Performance of urban rail transit: a review of measures and interdependencies

References

• Agarwal, S., Yadav, S. P., & Singh, S. P. (2010). DEA based estimation of the technical efficiency of state transport undertakings in India. Opsearch, 47(3), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-011-0035-4
   Google Scholar
• Aigner, D., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
   Google Scholar
• AitBihiOuali, L., Graham, D. J., Barron, A., & Trompet, M. (2020). Gender differences in the perception of safety in public transport. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 183(3), 737–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J., Muñoz, J. C., & de Dios Ortúzar, J. (2020). On the effect of operational service attributes on transit satisfaction. Transportation, 47(5), 2307–2336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10016-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrikopoulos, A. A., Loizidis, J., & Prodromidis, K. P. (1992). Technological change and scale economies in urban transportation. International Journal of Transport Economics/Rivista Internazionale Di Economia Dei Trasporti, 19(2), 127–148. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42747179
   Google Scholar
• Anupriya, Graham, D. J., Carbo, J. M., Anderson, R. J., & Bansal, P. (2020). Understanding the costs of urban rail transport operations. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 138, 292–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2020.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avenali, A., Boitani, A., Catalano, G., Matteucci, G., & Monticini, A. (2020). Standard costs of regional public rail passenger transport: Evidence from Italy. Applied Economics, 52(15), 1704–1717. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1677852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S. S., Omrani, H., & Panahi, A. (2011). A hybrid approach based on SERVQUAL and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluating transportation service quality. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61(3), 637–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin, N. (2017). A fuzzy-based multi-dimensional and multi-period service quality evaluation outline for rail transit systems. Transport Policy, 55(February), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babalık-Sutcliffe, E. (2016). Urban rail operators in Turkey: Organisational reform in transit service provision and the impact on planning, operation and system performance. Journal of Transport Geography, 54, 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcombe, R., Mackett, R., Paulley, N., Preston, J., Shires, J., Titheridge, H., … Wardman, M. (2004). The demand for public transport: A practical guide. (TRL Report TRL593). TRL Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441648108716470
   Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabino, B., Cabras, N. A., Conversano, C., & Olivo, A. (2020). An Integrated Approach to Select Key Quality Indicators in Transit Services. Social indicators research, 149(3), 1045–1080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02284-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabino, B., & Di Francesco, M. (2016). Characterizing, measuring, and managing transit service quality. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 50(5), 818–840. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.1377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnum, D. T., Tandon, S., & McNeil, S. (2008). Comparing the performance of bus routes after adjusting for the environment using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 134(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2008)134:2(77)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, L. L., Zeithaml, V. A., & Parasuraman, A. P. (1990). Five imperatives for improving service quality. MIT Sloan Management Review, 31(4), 29.
   Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, Y. P., & Singh, M. (2021). View of a study to analyse the perception of commuters’ towards service quality of Delhi metro rail corporation: Empirical study. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(5), 701–708. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i5.1471
   Google Scholar
• Bogetoft, P., & Otto, L. (2010). Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Canavan, S., Graham, D. J., Anderson, R. J., & Barron, A. (2018). Urban metro rail demand: Evidence from dynamic generalized method of moments estimates using panel data. Transportation Research Record, 2672(8), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118794547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascetta, E., & Cartenì, A. (2014). A quality-based approach to public transportation planning: Theory and a case study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 8(1), 84–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2012.758532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalano, G., Daraio, C., Diana, M., Gregori, M., & Matteucci, G. (2019). Efficiency, effectiveness, and impacts assessment in the rail transport sector: A state-of-the-art critical analysis of current research. International Transactions in Operational Research, 26(1), 5–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. In Company European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, Á, Cruz, C. O., Sarmento, J. M., & Sousa, V. F. (2021). Empirical analysis of the effects of ownership model (public vs. private) on the efficiency of urban rail firms. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(23), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crôtte, A., Noland, R. B., & Graham, D. J. (2009). Is the Mexico city metro an inferior good? Transport Policy, 16(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A., Oña, J. d., & Oña, R. d. (2018). How to study perceived quality in public transport. In Luigi dell’Olio, Angel Ibeas, Juan de Oña, & Rocio de Oña (Eds.), Public transportation quality of service (pp. 7–32). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-102080-7.00002-1
   Google Scholar
• De Oña, J., & De Oña, R. (2015). Quality of service in public transport based on customer satisfaction surveys: A review and assessment of methodological approaches. Transportation Science, 49(3), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2014.0544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oña, J., de Oña, R., & López, G. (2016). Transit service quality analysis using cluster analysis and decision trees: A step forward to personalized marketing in public transportation. Transportation, 43(5), 725–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9615-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Oña, R., MacHado, J. L., & De Oña, J. (2015). Perceived service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions structural equation model for the Metro of Seville, Spain. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2538(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.3141/2538-09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz, G., & Charles, V. (2016). Regulatory design and technical efficiency: Public transport in France. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 50(3), 328–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-016-9308-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díez-Mesa, F., de Oña, R., & de Oña, J. (2018). Bayesian networks and structural equation modelling to develop service quality models: Metro of Seville case study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 118(November 2017), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, N., & Karpouzis, G. (2009). An explorative econometric model of Sydney metropolitan rail patronage. Proceedings of the 32nd Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF), January 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Eboli, L., & Mazzulla, G. (2011). A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger’s point of view. Transport Policy, 18(1), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eboli, L., & Mazzulla, G. (2012). Performance indicators for an objective measure of public transport service quality. European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, 51(17), 1–4. http://hdl.handle.net/10077/6119
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization (CEN). (2002). EN 13816:2002, Transportation – Logistics and services – Public passenger transport – Service quality definition, targeting and measurement.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, G. J. (1992). Transit performance evaluation in the U.S.A. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 26(6), 483–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-8564(92)90029-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, G. J., Babitsky, T. T., & Brenner, M. E. (1985). Performance evaluation for bus transit. Transportation Research Part A: General, 19(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2607(85)90009-3
   Google Scholar
• Friman, M., & Fellesson, M. (2009). Service supply and customer satisfaction in public transportation: The quality paradox. Journal of Public Transportation, 12(4), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.12.4.4
   Google Scholar
• García-Sánchez, I. M. (2009). Technical and scale efficiency in Spanish urban transport: Estimating with data envelopment analysis. Advances in Operations Research, 2009(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/721279
   Google Scholar
• Graham, D. J. (2008). Productivity and efficiency in urban railways: Parametric and non-parametric estimates. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2006.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, D. J., Couto, A., Adeney, W. E., & Glaister, S. (2003). Economies of scale and density in urban rail transport: Effects on productivity. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 39(6), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(03)00017-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Z., Liao, L., & Wang, G. (2018). Research on performance evaluation method of public transit routes based on BCC model. Filomat, 32(5), 1887–1896. https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL1805887H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A. (2014). The relationship between bus contract costs, user perceived service quality and performance assessment. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 8(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2012.758454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschhorn, F., Veeneman, W., & van de Velde, D. (2018). Inventory and rating of performance indicators and organisational features in metropolitan public transport: A worldwide Delphi survey. Research in Transportation Economics, 69(March), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holvad, T. (2020). Efficiency analyses for the railway sector: An overview of key issues. Research in Transportation Economics, 82(September 2019), 100877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, A. N. H., Borhan, M. N., Mat Yazid, M. R., Rahmat, R. A., & Yukawa, S. (2021). Factors influencing passengers’ satisfaction with the light rail transit service in alpha cities: Evidence from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia using structural equation modelling. Mathematics, 9(16), 1954. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9161954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, A. N. H., Borhan, M. N., Osman, M. H., Khairuddin, F. H., & Zakaria, N. M. (2022). An empirical study of passengers ‘ perceived satisfaction with monorail service quality: Case of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Sustainability, 14(11), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingvardson, J. B., & Nielsen, O. A. (2018). How urban density, network topology and socio-economy influence public transport ridership: Empirical evidence from 48 European metropolitan areas. Journal of Transport Geography, 72, 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingvardson, J. B., & Nielsen, O. A. (2019). The relationship between norms, satisfaction and public transport use: A comparison across six European cities using structural equation modelling. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 126(May), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismael, K., & Duleba, S. (2021). Investigation of the relationship between the perceived public transport service quality and satisfaction: A PLS-SEM technique. Sustainability, 13(23), 13018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, P., Cullinane, S., & Cullinane, K. (2008). The impact of governance development models on urban rail efficiency. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(9), 1238–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasti, P. C., & Vinayaka Ram, V. (2019). Integrated and sustainable benchmarking of metro rail system using analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy logic: A case study of Mumbai. Urban Rail Transit, 5(3), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40864-019-00107-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlaftis, M. G., & Tsamboulas, D. (2012). Efficiency measurement in public transport: Are findings specification sensitive? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(2), 392–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesten, A. S., & Öğüt, K. S. (2014). A new passenger oriented performance measurement framework for public rail transportation systems. PROMET - Traffic&Transportation, 26(4), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v26i4.1314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittelson & Assoc Inc., Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc., KFH Group Inc., Institute, T. A. T., Ar, & Up. (2013). Transit capacity and quality of service manual (Third Edition). The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24766
   Google Scholar
• Lai, W.-T., & Chen, C.-F. (2011). Behavioral intentions of public transit passengers – The roles of service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and involvement. Transport Policy, 18(2), 318–325. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VGG-51430M0-3/2/ca8d7f9bc0cc443f5a56e9601762c847 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan, L. W., Chiou, Y. C., & Yen, B. T. H. (2014). Integrated fuzzy data envelopment analysis to assess transport performance. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 10(5), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2013.775611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, Y., Oka, M., & Kato, H. (2022). Efficiencies of the urban railway lines incorporating financial performance and in-vehicle congestion in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area. Transport Policy, 116, 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. H., Huang, L., Li, Q., & Liu, H. C. (2020). Passenger satisfaction evaluation of public transportation using pythagorean fuzzy MULTIMOORA method under large group environment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(12), 4996. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, H. (2019). The impact of including service quality into efficiency analysis: The case of franchising regional rail passenger serves in Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 119(November 2018), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.11.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liping, F., Jingtao, Y., & Casello, J. (2007). Quantifying technical efficiency of paratransit systems by data envelopment analysis method. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2034(1), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.3141/2034-13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Wu, N., Qiao, Y., & Li, Z. (2021). Performance evaluation of public bus transportation by using DEA models and Shannon’s entropy: An example from a company in a large city of China. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 8(4), 779–795. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2020.1003405
   Google Scholar
• Lobo, A., & Couto, A. (2016). Technical efficiency of European metro systems: The effects of operational management and socioeconomic environment. Networks and Spatial Economics, 16(3), 723–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-015-9295-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandhani, J., Nayak, J. K., & Parida, M. (2020). Interrelationships among service quality factors of metro rail transit system: An integrated Bayesian networks and PLS-SEM approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 140(September), 320–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, M. J., & Nakanishi, Y. J. (2004). Productivity analysis in heterogeneous operating conditions: Data envelopment analysis method applied to the U.S. Heavy Rail Industry. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1872(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.3141/1872-03
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1974). The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics, 3(4), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(74)90003-6
   Google Scholar
• Meeusen, W., & van Den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18(2), 435. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo, P. C., Sobreira, N., & Goulart, P. (2019). Estimating the long-run metro demand elasticities for Lisbon: A time-varying approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 126(April), 360–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mijares, A. C., Suzuki, M., & Yai C, T. (2016). An analysis of Metro Manila MRT-3 Passengers’ perceptions of their commuting experience and its effects using structural equation modeling. Asian Transport Studies, 4(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.11175/eastsats.4.1
   Google Scholar
• Mizutani, F., & Shoji, K. (1997). A comparative analysis of financial performance: US and Japanese urban railways. International Journal of Transport Economics, 24(2), 207–239.
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., Atkins, D., Barbour, V., Barrowman, N., Berlin, J. A., Clark, J., Clarke, M., Cook, D., D’Amico, R., Deeks, J. J., Devereaux, P. J., Dickersin, K., Egger, M., Ernst, E., … Tugwell, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), 7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathanail, E. (2008). Measuring the quality of service for passengers on the Hellenic railways. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2007.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (2006). Urban design to reduce automobile dependence. Opolis, 2(1), 35–52.
   Google Scholar
• Niedercorn, J. H., & Bechdolt Jr, B. V. (1969). An economic derivation of the “gravity law” of spatial interaction: Reply. Journal of Regional Science, 9(2), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1969.tb01340.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novaes, A. G. N. (2001). Rapid-transit efficiency analysis with the assurance-region DEA method. Pesquisa Operacional, 21(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-74382001000200004
   Google Scholar
• Obsie, A., Woldeamanuel, M., & Woldetensae, B. (2020). Service quality of Addis Ababa light rail transit: Passengers’ views and perspectives. Urban Rail Transit, 6(4), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40864-020-00135-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oum, T. H., Waters, W. G. I., & Yu, C. (1999). A survey of productivity and efficiency measurement in rail transport. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 33(1), 9–42.
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, A. P., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkan, C. (2002). Measuring the operational performance of a public transit company. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22(5–6), 693–720. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210427695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TCRP, Parks, J., Ryus, P., Coffel, K., Gan, A., Perk, V., Cherrington, L., Arndt, J., & Nakanishi, Y. (2010). A methodology for performance measurement and peer comparison in the public transportation industry. In Report No. 141. https://doi.org/10.17226/14402
   Google Scholar
• Peng, L., Feng, Y., Li, X., & Li, X. (2016). Relationship Analysis of the Urban Rail Service Quality, Passenger Satisfaction and Loyalty Based on the Structural Equation Model. 2016 International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS), 71273023, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Pina, V., & Torres, L. (2001). Analysis of the efficiency of local government services delivery. An application to urban public transport. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35(10), 929–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00033-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozdena, R. J., & Merewitz, L. (1978). Estimating cost functions for rail rapid transit properties. Transportation Research, 12(2), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-1647(78)90044-8
   Google Scholar
• Pulido, D., Darido, G., Munoz-Raskin, R., & Moody, J. (2018). The urban rail development handbook. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, F., Zhang, X., & Zhou, Q. (2014). Evaluating the impact of organizational patterns on the efficiency of urban rail transit systems in China. Journal of Transport Geography, 40, 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redman, L., Friman, M., Gärling, T., & Hartig, T. (2013). Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review. Transport Policy, 25, 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietveld, P. (2005). Six reasons why supply-oriented indicators systematically overestimate service quality in public transport. Transport Reviews, 25(3), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144164042000335814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeidi, T., Mesbah, M., & Habibian, M. (2020). Sequenced ordered logit model considering latent variables for determining trip satisfaction of metro passengers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2674(9), 755–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120931846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, P. K., & Kumar, J. A. (2016). Demand elasticity of capacity offered for urban rail transport. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 06(04), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2016.64016
   Google Scholar
• Savage, I. (1997). Scale economies in United States rail transit systems. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 31(6), 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(97)00003-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, M. G., Debnath, R. M., Oloruntoba, R., & Sharma, S. M. (2016). Benchmarking of rail transport service performance through DEA for Indian railways. International Journal of Logistics Management, 27(3), 629–649. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-08-2014-0122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, W., Xiao, W., & Wang, X. (2016). Passenger satisfaction evaluation model for urban rail transit: A structural equation modeling based on partial least squares. Transport Policy, 46, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. S. J., & Nash, C. (2014). Rail efficiency: Cost research and its implications for policy.International Transport Forum Discussion Papers.No. 2014/22.OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrw1kq13qq2-en.
   Google Scholar
• Soltanpour, A., Mesbah, M., & Habibian, M. (2020). Customer satisfaction in urban rail: A study on transferability of structural equation models. Public Transport, 12(1), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-019-00223-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, K. R., Mednick, M., & Bockman, J. (2000). Structural equation model of customer satisfaction for the New York city subway system. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1735(1), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.3141/1735-16
   Google Scholar
• Suguiy, T., de Carvalho, M. F. H., & Ferreira, P. A. V. (2020). Efficiency versus satisfaction in public transport: Practices in Brazilian cities. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8(3), 938–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2020.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tovar, B., & Rodríguez-Déniz, H. (2015). Classifying ports for efficiency benchmarking: A review and a frontier-based clustering approach. Transport Reviews, 35(3), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1016473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transportation Research Board. (2003). A guidebook for developing a transit performance-measurement system. TCRP Report 88. www.TRB.org
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C.-H. (Patrick), Mulley, C., & Merkert, R. (2015). Measuring the cost efficiency of urban rail systems an international comparison using DEA and Tobit models. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 49(1), 17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. P., & Mulley, C. (2013). Benchmarking the efficiency performance of international metro systems. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies (Vol. 9).
   Google Scholar
• Tyrinopoulos, Y., & Aifadopoulou, G. (2008). A complete methodology for the quality control of passenger services in the public transport business. European Transport / Trasporti Europei, 38(38), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Veeneman, W., Wilschut, J., Urlings, T., Blank, J., & van de Velde, D. (2014). Efficient frontier analysis of Dutch public transport tendering: A first analysis. Research in Transportation Economics, 48, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2014.09.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., & Sun, H. (2018). Assessing customer satisfaction of urban rail transit network in Tianjin based on intuitionistic fuzzy group decision model. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2018(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4205136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhu, M., & Wang, H. (2020). The impact of service quality and customer satisfaction on reuse intention in urban rail transit in Tianjin, China. SAGE Open, 10(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019898803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, A. (2000). Customer satisfaction among transit riders: How customers rank the relative importance of various service attributes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1735(1), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.3141/1735-15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijeweera, A., & Charles, M. B. (2013a). An empirical analysis of the determinants of passenger rail demand in Melbourne, Australia. Economic Analysis and Policy, 43(3), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0313-5926(13)50031-2
   Google Scholar
• Wijeweera, A., & Charles, M. B. (2013b). Determinants of passenger rail demand in Perth, Australia: A time series analysis1. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 13(2), 221–234.
   Google Scholar
• Wonglakorn, N., Ratanavaraha, V., Karoonsoontawong, A., & Jomnonkwao, S. (2021). Exploring passenger loyalty and related factors for urban railways in Thailand. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(10), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, L., & Zhao, S. (2021). Evaluating and analyzing the operation efficiency of urban rail transit systems in China using an integrated approach of DEA model, Malmquist productivity index, and Tobit regression model. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 147(10), 04021061. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, Y., & Chen, J. (2019). Research on the influence of service quality, passenger satisfaction and passenger loyalty on Fuzhou Metro Line 1. International Journal of New Developments in Engineering and Society, 3(4), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDES.030417
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Liu, H., Xu, M., Mao, C., Shi, J., Meng, G., & Wu, J. (2020). Evaluation of passenger satisfaction of urban multi-mode public transport. PLoS ONE, 15(10 October), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, W., Yang, X., & Preston, J. (2016). Efficiency measurement of bus routes and exogenous operating environment effects on efficiency. Transportation planning and technology, 39(5), 464–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2016.1174364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar