9,345
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A Social Sciences and Humanities research agenda for transport and mobility in Europe: key themes and 100 research questions

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 755-779 | Received 20 May 2022, Accepted 23 Dec 2022, Published online: 19 Jan 2023

References

  • Abbott, A., & Schiermeier, Q. (2019). How European scientists will spend [euro] 100 billion. Nature, 569(7757), 472–476. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-01566-z
  • Adams, J. (2001). The Social Consequences of Hypermobility. Lecture given at the Royal Society of Arts (RSA), 21 November 2001, London.
  • Anfinsen, M., Lagesen, V. A., & Ryghaug, M. (2019). Green and gendered? Cultural perspectives on the road towards electric vehicles in Norway. Transportation research part D: transport and environment, 71, 37–46. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2018.12.003
  • Ash, J., Kitchin, R., & Leszczynski, A. (2016). Digital turn, digital geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 42(1), 25–43. doi:10.1177/0309132516664800
  • Bandola-Gill, J. (2019). Between relevance and excellence? Research impact agenda and the production of policy knowledge. Science and Public Policy, 46(6), 895–905. doi:10.1093/scipol/scz037
  • Banister, D. (2018). Inequality in transport. Alexandrine Press.
  • Banister, D., & Hickman, R. (2013). Transport futures: Thinking the unthinkable. Transport Policy, 29(C), 283–293. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.07.005
  • Barns, S. (2020). Platform Urbanism: Negotiating Platform Ecosystems in Connected Cities. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Becker, H., Balac, M., Ciari, F., & Axhausen, K. W. (2020). Assessing the welfare impacts of Shared Mobility and Mobility as a Service (MaaS). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 131, 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.027
  • Benita, F. (2021). Human mobility behavior in COVID-19: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society, 70, 102916. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102916
  • Bertolini, L. (2020). Beyond the dilemma: questioning the links between human prosperity and mobility growth. In Handbook of Sustainable Transport. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Bharucha, Z., Krupnik, S., Robison, R., Foulds, C., Bode, N., & Rudek, T. (2021). Horizon Scanning and Policy Fellowships to embed Social Sciences and Humanities within EU energy research and innovation policy: An Energy-SHIFTS evaluation. Energy-SHIFTS.
  • Bickerstaff, K., Tolley, R., & Walker, G. (2002). Transport planning and participation: the rhetoric and realities of public involvement. Journal of Transport Geography, 10(1), 61–73. doi:10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00027-8
  • Camarero, L., & Oliva, J. (2019). Thinking in rural gap: mobility and social inequalities. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 1–7. doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0306-x
  • Carvalho, C., & Sales Oliveira, C. S. (2017). A gender reading on rural mobility and accessibility. Cidades, Comunidades e Territórios, 35, 129–146. doi:10.15847/citiescommunitiesterritories.dec2017.035.art07.
  • Cavoli, C. (2021). Accelerating sustainable mobility and land-use transitions in rapidly growing cities: identifying common patterns and enabling factors. Journal of Transport Geography, 94, 103093. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103093
  • Cohen, T., & Cavoli, C. (2019). Automated vehicles: Exploring possible consequences of government (non) intervention for congestion and accessibility. Transport reviews, 39(1), 129–151. doi:10.1080/01441647.2018.1524401
  • Cresswell, T. (2010). Towards a politics of mobility. Environment and planning D: Society and space, 28(1), 17–31. doi:10.1068/d11407
  • Delina, L. L., & Sovacool, B. K. (2018). Of temporality and plurality: An epistemic and governance agenda for accelerating just transitions for energy access and sustainable development. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 34, 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.05.016
  • Dijk, M., & Yarime, M. (2010). The emergence of hybrid-electric cars: Innovation path creation through co-evolution of supply and demand. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(8), 1371–1390. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.05.001
  • Docherty, I., Marsden, G., & Anable, J. (2018). The governance of smart mobility. Transportation Research Part A, 115, 114–125. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.012
  • ECA. (2022). Closing the EU’s innovation gap: Member states must get more involved. Press release, 15 June 2022, European Court of Auditors (ECA). Available online at: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/NewsItem.aspx?nid=16760.
  • Elvy, J. (2014). Public participation in transport planning amongst the socially excluded: An analysis of 3rd generation local transport plans. Case studies on transport policy, 2(2), 41–49. doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2014.06.004
  • Epstein, S. (2008). Culture and Science/Technology: Rethinking Knowledge, Power, Materiality, and Nature. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 619(1), 165–182. doi:10.1177/0002716208319832
  • European Commission. (1992). Green Paper on the Impact of Transport on the Environment. A Community Strategy for ‘Sustainable Mobility’. COM (92) 46 Final.
  • European Commission. (2017). Towards clean, competitive and connected mobility: the contribution of Transport Research and Innovation to the Mobility package. SWD(2017) 223 final.
  • European Commission. (2019). Communication and roadmap on the European Green Deal. COM (2019) 640 final.
  • Ferreira, A. (2018). (Un)healthy Bodies and the Transport Planning Profession. In M. Nieuwenhuijsen, & H. Khreis (Eds.), Integrating Human Health into Urban and Transport Planning: A Framework (pp. 325–344). Springer.
  • Foulds, C., Bharucha, Z. P., Krupnik, S., de Geus, T., Suboticki, I., Royston, S., & Ryghaug, M. (2019). An approach to identifying future Social Sciences & Humanities energy research priorities for Horizon Europe: Working Group guidelines for systematic Horizon Scanning. Energy-SHIFTS.
  • Foulds, C., & Christensen, T. H. (2016). Funding pathways to a low-carbon transition. Nature Energy, 1(7), 1–4. doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.87
  • Foulds, C., & Robison, R. (2018). Mobilising the Energy-Related Social Sciences and Humanities. In C. Foulds, & R. Robison (Eds.), Advancing Energy Policy: Lessons on the Integration of Social Sciences and Humanities (pp. 1–12). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Frantzeskaki, N., Dumitru, A., Anguelovski, I., Avelino, F., Bach, M., Best, B., … Rauschmayer, F. (2016). Elucidating the changing roles of civil society in urban sustainability transitions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 22, 41–50. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.04.008
  • Freudendal-Pedersen, M. (2016). Mobility in daily life: between freedom and unfreedom. Routledge.
  • Fullagar, S., Wilson, E., & Markwell, K. (2012). Starting slow: Thinking through slow mobilities and experiences. In S. Fullagar, K. Markwell, & E. Wilson (Eds.), Slow Tourism. Channel View Publications.
  • Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 21–40. doi:10.1177/0263276414531627
  • Gehl, J. (2013). Cities for people. Island Press.
  • Genus, A., Fahy, F., Goggins, G., Iskandarova, M., & Laakso, S. (2018). Imaginaries and practices: Learning from ‘ENERGISE’about the integration of social sciences with the EU Energy Union. In Advancing energy policy (pp. 131–144). Palgrave Pivot.
  • Gil, O., Cortés-Cediel, M. E., & Cantador, I. (2019). Citizen participation and the rise of digital media platforms in smart governance and smart cities. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 8(1), 19–34. doi:10.4018/IJEPR.2019010102
  • Gössling, S., Hanna, P., Higham, J., Cohen, S., & Hopkins, D. (2019). Can we fly less? Evaluating the ‘necessity’. of air travel. Journal of Air Transport Management, 81. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.101722
  • Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2019). Imagining the post-fossil city: why is it so difficult to think of new possible worlds? Territory, Politics, Governance, 7(2), 122–134. doi:10.1080/21622671.2018.1510339
  • Halpern, C. (2014). Urban Mobility: What Role for the European Union? Explaining Dynamics of European Union Policy Design Since 1995. European Planning Studies, 22(12), 2526–2541. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.844775
  • Hines, P., Yu, L. H., Guy, R. H., Brand, A., & Papaluca-Amati, M. (2019). Scanning the horizon: a systematic literature review of methodologies. BMJ open, 9(5), e026764. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026764
  • Holden, E., Banister, D., Gössling, S., Gilpin, G., & Linnerud, K. (2020). Grand Narratives for sustainable mobility: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science, 65, 101454. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101454
  • Holden, E., Gilpin, G., & Banister, D. (2019). Sustainable Mobility at Thirty. Sustainability, 11(7), 1965. doi:10.3390/su11071965
  • IEA. (2022). Transport IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/transport.
  • Ingram, J. S., Wright, H. L., Foster, L., Aldred, T., Barling, D., Benton, T. G., Berryman, P. M., Bestwick, C. S., Bows-Larkin, A., Brocklehurst, T. F., & Buttriss, J. (2013). Priority research questions for the UK food system. Food Security, 5(5), 617–636. doi:10.1007/s12571-013-0294-4
  • Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2015). Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. The University of Chicago Press.
  • Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H., & Rehner, R. (2016). Energy justice: a conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science, 11, 174–182. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004
  • Jochem, P., Frankenhauser, D., Ewald, L., Ensslen, A., & Fromm, H. (2020). Does free-floating carsharing reduce private vehicle ownership? The case of SHARE NOW in European cities. Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice, 141, 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.09.016
  • Joly, P. (2017). Beyond the Competitiveness Framework? Models of Innovation Revisited. Journal of Innovation Economics Management, 2017/1(22), 79–96.
  • Kallis, G., Kerschner, C., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2012). The economics of degrowth. Ecological Economics, 84, 172–180. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.017
  • Kanda, W., & Kivimaa, P. (2020). What opportunities could the COVID-19 outbreak offer for sustainability transitions research on electricity and mobility? Energy Research & Social Science, 68, 101666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101666
  • Kaufmann, V., Bergman, M. M., & Joye, D. (2004). Motility: mobility as capital. International journal of urban and regional research, 28(4), 745–756. doi:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00549.x
  • Khalaj, F., Pojani, D., Sipe, N., & Corcoran, J. (2020). Why are cities removing their freeways? A systematic review of the literature. Transport Reviews, 40(5), 557–580. doi:10.1080/01441647.2020.1743919
  • Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., … Wells, P. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 31, 1–32. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
  • Kropp, A. (2021). The EU and the social sciences: A fragile relationship. The Sociological Review, 69(6), 1325–1341. doi:10.1177/00380261211034706
  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
  • Kwan, M. P. (1999). Gender and individual access to urban opportunities: a study using space–time meas­ures. The Professional Geographer, 51(2), 210–227.
  • Latour, B. (2005). From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik: or how to make things public. In: Latour, B., and Weibel, W. (eds) Making things public: atmospheres of democracy (pp. 14–41). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Law, R. (1999). Beyond ‘women and transport’: towards new geographies of gender and daily mobility. Progress in human geography, 23(4), 567–588. doi:10.1191/030913299666161864
  • Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42(1), 599–626. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340
  • Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport policy, 20, 105–113. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
  • Lucas, K., Mattioli, G., Verlinghieri, E., & Guzman, A. (2016, December). Transport poverty and its adverse social consequences. In Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-transport (Vol. 169, No. 6, pp. 353-365). Thomas Telford Ltd.
  • Marsden, G., Anable, J., Chatterton, T., Docherty, I., Faulconbridge, J., Murray, L., … Shires, J. (2020). Studying disruptive events: Innovations in behaviour, opportunities for lower carbon transport policy? Transport Policy, 94, 89–101. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.04.008
  • Marsden, G., & Reardon, L. (2017). Questions of governance: Rethinking the study of transportation policy. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 101, 238–251.
  • Martens, K. (2012). Justice in transport as justice in accessibility: applying Walzer’s ‘Spheres of Justice’to the transport sector. Transportation, 39(6), 1035–1053. doi:10.1007/s11116-012-9388-7
  • Martens, K. (2016). Transport justice: Designing fair transportation systems. Routledge.
  • Mattioli, G. (2016). Transport needs in a climate-constrained world. A novel framework to reconcile social and environmental sustainability in transport. Energy Research & Social Science, 18, 118–128. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.03.025
  • Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented research & innovation in the European Union. European Commission. Available at: https://www.johannebergsciencepark.com/sites/default/files/mazzucato_report_2018%20-%20Mission.pdf
  • Milakis, D., & Müller, S. (2021). The societal dimension of the automated vehicles transition: Towards a research agenda. Cities, 113, 103144. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103144
  • Milakis, D., van Arem, B., & van Wee, B. (2017). Policy and society related implications of automated driving: a review of literature and directions for future research. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations, 21(4), 324–348. doi:10.1080/15472450.2017.1291351
  • Mokhtarian, P. L., & Salomon, I. (2001). How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and meas­urement considerations. Transportation research part A: Policy and practice, 35(8), 695–719. doi:10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00013-6
  • Mom, G. (2013). The electric vehicle: Technology and expectations in the automobile age. JHU Press.
  • Mullen, C., & Marsden, G. (2016). Mobility justice in low carbon energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 18, 109–117. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.03.026
  • Nikolaeva, A., & Nello-Deakin, S. (2019). Exploring velotopian urban imaginaries: where Le Corbusier meets Constant? Mobilities, 15(3), 309–324. doi:10.1080/17450101.2019.1694300
  • Noy, K., & Givoni, M. (2018). Is ‘Smart Mobility’ Sustainable? Examining the Views and Beliefs of Transport’s Technological Entrepreneurs. Sustainability, 10(2), 422–419. doi:10.3390/su10020422
  • Pereira, R. H., Schwanen, T., & Banister, D. (2017). Distributive justice and equity in transportation. Transport Reviews, 37(2), 170–191. doi:10.1080/01441647.2016.1257660
  • Peters, G. P., Andrew, R. M., Canadell, J. G., Friedlingstein, P., Jackson, R. B., Korsbakken, J. I., … Peregon, A. (2020). Carbon dioxide emissions continue to grow amidst slowly emerging climate policies. Nature Climate Change, 10(1), 3–6. doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0659-6
  • Pretty, J., Sutherland, W. J., Ashby, J., Auburn, J., Baulcombe, D., Bell, M., Bentley, J., Bickersteth, S., Brown, K., Burke, J., & Campbell, H. (2010). The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture. International journal of agricultural sustainability, 8(4), 219–236. doi:10.3763/ijas.2010.0534
  • Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. Human choice and climate change, 2(2), 327–399.
  • Rockstrom, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin III, F. S., Lambin, E., … Foley, J. (2009). Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and society, 14(2), 1–33. doi:10.5751/ES-03180-140232
  • Rogge, K. S., & Johnstone, P. (2017). Exploring the role of phase-out policies for low-carbon energy transitions: The case of the German Energiewende. Energy Research & Social Science, 33, 128–137. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.004
  • Royston, S., & Foulds, C. (2021). The making of energy evidence: How exclusions of Social Sciences and Humanities are reproduced. Energy Research & Social Science, 77), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102084
  • Rudd, M. A. (2011). How research-prioritization exercises affect conservation policy. Conservation Biology, 25(5), 860–866. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01712.x
  • Ryghaug, M., & Skjolsvold, T. (2023). How policies and actor strategies affect electric vehicle diffusion and wider sustainability transitions. (in press) PNAS.
  • Ryghaug, M., & Skjølsvold, T. M. (2021). Catering for Socio-technical Transformations: Rethinking Technology Policy for Inclusive Transformation. In Pilot Society and the Energy Transition (pp. 93–112). Palgrave Pivot.
  • Ryghaug, M., Suboticki, I., von Wirth, T., Smeds, E., Scherer, A., Foulds, C., Bertolini, L., İnce, E. B., Brand, R., Cohen-Blankshtain, G., Dijk, M., Freudendal-Pedersen, M., Gössling, S., Guzik, R., Kivimaa, P., Klöckner, C., Nikolova, H. L., Lis, A., Marquet, O., … Wentland, A. (2020). 100 Social Sciences and Humanities priority research questions for transport and mobility in Horizon Europe. Energy-SHIFTS.
  • Ryghaug, M., & Toftaker, M. (2014). A transformative practice? Meaning, competence, and material aspects of driving electric cars in Norway. Nature and Culture, 9(2), 146–163. doi:10.3167/nc.2014.090203
  • Sales Oliveira, S. (2019). My trip in my words: Subjectivities, time(s) and mobilities in slow travel blogs. Time and Society, 29(1), 223–255. doi:10.1177/0961463X18820740
  • Schuitema, G., Steg, L., & Forward, S. (2010). Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 44(2), 99–109. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2009.11.005
  • Schwanen, T. (2018). Towards decolonised knowledge about transport. Palgrave Communictions, 4(79), 79. doi:10.1057/s41599-018-0130-8
  • Schwanen, T. (2021). Achieving just transitions towards low-carbon urban mobility. Nature Energy, 6(7), 685–687. doi:10.1038/s41560-021-00856-z
  • Schwanen, T., Banister, D., & Anable, J. (2011). Scientific research about climate change mitigation in transport: A critical review. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(10), 993–1006. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.005
  • Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2000). The city and the car. International journal of urban and regional research, 24(4), 737–757. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00276
  • Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and planning A, 38(2), 207–226. doi:10.1068/a37268
  • Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2010). Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Research Policy, 39(4), 471–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019
  • Silva, C., Bertolini, L., te Brömmelstroet, M., Milakis, D., & Papa, E. (2017). Accessibility instruments in planning practice: Bridging the implementation gap. Transport Policy, 53, 135–145. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.09.006
  • Silvast, A., & Foulds, C. (2022). Sociology of Interdisciplinarity: The Dynamics of Energy Research. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Skjølsvold, T. M., & Coenen, L. (2021). Are rapid and inclusive energy and climate transitions oxymorons? Towards principles of responsible acceleration. Energy Research & Social Science, 79, 102164. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102164
  • Skjølsvold, T. M., Henriksen, I. M., & Ryghaug, M. (2022). Beyond the car: how electric vehicles may enable new forms of material politics at the intersection of the smart grid and smart city. Urban Geography, 1–18. doi:10.1080/02723638.2022.2044692
  • Smeds, E., & Cavoli, C. (2021). Pathways for accelerating transitions towards sustainable mobility in European cities. Barcelona Centre for International Affairs (CIDOB). Available at: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10120413/1/CIDOB%20Smeds%20Cavoli%20final%20chapter.pdf
  • Smeds, E., & Jones, P. (2020). Developing Transition Pathways towards Sustainable Mobility in European Cities: Conceptual framework and practical guidance. Deliverable D1.2, H2020 CIVITAS SUMP-PLUS project.
  • Smeds, E., Robin, E., & McArthur, J. (2020). Night-time mobilities and (in)justice in London: Constructing mobile subjects and the politics of difference in policy-making. Journal of Transport Geography, 82), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102569
  • Sovacool, B. K., Kim, J., & Yang, M. (2021). The hidden costs of energy and mobility: A global meta-analysis and research synthesis of electricity and transport externalities. Energy Research & Social Science, 72, 101885. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101885
  • Sperling, D. (2018). Three revolutions: Steering automated, shared, and electric vehicles to a better future. Island Press.
  • Steg, L. (2005). Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2-3), 147–162. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.07.001
  • Stern, P., Sovacool, B., & Dietz, T. (2016). Towards a science of climate and energy choices. Nature Clim Change, 6(6), 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3027
  • Stockmann, N., & Graf, A. (2020). “Polluting our kids’ imagination”? Exploring the power of Lego in the discourse on sustainable mobility. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 16(1), 231–246. doi:10.1080/15487733.2020.1802142
  • Suboticki, I., Ryghaug, M., Smeds, E., Valler, T. M., Scherrer, A., Haugland, B. T., & von Wirth, T. (2021). Transport and Mobility: A Social Sciences and Humanities annotated bibliography.
  • Suboticki, I., & Sørensen, K. H. (2021). Designing and domesticating an interstructure: Exploring the practices and the politics of an elevator for cyclists. Urban Studies, 58(6), 1229–1244. doi:10.1177/0042098020910334
  • Sutherland, W. J., Fleishman, E., Mascia, M. B., Pretty, J., & Rudd, M. A. (2011). Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2(3), 238–247. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00083.x
  • Te Brömmelstroet, M., Nikolaeva, A., Cadima, C., Verlinghieri, E., Ferreira, A., Mladenović, M., … Papa, E. (2021). Have a good trip! Expanding our concepts of the quality of everyday travelling with flow theory. Applied Mobilities, 1–22. doi:10.1080/23800127.2021.1912947
  • Timms, P., Tight, M., & Watling, D. (2014). Imagineering Mobility: Constructing Utopias for Future Urban Transport. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46(1), 78–93. doi:10.1068/a45669
  • TRANSGEN. (2007). Gender Mainstreaming European Transport Research and Policies: Building the Knowledge Base and Mapping Good Practices. The Co-ordination for Gender Studies. University of Copenhagen.
  • Tuvikene, T. (2018). Post-socialist (auto) mobilities: Modernity, freedom and citizenship. Geography Compass, 12(3), e12362. doi:10.1111/gec3.12362
  • Tyfield, D. (2014). Putting the Power in ‘Socio-Technical Regimes’: E-Mobility Transition in China as Political Process. Mobilities, 9(4), 585–603. doi:10.1080/17450101.2014.961262
  • Urry, J. (2004). The ‘System’ of Automobility. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4-5), 25–39. doi:10.1177/0263276404046059
  • Urry, J. (2016). Mobilities: new perspectives on transport and society. Routledge.
  • Van Wee, B. (2011). Transport and ethics: ethics and the evaluation of transport policies and projects. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Van Wee, B., & Banister, D. (2016). How to write a literature review paper? Transport Reviews, 36(2), 278–288. doi:10.1080/01441647.2015.1065456
  • Verlinghieri, E., & Middleton, J. (2020). Decolonising and provincializing knowledge within the neoliberal university? The challenge of teaching about sustainable transport. Journal of Transport Geography, 88. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102785
  • Verlinghieri, E., & Schwanen, T. (2020). Transport and mobility justice: evolving discussions. Journal of Transport Geography, 87), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102798
  • Wittmayer, J. M., et al. (2020). Beyond instrumentalism_ Broadening the understanding of social innovation in socio-technical energy systems. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 101689. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101689
  • Wood, A., Kębłowski, W., & Tuvikene, T. (2020). Decolonial approaches to urban transport geographies: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Transport Geography, 88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102811