Methods used to capture subjective user experiences in adults while riding bicycles: a scoping review

References

• Adlakha, D., Tully, M. A., & Mansour, P. (2022). Assessing the impact of a new urban greenway using mobile, wearable technology-elicited walk-and bike-along interviews. Sustain, 14(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldred, R. (2016). Cycling near misses: Their frequency, impact, and prevention. Transportation Research. Part A, Policy and Practice, 90, 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldred, R., & Crosweller, S. (2015). Investigating the rates and impacts of near misses and related incidents among UK cyclists. Journal of Transport and Health, 2(3), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2015.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldred, R., & Goodman, A. (2018). Predictors of the frequency and subjective experience of cycling near misses: Findings from the first two years of the UK near miss project. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 110(June 2017), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aromataris, E., & Munn, Z. (2020). JBI manual for evidence synthesis.
   Google Scholar
• Avbulimen, I. (2018). Walking and cycling statistics, England: 2017. Department for Transport, England. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/736909/walking-and-cycling-statistics-england-2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bai, L., Liu, P., Chan, C. Y., & Li, Z. (2017). Estimating level of service of mid-block bicycle lanes considering mixed traffic flow. Transportation Research. Part A, Policy and Practice, 101, 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, A., Rissel, C., Garrard, J., Ker, I., Speidel, R., & Fishman, E. (2008). Cycling: Getting Australia moving – barriers, facilitators and interventions to get more Australians physically active through cycling. 31st Australasian Transport Research Forum (January) (pp. 593–601). https://www.australasiantransportresearchforum.org.au/sites/default/files/2008_Bauman_Rissel_Garrard_Ker_Spiedel_Fishman.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beck, B., Perkins, M., Olivier, J., Chong, D., & Johnson, M. (2021). Subjective experiences of bicyclists being passed by motor vehicles: The relationship to motor vehicle passing distance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 155(December 2020), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, M., & Dörrzapf, L. (2018). Sensing comfort in bicycling in addition to travel data. Transportation Research Procedia, 32, 524–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.034
   Google Scholar
• Bigazzi, A. Y., & Gehrke, S. R. (2018). Joint consideration of energy expenditure, air quality, and safety by cyclists. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 652–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehler, R., & Pucher, J. (2012). Cycling to work in 90 large American cities: New evidence on the role of bike paths and lanes. Transportation (Amst), 39(2), 409–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9355-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Selecting data collection methods and sources [cited 2021 September 12] (pp. 1–2). https://www.cdc.gov/std/Program/pupestd/Selecting Data Collection Methods.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Covidence. (2021). Better systematic review management [Internet]. Veritas Health Innovation. https://www.covidence.org/
   Google Scholar
• Cox, B., & Bartle, C. (2020). A qualitative study of the accessibility of a typical UK town cycle network to disabled cyclists. Journal of Transport and Health, 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2020.100954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane, M., Rissel, C., Greaves, S., Standen, C., & Ming Wen, L. (2016). Neighbourhood expectations and engagement with new cycling infrastructure in Sydney, Australia: Findings from a mixed method before-and-after study. Journal of Transport and Health, 3(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2015.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cycling Promotion Fund and Heart Foundation. (2011). Riding a bike for transportation. 2011 Survey Findings. https://www.freestylecyclists.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Cycling-Survey-2011-Riding-a-Bike-for-Transport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• De Vos, J., Schwanen, T., Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F. (2019). Do satisfying walking and cycling trips result in more future trips with active travel modes? An exploratory study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 13(3), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1456580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dozza, M., Bianchi Piccinini, G. F., & Werneke, J. (2016). Using naturalistic data to assess e-cyclist behavior. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 41, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dozza, M., & Werneke, J. (2014). Introducing naturalistic cycling data: What factors influence bicyclists’ safety in the real world? Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 24, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dozza, M., Werneke, J., & Fernandez, A. (2012). Piloting the naturalistic methodology on bicycles. Proceedings, International Cycling Safety Conference. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287489522_Piloting_the_Naturalistic_Methodology_on_Bicycles
   Google Scholar
• Dozza, M., Werneke, J., & Mackenzie, M. (2013). e-BikeSAFE: A naturalistic cycling study to understand how electrical bicycles change cycling behaviour and influence safety. Proceedings, International Cycling Safety Conference (pp. 1–10). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287489452_e-BikeSAFE_A_Naturalistic_Cycling_Study_to_Understand_how_Electrical_Bicycles_Change_Cycling_Behaviour_and_Influence_Safety
   Google Scholar
• Environmental and Energy Study Institute. (2021). Making way for bicycle infrastructure (pp. 1–6). https://www.eesi.org/articles/view/making-way-for-bicycle-infrastructure
   Google Scholar
• European Cyclists Federation. (2021). Final analysis : Cycling becomes mainstream in EU member states’ COVID-19 recovery plans (pp. 1–9). https://ecf.com/news-and-events/news/final-analysis-cycling-becomes-mainstream-eu-member-states-covid-19-recovery
   Google Scholar
• Feizi, A., Oh, J. S., Kwigizile, V., & Joo, S. (2020). Cycling environment analysis by bicyclists’ skill levels using instrumented probe bicycle (IPB). International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(9), 722–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2019.1610921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitch, D. T., & Handy, S. L. (2018). The relationship between experienced and imagined bicycling comfort and safety. Transportation Research Record, 2672(36), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118787635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitch-Polse, D. T. (2018). The road environment and urban bicycling: psychophysiological and behavioral responses. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/19m7v3jr
   Google Scholar
• Fyhri, A., Karlsen, K., & Sundfør, H. B. (2021). Paint it red - a multimethod study of the nudging effect of coloured cycle lanes. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadsby, A., Hagenzieker, M., & Watkins, K. (2021). An international comparison of the self-reported causes of cyclist stress using quasi-naturalistic cycling. Journal of Transport Geography, 91(December 2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble, J., Snizek, B., & Nielsen, T. S. (2017). From people to cycling indicators: Documenting and understanding the urban context of cyclists’ experiences in Quito, Ecuador. Journal of Transport Geography, 60, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gkekas, F., Bigazzi, A., & Gill, G. (2020). Perceived safety and experienced incidents between pedestrians and cyclists in a high-volume non-motorized shared space. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100094
   Google Scholar
• Götschi, T., Castro, A., Deforth, M., Miranda-Moreno, L., & Zangenehpour, S. (2018). Towards a comprehensive safety evaluation of cycling infrastructure including objective and subjective measures. Journal of Transportation and Health, 8(December 2017), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graystone, M., Mitra, R., & Hess, P. M. (2022). Gendered perceptions of cycling safety and on-street bicycle infrastructure: Bridging the gap. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 105, 103237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, W. W., Harkey, D. L., Stewart, J. R., & Birk, M. L. (2000). Evaluation of blue bike-lane treatment in Portland, Oregon. Journal of Transportation Research Record, 1705(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.3141/1705-16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo, S., & Oh, C. (2013). A novel method to monitor bicycling environments. Transportation Research. Part A, Policy and Practice, 54, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, M. S., Senior, V., & Smith, G. P. (2001). A diary study of the risk perceptions of road users. Health Risk & Society, 3(3), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570120079877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, M. S., & Smith, G. P. (1992). Cyclists under threat: A survey of Oxford cyclists’ perceptions of risk. Health Education Journal, 51(4), 188–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/001789699205100409
   Google Scholar
• Jünger, S. (2019). Using georeferenced data in social science survey research: The method of spatial linking and its application with the German general social survey and the GESIS panel. GESIS – Leibniz Institure for Social Science, 24, 1–201. https://doi.org/10.21241/ssoar.63688
   Google Scholar
• Kazemzadeh, K., Camporeale, R., D’Agostino, C., Laureshyn, A., & Winslott, H. L. (2020). Same questions, different answers? A hierarchical comparison of cyclists’ perceptions of comfort: In-traffic vs. online approach. Transportation Letters, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2020.1737373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keliikoa, L. B., Packard, M. Y., Hansen Smith, H., Kim, I. N., Akasaki, K. A., & Stupplebeen, D. A. (2018). Evaluation of a community wayfinding signage project in Hawai‘i: Perspectives of pedestrians and bicyclists. Journal of Transportation and Health, 11, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobas, G. V., & Drury, C. G. (1976). The bicyclist’s exposure to risk. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (pp. 484–487). https://doi.org/10.1177/154193127602002102#
   Google Scholar
• Koike, H., Morimoto, A., & Kitazawa, A. (2003). Unevenness of intersection pavement and bicycle safety. Transportation Research Record, 1846(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.3141/1846-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krizek, K. J., & Roland, R. W. (2005). What is at the end of the road? Understanding discontinuities of on-street bicycle lanes in urban settings. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 10(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2004.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, B. W., Vattikuti, V. R., & Brannick, M. T. (1997). Real-time human perceptions: Toward a bicycle level of service. Transportation Research Record, 1578(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.3141/1578-15
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Wang, W., Liu, P., & Ragland, D. R. (2012a). Physical environments influencing bicyclists’ perception of comfort on separated and on-street bicycle facilities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17(3), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Wang, W., Liu, P., Schneider, R., & Ragland, D. R. (2012b). Investigating bicyclists’ perception of comfort on physically separated bicycle paths in nanjing, China. Transportation Research Record, 2317(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.3141/2317-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, T., Kalra, A., Thompson, J., Caldwell Odgers, J., & Beck, B. (2022). (Unpublished manuscript). measuring bicyclists’ subjective experiences through physiological measurements: A scoping review. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3979408
   Google Scholar
• Llorca, C., Angel-Domenech, A., Agustin-Gomez, F., & Garcia, A. (2017). Motor vehicles overtaking cyclists on two-lane rural roads: Analysis on speed and lateral clearance. Safety Science, 92, 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, G., Pérez-Zuriaga, A. M., Moll, S., & García, A. (2020). Analysis of overtaking maneuvers to cycling groups on Two-lane rural roads using objective and subjective risk. Transportation Research Record, 2674(7), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120921169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L., Ye, R., & Wang, H. (2021). Exploring the causal effects of bicycling for transportation on mental health. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 93(March), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac, H. T., Doorley, R., O’byrne, M., Rittgers, G., Pakrashi, V., & Ghosh, B. (2019). How do passing events influence the perception of risk among cyclists. EEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) (pp. 2355–2360).
   Google Scholar
• Manaugh, K., Boisjoly, G., & El-Geneidy, A. (2017). Overcoming barriers to cycling: Understanding frequency of cycling in a university setting and the factors preventing commuters from cycling on a regular basis. Transportation (Amst), 44(4), 871–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9682-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquart, H., & Schicketanz, J. (2022). Experiences of safe and healthy walking and cycling in urban areas: The benefits of mobile methods for citizen-adapted urban planning. Transportation Research Procedia, 60, 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.038
   Google Scholar
• Marquart, H., Stark, K., & Jarass, J. (2022). How are air pollution and noise perceived en route? Investigating cyclists’ and pedestrians’ personal exposure, wellbeing and practices during commute. Journal of Transportation and Health, 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquart, H., Ueberham, M., & Schlink, U. (2021). Extending the dimensions of personal exposure assessment: A methodological discussion on perceived and measured noise and air pollution in traffic. Journal of Transport Geography, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIlroy, R. C., Plant, K. L., & Stanton, N. A. (2021). Thinking aloud on the road: Thematic differences in the experiences of drivers, cyclists, and motorcyclists. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 83, 192–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazemi, M., van Eggermond, A. B., Erath, A., Schaffner, D., Joos, M., & Axhausen, K. W. (2021). Studying bicyclists’ perceived level of safety using a bicycle simulator combined with immersive virtual reality. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 151(October 2021), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oja, P., Titze, S., Bauman, A., de Geus, B., Krenn, P., Reger-Nash, B., & Kohlberger, T. (2011). Health benefits of cycling: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 21(4), 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01299.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-based Healthcare, 13(3), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, A. K., Kontou, E., McDonald, N. C., & Evenson, K. R. (2020). Perceived barriers to commuter and exercise bicycling in U.S. Adults: The 2017 national household travel survey. Journal of Transportation and Health, 16(January). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2020.100820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulos, R. G., Hatfield, J., Rissel, C., Flack, L. K., Grzebieta, R., & McIntosh, A. S. (2019). Cyclists’ self-reported experiences of, and attributions about, perceived aggressive behaviour while sharing roads and paths in New South Wales, Australia. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 64, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch, A., Moll, S., López, G., García, A., & Dozza, M. (2022). Drivers’ and cyclists’ safety perceptions in overtaking maneuvers. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 84, 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resch, B., Puetz, I., Bluemke, M., Kyriakou, K., & Miksch, J. (2020). An interdisciplinary mixed-methods approach to analyzing urban spaces: The case of urban walkability and bikeability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 6994. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17196994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryerson, M. S., Long, C. S., Fichman, M., Davidson, J. H., Scudder, K. N., Kim, M., … Harris, M. D. (2021). Evaluating cyclist biometrics to develop urban transportation safety metrics. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 159(1), 106287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabyrbekov, R., & Overland, I. (2020). Why choose to cycle in a low-income country? Sustain, 12(18), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, R., & Cooper, J. (2013). Do all roadway users want the same things? Results from roadway design survey of San Francisco Bay area pedestrians, drivers, bicyclists, and transit users. Transportation Research Record, 2393(1), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.3141/2393-18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, R. L., & Judelman, B. (2018). Perceived safety and separated bike lanes in the Midwest: Results from a roadway design survey in Michigan. Transportation Research Record, 2672(36), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118758395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiers, R., Pritchard, C., & Gee, I. (2017). A cross sectional survey of attitudes, behaviours, barriers and motivators to cycling in university students. Journal of Transportation and Health, 6(July), 379–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transport for Victoria. (2018). Victorian cycling strategy 2018-28, Increasing cycling for transport. https://transport.vic.gov.au/-/media/tfv-documents/walking-and-cycling/victorian-cycling-strategy-2018-28.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Tunçalp, Ö. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Useche, S. A., Montoro, L., Sanmartin, J., & Alonso, F. (2019). Healthy but risky: A descriptive study on cyclists’ encouraging and discouraging factors for using bicycles, habits and safety outcomes. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 62, 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bekkum, J. E., Williams, J. M., & Morris, P. G. (2011). Cycle commuting and perceptions of barriers: Stages of change, gender and occupation. Health Education, 111(6), 476–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/09654281111180472
   Google Scholar
• Van Cauwenberg, J., Clarys, P., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Ghekiere, A., de Geus, B., Owen, N., & Deforche, B. (2018). Environmental influences on older adults’ transportation cycling experiences: A study using bike-along interviews. Landscape and Urban Planning, 169, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Duppen, J., & Spierings, B. (2013). Retracing trajectories: The embodied experience of cycling, urban sensescapes and the commute between “neighbourhood” and “city” in Utrecht, NL. Journal of Transport Geography, 30, 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lierop, D., Soemers, J., Hoeke, L., Liu, G., Chen, Z., Ettema, D., & Kruijf, J. (2020). Wayfinding for cycle highways: Assessing e-bike users’ experiences with wayfinding along a cycle highway in the Netherlands. Journal of Transport Geography, 88, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verlinden, Y., Manaugh, K., Savan, B., Smith, L. N., Tomalty, R., & Winters, M. (2019). Increasing cycling in Canada. https://www.tcat.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Increasing-Cycling-in-Canada-A-Guide-to-What-Works-2019-09-25.pdf
   Google Scholar
• von Stülpnagel, R. (2020). Gaze behavior during urban cycling: Effects of subjective risk perception and vista space properties. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 75, 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Stülpnagel, R., & Krukar, J. (2018). Risk perception during urban cycling: An assessment of crowdsourced and authoritative data. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 121(September), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werneke, J., Dozza, M., & Karlsson, M. (2015). Safety-critical events in everyday cycling - interviews with bicyclists and video annotation of safety-critical events in a naturalistic cycling study. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 35, 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, M., Davidson, G., Kao, D., & Teschke, K. (2011). Motivators and deterrents of bicycling: Comparing influences on decisions to ride. Transportation (Amst), 38(1), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9284-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamanaka, H., & Namerikawa, S. (2007). Measuring level-of-service for cycling of urban streets using “probe bicycle system. Transportation (Amst), 7, 1614–1625. https://doi.org/10.11175/easts.7.1614
   Google Scholar
• Yamanaka, H., Pan, X., & Sanada, J. (2013). Evaluation models for cyclists’ perception using probe bicycle system. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies (pp. 1413–1425). https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/easts/10/0/10_1413/_article
   Google Scholar
• Yao, M., Fu, Q., Gao, L., & Li, Z. (2011). Exploring influencing factors to the riding comfort of bicyclists on physically separated bicycle roadways in china using proportional odds model. 11th International Conference of Chinese Transportation Professionals (ICCTP) (pp. 718–727). https://ascelibrary-org.ap1.proxy.openathens.net/doi/10.106141186(421)70
   Google Scholar