As strong as the weakest link. Transport and supply chain security

References

• Arce, D. G., Kovenock, D., & Roberson, B. (2012). Weakest-link attacker-defender games with multiple attack technologies. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 59(6), 457–469. doi:10.1002/nav.21500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arce, M. D. G., & Sandler, T. (2001). Transnational public goods: Strategies and institutions. European Journal of Political Economy, 17(3), 493–516. doi:10.1016/S0176-2680(01)00042-8
   Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Bakır, N. O. (2011). A stackelberg game model for resource allocation in cargo container security. Annals of Operations Research, 187(1), 5–22. doi:10.1007/s10479-010-0793-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakshi, N., & Kleindorfer, P. (2009). Co-Opetition and investment for resilience in global supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 18(6), 583–603. doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01031.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbieri, S., & Malueg, D. A. (2014). On the voluntary provision of public goods with private information: The case of “weakest-link” public goods. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2426415
   Google Scholar
• Barbieri, S., & Malueg, D. A. (2019). On the voluntary provision of “weakest-link” public goods: The case of private information. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 21(5), 866–894. doi:10.1111/jpet.12344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F. E., Marcucci, G., & Mazzuto, G. (2018). Conceptual model for asnalysing domino effect among concepts affecting supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Forum, 19(4), 282–299. doi:10.1080/16258312.2018.1537504
   Google Scholar
• Bier, V. (2005). Game-Theoretic And Reliability Methods In Counter-Terrorism And Security (pp. 17–28). doi:10.1142/9789812703378_0002
   Google Scholar
• Bier, V. (2006). Game-Theoretic and Reliability Methods in Counterterrorism and Security. In: Wilson A.G., Wilson G.D., Olwell D.H. (eds) Statistical Methods in Counterterrorism (pp. 23–40). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/0-387-35209-0_3
   Google Scholar
• Bier, V. M., Nagaraj, A., & Abhichandani, V. (2005). Protection of simple series and parallel systems with components of different values. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 87(3), 315–323. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2004.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brück, T. (2004). Assessing the economic trade-offs of the security economy. In The security economy, Vol. 9789264107748 (pp. 101–125). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Brück, T. (2005). An Economic analysis Of security policies. Defence and Peace Economics, 16(5), 375–389. doi:10.1080/10242690500210864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, K.. (2016). The Economics and Political Economy of Transportation Security. Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA, USA : Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Button, K., & Thibault, M. (2005). The political economy of maritime container security. 46th Annual Transportation Research Forum 2005, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Cats, O., Yap, M., & van Oort, N. (2016). Exposing the role of exposure: Public transport network risk analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 88, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Closs, D. (2004). Enhancing security throughout the supply chain. Special Report to the IBM Center For, April.
   Google Scholar
• Conybeare, J. A. C., Murdoch, J. C., & Sandler, T. (1994). Alternative collective-goods models Of military alliances: Theory And empirics. Economic Inquiry, 32(4), 525–542. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.1994.tb01349.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornes, R. (1993). Dyke maintenance and other stories: Some neglected types of public goods. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(1), 259–271. doi:10.2307/2118503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulbecco, P., & Laporte, B. (2005). How can the security of international trade be financed in developing countries? A global public good approach. World Development, 33(8), 1201–1214. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekwall, D. (2009). The displacement effect in cargo theft. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 39(1), 47–62. doi:10.1108/09600030910929183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekwall, D. (2012). Antagonistic threats against supply chain activities are wicked problems. Journal of Transportation Security, 5, 123–140. doi:10.1007/s12198-012-0086-7
   Google Scholar
• Fauchart, E., & Cowan, R. (2014). Weak links and the management of reputational interdependencies. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 532–549. doi:10.1002/smj.2122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felson, M., Clarke, R. V., & Webb, B. (1998). Opportunity Makes the Thief: Practical theory for crime prevention. In Policing and Reducing Crime Unit: Police Research Series.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, R. J., Halibozek, E. P., & Walters, D. C. (2019). Origins and Development of 21st Century Security. In Introduction to Security. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-805310-2.00001-9
   Google Scholar
• Golany, B., Kaplan, E. H., Marmur, A., & Rothblum, U. G. (2009). Nature plays with dice - terrorists do not: Allocating resources to counter strategic versus probabilistic risks. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(1), 198–208. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, A. (2007). Supply chain security: Adding to a complex operational and institutional environment. World Customs Journal, 1(2), 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gregor, M. (2011). Tradeoffs of foreign assistance for the weakest-link global public goods. International Tax and Public Finance, 18(2), 233–251. doi:10.1007/s10797-010-9153-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, G. W., & Hirshleifer, J. (1989). An experimental evaluation of weakest link/best shot models of public goods. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 201–225. doi:10.2307/1831060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausken, K. (2006). Income, interdependence, and substitution effects affecting incentives for security investment. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(6), 629–665. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Hausken, K. (2011). Protecting complex infrastructures against multiple strategic attackers. International Journal of Systems Science, 42(1), 11–29. doi:10.1080/00207720903434789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heal, G., & Kunreuther, H. (2003). You Only Die Once: Managing Discrete Interdependent Risks. doi:10.3386/w9885
   Google Scholar
• Heal, G., & Kunreuther, H. (2005). IDS models of airline security. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(2), 201–217. doi:10.1177/0022002704272833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer, J. (1983). From weakest-link to best-shot: The voluntary provision of public goods. Public Choice, 41(3), 371–386. doi:10.1007/BF00141070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer, J., Glazer, A., & Hirshleifer, D. (2005). Price Theory and Applications. In Price Theory and Applications. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813382
   Google Scholar
• Ihori, T., & McGuire, M. C. (2007). Collective risk control and group security: The unexpected consequences of differential risk aversion. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 9(2), 231–263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9779.2007.00306.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2010). Adaptive supply chain management. In Adaptive Supply Chain Management. doi:10.1007/978-1-84882-952-7
   Google Scholar
• Jain, S. C., & Grosse, R. (2009). Impact of terrorism and security measures on global business transactions: Some international business guidelines. Journal of Transnational Management, 14(1), 42–73. doi:10.1080/15475770802698540
   Google Scholar
• Jażdżewska-Gutta, M. (2016). Who is responsible? The roles of the supply chain participants in the area of supply chain security. Proceedings of IAC-MEM 2016 in Bratislava, 73–86.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., Grossklags, J., Christin, N., & Chuang, J. (2010). Are security experts useful? Bayesian Nash equilibria for network security games with limited information. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6345 LNCS, 588–606. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15497-3_36
   Google Scholar
• Jonkeren, O., & Rietveld, P. (2016). Protection of critical waterborne transport infrastructures: An economic review. Transport Reviews, 36(4), 437–453. doi:10.1080/01441647.2015.1137654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jüttner, U. (2005). Supply chain risk management: Understanding the business requirements from a practitioner perspective. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 16(1), 120–141. doi:10.1108/09574090510617385
   Google Scholar
• Kanafani, A., & Huang, J. (2010). Securing linked transportation systems: Economic implications and investment strategies. Journal of Transportation Security, 3(4), 257–274. doi:10.1007/s12198-010-0051-2
   Google Scholar
• Kaul, I., Grunberg, I., Stern, M., Kaul, I., Grunberg, I., & Stern, M. A. (1999). Defining Global Public Goods. In Global Public Goods (pp. 2–19). doi:10.1093/0195130529.003.0001
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, M., & Ortiz, L. E. (2004). Algorithms for interdependent security games. In S. Thrun, L. Saul, & B. Schölkopf (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 16 (pp. 561–568). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kunreuther, H., & Heal, G. (2002). Interdependent Security: The Case of Identical Agents. Working Paper 8871, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Kunreuther, H., & Heal, G. (2003). Interdependent security. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(2–3), 231–249. doi:10.1023/A:1024119208153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunreuther, H. C., & Michel-Kerjan, E. O. (2007). Assessing, Managing and Benefiting from Global Interdependent Risks The Case of Terrorism and Natural Disasters. http://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/risk/
   Google Scholar
• Kuper, G., Massacci, F., Shim, W., & Williams, J. (2020). Who should Pay for interdependent risk? Policy implications for security interdependence Among airports. Risk Analysis, 40(5), 1001–1019. doi:10.1111/risa.13454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(69). doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenc, A., Kuźnar, M., Lerher, T., & Szkoda, M. (2020). Predicting the probability of cargo theft for individual cases in railway transport. Tehnicki Vjesnik, 27(3), 773–780. doi:10.17559/TV-20190320194915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(143). doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghizadeh, P., & Liu, M. (2014). Budget balance or voluntary participation? Incentivizing investments in interdependent security games. 2014 52nd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, Allerton 2014, 1102–1109. doi:10.1109/ALLERTON.2014.7028578
   Google Scholar
• Ohmori, S., & Yoshimoto, K. (2013). A framework of managing supply chain disruption risks using network reliability. Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, 12(2), 103–111. doi:10.7232/iems.2013.12.2.103
   Google Scholar
• Pan, C., Zhong, W., & Mei, S. (2015). Finding the weakest link in the interdependent security chain using the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Advances in Computer Networks, 3(4), 320–325. doi:10.18178/JACN.2015.3.4.190
   Google Scholar
• Park, K., Min, H., & Min, S. (2016). Inter-relationship among risk taking propensity, supply chain security practices, and supply chain disruption occurrence. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22(2), 120–130. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, F., & Puerto, J. (2013). Revisiting a game theoretic framework for the robust railway network design against intentional attacks. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(2), 286–292. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 141–146. doi:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokop, D. (2012). Smart containers and the public goods approach to supply chain security. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 4(2), 124–136. doi:10.1504/IJSTL.2012.046191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, T. (2006a). Regional public goods and international organizations. Review of International Organizations, 1(1), 5–25. doi:10.1007/s11558-006-6604-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, T. (2006b). Hirshleifer’s social composition function In defense economics. Defence and Peace Economics, 17(6), 645–655. doi:10.1080/10242690601025583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, T., & Vicary, S. (2001). Weakest-link public goods: Giving in-kind or transferring money in a sequential game. Economics Letters, 74(1), 71–75. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00515-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan, X., & Zhuang, J. (2018). Modeling cumulative defensive resource allocation against a strategic attacker in a multi-period multi-target sequential game. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 179, 12–26. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavell, S. (1991). Individual precautions to prevent theft: Private versus socially optimal behavior. International Review of Law and Economics, 11(2), 123–132. doi:10.1016/0144-8188(91)90014-5
   Google Scholar
• Siqueira, K., & Sandler, T. (2001). Models of alliances: Internalizing externalities and financing. Defence and Peace Economics, 12(3), 249–270. doi:10.1080/10430710108404987
   Google Scholar
• Urciuoli, L., Männistö, T., Hintsa, J., & Khan, T. (2013a). Supply chain cyber security – potential threats. Information & Security: An International Journal, 29(1), 51–68. doi:10.11610/isij.2904
   Google Scholar
• Urciuoli, L., Paulraj, A., & Näslund, D. (2013b). The role of the law enforcement agencies in transport security, a survey with Swedish operators. Logistics Research, 6(4), 145–157. doi:10.1007/s12159-013-0102-8
   Google Scholar
• Varian, H. (2003). System reliability And free riding. ACM press. In L. J. Camp, & S. Lewis (Eds.), Economics of information security. Advances in Information Security, vol 12 (pp. 1–15). Boston: Springer. doi:10.1007/1-4020-8090-5_1
   Google Scholar
• Vicary, S. (1990). Transfers and the weakest-link: An extension of Hirshleifer’s analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 43(3), 375–394. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(90)90007-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicary, S., & Sandler, T. (2002). Weakest-link public goods: Giving in-kind or transferring money. European Economic Review, 46(8), 1501–1520. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00103-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wee, B. V., & Banister, D. (2016). How to write a literature review paper? Transport Reviews, 36(2), 278–288. doi:10.1080/01441647.2015.1065456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, G. (2002). Quantitative terrorism risk assessment. Journal of Risk Finance, 4(1), 7–14. doi:10.1108/eb022949
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., Dadkhah, P., & Ekwall, D. (2011). How robustness and resilience support security business against antagonistic threats in transport network. Journal of Transportation Security, 4, 201–219. doi:10.1007/s12198-011-0067-2
   Google Scholar
• Zhuang, J. (2010). Impacts of subsidized security on stability and total social costs of equilibrium solutions in an N-player game with errors. Engineering Economist, 55(2), 131–149. doi:10.1080/00137911003775107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang, J., Bier, V. M., & Gupta, A. (2007). Subsidies in interdependent security with heterogeneous discount rates. Engineering Economist, 52(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/00137910601159722
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, P. R. (2014). The deterrence of crime through private security efforts: Theory and evidence. International Review of Law and Economics, 37, 66–75. doi:10.1016/j.irle.2013.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar