MamaBakers as Everyday Makers: the political is personal

References

• Almond, G., and S. Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, H. 2004. From Democratic Government to Democratic Governance. Accessed June 10, 2012. https://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/42117/2/Henrik.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, H. 2009. “‘Yes We Can’: Identity Politics and Project Politics for a Late-Modern World.” Urban Research and Practice 2 (2): 117–137. doi: 10.1080/17535060902979022
   Google Scholar
• Bang, H. 2010. “Everyday Makers and Expert Citizens: Active Participants in Search for a New Governance.” In Public Management in the Postmodern Era: Challenges and Prospects, edited by J. Fenwick and J. McMillan, 163–191. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, H., and E. Soerensen. 2001. “The Everyday Maker: Building Political Rather than Social Capital.” In Social Capital and Participation in Everyday Life, edited by P. Dekker and E. M. Uslaner, 148–161. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bellah, R. N. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American life. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. 1998. “1998 Ithiel De Sola Pool Lecture: The UnCivic Culture: Communication, Identity, and the Rise of Lifestyle Politics.” PS: Political Science & Politics 31 (4): 740–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. 2004. “Branded Political Communication: Lifestyle Politics, Logo Campaigns, and the Rise of Global Citizenship.” In Politics, Products and Markets: Exploring Political Consumerism Past and Present, edited by M. Micheletti, A. Follesdal and D. Stolle, New Brunswick, 101–126. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Bennet, L., and A. Segerberg. 2013. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bochel, C., H. Bochel, P. Somerville, and C. Worley. 2008. “Marginalised or Enabled Voices? ‘User Participation’ in Policy and Practice.” Social Policy and Society 7: 201–210. doi: 10.1017/S1474746407004150
   Google Scholar
• Boggs, C. 2000. The End of Politics: Corporate Power and the Decline of the Public Sphere. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boler, M., A. Macdonald, C. Nitsou, and A. Harris. 2014. “Connective Labor and Social Media: Women's Roles in the ‘Leaderless’ Occupy Movement.” Convergence 20 (4): 438–460.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2010. Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Coffé, H., and C. Bolzendahl. 2010. “Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation.” Sex Roles 62 (5–6): 318–333. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9729-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin, P. 2008. “The Internet, Youth Participation Policies, and the Development of Young People's Political Identities in Australia.” Journal of Youth Studies 11 (5): 527–542. doi: 10.1080/13676260802282992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. 2008. “Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation.” Political Studies 56: 76–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, C. 2013. Teenage Citizens: The Political Theories of the Young. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A., and H. Wagenaar. 2003. “Introduction.” In Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, edited by M. A. Hajer and H. Wagenaar, 1–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halupka, M. 2013. “The Evolution of Anonymous as a Political Actor.” Unpublished Masters Thesis, The Flinders University of South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Hanisch, C. 1970. “The Personal is Political.” In Notes from the Second Year: Women’s Liberation, edited by S. Firestone and A. Koedt, 76–78. Accessed January, 2014. http://scholar.alexanderstreet.com/download/attachments/2259/Personal+Is+Pol.pdf?version=1.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. 2001. “Riding My Own Tidal Wave: Young Women's Feminist Work.” Canadian Women’s Studies Journal, Special issue: Young women, Feminist, activists, grrrls (winter/spring) 4: 27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2007. Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., and J. Oser. 2015. “The Rise of Engaged Citizenship: The Evolution of Citizenship Norms among Adolescents in 21 Countries between 1999 and 2009.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 56 (1): 29–52. doi: 10.1177/0020715215578488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Vol. 19. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, R. E. 2000. The Loss of Happiness in Market Democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and D. Marsh. 2008. “New Forms of Political Participation: Searching for Expert Citizens and Everyday Makers.” British Journal of Political Science 38: 247–272. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo, S., and Y. Alex-Assessoh. 2005. Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation, and What we Can do About it. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., T. O'Toole, and S. Jones. 2007. Young People and Politics in the UK: Apathy or Alienation? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., and A. Vromen. 2011. Everyday Makers with a Difference?: Contemporary Forms of Political Participation. Accessed April, 2015. https://www.tasa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Marsh-David-Vromen-Ariadne.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2002. Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2007. “Political Activism: New Challenges, New Opportunities.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by C. Boix and S. Stokes, 628–652. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2011. Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L. 2011. “Everyday Politics and Generational Conflicts in the World Economy.” International Political Sociology 5 (4): 456–459. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00145_5.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale, C., J. Charteris-Black, A. MacFarlane, and A. McPherson. 2010. “Interviews and Internet Forums: a Comparison of two Sources of Qualitative Data.” Qualitative Health Research 20 (5): 595–606. doi: 10.1177/1049732309354094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. 2006. Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vromen, A., and P. Collin. 2010. “Everyday Youth Participation? Contrasting Views from Australian Policymakers and Young People.” Young 18: 97–112. doi: 10.1177/110330880901800107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar