Innovation policy configuration – a comparative study of Russia and China

References

• Bemelmans-Videc, Marie-Louise, Ray C. Rist, and Evert Oskar Vedung. 1998. Carrots, Sticks & Sermons: Policy Instruments & Their Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg. 2014. Most Innovative in the World 2014: Countries. New York: Bloomberg. http://www.bloomberg.com/slideshow/2014-01-22/30-most-innovative-countries.html.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2010. Communication of the European Commission on Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative Innovation Union. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2012. International Cooperation in Science, Technology and Innovation: Strategies for a Changing World. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Edler, Jokob, Paul Cunningham, Abdullah Gök, Philip Shapira. 2013. Impacts of Innovation Policy: Synthesis and Conclusion. Nesta Working Paper 13/21.
   Google Scholar
• Elder, Jakob. 2013. Review of Policy Measures to Stimulate Private Demand for Innovation: Concepts and Effects. Nesta Working Paper No. 13/13.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, Kieron, Elvira Uyarra, and Manuel Laranja. 2011. “Reconceptualising the ‘Policy Mix’ for Innovation.” Research Policy 40 (5): 702–713. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriques, Luisa, and Philippe Larédo. 2013. “Policy-making in Science Policy: The ‘OECD Model’ Unveiled.” Research Policy 42 (3): 801–816. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C., J. Su, X. Xie, X. Ye, Z. Li, A. Porter, and J. Li. 2015. “A Bibliometric Study of China’s Science and Technology Policies: 1949–2010.” Scientometrics 102 (2): 1521–1539. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1406-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intersolution. 2015. Russian Foreign Trade, Export and Import Structures. St. Petersburg: Intersolution. http://www.intersolution.eu/about/.
   Google Scholar
• Klochikhin, Evgeny A. 2012. “Russia’s Innovation Policy: Stubborn Path-dependencies and New Approaches.” Research Policy 41 (9): 1620–1630. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• deLeon, Peter, and Linda deLeon. 2002. “What Ever Happened to Policy Implementation? An Alternative Approach.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12 (4): 467–492. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Feng-chao, Denis Fred Simon, Yu-tao Sun, and Cong Cao. 2011. “China’s Innovation Policies: Evolution, Institutional Structure, and Trajectory.” Research Policy 40 (7): 917–931. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, Zedong. 1966. 5.7 Instructions – Letter to Lin Biao. May 7, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Matland, Richard E. 1995. “Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-conflict Model of Policy Implementation.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 5 (2): 145–174.
   Google Scholar
• National Bureau of Statistics. 1999. Rise of Rural and Township Enterprises – Part 6 of the 50 Years of New China Series. Beijing. http://www.stats.gov.cn/ztjc/ztfx/xzg50nxlfxbg/200206/t20020605_35964.html.
   Google Scholar
• Nill, Jan, and René Kemp. 2009. “Evolutionary Approaches for Sustainable Innovation Policies: From Niche to Paradigm?” Research Policy 38 (4): 668–680. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2011. Demand-side Innovation Policies. OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264098886-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2012. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2012. OECD. doi:10.1787/sti_outlook-2012-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2014. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2014. OECD. doi:10.1787/sti_outlook-2014-en.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole Jr., Laurence J. 2000. “Research on Policy Implementation: Assessment and Prospects.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (2): 263–288. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024270
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. Guy. 2000. “Policy Instruments and Public Management: Bridging the Gaps.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (1): 35–47. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024265
   Google Scholar
• Radosevic, Slavo. 2003. “Patterns of Preservation, Restructuring and Survival: Science and Technology Policy in Russia in Post-Soviet Era.” Research Policy 32 (6): 1105–1124. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00117-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shyu, Joseph Z., Yi-Chia Chiu, and Chao-Chen You. 2001. “A Cross-national Comparative Analysis of Innovation Policy in the Integrated Circuit Industry.” Technology in Society 23 (2): 227–240. doi: 10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00011-2
   Google Scholar
• Sorg, James D. 1983. “A Typology of Implementation Behaviors of Street-level Bureaucrats.” Review of Policy Research 2 (3): 391–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1983.tb00725.x
   Google Scholar
• State of the Province Archives of Fujian. 2006. “Chorography of Jinjiang City.” Local Chorography. http://www.fjsq.gov.cn/ShowText.asp?ToBook=6049&index=95&.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Haijie. 2005. “New Explanation for the Differences in Performance between China and Russia in Transitions.” Russian and Central Asian and Eastern European Markets No. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Suriñach, Jordi, Corinne Autant-Bernard, Fabio Manca, Nadine Massard, and Rosina Moren. 2009. The Diffusion/Adoption of Innovation in the Internal Market. Brussels: European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Wezeman, Pieter D., and Siemon T. Wezeman. 2015. “Trends in International Arms Transfers 2014.” SIPRI Fact Sheet: 1–8.
   Google Scholar