References
- Anderson, J. M., Kalra, N., Stanley, K. D., Sorensen, P., Samaras, C., & Oluwatola, O. A. (2014). Autonomous vehicle technology: A guide for policymakers. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
- AutoX (2018). The autox safety factor (Tech. Rep.). Auto X. Retrieved from https://www.autox.ai/download/pdf/safety.pdf
- Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., … Rahwan, I. (2018). The moral machine experiment. Nature, 563(7729), 59–64.
- Aydemir, F. B., & Dalpiaz, F. (2018). A roadmap for ethics-aware software engineering. In 2018 IEEE/ACM international workshop on software fairness (fairware), Gothenburg, Sweden (pp. 15–21). IEEE.
- Bagloee, S. A., Tavana, M., Asadi, M., & Oliver, T. (2016). Autonomous vehicles: Challenges, opportunities, and future implications for transportation policies. Journal of Modern Transportation, 24(4), 284–303.
- Bergmann, L. T., Schlicht, L., Meixner, C., König, P., Pipa, G., Boshammer, S., … Stephan, A. (2018). Autonomous vehicles require socio-political acceptance – An empirical and philosophical perspective on the problem of moral decision making. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 31.
- Bigman, Y. E., & Gray, K. (2020). Life and death decisions of autonomous vehicles. Nature, 579(7797), E1–E2.
- BMW (2016). Sustainable value report (Tech. Rep.). BMW. Retrieved from https://www.bmwgroup.com/content/dam/grpw/websites/bmwgroup_com/ir/downloads/en/2016/2016-BMW-Group-Sustainable-Value-Report.pdf
- Bonnefon, J. F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2016). The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, 352(6293), 1573–1576.
- Bonnefon, J. F., Shariff, A., & Rahwan, I. (2019). The trolley, the bull bar, and why engineers should care about the ethics of autonomous cars [point of view]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(3), 502–504.
- Borenstein, J., Herkert, J., & Miller, K. (2017). Self-driving cars: Ethical responsibilities of design engineers. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 36(2), 67–75.
- Borenstein, J., Herkert, J. R., & Miller, K. W. (2019). Self-driving cars and engineering ethics: The need for a system level analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(2), 383–398.
- Brown, A., Rodriguez, G., Best, B., Hoang, K. T., Safford, H., Anderson, G., … D'Agostino, M. C. (2018). Federal, state, and local governance of automated vehicles. Davis, CA: Institute of Transportation Studies & Policy Institute for Energy, Environment, and the Economy.
- Coeckelbergh, M. (2016). Responsibility and the moral phenomenology of using self-driving cars. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 30(8), 748–757.
- Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). Artificial intelligence, responsibility attribution, and a relational justification of explainability. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 2051–2068. doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00146-8
- Collingwood, L. (2017). Privacy implications and liability issues of autonomous vehicles. Information & Communications Technology Law, 26(1), 32–45.
- Csizmadia, T. (2018). Ensuring safe self-driving AImotive's development puts safety first (Tech. Rep.). AImotive. Retrieved from https://medium.com/aimotive/ensuring-safe-self-driving-ad28cc89fa3b?.
- Cunneen, M., Mullins, M., Murphy, F., Shannon, D., Furxhi, I., & Ryan, C. (2020). Autonomous vehicles and avoiding the trolley (dilemma): vehicle perception, classification, and the challenges of framing decision ethics. Cybernetics and Systems, 51(1), 59–80.
- Daimler (2018). Reinventing safety: A joint approach to automated driving systems (Tech. Rep.). Mercedes-Benz and Bosch. Retrieved from https://www.daimler.com/documents/innovation/other/vssa-mercedes-benz-and-bosch.pdf
- Danks, D., & London, A. J. (2017). Regulating autonomous systems: Beyond standards. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 32(1), 88–91.
- Endsley, M. R. (2017). From here to autonomy: Lessons learned from human–automation research. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 59(1), 5–27.
- Etienne, H. (2020, February). When AI ethics goes astray: A case study of autonomous vehicles. Social Science Computer Review. doi:10.1177/0894439320906508
- Etzioni, A., & Etzioni, O. (2017). Incorporating ethics into artificial intelligence. The Journal of Ethics, 21(4), 403–418.
- Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. (2015). Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 167–181.
- Favarò, F., Eurich, S., & Nader, N. (2018). Autonomous vehicles' disengagements: Trends, triggers, and regulatory limitations. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 110, 136–148.
- Favarò, F. M., Nader, N., Eurich, S. O., Tripp, M., & Varadaraju, N. (2017). Examining accident reports involving autonomous vehicles in California. PLoS One, 12(9), e0184952.
- Fischer, J. M., & Ravizza, M. (2000). Responsibility and control: A theory of moral responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Fleetwood, J. (2017). Public health, ethics, and autonomous vehicles. American Journal of Public Health, 107(4), 532–537.
- Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5–16. Retrieved from https://philpapers.org/archive/FOOTPO-2.pdf
- Fried, B. H. (2012). What does matter? The case for killing the trolley problem (or letting it die). The Philosophical Quarterly, 62(248), 505–529.
- Funkhouser, K. (2013). Paving the road ahead: Autonomous vehicles, products liability, and the need for a new approach. Utah Law Review, 2013, 437.
- Gandia, R. M., Antonialli, F., Cavazza, B. H., Neto, A. M., Lima, D. A. D., Sugano, J. Y., … Zambalde, A. L. (2019). Autonomous vehicles: Scientometric and bibliometric review. Transport Reviews, 39(1), 9–28.
- Garza, A. P. (2011). Look ma, no hands: Wrinkles and wrecks in the age of autonomous vehicles. New England Law Review, 46, 581.
- GM (2018). Self-driving safety report (Tech. Rep.). General Motors. Retrieved from https://www.gm.com/content/dam/company/docs/us/en/gmcom/gmsafetyreport.pdf.
- Goodall, N. (2019). More than trolleys. Transfers, 9(2), 45–58. Retrieved from https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/transfers/9/2/trans090204.xml.
- Goodall, N. J. (2014a). Ethical decision making during automated vehicle crashes. Transportation Research Record, 2424(1), 58–65.
- Goodall, N. J. (2014b). Machine ethics and automated vehicles. In G. Meyer & S. Beiker (Eds), Road vehicle automation. Lecture notes in mobility (pp. 93–102). Cham: Springer.
- Goodall, N. J. (2016). Can you program ethics into a self-driving car? IEEE Spectrum, 53(6), 28–58.
- Gurney, J. K. (2013). Sue my car not me: Products liability and accidents involving autonomous vehicles. University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, 2013(2), 247.
- Gurney, J. K. (2015). Crashing into the unknown: An examination of crash-optimization algorithms through the two lanes of ethics and law. Albany Law Review, 79, 183.
- Hagendorff, T. (2020). The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines. Minds and Machines, 30, 99–120. doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8
- Harris, J. (2020). The immoral machine. Cambridge Quarterly Of Healthcare Ethics, 29(1), 71–79.
- Heikoop, D. D., Hagenzieker, M., Mecacci, G., Calvert, S., Santoni De Sio, F., & Arem, B. van. (2019). Human behaviour with automated driving systems: A quantitative framework for meaningful human control. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 20(6), 711–730.
- Hengstler, M., Enkel, E., & Duelli, S. (2016). Applied artificial intelligence and trust – The case of autonomous vehicles and medical assistance devices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 105, 105–120.
- Hevelke, A., & Nida-Rümelin, J. (2015). Responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: An ethical analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(3), 619–630.
- Himmelreich, J. (2018). Never mind the trolley: The ethics of autonomous vehicles in mundane situations. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 21, 669–684. doi:10.1007/s10677-018-9896-4
- Honda (2015). Honda sustainability report (Tech. Rep.). Honda. Retrieved from https://global.honda/about/sustainability/report/pdf-download/2015.html
- Huang, K., Greene, J. D., & Bazerman, M. (2019). Veil-of-ignorance reasoning favors the greater good. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(48), 23989–23995.
- Huang, B., van Cranenburgh, S., & Chorus, C. G. (2020). Death by automation. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 20(3), 71–86.
- Kallioinen, N., Pershina, M., Zeiser, J., Nosrat Nezami, F., Stephan, A., Pipa, G., … König, P. (2019). Moral judgements on the actions of self-driving cars and human drivers in dilemma situations from different perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2415.
- Kalra, N., & Paddock, S. M. (2016). Driving to safety: How many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 182–193.
- Keeling, G. (2017). Against Leben's Rawlsian collision algorithm for autonomous vehicles. In 3rd conference on “Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence”, Leeds, UK (pp. 259–272). Cham: Springer.
- Keeling, G. (2020). Why trolley problems matter for the ethics of automated vehicles. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(1), 293–307.
- Keeling, G., Evans, K., Thornton, S. M., Mecacci, G., & de Sio, F. S. (2019). Four perspectives on what matters for the ethics of automated vehicles. In G. Meyer & S. Beiker (Eds.), Automated vehicles symposium (pp. 49–60). Cham: Springer.
- Kirkpatrick, K. (2015). The moral challenges of driverless cars. Communications of the ACM, 58(8), 19–20.
- Leben, D. (2017). A Rawlsian algorithm for autonomous vehicles. Ethics and Information Technology, 19(2), 107–115.
- Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., … Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), e1–e34.
- Lin, P. (2016). Why ethics matters for autonomous cars. In M. Maurer, J. C. Gerdes, B. Lenz, & H. Winner (Eds.), Autonomes Fahren: Technische, rechtliche und gesellschaftliche Aspekte (pp. 69–85). Berlin, HD: Springer.
- Lin, P., Abney, K., & Jenkins, R. (2017). Robot ethics 2.0: From autonomous cars to artificial intelligence (P. Lin, R. Jenkins, & K. Abney). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Luetge, C. (2017). The German ethics code for automated and connected driving. Philosophy & Technology, 30(4), 547–558.
- Lundgren, B. (2020, April). Safety requirements vs. crashing ethically: What matters most for policies on autonomous vehicles. AI & Society, 1435–5655. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00964-6
- Mando (2018). Mando sustainability report 2018 (Tech. Rep.). Mando Corporation. Retrieved from https://www.mando.com/eng/sustainability/sustain13.jsp
- Marakby, S. (2018). A matter of trust: Ford's approach to developing self-driving vehicles (Tech. Rep.). Ford Autonomous Vehicles LLC. Retrieved from https://media.ford.com/content/dam/fordmedia/pdf/Ford_AV_LLC_FINAL_HR_2.pdf
- Marchant, G. E., & Lindor, R. A. (2012). The coming collision between autonomous vehicles and the liability system. Santa Clara Law Review, 52, 1321.
- Martins Martinho Bessa, A., Caspar, C., Kroesen, M. (Maarten), & Van Herber, N. (2020). Dataset ethical issues in focus by the autonomous vehicles industry 4TU ResearchData [Dataset] doi:https://doi.org/10.4121/13348535.v1
- Matthias, A. (2004). The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics and Information Technology, 6(3), 175–183.
- Menon, C., & Alexander, R. (2020). A safety-case approach to the ethics of autonomous vehicles. Safety and Reliability, 39(1) 33–58.
- Milakis, D., Van Arem, B., & Van Wee, B. (2017). Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(4), 324–348.
- Misselhorn, C. (2015). Collective agency and cooperation in natural and artificial systems. In C. Misselhorn (Ed.), Collective agency and cooperation in natural and artificial systems (pp. 3–24). Cham: Springer.
- Mobileye (n.d.). Implementing the RSS model on NHTSA pre-crash scenarios (Tech. Rep.). Intel Corp. Retrieved from https://static.mobileye.com/website/corporate/rss/rss_on_nhtsa.pdf
- Morita, T., & Managi, S. (2020). Autonomous vehicles: Willingness to pay and the social dilemma. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 119, 102748.
- Mulgan, R. (2000). ‘Accountability’: An ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 78(3), 555–573.
- Nissan (2017). Financial information as of March 31, 2017 (Tech. Rep.). Nissan. Retrieved from https://group.renault.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/yuho-nissan-fr2016.pdf
- Noothigattu, R., Gaikwad, S. S., Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Rahwan, I., Ravikumar, P., … Procaccia, A. D. (2018). A voting-based system for ethical decision making. In Thirty-second AAAI conference on Artificial Intelligence, New Orleans, Louisiana.
- Nuro (2018). Delivering safety: Nuro's approach (Tech. Rep.). Nuro. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/57bcb0e02994ca36c2ee746c/t/5b9a00848a922d8eaecf65a2/15368193586
- Nvidia (2018). Nvidia self-driving safety report (Tech. Rep.). Nvidia. Retrieved from https://www.nvidia.com/content/dam/en-zz/Solutions/self-driving-cars/safety-report/auto-print-safety-report-pdf-v16.5(1).pdf
- Nyholm, S. (2018). The ethics of crashes with self-driving cars: A roadmap, I. Philosophy Compass, 13(7), e12507.
- Nyholm, S., & Smids, J. (2016). The ethics of accident-algorithms for self-driving cars: An applied trolley problem? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19(5), 1275–1289.
- Parkinson, S., Ward, P., Wilson, K., & Miller, J. (2017). Cyber threats facing autonomous and connected vehicles: Future challenges. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 18(11), 2898–2915.
- SAE On-Road Automated Vehicle Standards Committee. (2014). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. SAE Standard J3016 201401. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
- Santoni de Sio, F., & Van den Hoven, J. (2018). Meaningful human control over autonomous systems: A philosophical account. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 15.
- Schuelke-Leech, B. A., Jordan, S. R., & Barry, B. (2019). Regulating autonomy: An assessment of policy language for highly automated vehicles. Review of Policy Research, 36(4), 547–579.
- Shashua, A., & Shalev-Shwartz, S. (2017). A plan to develop autonomous vehicles. And prove it. (Tech. Rep.). Intel. Retrieved from https://newsroom.intel.com/newsroom/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2017/10/autonomous-vehicle-safety-strategy.pdf
- Soriano, B. C., Dougherty, S. L., Soublet, B. G., & Triepke, K. J. (2014). Autonomous vehicles: A perspective from the California Department of motor vehicles. In G. Meyer & S. Beiker (Eds.), Road vehicle automation (pp. 15–24). Cham: Springer.
- Sparrow, R., & Howard, M. (2017). When human beings are like drunk robots: Driverless vehicles, ethics, and the future of transport. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 80, 206–215.
- Taeihagh, A., & Lim, H. S. M. (2019). Governing autonomous vehicles: Emerging responses for safety, liability, privacy, cybersecurity, and industry risks. Transport Reviews, 39(1), 103–128.
- Taiebat, M., Brown, A. L., Safford, H. R., Qu, S., & Xu, M. (2018). A review on energy, environmental, and sustainability implications of connected and automated vehicles. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(20), 11449–11465.
- Thomson, J. J. (1984). The trolley problem. Yale Law Journal, 94, 1395.
- Thornton, S. M., Pan, S., Erlien, S. M., & Gerdes, J. C. (2017). Incorporating ethical considerations into automated vehicle control. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 18(6), 1429–1439.
- Toyota (n.d.). Automated driving at toyota: Vision, strategy and development (Tech. Rep.). Toyota Motor Corporation. Retrieved from https://autodocbox.com/Electric_Vehicle/65566194-Automated-driving-at-toyota-vision-strategy-and-development.html
- Uber (2018). A principled approach to safety (Tech. Rep.). Uber. Retrieved from https://docs.huihoo.com/car/Uber-ATGSafety-Report-2018.pdf.
- Valeo (2016). Meet the future 2016 activity and sustainable development report (Tech. Rep.). Valeo. Retrieved from https://www.valeo.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/VALEO_RA_2016_GB_MEL.pdf
- Van den Hoven, J., Vermaas, P., & Van de Poel, I. (2015). Handbook of ethics, values and technological design. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Van de Poel, I., Fahlquist, J. N., Doorn, N., Zwart, S., & Royakkers, L. (2012). The problem of many hands: Climate change as an example. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(1), 49–67.
- Van Wee, B. (2011). Transport and ethics: Ethics and the evaluation of transport policies and projects. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Weast, J., Yurdana, M., & Jordan, A. (2016). A matter of trust: How smart design can accelerate automated vehicle adoption (Tech. Rep.). Intel. Retrieved from https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/white-papers/trust-autonomous-white-paper-secure.pdf
- Wolkenstein, A. (2018). What has the trolley dilemma ever done for us (and what will it do in the future). On some recent debates about the ethics of self-driving cars? Ethics and Information Technology, 20(3), 163–173.
- Wood, M., Robbel, P., Maass, M., Tebbens, R. D., Meijs, M., Harb, M., … Robinson, K. (2019). Safety first for automated driving (Tech. Rep.). Mercedes-Benz, Daimler, Intel Corp. Retrieved from https://www.daimler.com/documents/innovation/other/safety-first-for-automated-driving.pdf
- Wu, S. S. (2019). Autonomous vehicles, trolley problems, and the law. Ethics and Information Technology, 22(1), 1–13.
- Zoox (2018). Safety innovation at Zoox: Setting the bar for safety in autonomous mobility (Tech. Rep.). Zoox. Retrieved from https://zoox.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Safety_Report_12Dec2018.pdf