Is subsidiarity a conditio sine qua non for sustainability?

References

• Abbott, Russ. 2006. “Emergence Explained: Abstractions: Getting Epiphenomena to do Real Work.” Complexity 12 (1): 13–26. doi: 10.1002/cplx.20146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aligica, Paul D., and Vlad Tarko. 2012. “Polycentricity: From Polanyi to Ostrom, and Beyond.” Governance 25 (2): 237–262. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01550.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, Peter M. 1997. Cities and Regions as Self-Organizing Systems: Models of Complexity. Amsterdam: Overseas Publishers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Backhaus, Jürgen G. 1999. “Subsidiarity.” In The Elgar Companion to Law and Economics, edited by Jürgen G. Backhaus, 136–143. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bawden, Richard. 2004. “Sustainability as Emergence: The Need for Engaged Discourse.” In Higher Education and the Challenge of Sustainability: Problematics, Promise, and Practice, edited by Arjen E. J. Wals, and Peter Blaze Corcoran, 21–32. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, Yishai. 2006. “Localism in the New Global Legal Order.” Harvard International Law Journal 47 (1): 263–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blitz, David. 1992. Emergent Evolution: Qualitiative Novelty and the Levels of Reality. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Bonabeau, Eric, Marco Dorigo, and Guy Theraulaz. 1999. Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Isystems. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bosselmann, Klaus. 2008. The Principle of Sustainability [Electronic Resource]: Transforming Law and Governance/By Klaus Bosselmann. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bosselmann, Klaus, J Ronald Engel, and Prue Taylor. 2008. Governance for Sustainability. Gland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Carozza, Paolo G. 2003. “Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law.” The American Journal of International Law 97 (38): 38–79. doi: 10.2307/3087103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corning, Peter A. 2002. “The Re-Emergence of “Emergence”: A Venerable Concept in Search of a Theory.” Complexity 7 (6): 18–30. doi: 10.1002/cplx.10043
   Google Scholar
• Dendrinos, Dimitrios S. 1996. “Cities as Spacial Chaotic Attractors.” In Chaos Theory in the Social Sciences: Foundations and Applications, Euel W. Elliott, and L. Douglas Kiel. Ann Arbor, 237–269. MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Wolf, Tom, and Tom Holvoet. 2005. “Emergence Versus Self-Organisation: Different Concepts but Promising When Combined.” In Engineering Self-Organising Systems: Methodologies and Applications, edited by Sven A. Brueckner et al., 1–15. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Di Marzo Serugendo, Giovanna, ed. 2004. Engineering Self-Organising Systems : Nature-Inspired Approaches to Software Engineering. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Eble, Gunther J. 2001. “The Complexity of Evolution.” Complexity 6 (6): 24–27. doi: 10.1002/cplx.10001
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa Salazar, Angela Ma, and Jon Walker. 2011. A Complexity Approach to Sustainability: Theory and Application. London: Imperial College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Floriani, Peter J. 2012. Subsidiarity. Reading, PA: Penn Street Productions.
   Google Scholar
• Føllesdal, Andreas. 1998. “Survey Article: Subsidiarity.” Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (2): 190–218. doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, Heylighen. 2008. “Complexity and Self-Organization.” In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, Vol. 2, edited by Marcia J. Bates, and Mary Niles Maack, 1215–1224. Oxford: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Frug, Gerald E. 1979–1980. “The City as a Legal Concept.” Harvard Law Review 93: 1057–1120. doi: 10.2307/1340702
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Jeffery. 1999. “Emergence as a Construct: History and Issues.” Emergence 1: 49–72. doi: 10.1207/s15327000em0101_4
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Brian. 1994. How the Leopard Changed its Spots: The Evolution of Complexity. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Gosepath, Stefan. 2005. “The Principle of Subsidiarity.” In Real World Justice: Grounds, Principles, Human Rights, and Social Institutions, edited by Andreas Follesdal, and Thomas Pogge, 157–170. The Netherlands: Springer Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” The American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–1380. doi: 10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, Mark S. 1983. “The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited.” Sociological Theory 1: 201–233. doi: 10.2307/202051
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, Mark S. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” The American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510. doi: 10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gussen, Benjamen F. 2012. “The Marginalisation of Localism in Current Responses to the Ecological Crisis.” New Zealand Journal of Environmental Law 16: 167–201.
   Google Scholar
• Gussen, Benjamen F. 2013a. “On the Problem of Scale: Hayek, Kohr, Jacobs and the Reinvention of the Political State.” Constitutional Political Economy 24 (1): 19–42. doi: 10.1007/s10602-012-9130-7
   Google Scholar
• Gussen, Benjamen F. 2013b. “On the Problem of Scale: Spinozistic Sovereignty as the Logical Foundation of the Constitutional Economics.” Journal of Philosophical Economics 7 (1). ISSN: 1843–2298 (online).
   Google Scholar
• Haan, J. de. 2006. “How Emergence Arises.” Ecological Complexity 3: 293–301. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halley, Julianne D., and David A. Winkler. 2008. “Classification of Emergence and Its Relation to Self-Organization.” Complexity 13 (5): 10–15. doi: 10.1002/cplx.20216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, Friedrich. 1983a. Law, Legislation and Liberty. Vol. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, Friedrich A. 1983b. Law Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E. J. 1992. Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, John. 2002. Devolution in Context: Regional, Federal and Devolved Government in the European Union. London: Cavendish Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• IReR (Istituto Regionale Di Ricerca Della Lombardia). 2009. Subsidiarity: Brief Anthology. Milan: Regione Lombardia.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Jane. 1985. Cities and Wealth of Nations. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Jane. 2000. The Nature of Economies. New York: The Modern Library.
   Google Scholar
• Jantsch, Erich. 1975. Design for Evolution : Self-Organization and Planning in the Life of Human Systems/Erich Jantsch. New York: G. Braziller.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchner, Christian. 1998. “The Principle of Subsidiarity in the Treaty on European Union: A Critique from a Perspective of Constitutional Economics.” Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 6: 291–00.
   Google Scholar
• Kohr, Leopold. 1986. The Breakdown of Nations. New York: Routledge Kegan & Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Laughlin, R. B. 2005. A Different Universe. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Frederick J. 2010. “Global Institutional Choice.” New York University Law Review 85: 328–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo XIII. 1990. “Rerum Novarum: Encyclical Letter on Capital and Labor.” (May 15, 1891), In 2 The Papal Encyclicals 1878–1903, edited by Claudia Carlen, 241 at 250–251, para. 36.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, Scot, and Gunnar Nielsson. 1995. “Linkages between the Concepts of ‘Subsidiarity’ and Sovereignty: The New Debate Over Allocation of Authority in the European Union.” In Fourth European Union Studies Association (EUSA) Biennial Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Mainzer, Klaus. 2005. Symmetry and Complexity [Electronic Resource]: The Spirit and Beauty of Nonlinear Science/Klaus Mainzer. London: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Marion, Russ. 1999. The Edge of Organization: Chaos and Complexity Theories of Formal Social Systems. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Graham R. 2008. “Nesting, Subsidiarity, and Community-Based Environmental Governance beyond the Local Level.” International Journal of the Commons 2 (1): 75–97.
   Google Scholar
• Millon-Delsol, Chantal. 1992. L’État subsidiaire : Ingérence et non-ingérence de l’État, le principe de subsidiarité aux fondements de l'histoire européenne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, Lloyd C. 1923. Emergent Evolution. London: Williams and Norgate.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, Peter, and Van Den Bergh, C. J. M. Jeroen. 2001. “Evolutionary Economic Theories of Sustainable Development.” Growth and Change 32 (1): 110–134. doi: 10.1111/0017-4815.00152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, Richard R. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change / Richard R. Nelson and Sidney G. Winter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 2009. “A Polycentric Approach for Coping with Climate Change” Policy Research Working Paper 5095. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 2010a. “A Long Polycentric Journey.” Annu Rev Polit Sci 13: 1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.090808.123259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 2010b. “Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems.” American Economic Review 100 (3): 641–672. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.3.641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavé, Alain. 2006. “Biological and Ecological Systems Hierarchical Organization.” In Hierarchy in Natural and Social Sciences, edited by Denise Pumain, 39–70. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pius XI. 1990. “Quadragesimo Anno: Encyclical Letter on Reconstruction of Social Order.” (May 15, 1931) In 3 The Papal Encyclicals 1903–1939, edited by Claudia Carlen, 421 at paras, 79–80.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, Michael. 1968. “Life's Irreducible Structure: Live Mechanisms and Information in DNA are Boundary Conditions with a Sequence of Boundaries above them.” Science 160: 1308–1312. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3834.1308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portugali, Juval. 1997. “Self-Organizing Cities.” Futures 29 (4–5): 353–380. doi: 10.1016/S0016-3287(97)00022-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigogine, Nicolis G. 1977. Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Prokhovnik, Raia. 2001. “Spinoza's Conception of Sovereignty.” History of European Ideas 27: 289–306. doi: 10.1016/S0191-6599(01)00051-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees, W. 2008. “Cities as Dissipative Structures: Global Change and the Increasing Vulnerability of Urban Civilization.” In Sustainability Science: The Emerging Paradigm and the Urban Environment, edited by M. Weinstein, and R. Turner, 244–268. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, William E. 2010a. “Human Nature, Eco-Footprints and Environmental Injustice.” Local Environment 13: 685–701. doi:10.1080/13549830802475609.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, William E. 2010b. “What's Blocking Sustainability? Human Nature, Cognition and Denial.” Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy 6: 13. http://sspp.proquest.com/archives/vol6iss2/1001-012.rees.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, William E. 2012. “Cities as Dissipative Structures: Global Change and the Vulnerability of Urban Civilization.” In Sustainability Science: The Emerging Paradigm and the Urban Environment, edited by M. P. Weinstein and R. E. Turner, 247–273. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, Saskia. 2006. Cities in a World Economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, Arthur Meier. 1933. The Rise of the City, 1878–1898. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Spinoza, Baruch. 1958. The Political Works: The Tractatus Theologico-Politicus in Part and the Tractatus Politicus in Full ed. and Trans. with an Introd. and Notes by A.G. Wernham. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• “Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.” 1997. Emergent Properties.
   Google Scholar
• Tainter, Joseph A. 1988. The Collapse of Complex Societies. Cambridge: CAmbridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tainter, Joseph A. 1995. “Sustainability of Complex Societies.” Futures 27 (4): 397–407. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(95)00016-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tainter, Joseph A. 2000. “Problem Solving: Complexity, History, Sustainability.” Population and Environment 22 (1): 3–41. doi: 10.1023/A:1006632214612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, Morton. 1949. The Cry and the Covenant. New York: Doubleday Garden City.
   Google Scholar
• Vischer, Robert K. 2001–2002. “Subsidiarity as a Principle of Governance: Beyond Devolution.” Indiana Law Review 35: 103–142.
   Google Scholar
• Waldrop, M. Mitchell. 1992. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, M., R. Turner, and C. Ibáñez. 2012. “The Global Sustainability Transition: It is More than Changing Light Bulbs.” Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy 9 (1): 4–15.
   Google Scholar