Learning through policy transfer? Reviewing a decade of scholarship for the field of transport

References

• Aligica, P. D. (2006). Institutional and stakeholder mapping: Frameworks for policy analysis and institutional change. Public Organization Review, 6(1), 79–90.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A theory of Action Perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. J., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25, 275–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, D., & Jordan, A. (2011). What have we learned from policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited. Political Studies Review, 9(3), 366–378. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00240.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343–357. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (2012). The Future of Policy Transfer Research. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 339–345. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00274.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making. Governance, 13(1), 5. doi:10.1111/0952-1895.00121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ⁠Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duguid, P. (2005). The Art of Knowing: Social and Tacit Dimensions of Knowledge and the Limits of the Community of Practice. The Information Society, 21, 109–118. doi:10.1080/01972240590925311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A. (2009). Policy transfer as learning: capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities. Policy Studies, 30(3), 289–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A. (2015). Organizational political capacity as learning. Policy & Society, 34(3–4), 259–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2013). Systematising Policy Learning: From Monolith to Dimensions. Political Studies, 61(3), 599–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M. (2009). New directions in the study of policy transfer. Policy Studies, 30(3), 237–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M., & Davies, J. (1999). Understanding Policy Transfer: A Multi-Level, Multi-Disciplinary Perspective. Public Administration, 77(2), 361–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster-Fishman, P. G., Berkowitz, S. L., Lounsbury, D. W., Jacobson, S., & Allen, N. A. (2001). Building Collaborative Capacity in Community Coalitions: A Review and Integrative Framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 241–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardi, A. R., Perrier, L., Webster, F., Leslie, K., Bell, M., Levinson, W., … Straus, S. E. (2009). Exploring mentorship as a strategy to build capacity for knowledge translation research and practice: Protocol for a qualitative study. Implementation Science, 4(1), 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A. K., Heikkila, T., Smolinski, S. L., Huitema, D., & Armitage, D. (2018). Learning our way out of environmental policy problems: a review of the scholarship. Policy Sciences, 51(3), 335–371. doi:10.1007/s11077-017-9278-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2001). Social Science Methodology: A Critical Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, M., te Brömmelstroet, M., & Bertolini, L. (2019). Learning to build strategic capacity for transportation policy change: An interdisciplinary exploration. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 1, 100006.
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J., & Loeber, A. (2006). Theories of Policy Learning: Agency, Structure, and Change. In F. Fischer & G. J. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of Public Policy Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 275–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heclo, H. (1974). Modern social politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2013). Building a Conceptual Approach to Collective Learning : Lessons for Public Policy Scholars, 41(3), 484–512.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, E., Gilpin, G., & Banister, D. (2019). Sustainable mobility at thirty. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(7), 1–14. doi:10.3390/su11071965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, J., & Kim, B.-Y. (2014). Policy transfer using the “gold standard”: exploring policy tourism in practice. Policy & Politics, 42(4), 495–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M., Bryman, A., & Futing Liao, T. (2003). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, G., & Reardon, L. (2017). Questions of governance: Rethinking the study of transportation policy. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 101, 238–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, G., & Stead, D. (2011). Policy transfer and learning in the field of transport: A review of concepts and evidence. Transport Policy, 18(3), 492–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. J. (1992). Policy Learning and Failure. Source Journal of Public Policy Pol, 12(4), 331–354.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012). Assembling urbanism: following policies anstudying through’ the sites and situations of policy making. Environment and Planning A, 44, 42–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meseguer, C. (2006). Rational learning and bounded learning in the diffusion of policy innovations. Rationality and Society, 18(1), 35–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyson, S., Scholten, P., & Weible, C. M. (2017). Policy learning and policy change: theorizing their relations from different perspectives. Policy and Society, 36(2), 161–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J., Jager, N. W., Kochskämper, E., & Challies, E. (2019). Learning in participatory environmental governance–its antecedents and effects. Findings from a case survey meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 21(3), 213–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, J., & Hysing, E. (2012). Theorizing Inside Activism: Understanding Policymaking and Policy Change from Below. Planning Theory and Practice, 13(2), 257–273.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19, 354–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41(2), 169–174. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pojani, D. (2020). Theoretical Approaches to Studying Policy Transfer. In Planning for Sustainable Urban Transport in Southeast Asia (pp. 9–16). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. (1995). The role of knowledge in the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 2(2), 159–183.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R. (1993). Lesson Drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Rouwette, E. A. J. A., Vennix, J. A. M., & Van Mullekom, T. (2002). Group model building effectiveness: A review of assessment studies. System Dynamics Review, 18(1), 5–45. doi:10.1002/sdr.229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2–3), 129–168. doi:10.1007/BF00136406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, P., & Wiechmann, T. (2019). disP-The Planning Review Unpacking Spatial Planning as the Governance of Place Extracting Potentials for Future Advancements in Planning Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38, 207–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaans, M., & Louw, E. (2009). Crossing Borders With Planners and Developers: the Limits of Lesson-Drawing, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2016). Key research themes on governance and sustainable urban mobility. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(1), 40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, W. (2011). Strategy-making for Sustainability: An Institutional Learning Approach to Transformative Planning Practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 12(2), 205–221.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2001). Learning lessons, policy transfer and the international diffusion of policy ideas. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation working paper, 69(1).
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 545–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2012). Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Studies, 33(6), 483–499. doi:10.1080/01442872.2012.695933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straatemeier, T., Bertolini, L., te Brömmelstroet, M., & Hoetjes, P. (2010). An experiential approach to research in planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 4(37), 578–591.
   Google Scholar
• Temenos, C., & McCann, E. (2013). Geographies of Policy Mobilities. Geography Compass, 7(5), 344–357. doi:10.1111/gec3.12063
   Google Scholar
• van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., van Leeuwen, E. S., Oosterhuis, F. H., Rietveld, P., & Verhoef, E. T. (2007). Social learning by doing in sustainable transport innovations: Ex-post analysis of common factors behind successes and failures. Research Policy, 36(2), 247–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Doren, D., Driessen, P. P. J., Runhaar, H. A. C., & Giezen, M. (2020). Learning within local government to promote the scaling-up of low-carbon initiatives: A case study in the City of Copenhagen. Energy Policy, 136(August 2017), 111030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Poeck, K., Östman, L., & Block, T. (2020). Opening up the black box of learning-by-doing in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 298–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Schönfeld, K. C., Tan, W., Wiekens, C., Salet, W., & Janssen-Jansen, L. (2019). Social learning as an analytical lens for co-creative planning. European Planning Studies, 4313.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wee, B., & Banister, D. (2016). How to Write a Literature Review Paper? Transport Reviews, 36(2), 278–288. doi:10.1080/01441647.2015.1065456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolman, H., & Page, E. (2002). Policy transfer among local governments: An information-theory approach. Governance, 15(4), 477–501. doi:10.1111/1468-0491.00198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar