A., Atasoy, B., Jeong, K., … Ben-Akiva, M. (2019, January). Behavioral modeling of on-demand mobility services: General framework and application to sustainable travel incentives. The 98th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., Yin, Y., & Ye, J. (2019, January). On the supply function of ride-hailing systems. The 98th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., Hu, J., Shu, Y., Cheng, P., Chen, J., & Moscibroda, T. (2016). Mobility modeling and prediction in bike-sharing systems. Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services - MobiSys ‘16, pp. 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1145/2906388.2906408
   Google Scholar
• Yang, H., Ke, J., Li, X., & Wang, H. (2019, January). Pricing, matching probability, and detour cost in a ride-sharing market. The 98th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Zha, L., Yin, Y., & Du, Y. (2017). Surge pricing and labor supply in the ride-sourcing market. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. doi: 10.1016/J.TRB.2017.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zha, L., Yin, Y., & Xu, Z. (2018). Geometric matching and spatial pricing in ride-sourcing markets. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 92, 58–75. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, R., & Pavone, M. (2016). Control of robotic mobility-on-demand systems: A queueing-theoretical perspective. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 35(1–3), 186–203. doi: 10.1177/0278364915581863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., & Wang, Z. (2016). Inferring passenger denial behavior of taxi drivers from large-scale taxi traces. PLoS ONE, 11(11), 1–21. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar