2,779
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A systematic review of the factors associated with pedestrian route choice

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 672-694 | Received 18 Sep 2020, Accepted 22 Oct 2021, Published online: 13 Dec 2021

References

  • Argin, G., & Ozbil, A. (2015). Walking to school: The effects of street network configuration and urban design qualities on route selection behaviour of elementary school students. SSS 2015 - 10th International Space Syntax Symposium 10th International Space Syntax Symposium, SSS 2015, July 13, 2015 - July 17, 2015, London, UK.
  • Bafatakis, C., Duives, D., & Daamen, W. (2015). Determining a pedestrian route choice model through a photo survey (No. 15-4859). Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC United States, p. 14, 11-15 January 2015. https://trid.trb.org/view/1338885
  • Ben-Akiva, M., & Bierlaire, M. (2003). Discrete choice models with applications to departure time and route choice. In R. W. Hall (Ed.), Handbook of transportation science. International series in operations research & management science (Vol. 56, pp. 7–37). Kluwer: Springer. doi:10.1007/0-306-48058-1_2
  • Borst, H. C., De Vries, S. I., Graham, J. M. A., van Dongen, J. E. F., Bakker, I., & Miedema, H. M. E. (2009, December). Influence of environmental street characteristics on walking route choice of elderly people. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(4), 477–484. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.08.002
  • Bovy, P. H., & Stern, E. (2012). Route choice: Wayfinding in transport networks (Vol. 9). Springer Science and Business Media.
  • Broach, J., & Dill, J. (2015). Pedestrian route choice model estimated from revealed preference GPS Data (No. 15-3669). Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, United States, p. 13, 11-15 January 2015. https://trid.trb.org/view/1338221
  • Brookfield, K., & Tilley, S. (2016). Using virtual street audits to understand the walkability of older adults’ route choices by gender and age. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(11), 1–12.
  • Brown, B. B., Werner, C. M., Amburgey, J. W., & Szalay, C. (2007). Walkable route perceptions and physical features: Converging evidence for en route walking experiences. Environment and Behavior, 39(1), 34–61.
  • Buliung, R. N., Larsen, K., Faulkner, G. E., & Stone, M. R. (2013). The “path” not taken: Exploring structural differences in mapped-versus shortest-network-path school travel routes. American Journal of Public Health, 103(9), 1589–1596. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3780669/
  • Cervero, R., Sarmiento, O. L., Jacoby, E., Gomez, L. F., & Neiman, A. (2009). Influences of built Environments on walking and cycling: Lessons from bogotá. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 3(4), 203–226. doi:10.1080/15568310802178314
  • Czogalla, O., & Herrmann, A. (2011). Parameters determining route choice in pedestrian networks (No. 11-0380). TRB 90th annual meeting compendium of papers DVD., Washington, D.C, United States, p. 16, 23-27 January 2011. https://trid.trb.org/view/1091381
  • Dessing, D., De Vries, S. I., Hegeman, G., Verhagen, E., Willem van, M., & Pierik, F. H. (2016). Childrens route choice during active transportation to school: Difference between shortest and actual route. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 13), doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0373-y
  • Dijkstra, J., Timmermans, H. J., & Jessurun, A. (2001). A multi-agent cellular automata system for visualising simulated pedestrian activity. In S. Bandini & T. Worsha (Eds.), Theory and practical issues on cellular automata (pp. 29–36). London: Springer.
  • Duncan, M. J., & Mummery, W. K. (2007). GIS or GPS? A comparison of two methods for assessing route taken during active transport. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33(1), 51–53. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.042
  • Evers, C., Boles, S., Johnson-Shelton, D., Schlossberg, M., & Richey, D. (2014). Parent safety perceptions of Child walking routes. Jounal of Transport and Health, 1(2), 108–115. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2014.03.003
  • Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294. doi:10.1080/01944361003766766
  • Foltete, J., & Piombini, A. (2010). Deviations in pedestrian itineraries in urban areas: A method to assess the role of environmental factor. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(4), 723–739. https://trid.trb.org/view/935165
  • Fu, L., Fang, J., Cao, S., & Lo, S. (2018). A cellular automaton model for exit selection behavior simulation during evacuation processes. Procedia Engineering, 211, 169–175. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.12.123
  • Galama, I., Daamen, W., Hünneman, M., Annema, J. A., Hoogendoorn, S. P., & Transportation Research, B. (2017). Stated and revealed preference study of pedestrian route choices at the mass-event SAIL Amsterdam 2015 (No. 17-02970). Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, United States, p. 12, 8-12 January 2017. https://trid.trb.org/view/1438201
  • Gallimore, J. M., Brown, B. B., & Werner, C. M. (2011). Walking routes to school in new urban and suburban neighborhoods: An environmental walkability analysis of blocks and routes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(2), 184–191. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.01.001
  • Gärling, T., & Axhausen, K. W. (2003). Introduction: Habitual travel choice. Transportation, 30(1), 1–11.
  • Gärling, T., & Garvill, J. (1993). Psychological explanations of participation in everyday activities. In T. Garling & R. G. Garvill (Eds.), Behaviour and environment: Psychological and geographical approaches advances in psychology (Vol. 96, pp. 270–297). Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/qut/detail.action?docID=403904#
  • Ghorveh, M. G. (2017). Does street quality affect transit users’ route choice? North Carolina State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis. Raleigh, North Carolina.
  • Gim, T. H. T., & Ko, J. (2017). Maximum likelihood and firth logistic regression of the pedestrian route choice. International Regional Science Review, 40(6), 616–637. doi:10.1177/0160017615626214
  • Gotschi, T., De Nazelle, A., Brand, C., Gerike, R., & Consortium, P. (2017). Towards a comprehensive conceptual framework of active travel behavior: A review and synthesis of published frameworks. Current Environmental Health Reports, 4(3), 286–295. doi:10.1007/s40572-017-0149-9
  • Guo, Z. (2009). Does the pedestrian environment affect the utility of walking? A case of path choice in downtown Boston. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 14(5), 343–352. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2009.03.007
  • Guo, Z., & Ferreira, J. (2008). Pedestrian environments, transit path choice, and transfer penalties: Understanding land-use impacts on transit travel. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design, 35(3), 461–479. doi:10.1068/b33074
  • Guo, Z., & Loo, B. P. Y. (2013). Pedestrian environment and route choice: Evidence from New York City and Hong Kong. Journal of Transport Geography, 28, 124–136. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.11.013
  • Harrison, F., Burgoine, T., Corder, K., van Sluijs, E. M. F., & Jones, A. (2014). How well do modelled routes to school record the environments children are exposed to?: A cross-sectional comparison of Gis-modelled and Gps-measured routes to school. International Journal of Health Geographics, 13(1), 5. doi:10.1186/1476-072X-13-5
  • Hill, M. R. (1985). Walking straight home from school: Pedestrian route choice by young children. Environment and Behavior, 39(1), 34–61.
  • Hoogendoorn, S. P., & Bovy, P. H. L. (2004). Pedestrian route-choice and activity scheduling theory and models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 38(2), 169–190. doi:10.1016/s0191-2615(03)00007-9
  • Ito, K., Reardon, T. G., Arcaya, M. C., Shamsuddin, S., Gute, D. M., & Srinivasan, S. (2017). Built environment and walking to school: Findings from a student travel Behavior survey in massachusetts. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2666, 78–84. doi:10.3141/2666-09
  • Joseph, A., & Zimring, C. (2007). Where active older adults walk: Understanding the factors related to path choice for walking among active retirement community residents. Environment and Behavior, 39(1), 75–105. doi:10.1177/0013916506295572
  • Karusisi, N., Thomas, F., Méline, J., Brondeel, R., & Chaix, B. (2014). Environmental conditions around itineraries to destinations as correlates of walking for Transportation among adults: The RECORD cohort study. PLOS ONE, 9(5), e88929. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088929
  • Kielar, P. M., Biedermann, D. H., Kneidl, A., & Borrmann, A. (2018). A unified pedestrian routing model for graph-based wayfinding built on cognitive principles. Transportmetrica a-Transport Science, 14(5), 406–432. doi:10.1080/23249935.2017.1309472
  • Kielar, P. M., & Borrmann, A. (2016). Modeling pedestrians’ interest in locations: A concept to improve simulations of pedestrian destination choice. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 61, 47–62. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2015.11.003
  • Kim, B., Kim, M., Lee, J., & Park, J. (2016). Pedestrian path choice with diagonal streets. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 15(3), 463–470.
  • Koh, P. P., & Wong, Y. D. (2013). Influence of infrastructural compatibility factors on walking and cycling route choices. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 202–213. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.08.001
  • Larsen, K., Gilliland, J., & Hess, P. M. (2012). Route-based analysis to capture the environmental influences on a child's mode of travel between home and school. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(6), 1348–1365.
  • Le, H. T. K., Buehler, R., & Hankey, S. (2018). Correlates of the built environment and active travel: evidence from 20 US metropolitan areas. Environmental Health Perspectives, 126(7), 077011. doi:10.1289/EHP3389
  • Lee, S., & Lee, M.-H. (2021). Impact of neighborhood environment on pedestrian route selection among elementary schoolchildren in Korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 7049. doi:10.3390/ijerph18137049
  • Liu, Y., Yang, D., Timmermans, H. J., & de Vries, B. (2020a). The impact of the street-scale built environment on pedestrian metro station access/egress route choice. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 87, 102491. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2020.102491
  • Liu, Y., Yang, D., Timmermans, H. J. P., & de Vries, B. (2020b). Analysis of the Impact of Street-Scale built Environment design near Metro Stations on pedestrian and cyclist road segment choice: A stated choice experiment. Journal of Transport Geography, 82, 102570. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102570
  • López-Lambas, M. E., Sánchez, J. M., & Alonso, A. (2021). The walking health: A route choice model to analyze the street factors enhancing active mobility. Journal of Transport & Health, 22, 101133. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2021.101133
  • Lue, G., & Miller, E. J. (2019). Estimating A toronto pedestrian route choice Model using smartphone Gps data. Travel Behaviour and Society, 14, 34–42. doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2018.09.008
  • Moran, M. R., Rodríguez, D. A., & Corburn, J. (2018). Examining the role of trip destination and Neighborhood attributes in shaping environmental influences on children’s route choice. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 65, 63–81. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2018.08.001
  • Moran, M. R., Werner, P., Doron, I., HaGani, N., Benvenisti, Y., King, A. C., … Ergon, S. (2017). Exploring the objective and perceived environmental attributes of older adults’ neighborhood walking routes: A mixed methods analysis. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 25(3), 420–431. doi:10.1123/japa.2016-0165
  • Muraleetharan, T., & Hagiwara, T. (2007). Overall level of service of urban walking environment and its influence on pedestrian route choice behavior - analysis of pedestrian travel in sapporo, Japan. Transportation Research Record, 2002, 7–17. doi:10.3141/2002-02
  • Muraleetharan, T., Meguro, K., Adachi, T., Hagiwara, T., Kagaya, S., & Trb. (2005). Influence of winter road conditions and signal delay on pedestrian route choice in Japan's Snowiest metropolis. Bicycles and Pedestrians; Developing Countries 2005 (pp. 145-153). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0361198105193900117
  • Nasir, M., Lim, C. P., Nahavandi, S., & Creighton, D. (2014). Prediction of pedestrians routes within A built Environment in normal conditions. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(10), 4975–4988. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.02.034
  • Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., Haque, M. M., King, M., & Washington, S. (2016). Understanding the Impacts of mobile phone distraction on driving performance: A systematic review. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 72, 360–380. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2016.10.006
  • Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., Truelove, V., Watson, B., & Hinton, J. A. (2019). The Impact of road advertising signs on driver behaviour and implications for road safety: A critical systematic review. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 122, 85–98. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2019.01.012
  • Ozbil, A., Argin, G., & Yesiltepe, D. (2016). Pedestrian route choice by elementary school students: The role of street network configuration and pedestrian quality attributes in walking to school. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 4(2), 67–84. doi:10.1080/21650349.2015.1123120
  • Papadimitriou, E., Yannis, G., & Golias, J. (2009). A critical assessment of pedestrian behaviour models. Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(3), 242–255. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2008.12.004
  • Pont, K., Ziviani, J., Wadley, D., Bennett, S., & Abbott, R. (2009). Environmental correlates of children's active transportation: A systematic literature review. Health & Place, 15(3), 849–862. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.02.002
  • Prato, C. G. (2009). Route choice modeling: Past, present and future research directions. Journal of Choice Modelling, 2(1), 65–100. doi:10.1016/s1755-5345(13)70005-8
  • Pritchard, R. (2018). Revealed preference methods for studying bicycle route choice—a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(3), 470. doi:10.3390/ijerph15030470
  • Rahmati, Y., Talebpour, A., & Hamdar, S. H. (2018). The route choice behavior of connected pedestrians: A macroscopic evaluation of crowd dynamics based on a game theoretical framework. Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting.
  • Riggs, W., & Gross, S. (2018). Pedestrian use of Urban alleys: Analyzing plans and surveying route choice (No. 18-00652) In: Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, United States, p. 22, 7-11 January 2018. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3057848. https://trid.trb.org/view/1494521
  • Rod, J. E., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., Senserrick, T., & King, M. (2021, March). Older adult pedestrian trauma: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment of injury health outcomes from an aggregate study sample of 1 million pedestrians. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 152, 105970. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.105970
  • Rodríguez, D. A., Merlin, L., Prato, C. G., Conway, T. L., Cohen, D., Elder, J. P., … Veblen-Mortenson, S. (2015). Influence of the built environment on pedestrian route choices of adolescent girls. Environment and Behaviour, 47(4), 359–394. doi:10.1177/0013916513520004
  • Ronis, D. L., Yates, J. F., & Kirscht, J. P. (1989). Attitudes, decisions, and habits as determinants of repeated behavior. Attitude Structure and Function, 213, 39.
  • Sarjala, S. (2019). Built environment determinants of Pedestrians’ and bicyclists’ route choices on commute trips: Applying a new grid-based method for measuring the built environment along the route. Journal of Transport Geography, 78, 56–69. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.05.004
  • Schmid, J. (2006). La Relation Entre L’environment Construit Et L’activité Physique Sous Forme De Déplacements à Pied Université de Lausanne.
  • Seneviratne, P. N., & Morrall, J. F. (1985). Analysis of factors affecting the choice of route of pedestrians. Transportation Planning and Technology, 10(2), 147–159. doi:10.1080/03081068508717309
  • Sevtsuk, A., Basu, R., Li, X., & Kalvo, R. (2021). A big data approach to understanding pedestrian route choice preferences: Evidence from San Francisco. Travel Behaviour and Society, 25, 41–51. doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2021.05.010
  • Shatu, F., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2018). Development and validity of a virtual street walkability audit tool for pedestrian route choice analysis—SWATCH. Journal of Transport Geography, 70, 148–160. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.06.004
  • Shatu, F., Yigitcanlar, T., & Bunker, J. (2019a). Objective vs. subjective measures of street environments in pedestrian route choice behaviour: Discrepancy and correlates of non-concordance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 126, 1–23. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2019.05.011
  • Shatu, F., Yigitcanlar, T., & Bunker, J. (2019b). Shortest path distance vs. least directional change: Empirical testing of space syntax and geographic theories concerning pedestrian route choice behaviour. Journal of Transport Geography, 74, 37–52. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.005
  • Sheffi, Y. (1985). Urban transportation networks: Equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PRENTICE-HALL.
  • Shepherd, R. (1999). Social determinants of food choice. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 58(4), 807–812.
  • Stubenschrott, M., Matyus, T., Schrom-Feiertag, H., Kogler, C., & Seer, S. (2017). Route-choice modeling for pedestrian evacuation based on infrastructure knowledge and personal preferences. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2623, 82–89. doi:10.3141/2623-09
  • Tewahade, S., Li, K., Goldstein, R. B., Haynie, D., Iannotti, R. J., & Simons-Morton, B. (2019). Association between the built environment and active transportation among U.S. adolescents. Journal of Transport & Health, 15), doi:10.1016/j.jth.2019.100629
  • Tribby, C. P., Miller, H. J., Brown, B. B., Werner, C. M., & Smith, K. R. (2017). Analyzing walking route choice through built environments using random forests and discrete choice techniques. Environment and Planning B-Urban Analytics and City Science, 44(6), 1145–1167.
  • Tsukaguchi, H., & Ohashi, Y. (2007). Modelling pedestrian route choice behaviour and its application to the planning of underground shopping streets. 11th Acuus International Conference - Underground Space: Expanding the Frontiers, pp. 527–532, Athens – Greece, September 10-13 2007.
  • Van Cauwenberg, J., Van Holle, V., Simons, D., Deridder, R., Clarys, P., Goubert, L., … Deforche, B. (2012). Environmental factors influencing older Adults’ walking for transportation: A study using walk-along interviews. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 85. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-85
  • Verlander, N. Q., & Heydecker, B. G. (1997). Pedestrian route choice: An empirical study. 25th PTRC European Transport Forum (formerly Summer Annual Meetings). PTRC Education and Research Services Ltd: London, pp. 39-49, 1-5 September 1997. http://worldcat.org/isbn/0860503054
  • Wagoum, A. U. K., Seyfried, A., & Holl, S. (2012). Modeling the dynamic route choice of pedestrians to assess the criticality of building evacuation. Advances in Complex Systems, 15(7), 22, Article 1250029.
  • Weinstein-Agrawal, A., Schlossberg, M., & Irvin, K. (2008). How far, by which route and why? A spatial analysis of pedestrian preference. Journal of Urban Design, 13(1), 81–98. doi:10.1080/13574800701804074
  • Wickramasinghe, V., & Dissanayake, S. (2015). Pedestrians’ route choice behavior for intra-CBD Trips in a Developing Country (No. 15-3003). Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, United States, p. 11, 11-15 January 2015. https://trid.trb.org/view/1337870
  • Xie, S. Q., Wong, S. C., & Lam, W. H. K. (2016). Microscopic decision model for pedestrian route choice at signalized crosswalks. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 50(6), 1181–1192. doi:10.1002/atr.1396
  • Yamamoto, T., Takamura, S., & Morikawa, T. (2012). Analysis of mode and walk-route choice in a downtown area considering heterogeneity in trip distance (No. 12-2610). Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting, Washington DC, United States, p. 19, 22-26 January 2012. https://trid.trb.org/view/1129849
  • Yamamoto, T., Takamura, S., & Morikawa, T. (2018). Structured random walk parameter for heterogeneity in trip distance on modeling pedestrian route choice behavior at downtown area. Travel Behaviour and Society, 11, 93–100. doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2018.02.006
  • Zeng, W., Chen, P., Yu, G., & Wang, Y. (2017). Specification and calibration af a microscopic model for pedestrian dynamic simulation at signalized intersections: A hybrid approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 80, 37–70. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2017.04.009
  • Zhang, L. M., Liu, M. J., Wu, X. G., & AbouRizk, S. M. (2016). Simulation-based route planning for pedestrian evacuation in metro stations: A case study. Automation in Construction, 71, 430–442. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.031

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.