Knowledge for policy-making in times of uncertainty: the case of autonomous vehicle model results

References

• Auld, J., Sokolov, V., & Stephens, T. (2017). Analysis of the effects of connected–automated vehicle technologies on travel demand. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2625, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auld, J., Verbas, O., Javanmardi, M., & Rousseau, A. (2018). Impact of privately-owned level 4 CAV technologies on travel demand and energy. Procedia Computer Science, 130(C), 914–919.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15, 73–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basso, A., Lisciandra, C., & Marchionni, C. (2017). Hypothetical models in social science. In L. Magnani & T. Bertolotti (Eds.), Springer handbook of model-based science (pp. 413–433). Cham: Springer Handbooks. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bischoff, J., & Maciejewski, M. (2016). Simulation of city-wide replacement of private cars with autonomous Taxis in Berlin. Procedia Computer Science, 83, 237–244.
   Google Scholar
• Bonabeau, E. (2002). Agent-based modelling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(suppl. 3), 7280–7287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulanger, P.-M. (2007). Political uses of social indicators: Overview and application to sustainable development indicators. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(1-2), 14–32.
   Google Scholar
• Boumans, M. (2005). How economists model the world into numbers. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, C., & Kornhauser, A. (2014). A driverless alternative. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2416, 73–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burghout, W., Rigole, P., & Andreasson, I. (2015). Impacts of shared autonomous taxis in a metropolitan area. 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, T., & Kockelman, K. (2016). Management of a shared autonomous electric vehicle fleet: Implications of pricing Schemes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2572, 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T., Kockelman, K., & Hanna, J. (2016). Operations of a shared, autonomous, electric vehicle fleet: Implications of vehicle and charging infrastructure decisions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 243–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childress, S., Nichols, B., Charlton, B., & Coe, S. (2015). Using an activity-based model to explore the potential impacts of Automated vehicles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2493, 99–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia, G., & van Arem, B. (2016). Solving the user optimum privately owned automated vehicles assignment Problem (UO-POAVAP): A model to explore the impacts of self-driving vehicles on urban mobility. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 87, 64–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COWI and PTV. (2019). The Oslo study – how autonomous cars may change transport in cities. Oslo: Ruter. Retrieved September 16, 2019, from http://www.mynewsdesk.com/no/ruter/documents/the-oslo-study-how-autonomouscars-may-change-transport-in-cities-87313
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, C., Stone, J., Legacy, C., & Ashmore, D. (2019). Governance of future urban mobility: A research agenda. Urban Policy and Research, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2019.1626711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docherty, I., Marsden, G., & Anable, J. (2018). The governance of smart mobility. Transportation Research Part A, 115, 114–125.
   Google Scholar
• Fagnant, D., & Kockelman, K. (2014). The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 40, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagnant, D., & Kockelman, K. (2018). Dynamic ride-sharing and fleet sizing for a system of shared autonomous vehicles in Austin, Texas. Transportation, 45(1), 143–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagnant, D., Kockelman, K., & Bansal, P. (2015). Operations of shared autonomous vehicle fleet for Austin, Texas, market. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2536, 98–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power. Democracy in practice. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gudmundsson, H., & Sørensen, C. H. (2013). Some use – little influence? On the roles of indicators in European sustainable transport policy. Ecological Indicators, 35, 43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra, E. (2016). Planning for cars that drive themselves: Metropolitan planning organization, regional transportation plans, and autonomous vehicles. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36(2), 210–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, J., & Nurul Habib, K. (2019). Integrated models of land use and transportation for the autonomous vehicle revolution. Transport Reviews, 39(1), 66–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilig, M., Hilgert, T., Mallig, N., Kagerbauer, M., & Vortisch, P. (2017). Potentials of autonomous vehicles in a changing private transportation system – a case study in the Stuttgart region. Transportation Research Procedia, 26, 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, A., Brenner, W. M., & Stadler, R. (2018). Autonomous driving. How the driverless revolution will change the world. Emerald Publishing Limited: Bingley.
   Google Scholar
• Hörl, S., Erath, A., & Axhausen, K. (2016). Simulation of autonomous taxis in a multi-modal traffic scenario with dynamic demand. Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs-und Raumplanung, 1184, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, M., Lidskog, R., White, J. M., & Standring, A. (2020). Social scientific knowledge in times of crisis: What climate change can learn from coronavirus (and vice versa). WIREs Climate Change, doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Transport Forum. (2017a). Transition to shared mobility. How large cities can deliver inclusive transport services. Paris: OECD. https://www.itf-oecd.org/transition-shared-mobility (September 16, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• International Transport Forum. (2017b). Shared mobility simulations for Auckland. Paris: OECD. https://www.itf-oecd.org/shared-mobility-simulations-auckland (September 16, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• International Transport Forum. (2017c). Shared mobility simulations for Helsinki. Paris: OECD. https://www.itf-oecd.org/shared-mobility-simulations-helsinki (September 16, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• International Transport Forum. (2018). Shared mobility simulations for Dublin. Paris: OECD. https://www.itf-oecd.org/shared-mobility-dublin (September 16, 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Jäger, B., Agua, F., & Lienkamp, M. (2017, October 16–19). Agent-based simulation of a shared, autonomous and electric on-demand mobility solution. IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Kuorikoski, J., & Marchionni, C. (2014). Unification and mechanistic detail as drivers of model construction: Models of networks in economics and sociology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 48, 97–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, M., & Boyles, S. (2015). Effects of autonomous vehicle ownership on trip, mode, and Route choice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2493, 29–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, M., Kockelman, K., Boyles, S., & Li, T. (2017). A general framework for modeling shared autonomous vehicles with dynamic network-loading and dynamic ride-sharing application. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 64, 373–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Kockelman, K., Boesch, P., & Ciari, F. (2017). Tracking a system of shared autonomous vehicles across the Austin, Texas network using agent-based simulation. Transportation, 44(6), 1261–1278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llorca, C., Moreno, A., & Moeckel, R. (2017). Effects of shared autonomous vehicles on the level of service in the greater Munich metropolitan area. International Conference on Intelligent Transport Systems in Theory and practice, Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Loeb, B., Kockelman, K., & Liu, J. (2018). Shared autonomous electric vehicle (SAEV) operations across the Austin, Texas network with charging infrastructure decisions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 89, 222–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnani, L., & Nersessian, N. (Eds.). (2002). Model-based reasoning: Science, technology, values. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, G., & Reardon, L. (2017). Questions of governance: Rethinking the study of transportation policy. Transportation Research Part A, 101, 238–251.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, L., & Viegas, J. (2017). Assessing the impacts of deploying a shared self-driving urban mobility system: An agent-based model applied to the city of Lisbon, Portugal. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 6(1), 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Masoud, N., & Jayakrishnan, R. (2017). Autonomous or driver-less vehicles: Implementation strategies and operational concerns. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 108, 179–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes, L., Bennàssar, M., & Chow, J. (2017). Comparison of light rail streetcar against shared autonomous vehicle fleet for Brooklyn–queens Connector in New York city. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2650, 142–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merlin, L. (2017). Comparing automated shared Taxis and conventional Bus transit for a small city. Journal of Public Transportation, 20(2), 19–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.20.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mershon, C., & Shvetsova, O. (2019). Formal modeling in social science. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., Becker, H., Bösch, P., & Axhausen, K. (2017). Autonomous vehicles: The next jump in accessibilities? Research in Transportation Economics, 62, 80–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, A., Michalski, A., Llorca, C., & Moeckel, R. (2018). Shared autonomous vehicles effect on vehicle-Km Traveled and average trip Duration. Hindawi Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, M. S. (2012). The world in the model: How economists work and think. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/ITF. (2015). Urban mobility system upgrade: How shared self-driving cars could change city traffic. Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/ITF. (2016). Shared mobility: Innovation for liveable cities. Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/ITF. (2017). Transition to shared mobility: How large cities can deliver inclusive transport services. Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/ITF. (2018). The shared-use city: Managing the curb. Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, R., Levin, M., & Boyles, S. (2016). Effects of autonomous vehicle Behavior on arterial and Freeway networks. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2561, 9–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietzsch, M. (2018, February 5). Demand ridesharing as a part of local public transport. The way to a car-free city. Presentation at Kollekivforum, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Rasouli, S., & Timmermans, H. (2011). Transport models and urban planning practice: Experiences with albatross. Transport Reviews, 31, 199–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, R. F. (1997). Measuring knowledge utilization: Process and outcomes. Knowledge and Policy, 10, 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Shulha, L. M., & Cousins, J. B. (1997). Evaluation use: Theory, research and practice since 1986. The American Journal of Evaluation, 18(1), 195–208.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D., & Vaddadi, B. (2019). Automated vehicles and how they may affect urban form: A review of recent scenario studies. Cities, 92, 125–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Boston Consulting Group. (2017). Making autonomous vehicles a reality: Lessons from Boston and Beyond. Boston, MA: The Boston Consulting Group.
   Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., Hisschemöller, M., & Eijsackers, H. (2007). Ecological indicators: Between the two fires of science and policy. Ecological Indicators, 7(2), 215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UITP. (2017). Policy brief. Autonomous vehicles: a potential game changer for urban mobility. Retrieved November 6, 2019, from https://www.uitp.org/sites/default/files/cck-focus-papers-files/PolicyBrief_Autonomous_Vehicles_LQ_20160116.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, M. (2013). Simulation and similarity: Using models to understand the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H. (1998). Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation? American Journal of Evaluation, 19(1), 21–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum, The Boston Consulting Group. (2018). Reshaping urban mobility with autonomous vehicles lessons from the city of Boston. Boston, MA: World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Zachariah, J., Gao, J., Kornhauser, A., & Mufti, T. (2014, January 12–16). Uncongested mobility for all: A proposal for an area wide autonomous taxi system in New Jersey. Transportation research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., & Guhathakurta, S. (2017). Parking spaces in the age of shared autonomous vehicles: How much parking will we need and where? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2651, 80–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Guhathakurta, S., Fang, J., & Zhang, G. (2015). Exploring the impact of shared autonomous vehicles on urban parking demand: An agent-based simulation approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 19, 34–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Guhathakurta, S., & Khalil, E. (2018). The impact of private autonomous vehicles on vehicle ownership and unoccupied VMT generation. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 90, 156–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., & Kockelman, K. (2018). Anticipating the regional impacts of connected and automated vehicle travel in Austin, Texas. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 144(4), 1943–5444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar