Policy assemblages: proposing an alternative conceptual framework to study public action

References

• AD-Aditiva. 2004. Análisis de Medidas Del Plan de Transporte Urbano de Santiago (PTUS) Para Favorecer a Las Personas Con Discapacidad [Analysis of the Measures Included in the Urban Transport Plan for Santiago (PTUS) to Favour People with Disabilities]. Santiago: Asesorias para el Desarrollo y Aditiva.
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M. 1992. “The De-Scription of Technical Objects.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by W. Bijker, 205–224. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. 2000. “Rationality Revisited: Planning Paradigms in a Postmodernist Perspective.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 19: 242–256. doi:10.1177/0739456X0001900303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J. 2011. “Powerful Assemblages?” Area 43 (2): 154–157. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnartt, S. 2010. “Disability as a Fluid State: Introduction.” In Disability as a Fluid State, edited by Sharon Barnartt, 1–22. Bingley: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• BCN. 1994. Historia de La Ley N° 19.284: Establece Normas Para La Plena Integración Social de Personas Con Discapacidad [History of Law 19.284: Establishes Norms for the Full Social Integration of People with Disabilities]. Santiago: Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2005. “The Agency of Assemblages and the North American Blackout.” Public Culture 17 (3): 445–466. doi:10.1215/08992363-17-3-445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1998. “An Essay on Framing and Overflowing: Economic Externalities Revisited by Sociology.” In The Laws of the Markets, edited by M. Callon, 244–269. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 2007. “What Does It Mean to Say That Economics Is Performative?” In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by D. Mackenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu, 311–356. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CCA. 2003. Diseño Accesible: Construir Para Todos [Accesible Design: Buildings for Everyone]. Santiago: Corporación Ciudad Accessible.
   Google Scholar
• Colebatch, H. 2006. “What Work Makes Policy?” Policy Science 39 (4): 309–321. doi:10.1007/s11077-006-9025-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colebatch, H., R. Hoppe, and M. Noordegraaf, eds. 2010. Working for Policy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Correa, G., E. Abedrapo, S. González, and S. Solís. 2000. Plan de Transporte Urbano de Santiago 2000–2010 [Urban Transport Plan for Santiago 2000–2010]. Santiago: Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Transporte y Telecomunicaciones (MOPTT).
   Google Scholar
• De Landa, M. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1988. A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1927. The Public and Its Problems. Oxford: Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Dewsbury, J.-D. 2011. “The Deleuze-Guattarian Assemblage: Plastic Habits.” Area 43 (2): 148–153. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01006.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. 1994. Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farias, I., and T. Bender. 2009. Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., and J. Forester, eds. 1993. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2002. “Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-Level Perspective and a Case-study.” Research Policy 31 (8–9): 1257–1274. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomart, E., and M. Hajer. 2003. “Is That Politics? For an Inquiry into Forms in Contemporary Politics.” In Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back Ahead, edited by B. Joerges and H. Nowotny, 33–62. Amsterdam: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, S. 2008. Just One Child: Science and Policy in Deng's China. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1995. “The Looping Effects of Human Kinds.” In Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate, edited by D. Sperber, D. Premack, and A. Premack, 351–394. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A., and W. Hendrik. 2003. Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 1999. “Crisis and the Structural Transformation of the State: Interrogating the Process of Change.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 1 (3): 317–344. doi:10.1111/1467-856X.00018
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1992. “Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society, edited by W. Bijker, 225–257. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. 2007. “Practices of Assemblage and Community Forest Management.” Economy and Society 36 (2): 263–293. doi:10.1080/03085140701254308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, G., and E. Saka. 2006. “Assemblage.” Theory, Culture & Society 23 (2–3): 101–106. doi:10.1177/0263276406062573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2007. “The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy.” Social Studies of Science 37 (5): 759–780. doi:10.1177/0306312706077367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., and K. Ward. 2012. “Policy Assemblages, Mobilities and Mutations: Toward a Multidisciplinary Conversation.” Political Studies Review 10 (3): 325–332. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00276.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. 1991. “The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and Their Critics.” The American Political Science Review 85 (1): 77–96. doi:10.2307/1962879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, I. 2005. “On Becoming Disabled and Articulating Alternatives; The Multiple Modes of Ordering Disability and Their Interferences.” Cultural Studies 19 (6): 667–700. doi:10.1080/09502380500365648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, I., and J. Law. 1999. “Good Passages, Bad Passages.” In Actor Network Theory and After, edited by J. Law and J. Hassard, 196–219. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• MTT. 2004. Modifica Decreto N° 122, de 1991. Fija Requisitos Dimensionales y Funcionales a Vehiculos Que Presten Servicios de Locomocion Colectiva Urbana Que Indica [Modification of Decree 122 of 1991: Fixes Dimensional and Functional Requisites for Public Transport Buses]. Diario Oficial de La Republica de Chile, Jueves 8 de Enero de 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, J. C., and A. Gschwender. 2008. “Transantiago: A Tale of Two Cities.” Research in Transportation Economics 22 (1): 45–53. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2008.05.010
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A., and S. J. Collier, eds. 2008. Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C. 2010. “Locating the Work of Policy.” In Working for Policy, edited by H. Colebatch, R. Hoppe, and M. Noordegraaf, 211–225. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C., and S. Wright. 1997. “Policy: A New Field of Anthropology.” In Anthropology of Policy: Critical Perspectives on Governance and Power, edited by C. Shore, and S. Wright, 3–33. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C., and S. Wright. 2011. “Conceptualising Policy: Technologies of Governance and the Politics of Visibility.” In Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power, edited by C. Shore, S. Wright, and D. Pero, 1–26. London: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and G. Bowker. 2006. “How to Infrastructure.” In Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Social Consequences of ICTs, edited by L. Lievrouw and S. Livingstone, 151–162. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and K. Ruhleder. 1996. “Steps toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces.” Information Systems Research 7 (1): 111–134. doi:10.1287/isre.7.1.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Switzer, J. V. 2003. Disabled Rights: American Disability Policy and the Fight for Equality. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• TEC. 2003. Análisis de Las Caracteristicas de Vehículos Para El Transporte Público y de Carga – Informe Ejectivo [Analysis of the Characteristics of Vehicles for Public Transport – Executive Report]. Santiago: Consultores en Ingeniería de Transporte, TEC ltda.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., and S. Epstein. 2010. “A World of Standards but Not a Standard World: Toward a Sociology of Standards and Standardization.” Annual Review of Sociology 36: 69–89. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titmuss, R. 1974. Social Policy. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Ureta, S. 2014. The Shelter That Wasn't There: On the Politics of Coordinating Multiple Urban Assemblages in Santiago, Chile. Urban Studies 51 (2): 231–246.
   Google Scholar
• Wedel, J., C. Shore, G. Feldman, and S. Lathrop. 2005. “Toward an Anthropology of Public Policy.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 600 (1): 30–51. doi:10.1177/0002716205276734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, J. M. 2005. “Assemblage.” In Deleuze: Key Concepts, edited by C. Stivale, 77–87. Montreal: McGill – Queen University press.
   Google Scholar