21,095
Views
132
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Dockless bike-sharing systems: what are the implications?

, & ORCID Icon
Pages 333-353 | Received 22 Feb 2019, Accepted 20 Dec 2019, Published online: 06 Jan 2020

References

  • Ai, Y., Li, Z., & Gan, M. (2018). A solution to measure traveler’s transfer tolerance for walking mode and dockless bike-sharing mode. The Journal of Supercomputing, 75(6), 3140–3157.
  • Bao, J., He, T., Ruan, S., Li, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2017). Planning bike lanes based on sharing-bikes’ trajectories. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1377–1386). ACM.
  • Buck, D., & Buehler, R. (2012). Bike lanes and other determinants of capital bikeshare trips. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2012, Washington, DC. Conference paper. Retrieved from https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Bike-Lanes-and-Other-Determinants-of-Capital-Bikeshare-Trips-Buck-et-al-12-3539.pdf
  • Buck, D., Buehler, R., Happ, P., Rawls, B., Chung, P., & Borecki, N. (2013). Are bikeshare users different from regular cyclists? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2387, 112–119.
  • Cass, N., Shove, E., & Urry, J. (2005). Social exclusion, mobility and access. The Sociological Review, 53(3), 539–555.
  • Chang, S., Song, R., He, S., & Qiu, G. (2018). Innovative bike-sharing in China: Solving faulty bike-sharing recycling problem. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018, 1–10.
  • Currie, G., & Delbosc, A. (2010). Modelling the social and psychological impacts of transport disadvantage. Transportation, 37(6), 953–966.
  • Currie, G., Richardson, T., Smyth, P., Vella-Brodrick, D., Hine, J., Lucas, K., … Stanley, J. K. (2010). Investigating links between transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being in Melbourne – updated results. Research in Transportation Economics, 29(1), 287–295.
  • Damant-Sirois, G., & El-Geneidy, A. M. (2015). Who cycles more? Determining cycling frequency through a segmentation approach in Montreal, Canada. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 113–125.
  • de Geus, B., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Jannes, C., & Meeusen, R. (2008). Psychosocial and environmental factors associated with cycling for transport among a working population. Health Education Research, 23(4), 697–708.
  • DeMaio. (2009). Bike-sharing: History, impacts, models of provision, and future. Journal of Public Transportation, 12(4), 3.
  • Dijst, M., & Vidakovic, V. (2000). Travel time ratio: The key factor of spatial reach. Transportation, 27(2), 179–199.
  • Du, M., & Cheng, L. (2018). Better understanding the characteristics and influential factors of different travel patterns in free-floating bike sharing: Evidence from Nanjing, China. Sustainability, 10(4), 1244.
  • Ekkekakis, P., Hall, E. E., & Petruzzello, S. J. (2008). The relationship between exercise intensity and affective responses demystified: To crack the 40-year-old nut, replace the 40-year-old nutcracker!. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35(2), 136–149.
  • Ettema, D., Friman, M., Gärling, T., & Olsson, L. E. (2016). Travel mode use, travel mode shift and subjective well-being: Overview of theories, empirical findings and policy implications. In D. Wang & S. He (Eds.), Mobility, sociability and well-being of urban living (pp. 129–150). Berlin: Springer.
  • Ettema, D., & Schekkerman, M. (2016). How do spatial characteristics influence well-being and mental health? Comparing the effect of objective and subjective characteristics at different spatial scales. Travel Behaviour and Society, 5, 56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2015.11.001
  • Ettema, D., & Smajic, I. (2015). Walking, places and wellbeing. The Geographical Journal, 181(2), 102–109.
  • Faghih-Imani, A., & Eluru, N. (2015). Analysing bicycle-sharing system user destination choice preferences: Chicago’s Divvy system. Journal of Transport Geography, 44, 53–64.
  • Faghih-Imani, A., & Eluru, N. (2016). Incorporating the impact of spatio-temporal interactions on bicycle sharing system demand: A case study of New York CitiBike system. Journal of Transport Geography, 54, 218–227.
  • Faghih-Imani, A., Eluru, N., El-Geneidy, A. M., Rabbat, M., & Haq, U. (2014). How land-use and urban form impact bicycle flows: evidence from the bicycle-sharing system (BIXI) in Montreal. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 306–314.
  • Fernández-Heredia, Á, Monzón, A., & Jara-Díaz, S. (2014). Understanding cyclists’ perceptions, keys for a successful bicycle promotion. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 63, 1–11.
  • Fishman, E. (2015). Bikeshare: A review of recent literature. Transport Reviews, 36(1), 92–113.
  • Fishman, E., & Schepers, P. (2016). Global bike share: What the data tells us about road safety. Journal of Safety Research, 56, 41–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.11.007
  • Fishman, E., Washington, S., & Haworth, N. (2013). Bike share: A synthesis of the literature. Transport Reviews, 33(2), 148–165.
  • Fishman, E., Washington, S., & Haworth, N. (2014). Bike share’s impact on car use: Evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 31, 13–20.
  • Fishman, E., Washington, S., Haworth, N., & Mazzei, A. (2014). Barriers to bikesharing: An analysis from Melbourne and Brisbane. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 325–337.
  • Fishman, E., Washington, S., Haworth, N., & Watson, A. (2015). Factors influencing bike share membership: An analysis of Melbourne and Brisbane. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 71, 17–30.
  • Fuller, D., Gauvin, L., Kestens, Y., Daniel, M., Fournier, M., Morency, P., & Drouin, L. (2011). Use of a new public bicycle share program in Montreal, Canada. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(1), 80–83.
  • Gatersleben, B., & Uzzell, D. (2007). Affective appraisals of the daily commute: Comparing perceptions of drivers, cyclists, walkers, and users of public transport. Environment and Behavior, 39(3), 416–431.
  • Goodman, A., & Cheshire, J. (2014). Inequalities in the London bicycle sharing system revisited: Impacts of extending the scheme to poorer areas but then doubling prices. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 272–279.
  • Gössling, S. (2018). ICT and transport behavior: A conceptual review. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(3), 153–164.
  • Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge.
  • Gu, T., Kim, I., & Currie, G. (2019). To be or not to be dockless: Empirical analysis of dockless bikeshare development in China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 119, 122–147.
  • Handy, S. L., Xing, Y., & Buehler, T. J. (2010). Factors associated with bicycle ownership and use: A study of six small US cities. Transportation, 37(6), 967–985.
  • Heinen, E., Kamruzzaman, M., & Turrell, G. (2018). The public bicycle-sharing scheme in Brisbane, Australia: Evaluating the influence of its introduction on changes in time spent cycling amongst a middle-and older-age population. Journal of Transport & Health, 10, 56–73.
  • Heinen, E., Maat, K., & van Wee, B. (2011). The role of attitudes toward characteristics of bicycle commuting on the choice to cycle to work over various distances. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(2), 102–109.
  • Heinen, E., Maat, K., & van Wee, B. (2012). The effect of work-related factors on the bicycle commute mode choice in the Netherlands. Transportation, 40(1), 23–43.
  • Heinen, E., van Wee, B., & Maat, K. (2010). Commuting by bicycle: An overview of the literature. Transport Reviews, 30(1), 59–96.
  • Hernandez, J. C. (2017, September 2). As bike-sharing brings out bad manners, China asks, what’s wrong with us? The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/02/world/asia/china-beijing-dockless-bikeshare.html
  • Hosford, K., & Winters, M. (2018). Who are public bicycle share programs serving? An evaluation of the equity of spatial access to bicycle share service areas in Canadian cities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. doi:10.0361198118783107.
  • Jäppinen, S., Toivonen, T., & Salonen, M. (2013). Modelling the potential effect of shared bicycles on public transport travel times in Greater Helsinki: An open data approach. Applied Geography, 43, 13–24.
  • Jaramillo, C., Lizárraga, C., & Grindlay, A. L. (2012). Spatial disparity in transport social needs and public transport provision in Santiago de Cali (Colombia). Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 340–357.
  • Lierop, D. v., Badami, M. G., & El-Geneidy, A. M. (2018). What influences satisfaction and loyalty in public transport A review of the literature. Transport Reviews, 38(1), 52–72.
  • Lim, A. (2018, March). Shared-bicycle operators to be licensed to curb indiscriminate parking. The Straits Times. Retreived from https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/transport/shared-bicycle-operators-to-be-licensed-to-curb-indiscriminate-parking
  • Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113.
  • Mao, Z., Ettema, D., & Dijst, M. (2016). Commuting trip satisfaction in Beijing: Exploring the influence of multimodal behavior and modal flexibility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 592–603.
  • Martens, K. (2013). Role of the bicycle in the limitation of transport poverty in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2387, 20–25.
  • Martin, E. W., & Shaheen, S. A. (2014). Evaluating public transit modal shift dynamics in response to bikesharing: A tale of two U.S. Cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 315–324.
  • Mobike Global, Beijing Tsinghua Tongheng Planning and Design Institute, & China New Urbanization Research Institute. (2017, May 19). The Mobike white paper: Bike-share in the city. Retrieved from https://mobike.com/sg/blog/post/mobikewhitepaper
  • Mooney, S. J., Hosford, K., Howe, B., Yan, A., Winters, M., Bassok, A., & Hirsch, J. A. (2019). Freedom from the station: Spatial equity in access to dockless bike share. Journal of Transport Geography, 74, 91–96.
  • Murphy, E., & Usher, J. (2014). The role of bicycle-sharing in the city: Analysis of the Irish experience. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 9(2), 116–125.
  • Ogilvie, F., & Goodman, A. (2012). Inequalities in usage of a public bicycle sharing scheme: Socio-demographic predictors of uptake and usage of the London (UK) cycle hire scheme. Preventive Medicine, 55(1), 40–45.
  • Parkes, S. D., Marsden, G., Shaheen, S. A., & Cohen, A. P. (2013). Understanding the diffusion of public bikesharing systems: Evidence from Europe and North America. Journal of Transport Geography, 31, 94–103.
  • Ricci, M. (2015). Bike sharing: A review of evidence on impacts and processes of implementation and operation. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 15, 28–38.
  • Rixey, R. A. (2013). Station-level forecasting of bikesharing ridership: Station network effects in three US systems. Transportation Research Record, 2387(1), 46–55.
  • Schwanen, T., Lucas, K., Akyelken, N., Cisternas Solsona, D., Carrasco, J.-A., & Neutens, T. (2015). Rethinking the links between social exclusion and transport disadvantage through the lens of social capital. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 74, 123–135.
  • Shaheen, S., Cohen, A., & Martin, E. (2013). Public bikesharing in North America: Early operator understanding and emerging trends. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2387(1), 83–92.
  • Shaheen, S., Guzman, S., & Zhang, H. (2010). Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: Past, present, and future. Transportation Research Record, 2143(1), 159–167.
  • Shaheen, S., Martin, E., & Cohen, A. (2013). Public Bikesharing and modal shift behavior: A comparative study of early bikesharing systems in North America. International Journal of Transportation, 1(1), 35–54.
  • Shaheen, S., Zhang, H., Martin, E., & Guzman, S. (2011). Hangzhou public bicycle: Understanding early adoption and behavioral response to bikesharing in Hangzhou, China. Transportation Research Record, 2247(1), 33–41.
  • Shen, Y., Zhang, X., & Zhao, J. (2018). Understanding the usage of dockless bike sharing in Singapore. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(9), 686–700.
  • Shi, J. G., Si, H., Wu, G., Su, Y., & Lan, J. (2018). Critical factors to achieve dockless bike-sharing sustainability in China: A stakeholder-oriented network perspective. Sustainability, 10(6), 2090.
  • Spinney, J., & Lin, W.-I. (2018). Are you being shared? Mobility, data and social relations in Shanghai’s public bike sharing 2.0 sector. Applied Mobilities, 3(1), 66–83.
  • St-Louis, E., Manaugh, K., van Lierop, D., & El-Geneidy, A. (2014). The happy commuter: A comparison of commuter satisfaction across modes. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 26, 160–170.
  • State Information Centre. (2017, September 13). The research report on bike-sharing employment. Retrieved from http://www.sic.gov.cn/News/568/8452.htm
  • Titze, S., Stronegger, W. J., Janschitz, S., & Oja, P. (2008). Association of built-environment, social-environment and personal factors with bicycling as a mode of transportation among Austrian city dwellers. Preventive Medicine, 47(3), 252–259.
  • Transport Department. (2018, September). Code of Practice (CoP) for automated dockless bicycle rental services. Retrieved from https://www.td.gov.hk/mini_site/cic/files/others/code_of_practice_en.pdf
  • Ursaki, J., & Aultman-Hall, L. (2016). Quantifying the equity of bikeshare access in US cities. Paper presented at the 94th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  • Uteng, T. P. (2009). Gender, Ethnicity, and constrained mobility: Insights into the resultant social exclusion. Environment and Planning A, 41(5), 1055–1071.
  • Van Lierop, D., Grimsrud, M., & El-Geneidy, A. (2015). Breaking into bicycle theft: Insights from Montreal, Canada. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 9(7), 490–501.
  • WHO. (2016). Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
  • Woodcock, J., Tainio, M., Cheshire, J., O'Brien, O., & Goodman, A. (2014). Health effects of the London bicycle sharing system: Health impact modelling study. BMJ, 348, g425.
  • Xing, Y., Handy, S. L., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2010). Factors associated with proportions and miles of bicycling for transportation and recreation in six small US cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15(2), 73–81.
  • Zhang, Y. (2018, July). Dockless bike share: How to get the most out of it? Retrieved from https://ecomobility.org/dockless-bike-share/
  • Zhang, Y., Lin, D., & Mi, Z. (2019). Electric fence planning for dockless bike-sharing services. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 383–393.
  • Zhang, H., Shaheen, S. A., & Chen, X. (2014). Bicycle evolution in China: From the 1900s to the present. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 8(5), 317–335.
  • Zhao, J., Wang, J., & Deng, W. (2015). Exploring bikesharing travel time and trip chain by gender and day of the week. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 58, 251–264.