Are polish theatres autonomous? Artistic institutions in a bureaucratic system of culture funding

References

• Act on Organising and Running Cultural Activity of October 25. 1991. Access to English version: http://www.eui.eu/Projects/InternationalArtHeritageLaw/Documents/NationalLegislation/Poland/actorganizingrunningculturalactivities.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E. 2004. “Auditing Culture: The Subsidised Cultural Sector in the New Public Management.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 10 (2): 183–202. doi: 10.1080/10286630042000255808
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E., and O. Bennett. 2007. “Rethinking the Social Impacts of the Arts.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 13 (2): 135–151. doi: 10.1080/10286630701342741
   Google Scholar
• Blomgren, R. 2012. “Autonomy or Democratic Cultural Policy: That Is the Question.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 18 (5): 519–529. doi: 10.1080/10286632.2012.708861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukowiecki, L. 2015. “Nie boję się silnego PiS, lecz jego bezczynności w kulturze.” [I Do Not Fear a Strong Law and Justice, I Fear Its Passivity in Culture]. Res Publica Nowa, November 3. Accessed 3 February 2016. http://publica.pl/teksty/bukowiecki-nie-boje-sie-silnego-pis-lecz-jego-bezczynnosci-w-kulturze-53800.html.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, P. 2001. “New Labour and the Politics of Depoliticisation.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 3 (2): 127–149. doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.00054
   Google Scholar
• Burns, R., and W. van der Will. 2003. “German cultural policy: and overview.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 9 (2): 133–152.
   Google Scholar
• Cattani, G., S. Ferriani, and P. D. Allison. 2014. “Insiders, Outsiders, and the Struggle for Consecration in Cultural Fields: A Core-Periphery Perspective.” American Sociological Review 79 (2): 258–281. doi: 10.1177/0003122414520960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Laegreid. 2002. “New Public Management: Puzzles of Democracy and the Influence of Citizens.” Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (3): 267–295. doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, M., and R. Katz. 1987. “Government and the Arts: An Overview.” In The Patron State: Government and the Arts in Europe, North America and Japan, edited by M. Cummings and R. Katz, 3–16. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160. doi: 10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunin, K. 2015. Karaboska kulturkampf. Dziennik Opinii, May 19. Accessed 12 January 2016. http://www.krytykapolityczna.pl/felietony/20150519/karaboska-kulturkampf.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. 2003. “What Is Equality? Part 4: Political Equality.” In Philosophy and Democracy: An Anthology, edited by T. Christiano, 116–136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flinders, M., and J. Buller. 2006. “Depoliticization, Democracy and Arena Shifting.” In Autonomy and Regulation: Coping with Agencies in the Modern State, edited by P. Lægreid and T. Christensen, 53–80. London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. 1941. Escape from Freedom. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
   Google Scholar
• GUS [Central Statistical Office of Poland]. 2010-2014. Wydatki na kulturę w latach 2010-2014 roku [Culture Spending in 2010-2014]. Accessed 12 January 2016. http://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/kultura-turystyka-sport/kultura/.
   Google Scholar
• Hausner, J., K. Malczyk, Ł. Maźnica, and J. Strycharz. 2016. Diagnoza potencjału podmiotów kultury w zakresie realizacji Programu Rozwoju Kultury 2020: analiza sytuacji zastanej [Diagnosis of Cultural Actors’ Potential in Realisation of Culture Development Programme 2020: An Analysis of Current Situation]. Krakow: Fundacja GAP.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, S. 2015. “Arm’s-length Funding of the Arts as an Expression of Laissez-faire.” International Journal of Cultural Policy. doi:10.1080/10286632.2015.1068766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman-Chartrand, H., and C. McCaughey. 1989. “The Arm’s Length Principle and the Arts: An International Perspective – Past, Present and Future.” In Who’s to Pay for the Arts? The International Search for Models of Support, edited by M. Cummings and J. M. D. Schuster, 43–73. New York, NY: American Council for the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Hołda, J. 2012. Komentarz do ustawy o organizowaniu i prowadzeniu działalności kulturalnej [Act on Organising and Running Cultural Activity: A Commentary]. Warsaw: National Centre for Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Ilczuk, D. 2015. “Cultural Policy Profile: Poland.” Compendium: Cultural policies and Trends in Europe. Accessed 11 May 2016. http://www.culturalpolicies.net/web/poland.php.
