Policy instrument affordances: a framework for analysis

References

• Anderson, C. W. 1971. “Comparative Policy Analysis: The Design of Measures.” Comparative Politics 4 (1): 117–132. doi: 10.2307/421437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barwise, J. 1989. The Situation in Logic. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language (CSLI).
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1980. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chemero, A. 2003. “An Outline of a Theory of Affordances.” Ecological Psychology 15 (2): 181–195. doi: 10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. 2004. “Textual Agency: How Texts Do Things in Organizational Settings.” Organization 11: 373–393. doi: 10.1177/1350508404041998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R., and C. Lindblom. 1953. Politics, Economics and Welfare. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Demir, R. 2015. “Strategic Activities as Bundled Affordances.” British Journal of Management 26: S125–S141. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F. 1987. “Instruments and Strategy in Public Policy.” Policy Studies Review 7 (1): 174–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1987.tb00036.x
   Google Scholar
• Fayard, A.-L., and J. Weeks. 2007. “Photocopiers and Water-Coolers: The Affordances of Informal Interaction.” Organization Studies 28 (5): 1391–1413. doi: 10.1177/0170840606068310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayard, A.-L., and J. Weeks. 2014. “Affordances for Practice.” Information and Organization 24: 236–249. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, L. A. 2013. “Rethinking Soft OR Interventions: Models as Boundary Objects.” European Journal of Operational Research 231: 720–733. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.06.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridlund, M. 2012. “Affording Terrorism: Idealists and Materialities in the Emergence of Modern Terrorism.” In Terrorism and Affordance, edited by M. Taylor and P. M. Curry, 73–92. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, W. W. 1991. “Technology Affordances.” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 79–84, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, W. 2010. “Policy Instruments and the Common Agricultural Policy.” West European Politics 33 (1): 22–38. doi: 10.1080/01402380903354049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. 2010. “What Is an Affordance and Can it Help us Understand the Use of ICT in Education?” Education and Information Technologies 15 (3): 205–217. doi: 10.1007/s10639-009-9106-z
   Google Scholar
• Hartson, H. R. 2003. “Cognitive, Physical, Sensory and Functional Affordances in Interaction Design.” Behavior and Information Technology 22 (5): 315–338. doi: 10.1080/01449290310001592587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. C. 1986. The Tools of Government. Chatham: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. C. 2007. “Intellectual Obsolescence and Intellectual Makeovers: Reflections on the Tools of Government after Two Decades.” Governance 20 (1): 127–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00347.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. C., ed. 2010. Paradoxes of Modernisation: Unintended Consequences of Public Policy Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. 1991. “Policy Instruments, Policy Styles, and Policy Implementation: National Approaches to Theories of Instrument Choice.” Policy Studies Journal 19 (2): 1–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1991.tb01878.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I. 2001. “Technologies, Texts and Affordances.” Sociology 35 (2): 441–456. doi: 10.1177/S0038038501000219
   Google Scholar
• John, P. 2011. Making Policy Work. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• John, P. 2013. “All Tools Are Informational Now: How Information and Persuasion Define the Tools of Government.” Policy and Politics 41: 605–620. doi: 10.1332/030557312X655729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, J. H., C. Schneider, and J. Valacich. 2010. “Enhancing the Motivational Affordance of Information Systems: The Effects of Real Time Performance Feedback and Goal Setting in Group Collaboration Environments.” Management Science 56: 724–742. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassim, H., and P. Le Galés. 2010. “Exploring Governance in a Multi-level Polity: A Policy Instruments Approach.” West European Politics 33 (1): 1–21. doi: 10.1080/01402380903354031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lascoumes, P., and P. Le Galés. 2007. “Introduction: Understanding Public Policy Through its Instruments – From the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation.” Governance 20 (1): 1–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Galés, P. 2016. “Performance Meansurement as a Policy Instrument.” Policy Studies 37 (6): 508–520. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2016.1213803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. 2011. “When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordances, Constraints and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies.” MIS Quarterly 35 (1): 147–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, S. H., and B. G. Peters. 1989. “Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts.” Journal of Public Policy 9 (1): 35–38. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X00007960
   Google Scholar
• Lowi, T. J. 1972. “Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice.” Public Administration Review 32 (4): 298–310. doi: 10.2307/974990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, James G., and J. P. Olsen. 2006. “The Logic of Appropriateness.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, edited by M. Moran, M. Rein, and R. E. Goodin, 689–708. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, L. 2008. Digitizing Race: Visual Cultures of the Internet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. 1998. The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. 2015. “Affordances: Commentary on the Special Issue of AI EDAM.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 29: 235–238. doi: 10.1017/S0890060415000232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. Behavioural Insights and Public Policy: Lessons from Around the World. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. 2000. “Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations.” Organization Science 11: 404–428. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M., and A. Meuwese. 2010. “Hard Questions and Equally Hard Solutions: Proceduralization Through Impact Assessment in the European Union.” West European Politics 33 (1): 136–153. doi: 10.1080/01402380903354189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radin, B. A. 2006. Challenging the Performance Movement: Accountability, Complexity and Democratic Values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reale, E., M. Nedeva, D. A. Thomas, and E. Primeri. 2014. “Evaluation through Impact: A Different Viewpoint.” fteval: Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation 39 (1): 36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, E. S. 1996. Encountering the World. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, D., and M. Smith. 2002. Governance and Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. 1999. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. 1981. “Rethinking Public Management: Third-party Government and the Changing Forms of Government Action.” Public Policy 29 (3): 256–275.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., and O. V. Elliott. 2002. The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scarantino, A. 2003. “Affordances Explained.” Philosophy of Science 70: 949–961. doi: 10.1086/377380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanfill, M. 2015. “The Interface as Discourse: The Production of Norms Through Web Design.” New Media and Society 17 (7): 1059–1074. doi: 10.1177/1461444814520873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turvey, M. 1992. “Affordances and Prospective Control. An Outline of the Ontology.” Ecological Psychology 4: 173–187. doi: 10.1207/s15326969eco0403_3
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S., and K. Grint. 1997. The Machine at Work: Technology, Work, and Organization. Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar