Towards transformation-oriented planning: what can sustainable urban mobility planning (SUMP) learn from transition management (TM)?

References

• Avelino, F. (2009). Empowerment and the challenge of applying transition management to ongoing projects. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9102-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F. (2017). Power in sustainability transitions: Analysing power and (dis)empowerment in transformative change towards sustainability. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27(6), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, S., Zuidgeest, M., Coninck, H. d., & Huizenga, C. (2014). Transport, development and climate change mitigation: Towards an integrated approach. Transport Reviews, 34(3), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2014.903531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L. (2020). From “streets for traffic” to “streets for people”: Can street experiments transform urban mobility? Transport Reviews, 40(6), 734–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1761907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, W. R. (2001). An unpopular essay on transportation. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(00)00045-4
   Google Scholar
• Bos, J. J., & Brown, R. R. (2012). Governance experimentation and factors of success in socio-technical transitions in the urban water sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(7), 1340–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehler, R., Pucher, J., Gerike, R., & Götschi, T. (2017). Reducing car dependence in the heart of Europe: Lessons from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Transport Reviews, 37(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1177799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canitez, F. (2019). Pathways to sustainable urban mobility in developing megacities: A socio-technical transition perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroli, L. (2018). Planning roles in infrastructure system transitions: A review of research bridging socio-technical transitions and planning. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 29, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffin, B. C., Garmestani, A. S., Gunderson, L. H., Benson, M. H., Angeler, D. G., Arnold, C. A., Cosens, B., Craig, R. K., Ruhl, J. B., & Allen, C. R. (2016). Transformative environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41(1), 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIVITAS. (2021). Tool inventory | CIVITAS. https://civitas.eu/tool-inventory
   Google Scholar
• CIVITAS SUMPs-UP. (2021). SUMPs-UP: Publications and reports. https://sumps-up.eu/publications-and-reports/
   Google Scholar
• Corais, F., Bandeira, M., Silva, C., & Bragança, L. (2022). Between the unstoppable and the feasible: The lucid pragmatism of transition processes for sustainable urban mobility: A literature review. Future Transportation, 2(1), 86–114. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp2010006
   Google Scholar
• CREATE. (2018a). D4.3 WP4 comparative analysis report. http://create-mobility.eu/create/Publications/Project-deliverables
   Google Scholar
• CREATE. (2018b). D5.3 - The CREATE Guidelines. http://create-mobility.eu/create/Publications/Project-deliverables
   Google Scholar
• Ehnert, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Barnes, J., Borgström, S., Gorissen, L., Kern, F., Strenchock, L., & Egermann, M. (2018). The acceleration of urban sustainability transitions: A comparison of Brighton, Budapest, Dresden, Genk, and Stockholm. Sustainability, 10(3), 612. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehnert, F., Kern, F., Borgström, S., Gorissen, L., Maschmeyer, S., & Egermann, M. (2018). Urban sustainability transitions in a context of multi-level governance: A comparison of four European states. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eltis. (2021). The urban mobility observatory - topic guides. Eltis. https://www.eltis.org/mobility-plans/topic-guides
   Google Scholar
• Essebo, M. (2013). Lock-in as make-believe: Exploring the role of myth in the lock-in of high mobility systems. Publications edited by the Departments of Geography, University of Gothenburg, Series B: Vol. 124. Avdelningen för kulturgeografi, Institutionen för ekonomi och samhälle, Handelshögskolan vid Göteborgs universitet.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2009). Action plan on urban mobility. European Commission. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52009DC0490
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). White paper - roadmap to a single European transport area - towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri = CELEX%3A52011DC0144
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). Annex: A concept for sustainable urban mobility plans to the communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions - Together towards competetive and resource-efficient urban mobility. Brussels. European Commission. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri = cellar:82155e82-67ca-11e3-a7e4-01aa75ed71a1.0011.02/DOC_4&format = PDF
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019). Sustainable mobility: The European green deal. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/1045f83c-1d88-11ea-95ab-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020a). Sustainable and smart mobility strategy – putting European transport on track for the future. Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_2329
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020b). Sustainable urban mobility indicators (SUMI) - mobility and transport - European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/urban/urban_mobility/sumi_en
   Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki, N., Bach, M., Hölscher, K., & Avelino, F. (2018). Introducing sustainability transitions’ thinking in urban contexts. In N. Frantzeskaki, K. Hölscher, M. Bach, & F. Avelino (Eds.), Co-­creating sustainable urban futures (Vol. 11, pp. 63–79). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69273-9_3
   Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki, N., Hölscher, K., Bach, M., & Avelino, F. (Eds.). (2018). Co-­creating sustainable urban futures (Vol. 11). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69273-9
   Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki, N., Hölscher, K., Wittmayer, J. M., Avelino, F., & Bach, M. (2018). Transition management in and for cities: Introducing a new governance approach to address urban challenges. In N. Frantzeskaki, K. Hölscher, M. Bach, & F. Avelino (Eds.), Co-­creating sustainable urban futures (Vol. 11, pp. 1–40). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69273-9_1
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2012). A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: Introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2018). Low-carbon transition via system reconfiguration? A socio-technical whole system analysis of passenger mobility in Great Britain (1990–2016). Energy Research & Social Science, 46, 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geus, T. d., Wittmayer, J. M., & Vogelzang, F. (2022). Biting the bullet: Addressing the democratic legitimacy of transition management. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 42, 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlow, J., Johnston, E., Hekler, E., & Yeh, Z. (2018). Fostering sustainability transitions by designing for the convergence of policy windows and transition arenas. Sustainability, 10(9), 2975. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10092975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebinck, A., Diercks, G., Wirth, T. v., Beers, P. J., Barsties, L., Buchel, S., Greer, R., van Steenbergen, F., & Loorbach, D. (2022). An actionable understanding of societal transitions: The X-curve framework. Sustainability Science, 17(3), 1009–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01084-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M. (2009). Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of transition management. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 341–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9095-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2010). Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Research Policy, 39(4), 477–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölscher, K. (2018). So what? Transition management as a transformative approach to support governance capacities in cities. In N. Frantzeskaki, K. Hölscher, M. Bach, & F. Avelino (Eds.), Co-­creating sustainable urban futures (Vol. 11, pp. 375–396). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69273-9_16
   Google Scholar
• Hölscher, K. (2020). Capacities for transformative climate governance: A conceptual framework. In Hölscher & Ballard (Eds.), Palgrave studies in environmental transformation, transition and accountability. Transformative climate governance (pp. 49–96). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49040-9_2
   Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, S., Lukkarinen, J., Kivimaa, P., Lovio, R., Temmes, A., Hildén, M., Marttila, T., Auvinen, K., Perikangas, S., Pyhälammi, A., Peljo, J., Savolainen, K., Hakkarainen, L., Rask, M., Matschoss, K., Huomo, T., Berg, A., & Pantsar, M. (2019). Developing policy pathways: Redesigning transition arenas for mid-range planning. Sustainability, 11(3), 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jhagroe, S., & Loorbach, D. (2018). It’s the complexity stupid! In J. S. Jensen, M. Cashmore, & P. Späth (Eds.), The politics of urban sustainability transitions (pp. 148–168). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351065344-9
   Google Scholar
• Kalakou, S., Spundflasch, S., Martins, S., & Diaz, A. (2021). SUMPs implementation: Designation of capacity gaps of local authorities in the delivery of sustainable mobility projects. In A. Bisello, D. Vettorato, D. Ludlow, & C. Baranzelli (Eds.), Green energy and technology. Smart and sustainable planning for cities and regions (pp. 239–258). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57764-3_16
   Google Scholar
• Kenis, A., Bono, F., & Mathijs, E. (2016). Unravelling the (post-)political in transition management: Interrogating pathways towards sustainable change. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 568–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1141672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., & Kern, F. (2016). Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 45(1), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., Fünfschilling, L., Hess, D., Holtz, G., Hyysalo, S., Jenkins, K., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., McMeekin, A., Mühlemeier, M. S., … Wells, P. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., Haan, F. de, Holtz, G., Kubeczko, K., Moallemi, E., Papachristos, G., & Chappin, E. (2018). Modelling sustainability transitions: An assessment of approaches and challenges. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 21(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.3629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koszowski, C., Gerike, R., Hubrich, S., Götschi, T., Pohle, M., & Wittwer, R. (2019). Active mobility: Bringing together transport planning, urban planning, and public health. In B. Müller & G. Meyer (Eds.), Lecture notes in mobility. Towards user-centric transport in Europe (pp. 149–171). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99756-8_11
   Google Scholar
• Lindenau, M., & Böhler-Baedeker, S. (2014). Citizen and stakeholder involvement: A precondition for sustainable urban mobility. Transportation Research Procedia, 4, 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2014.11.026
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition management: New mode of governance for sustainable development. International Books. https://repub.eur.nl/pub/10200/proefschrift.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability transitions research: Transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42(1), 599–626. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., Schwanen, T., Doody, B. J., Arnfalk, P., Langeland, O., & Farstad, E. (2021). Transition governance for just, sustainable urban mobility: An experimental approach from Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Journal of Urban Mobility, 1, 100009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2021.100009
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, G. (2021). Reviewing transport in light of the pandemic. Transport Reviews, 41(6), 715–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1962609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, G., & Davidson, C. (2016). Guidance for transport planning and policymaking in the face of an uncertain future. Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice, 88, 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malekpour, S., Brown, R. R., & Haan, F. J. d. (2015). Strategic planning of urban infrastructure for environmental sustainability: Understanding the past to intervene for the future. Cities, 46, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malekpour, S., Walker, W. E., Haan, F. J. d., Frantzeskaki, N., & Marchau, V. A. (2020). Bridging decision making under deep uncertainty (DMDU) and transition management (TM) to improve strategic planning for sustainable development. Environmental Science & Policy, 107, 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., Granqvist, K., Duman, O., & Mladenović, M. N. (2023). From forecasts to scenarios in strategic city-regional land-use and transportation planning. Regional Studies, 57(4), 629–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2058699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchau, V. A., Walker, W. E., & van Wee, G. P. (2010). Dynamic adaptive transport policies for handling deep uncertainty. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(6), 940–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marletto, G. (2014). Car and the city: Socio-technical transition pathways to 2030. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 87, 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, G., & Reardon, L. (2017). Questions of governance: Rethinking the study of transportation policy. Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice, 101, 238–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, A. D. (2015). Encouraging good practice in the development of sustainable urban mobility plans. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 3(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, A. D. (2016). CH4LLENGE measure selection manual – selecting the most effective packages of measures for sustainable urban mobility plans. Brussels. European Commission, Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport. https://www.eltis.org/resources/tools/sump-measure-selection-kit
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, K., Anderberg, S., Coenen, L., & Neij, L. (2013). Advancing sustainable urban transformation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercure, J-F, Sharpe, S., Vinuales, J. E., Ives, M., Grubb, M., Lam, A., Drummond, P., Pollitt, H., Knobloch, F., & Nijsse, F. J. (2021). Risk-opportunity analysis for transformative policy design and appraisal. Global Environmental Change, 70, 102359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagorny-Koring, N. C., & Nochta, T. (2018). Managing urban transitions in theory and practice - the case of the pioneer cities and transition cities projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevens, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Gorissen, L., & Loorbach, D. (2013). Urban transition labs: Co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P., & Vogel, N. (2012). Sustainable urban development and the multi-level transition perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 4, 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2012.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Nwanekezie, K., Noble, B., & Poelzer, G. (2021). Transitions-based strategic environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 91, 106643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peris, J., & Bosch, M. (2020). The paradox of planning for transformation: The case of the integrated sustainable urban development strategy in valència (Spain). Urban Transformations, 2(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-020-00011-z
   Google Scholar
• Rauschmayer, F., Bauler, T., & Schäpke, N. (2015). Towards a thick understanding of sustainability transitions — linking transition management, capabilities and social practices. Ecological Economics, 109, 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raynor, K. E., Doyon, A., & Beer, T. (2017). Collaborative planning, transitions management and design thinking: Evaluating three participatory approaches to urban planning. Australian Planner, 54(4), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2018.1477812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roorda, C., Wittmayer, J. M., Henneman, P., van Steenbergen, F., Frantzeskaki, N., & Loorbach, D. (2014). Transition management in the urban context: Guidance manual. DRIFT, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Rupprecht Consult. (2021). SUMP-self assessment. https://www.sump-assessment.eu/English/start
   Google Scholar
• Rupprecht Consult (Ed.). (2019). Guidelines for developing and implementing a sustainable urban mobility plan. 2nd ed. https://www.eltis.org/sites/default/files/sump_guidelines_2019_interactive_document_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Savini, F., & Bertolini, L. (2019). Urban experimentation as a politics of niches. Environment and Planning a: Economy and Space, 51(4), 831–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19826085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäpke, N., Omann, I., Wittmayer, J., van Steenbergen, F., & Mock, M. (2017). Linking transitions to sustainability: A study of the societal effects of transition management. Sustainability, 9(5), 737. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schippl, J., & Truffer, B. (2020). Directionality of transitions in space: Diverging trajectories of electric mobility and autonomous driving in urban and rural settlement structures. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 37, 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanen, T. (2015). The bumpy road toward low-energy urban mobility: Case studies from two UK cities. Sustainability, 7(6), 7086–7111. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7067086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeds, E., & Jones, P. (2020). Developing transition pathways towards sustainable mobility in European cities: Conceptual framework and practical guidance. https://sump-plus.eu/resource?t = D1.2%20Developing%20Transition%20Pathways%20towards%20Sustainable%20Mobility%20in%20European%20Cities
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2008). Social-ecological resilience and socio-technical transitions: critical issues for sustainability governance. STEPS Centre. https://steps-centre.org/publication/social-ecological-resilience-and-socio-technical-transitions-critical-issues-for-sustainability-governance/
   Google Scholar
• Soria-Lara, J. A., & Banister, D. (2017). Participatory visioning in transport backcasting studies: Methodological lessons from Andalusia (Spain). Journal of Transport Geography, 58, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2016). Key research themes on governance and sustainable urban mobility. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2013.821008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sustar, H., Mladenović, M. N., & Givoni, M. (2020). The landscape of envisioning and speculative design methods for sustainable mobility futures. Sustainability, 12(6), 2447. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Switzer, A., Bertolini, L., & Grin, J. (2013). Transitions of mobility systems in urban regions: A heuristic framework. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 15(2), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2012.746182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• te Brömmelstroet, M., & Bertolini, L. (2011). The role of transport-related models in urban planning practice. Transport Reviews, 31(2), 139–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2010.541295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timms, P. (2008). Transport models, philosophy and language. Transportation, 35(3), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-007-9154-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrens, J., Westman, L., Wolfram, M., Broto, V. C., Barnes, J., Egermann, M., Ehnert, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Fratini, C. F., Håkansson, I., Hölscher, K., Huang, P., Raven, R., Sattlegger, A., Schmidt-Thomé, K., Smeds, E. [., Vogel, N., Wangel, J., & Wirth, T. v. (2021). Advancing urban transitions and transformations research. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 41, 102–105. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.10.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Leeds. (2016). KonSULT measure option generator. http://www.konsult.leeds.ac.uk/mog/
   Google Scholar
• Varho, V., & Tapio, P. (2013). Combining the qualitative and quantitative with the Q2 scenario technique — the case of transport and climate. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(4), 611–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergragt, P. J., & Quist, J. (2011). Backcasting for sustainability: Introduction to the special issue. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(5), 747–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß, J-P, Smith, A., & Grin, J. (2009). Designing long-term policy: Rethinking transition management. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 275–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9103-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wefering, F., Rupprecht, S., Bührmann, S., & Böhler-Baedeker, S. (2014). Guidelines. Developing and implementing a sustainable urban mobility plan. European Commission, Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Werland, S. (2020). Diffusing sustainable urban mobility planning in the EU. Sustainability, 12(20), 8436. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiechmann, T. (2008). Planung und Adaption: Strategieentwicklung in Regionen, Organisationen und Netzwerken. Dresden, Univ., Habil.-Schr. 2007. Rohn.
   Google Scholar
• Wiechmann, T. (2018). Planungstheorie. In Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung (Ed.), Handwörterbuch der Stadt- und Raumentwicklung (pp. 1771–1784). Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0156-55991644
   Google Scholar
• Wiek, A., & Iwaniec, D. (2014). Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 9(4), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0208-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmayer, J. M. (2016). Insights and lessons for the governance of urban sustainability transitions. In D. Loorbach, J. M. Wittmayer, H. Shiroyama, J. Fujino, & S. Mizuguchi (Eds.), Theory and practice of urban sustainability transitions. Governance of urban sustainability transitions (pp. 153–169). Springer Japan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55426-4_9
   Google Scholar
• Wolfram, M. (2016). Conceptualizing urban transformative capacity: A framework for research and policy. Cities, 51, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram, M. (2018). Urban planning and transition management: Rationalities, instruments and dialectics. In N. Frantzeskaki, K. Hölscher, M. Bach, & F. Avelino (Eds.), Co-­creating sustainable urban futures (Vol. 11, pp. 103–125). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69273-9_5
   Google Scholar