   Google Scholar
• Inkei, P. 2001. Arm’s Length Financing in Culture: Why? Why Not? Budapest: Budapest Observatory. http://www.budobs.org/grant-paper-dec.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Iwański, M. 2015. “Niebezpieczne związki biznesu ze sztuką.” [Dangerous Liaisons of Business and Art]. Kultura się Liczy, March 4. Accessed 5 March 2015. http://nck.pl/blog-kultura-sie-liczy/316932-niebezpieczne-zwiazki-biznesu-ze-sztuka/.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2003. “(No?) Accounting for Expertise.” Science and Public Policy 30 (3): 157–162. doi: 10.3152/147154303781780542
   Google Scholar
• Karna, W. J. 2008. Zmiany w zarządzaniu publicznymi instytucjami kultury [Changes in Public Management of Cultural Institutions]. Krakow: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
   Google Scholar
• Klaic, D. 2012. Resetting the Stage: Public Theatre Between the Market and Democracy. Bristol: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Klamer, A., L. Petrova, and A. Mignosa. 2006. Financing the Arts and Culture in the European Union. Policy Department Structural and Cohesion Policies. Accessed 9 April 2016. http://www.culturalpolicies.net/web/files/134/en/Financing_the_Arts_and_Culture_in_the_EU.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowska, K. 2016. “Using Isaiah Berlin’s Two Concepts of Liberty to Rethink Cultural Policy: A Case of Poland.” International Journal of Cultural Policy. doi:10.1080/10286632.2016.1156101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looseley, D. 2001. Cultural Policy in France since 1959: Arm’s Length, or ‘Up Close and Personal?’. Nordic Cultural Institute. Accessed 8 April 2016. http://fgimello.free.fr/documents/florida/cultural_policy_in_france.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lowell, J., and E. Ondaatje. 2006. The Arts and State Governments: At Arm’s Length or Arm in Arm? Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. Accessed 8 April 2016. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG359/.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, C. 2009. The Independence of Government Arts Funding: A Review. D’Art topics in art policy, no. 9, International Federation of Arts Councils and Culture Agencies, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Mangset, P. 2009. “The Arm’s Length Principle and the Art Funding System: Comparative Approach.” In What About Cultural Policy? Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Culture and Politics, edited by M. Pyykkönen, N. Simanainen and S. Sokka, 273–298. Jyväskylä: Minerva Kustannus.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., and J. P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matarasso, F., and C. Landry. 1999. Balancing Act: Twenty-one Strategic Dilemmas in Cultural Policy. Cultural Policies Research and Development Unit. Council of Europe Publishing. Accessed 7 April 2016. http://www.artsmanagement.net/downloads/cultural-strategy-dilemmas.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, K. V. 2006. “Cultural Policy: Definitions and Theoretical Approaches.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 35 (4): 319–330. doi: 10.3200/JAML.35.4.319-330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murzyn-Kupisz, M. 2010. “Cultural Policy at the Regional Level: A Decade of Experiences of New Regions in Poland.” Cultural Trends 19 (1–2): 65–80. doi: 10.1080/09548961003696070
   Google Scholar
• Ploeg van der, F. 2005. “The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective.” CESifo Working Paper, no. 1524. Accessed 17 April 2016. http://www.cesifogroup.de/pls/guestci/download/CESifo%20Working%20Papers%202005/CESifo%20Working%20Papers%20August%202005/cesifo1_wp1524.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Płoski, P. 2009. Przemiany organizacyjne teatru w Polsce w latach 1989–2009 [Organisational Changes in Polish Theatre in 1989–2000]. Study commissioned by Ministry of Culture and National Heritage. Accessed 7 April 2016. http://www.kongreskultury.pl/library/File/RaportTeatr/teatr_raport_w.pelna(1).pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, R.-B. M. 1997. “Distance or intimacy?—The Arm’s Length Principle, the British Government and the Arts Council of Great Britain.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 4 (1): 127–159. doi: 10.1080/10286639709358066
   Google Scholar
• Ratiu, D.-E. 2007. “The Arts Support System in a Transitional Society: Romania 1990-2006.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 37 (3): 201–224. doi: 10.3200/JAML.37.3.201-224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratiu, D.-E. 2009. “Cultural Policy and Values: Intrinsic Versus Instrumental? The Case of Romania.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 39 (1): 24–44. doi: 10.3200/JAML.39.1.24-44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindzevičiūtė, E. 2012. “Post-Soviet Transformation of Lithuanian State Cultural Policy: The Meanings of Democratisation.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 18 (5): 563–578. doi: 10.1080/10286632.2012.718916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, D. 2004. “‘Civic Gold’ Rush: Cultural Planning and the Politics of the Third Way.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 10 (1): 119–131. doi: 10.1080/1028663042000212364
   Google Scholar
• Tomczyk, E. 2012. Instytucja kultury nie jest formalnie podporządkowana swojemu organizatorowi [Cultural Institution Is Not Formally Subordinated to Its Organiser]. Accessed 17 April 2016. http://www.samorzad.lex.pl/czytaj/-/artykul/instytucja-kultury-nie-jest-formalnie-podporzadkowana-swojemu-organizatorowi/.
   Google Scholar
• Towse, R. 2010. A Textbook of Cultural Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trzeciak, H. 2011. Ekonomika teatru [Theatre Economics]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Teatralnego.
   Google Scholar
• Ulldemolins, J. R., and A. R. Arostegui. 2013. “The Governance of National Cultural Organisations: Comparative Study of Performance Contracts with the Main Cultural Organisations in England, France and Catalonia (Spain).” International Journal of Cultural Policy 19 (2): 249–269. doi: 10.1080/10286632.2011.638981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upchurch, A. R. 2011. “Keynes’s Legacy: An Intellectual’s Influence Reflected in Arts Policy.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 17 (1): 69–80. doi: 10.1080/10286630903456851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestheim, G. 2009. “The Autonomy of Culture and the Arts – from the Early Bourgeois Era to Late Modern ‘Runaway World’.” In What About Cultural Policy? Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Culture and Politics, edited by M. Pyykkönen, N. Simanainen and S. Sokka, 31–53. Jyväskylä: Minerva Kustannus.
   Google Scholar
• Vojtíšková, K., and R. Lorencová. 2014. “Public Funding of Culture in the Czech Republic Since the Fall of the Iron Curtain: Contemporary Dilemmas.” International Journal of Cultural Policy. doi:10.1080/10286632.2014.931380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar