Access denied? Digital inequality in transport services

References

• Aberle, C. (2020). Who benefits from mobility as a service? A GIS-based investigation of the population served by four ride-pooling schemes in hamburg, Germany. KN - Journal of Cartography and Geographic Information, 70(1), 25–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s42489-020-00041-4
   Google Scholar
• Aguiléra, A. (2019). Smartphone and individual travel behavior. Urban mobility and the smartphone (pp. 1–37). Elsevier. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812647-9.00001-9
   Google Scholar
• Aguiléra, A., Guillot, C., & Rallet, A. (2012). Mobile ICTs and physical mobility: Review and research agenda. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(4), 664–672. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ampélas, A. (2001). Télématique et transports en commun [Telematics and public transport]. Les Cahiers du Numérique, 2(1), 213–238.
   Google Scholar
• Andreev, P., Salomon, I., & Pliskin, N. (2010). Review: State of teleactivities. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 18(1), 3–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2009.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2019). Transport for all. Transport Reviews, 39(3), 289–292. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2019.1582905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2006). Liquid times. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolaccini, K., & Hickman, M. (2019). Age, transport and technology: A survey of older Queenslanders. Australasian Transport Research Forum 2019, Canberra, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Johnson, H., O’Halloran, R., Douglas, J., West, D., & Bould, E. (2019). Communication access on trains: A qualitative exploration of the perspectives of passengers with communication disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(2), 125–132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1380721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (1992). Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boutueil, V. (2019). Chapter 2 - New mobility services. In A. Aguilera, & V. Boutueil (Eds.), Urban mobility and the smartphone (pp. 39–78). Elsevier. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812647-9.00002-0
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W. (2013). The implications of social capital for the digital divides in America. The Information Society, 29(1), 13–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2012.739265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., Van Lierop, D., & Ettema, D. (2020). Dockless bike-sharing systems: What are the implications? Transport Reviews, 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2019.1710306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, G., & Delbosc, A. (2010). Modelling the social and psychological impacts of transport disadvantage. Transportation, 37(6), 953–966. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9280-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidsson, P., Hajinasab, B., Holmgren, J., Jevinger, A., & Persson, J. A. (2016). The fourth wave of digitalization and public transport: Opportunities and challenges. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121248
   Google Scholar
• De Reuver, M., Van Wynsberghe, A., Janssen, M., & Van de Poel, I. (2020). Digital platforms and responsible innovation: Expanding value sensitive design to overcome ontological uncertainty. Ethics and Information Technology, 22(3), 257–267. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09537-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Garip, F. (2012). Network effects and social inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 93–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPrete, T. A., & Eirich, G. M. (2006). Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: A review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Review of Sociology, 32(1), 271–297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuy, G. (1999). From the “magic circle” to “automobile dependence”: measurements and political implications. Transport Policy, 6(1), 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(98)00028-6
   Google Scholar
• Dupuy, G. (2011). Fracture et dépendance: l'enfer des réseaux? [The digital divide and automobile dependence: Effects on service networks]. Flux, 83(1), 6–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.3917/flux.083.0006
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020). Horizon 2020 - Work Programme 2018-2020 - Smart, green and integrated transport.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, M. C., Fontesz, T., Costa, V., Dias, T. G., Borges, J. L., & e Cunha, J. F. (2017). Evaluation of an integrated mobile payment, route planner and social network solution for public transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 24, 189–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.107
   Google Scholar
• Gebresselassie, M., & Sanchez, T. W. (2018). “Smart” tools for socially sustainable transport: A review of mobility apps. Urban Science, 45(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci2020045
   Google Scholar
• Golub, A., Satterfield, V., Serritella, M., Singh, J., & Phillips, S. (2019). Assessing the barriers to equity in smart mobility systems: A case study of portland, oregon. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7(4), 689–697. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gössling, S. (2017). ICT and transport behaviour: A conceptual review. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(3), 153–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1338318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J., & Rumpe, B. (2015). Models for digitalization. Software & Systems Modeling, 14(4), 1319–1320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-015-0494-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groth, S. (2019). Multimodal divide: Reproduction of transport poverty in smart mobility trends. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 125, 56–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. (2001). Second-level digital divide: Mapping differences in people's online skills. First Monday, 7(4).
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, J., Guo, W., & Edwards, S. (2019). Increasing mobility for older travellers through engagement with technology. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 60, 172–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D., Ho, C. Q., Mulley, C., Nelson, J. D., Smith, G., & Wong, Y. Z. (2020). Understanding mobility as a service (MaaS): past, present and future. Elsevier. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/C2019-0-00508-0
   Google Scholar
• Hjorthol, R. J. (2008). The mobile phone as a tool in family life: Impact on Planning of everyday activities and Car Use. Transport Reviews, 28(3), 303–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640701630905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J., Thakuriah, P., Mason, P., & Lido, C. (2020). The role of numeracy and financial literacy skills in the relationship between information and communication technology use and travel behaviour. Travel Behaviour and Society, 21, 257–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeekel, H. (2018). Inclusive transport: Fighting involuntary transport disadvantages. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, S. T., Kong, H., Wu, R., & Sui, D. Z. (2018). Ridesourcing, the sharing economy, and the future of cities. Cities, 76, 96–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamga, C., Yazıcı, M. A., & Singhal, A. (2013). Implementation of interactive transit information kiosks at New York city transit facilities: Analysis of user utilization and lessons learned. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 35, 218–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karner, A., London, J., Rowangould, D., & Manaugh, K. (2020). From Transportation equity to Transportation justice: Within, through, and Beyond the state. Journal of Planning Literature, 35(4), 440–459. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220927691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, V., Bergman, M. M., & Joye, D. (2004). Motility: Mobility as capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(4), 754–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenyon, S., Lyons, G., & Rafferty, J. (2002). Transport and social exclusion: Investigating the possibility of promoting inclusion through virtual mobility. Journal of Transport Geography, 10(3), 207–219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00012-1
   Google Scholar
• Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P. (2016). Algorithmic geographies: Big Data, Algorithmic uncertainty, and the production of Geographic knowledge. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(2), 274–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1117937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, D., Kenyon, S., & Lyons, G. (2013). Dyslexia and mobility-related social exclusion: The role of travel information provision. Journal of Transport Geography, 26, 147–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leviäkangas, P. (2016). Digitalisation of Finland's transport sector. Technology in Society, 47, 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Line, T., Jain, J., & Lyons, G. (2011). The role of ICTs in everyday mobile lives. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1490–1499. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, K. (2019). A new evolution for transport-related social exclusion research? Journal of Transport Geography, 81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, K., Mattioli, G., Verlinghieri, E., & Guzman, A. (2016). Transport poverty and its adverse social consequences. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport, 169(6), 353–365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1680/jtran.15.00073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupač, P. (2018). Beyond the digital divide: Contextualizing the information society. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, G., Mokhtarian, P., Dijst, M., & Böcker, L. (2018). The dynamics of urban metabolism in the face of digitalization and changing lifestyles: Understanding and influencing our cities. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 132, 246–257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macharis, C., & Geurs, K. (2019). The future of European communication and transportation research: A research agenda. Region, 6(3), doi:https://doi.org/10.18335/region.v6i3.281
   Google Scholar
• Malik, F., & Wahaj, Z. (2019). Sharing Economy Digital Platforms and Social Inclusion/Exclusion: A Research Study of Uber and Careem in Pakistan. Information and Communication Technologies for Development 2019: Strengthening Southern-Driven Cooperation as a Catalyst for ICT4D, 248-259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18400-1_20
   Google Scholar
• Mariën, I., Heyman, R., Salemink, K., & Van Audenhove, L. (2016). Digital by default: Consequences, casualties and coping strategies. In Social inequalities, Media and communication: Theory and roots (pp. 167–188). Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musselwhite, C. (2019). Older people’s mobility, New transport technologies and user-centred innovation. In B. Müller, & G. Meyer (Eds.), Towards user-centric transport in Europe: Challenges, Solutions and collaborations (pp. 87–103). Springer International Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99756-8_7
   Google Scholar
• Netherlands Court of Audit. (2016). Aanpak van laaggeletterdheid [Tackling low literacy]. Presented to the House of Representatives on April 20th, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Nordbakke, S. (2013). Capabilities for mobility among urban older women: Barriers, strategies and options. Journal of Transport Geography, 26, 166–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oggolder, C., Brügger, N., Metyková, M., Salaverría, R., & Siapera, E. (2019). The emergence of the internet and the End of journalism? The Handbook of European Communication History, 333–350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119161783.ch18
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill, B. (2008). Digital Radio Policy in Canada: From analog replacement to multimedia convergence. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 15(1), 26–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19376520801978126
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, M., & Parker, N. (2012). ‘Unsatisfactory saturation’: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 13(2), 190–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112446106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• OV Ombudsman. (2019). OV Loket Kwartaalrapportage 1 januari 2019 - 31 maart 2019 [Quarterly report of the Dutch Public Transport Ombudsman, January 1st 2019 - March 31st 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Pangbourne, K. (2018). Mobility and ageing: A review of interactions between transport and technology from the perspective of older people. In A. Curl, & C. Musselwhite (Eds.), Geographies of transport and ageing (pp. 51–71). Springer International Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76360-6_3
   Google Scholar
• Pangbourne, K., Aditjandra, P. T., & Nelson, J. D. (2010). New technology and quality of life for older people: Exploring health and transport dimensions in the UK context. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 4(4), 318–327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2009.0106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pangbourne, K., Mladenović, M. N., Stead, D., & Milakis, D. (2019). Questioning mobility as a service: Unanticipated implications for society and governance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pangbourne, K., Stead, D., Mladenović, M., & Milakis, D. (2018). The case of mobility as a service: A critical reflection on challenges for urban transport and mobility governance. In Governance of the smart mobility transition (pp. 33–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78754-317-120181003
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, R. H. M., Schwanen, T., & Banister, D. (2017). Distributive justice and equity in transportation. Transport Reviews, 37(2), 170–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1257660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pick, J., & Sarkar, A. (2016). Theories of the Digital Divide: Critical Comparison. 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, G., Vines, J., & Olivier, P. (2015). Your Money's No Good Here: The Elimination of Cash Payment on London Buses. CHI 2015: Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Rizos, A. C. (2010). Implementation of Advanced Transit Traveler Information Systems in the United States and Canada: Practice and Prospects. Master thesis, MIT Massaschusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., … Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569–582. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, L., Schulz, J., Blank, G., Ragnedda, M., Ono, H., Hogan, B., … Khilnani, A. (2020). Digital inequalities 2.0: Legacy inequalities in the information age. First Monday, 25(7), doi:https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i7.10842
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations, first edition. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, fifth edition. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Royakkers, L., Timmer, J., Kool, L., & van Est, R. (2018). Societal and ethical issues of digitization. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(2), 127–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9452-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, J., Wretstrand, A., & Schmidt, S. M. (2019). Disparities in mobility among older people: Findings from a capability-based travel survey. Transport Policy. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabie, D., & Ahmed, S. I. (2019). Moving into a technology land: exploring the challenges for the refugees in Canada in accessing its computerized infrastructures. Proceedings of the conference on Computing & Sustainable Societies (COMPASS 2019), 218-233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3314344.3332481
   Google Scholar
• Scheerder, A. (2019). Inevitable inequalities? Exploring differences in Internet Domestication Between less and highly educated families. PhD Thesis, Twente University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerder, A., Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017). Determinants of internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1607–1624. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheerder, A., Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2019). Internet use in the home: Digital inequality from a domestication perspective. New Media & Society, 21(10), 2099–2118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819844299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanen, T., Lucas, K., Akyelken, N., Cisternas Solsona, D., Carrasco, J.-A., & Neutens, T. (2015). Rethinking the links between social exclusion and transport disadvantage through the lens of social capital. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 74, 123–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341–362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S., & Cohen, A. (2020). Chapter 3 - mobility on demand (MOD) and mobility as a service (MaaS): early understanding of shared mobility impacts and public transit partnerships. In C. Antoniou, D. Efthymiou, & E. Chaniotakis (Eds.), Demand for Emerging Transportation systems (pp. 37–59). Elsevier. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815018-4.00003-6
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. (2018). Mobility justice: The politics of movement in an age of extremes. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sherriff, G., Adams, M., Blazejewski, L., Davies, N., & Kamerāde, D. (2020). From mobike to no bike in greater manchester: Using the capabilities approach to explore Europe's first wave of dockless bike share. Journal of Transport Geography, 86, 102744. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibayama, T., & Emberger, G. (2020). New mobility services: Taxonomy, innovation and the role of ICTs. Transport Policy. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.05.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirgaokar, M. (2018). Expanding seniors’ mobility through phone apps: Potential responses from the private and public sectors. Journal of Planning Education and Research, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18769133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B. (1980). Software psychology: Human Factors in computer and information systems. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
   Google Scholar
• Snellen, D., & de Hollander, G. (2017). ICT's change transport and mobility: Mind the policy gap!. Transportation Research Procedia, 26, 3–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.07.003
   Google Scholar
• Sochor, J., & Nikitas, A. (2016). Vulnerable users’ perceptions of transport technologies. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning, 169(3), 154–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1680/jurdp.14.00054
   Google Scholar
• Sourbati, M., & Behrendt, F. (2020). Smart mobility, age and data justice. New Media & Society, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820902682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, J. R. (2011). Social exclusion. In New perspectives and methods in transport and social exclusion research (pp. 27–43). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/9781780522012-003
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Netherlands. (2018). The Netherlands leads Europe in Internet access. Retrieved January 29, 2019, from https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/news/2018/05/the-netherlands-leads-europe-in-internet-access
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42, 1568–1580. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tongia, R., & Wilson, E. (2011). The flip side of metcalfe's Law: Multiple and growing costs of network exclusion. Internation Journal of Communication, 5, 665–681.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, A. (2013). Smart cities: Big Data, civic hackers, and the quest for a New utopia. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A. J. A. M. (2018). Digitale ongelijkheid in Nederland Anno 2018. [Digital inequality in the Netherlands Year 2018]. Twente University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online? In Communication and information technologies annual (pp. 29–52). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002
   Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2018). Collateral benefits of internet use: Explaining the diverse outcomes of engaging with the internet. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2333–2351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Helsper, E. J., Eynon, R., & Van Dijk, J. (2017). The compoundness and sequentiality of digital inequality. International Journal of Communication, 11, 452–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2015). Toward a multifaceted model of internet access for understanding digital divides: An empirical investigation. The Information Society, 31(5), 379–391. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2015.1069770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Van Dijk, J. (2018). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society, 21(2), 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). Modeling Traditional literacy, internet skills and internet usage: An empirical study. Interacting with Computers, 28(1), 13–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwu027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J., & Ten Klooster, P. M. (2015). Increasing inequalities in what we do online. Telematics and Informatics, 32(2), 259–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2019). The digital divide. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & Van Deursen, A. J. A. M. (2014). Digital skills: Unlocking the information society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wee, B., & Banister, D. (2016). How to write a literature review paper? Transport Reviews, 36(2), 278–288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1065456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wee, B., Geurs, K., & Chorus, C. (2013). Information, communication, travel behavior and accessibility. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 6(3), 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v6i3.282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchio, G. (2020). Microstories of everyday mobilities and opportunities in bogotá: A tool for bringing capabilities into urban mobility planning. Journal of Transport Geography, 83, 102652. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchio, G., & Tricarico, L. (2018). “May the force move you”: roles and actors of information sharing devices in urban mobility. Cities, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velaga, N. R., Beecroft, M., Nelson, J. D., Corsar, D., & Edwards, P. (2012). Transport poverty meets the digital divide: Accessibility and connectivity in rural communities. Journal of Transport Geography, 21, 102–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., & Mu, L. (2018). Spatial disparities of Uber accessibility: An exploratory analysis in atlanta, USA. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 67, 169–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. (2007). The digital vicious cycle: Links between social disadvantage and digital exclusion in rural areas. Telecommunications Policy, 31(6), 374–388. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2007.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, Y. Z., Hensher, D. A., & Mulley, C. (2017). Emerging transport technologies and the modal efficiency framework: A case for mobility as a service (MaaS). International Conference Series on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport - Thredbo 15, Stockholm, Sweden. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/17503
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., Zhao, P., & Qiao, S. (2020). Smartness-induced transport inequality: Privacy concern, lacking knowledge of smartphone use and unequal access to transport information. Transport Policy. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar