A review of models for transport security and of their relevance for supply chains

References

• Arendt, F., Meyer-Larsen, N., & Muller, R. (2012). Practical approaches towards enhanced security and visibility in international intermodal container supply chains. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 4(2), 182–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autry, C. W., & Bobbitt, L. M. (2008). Supply chain security orientation: Conceptual development and a proposed framework. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 19(1), 42–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azaiez, M. N., & Bier, V. M. (2007). Optimal resource allocation for security in reliable systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 181, 773–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BIMCO, ICS, IGP&I Clubs, INTERTANKO and OCIMF. (2018). BMP5. Best management practices to deter piracy and enhance maritime security in the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden, Indian Ocean and Arabian Sea. Edinburgh: Witherby Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, M. (2005). Psychological acceptability revisited. In L. F. Cranor & S. Garfinkel (Eds.), Security and usability: Designing secure systems that people can use (pp. 1–12). Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Bohle, C., Hellingrath, B., & Deuter, P. (2014). Towards process reference models for secure supply chains. Journal of Transportation Security, 7, 255–276.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, A., & Sullivan, J. P. (2000). Emergency preparedness for transit terrorism. TRNews, 208, 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho Fagundes, M. V., Oliveira Teles, E., Vieira de Melo, S. A. B., & Mendonca Freires, F. G. (2020). Decision-making models and support systems for supply chain risk: Literature mapping and future research agenda. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 26, 63–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caunhye, A. M., Nie, X., & Pokharel, S. (2012). Optimization models in emergency logistics: A literature review. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 46, 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, F. T. S., & Kumar, N. (2007). Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega, 35(4), 417–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Closs, D. J., & McGarrell, E. F. (2004). Enhancing security throughout the supply chain. Washington, DC: Special ReportIBM Center for the business of Government. Retrieved from: http://www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/Enhancing%20Security.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Craighead, C. W., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M. J., & Handfield, R. B. (2007). The severity of supply chain disruptions: Design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decision Sciences, 38, 131–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egli, D. S. (2013). Beyond the storms: Strengthening preparedness, response and resilience in the 21st century. Journal of Strategic Security, 6(2), 32–45.
   Google Scholar
• Fahimnia, B., Tang, C. S., Davarzani, H., & Sarkis, J. (2015). Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 247, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckmann, I., Comes, T., & Nickel, S. (2015). A critical review on supply chain risk: Definition, measure and modeling. Omega, 52, 119–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helferich, O. K., & Cook, R. L. (2002). Securing the supply chain: Management Report. Oak Brook, IL: CLM Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. R. (2005). An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long-run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm. Production and Operations Management, 14, 35–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ireland, R. (2009). The WCO SAFE framework of standards: Avoiding excess in global supply chain security policy. WCO Research Paper N. 3/2009.
   Google Scholar
• Khanmohamadi, M., Bagheri, M., Khademi, N., & Ghannadpour, S. F. (2018). A security vulnerability analysis model for the dangerous goods transportation by rail – case study: Chlorine transportation in Texas-Illinois. Safety Science, 110, 230–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, D., Moser, R., Hartmann, E., & Moder, M. (2012). Supply risk management: Model development and empirical analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(1), 60–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleindorfer, P. R., & Saad, G. H. (2005). Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Productions and Operations Management, 14(1), 53–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koliousis, I. (2020). A conceptual framework that monitors port facility access through integrated port community systems and improves port and terminal security performance. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 12(4), 251–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koliousis, I., Tanveer, U., & Ishaq, S. (2020). A conceptual information sharing framework to improve supply chain security collaboration. International Journal of Value Chain Management, 11(4), 346–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leathrum, J. F., Mathew, R., & Mastaglio, T. W. (2009). Modeling and simulation techniques for maritime security. IEEE conference on technologies for homeland security (pp. 636–642). Boston, MA. doi: 10.1109/THS.2009.5168097.
   Google Scholar
• Lez’er, V., Muratova, I., & Korpusova, N. (2019). Issues of transport security and human factor. E3S Web of Conferences, 91, 08062. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/20199108062
   Google Scholar
• Lu, G., Koufteros, X., & Lucianetti, L. (2017). Supply chain security: A classification of practices and an empirical study of differential effects and complementarity. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 64(2), 234–248. doi:10.1109/TEM.2017.2652382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, G., Koufteros, X., Talluri, S., & Hult, G. T. (2019). Deployment of supply chain security practices: Antecedents and consequences. Decision Sciences, 50(3), 459–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukas, L., Hromada, M., & Pavlik, L. (2016). The key theoretical models for the Safety and security ensuring. Third international conference on mathematics and computers in sciences and in industry (MCSI) (pp. 61–65). Chania. doi:10.1109/MCSI.2016.022
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, A., Franklin, R., & Engel, Y. (2012). Predictive monitoring of heterogeneous service-oriented business networks: The transport and logistics case. Annual SRII global conference (pp. 313–322). San Jose, CA. doi: 10.1109/SRII.2012.42.
   Google Scholar
• Morrall, A., Rainbird, J., Katsoulakas, T., Koliousis, I., & Varelas, T. (2016). E-Maritime for automating legacy shipping practices. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 143–152.
   Google Scholar
• Noureddine, M. A., Marturano, A., Keefe, K., Bashir, M., & Sanders, W. H. (2017). Accounting for the human user in predictive security models. 22nd Pacific Rim international symposium on dependable computing (PRDC) (pp. 329–338). Christchurch. doi: 10.1109/PRDC.2017.58.
   Google Scholar
• Papa, P. (2013). US and EU strategies for maritime transport security: A comparative perspective. Transport Policy, 28, 75–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasternack, B. A. (2008). Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable com-modities. Marketing Science: Informations, 27(1), 133–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopal, V., Venkatesan, S. P., & Goh, M. (2017). Decision-making models for supply chain risk mitigation: A review. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 113, 646–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reggiani, A. (2013). Network resilience for transport security: Some methodological considerations. Transport Policy, 28, 63–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieke, R., & Stoynova, Z. (2010). Predictive security analysis for event-driven processes. In I. Kotenko & V. Skormin (Eds.), Computer network security (pp. 321–328). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. M., & Saldanha, J. P. (2003). Five tenets of security-aware logistics and supply chains operations. Transportation Journal, 42(4), 44–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarathy, R. (2006). Security and the global supply chain. Transportation Journal, 45(4), 21–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauer, S., Polemi, N., & Mouratidis, H. (2019). MITIGATE: A dynamic supply chain cyber risk assessment methodology. Journal of Transportation Security, 12, 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheffi, Y. (2001). Supply chain management under the threat of international terrorism. International Journal of Logistics Management, 12(2), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Sheu, C., Lee, L., & Niehoff, B. (2006). A voluntary logistics security program and international supply chain partnership. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(4), 363–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siva Kumar, P., & Anbanandam, R. (2020). Theory building on supply chain resilience: A SAP-LAP analysis. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 21(2), 113–133.
   Google Scholar
• Speier, C., Whipple, J. M., Closs, D. J., & Douglas Voss, M. (2011). Global supply chain design considerations: Mitigating product safety and security risks. Journal of Operations Management, 29, 721–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandh, V. (2017). Exploring vulnerabilities in preparedness – rail bound traffic and terrorist attacks. Journal of Transportation Security, 10, 45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talarico, L., Reniers, G., Sorensen, K., & Springael, J. (2015). MISTRAL: A game-theoretical model to allocate security measures in a multi-modal chemical transportation network with adaptive adversaries. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 138, 105–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibault, M., Brooks, M., & Button, K. J. (2006). The response of the US maritime industry to the new container security initiatives. Transportation Journal, 45(1), 5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venus Lan, Y. H., Wong, C. W. Y., Kee-Hung, L., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2008). Institutional perspective on the adoption of technology for the security enhancement of container transport. Transport Reviews, 28(1), 21–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, N. M., & Joubert, J. W. (2016). The vulnerability of the global container shipping network to targeted link disruption. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 462, 396–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Z., Lueg, J. E., & LeMay, S. A. (2008). Supply chain security: An overview and research agenda. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 19(2), 254–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L., Chen, L., Gao, Z., Chang, Y., Iakovou, E., & Shi, W. (2018). Binding the physical and cyber worlds: A blockchain approach for cargo supply chain security enhancement, IEEE international symposium on technologies for homeland security (HST) (pp. 1–5). Woburn, MA. doi: 10.1109/THS.2018.8574184.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, B., & Yang, Y. (2010). Postponement in supply chain risk management: A complexity perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 48, 1901–1912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamparini, L. (2010). Supply chain management. In K. Button, H. Vega, & H. & Nijkamp (Eds.), A dictionary of transport analysis (pp. 385–386). Abingdon: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Zamparini, L. (2016). Economic issues in multimodal freight transport security. In J. Szyliowicz, L. Zamparini, G. Reniers, & D. Rhoades (Eds.), Multimodal transport security: Frameworks and policy applications in freight and passenger transport (pp. 35–47). Abingdon: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Zamparini, L. (2018). Economic issues in air transport security. In J. Szyliowicz & L. Zamparini (Eds.), Air transport security: Issues, challenges and national policies (pp. 32–42). Abingdon: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Zamparini, L., & Reniers, G. (2013). A comparative study of hazardous material transportation security issues in Flanders and in Apulia. Security Journal, 26, 142–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar