Local autonomy, municipal size and local political participation in Europe

References

• Allers, M., and B. Geertsema. 2014. The Effects of Local Government Amalgamation Spending and Service Levels. Evidence from 15 Years of Municipal Boundary Reform. Groningen: Coelo.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, C. W., and M. S. De Vries. 2007. “High Expectations, Varying Outcomes: Decentralization and Participation in Brazil, Japan, Russia and Sweden.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 73 (3): 424–451. doi: 10.1177/0020852307081151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and J. Gingrich. 2003. “Trends in Decentralizaton.” In Democracy Transformed?, edited by B. Cain, R. Dalton, and S. Scarrow, 140–163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, P. A., and M. K. Jennings. 1982. “Pathways to Participation.” The American Political Science Review 76 (1): 94–108. doi: 10.1017/S000305540018606X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J., and G. S. Lenz. 2010. “Education and Political Participation: Exploring the Causal Link.” Political Behavior 33 (3): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J. 2010. “Municipal Amalgamations and Common Pool Problems: The Danish Local Government Reform in 2007.” Scandinavian Political Studies 33 (1): 51–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2009.00239.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochsler, D. 2009. “Neighbours or Friends? When Swiss Cantonal Governments Co-Operate with Each Other.” Regional and Federal Studies 19 (3): 349–370. doi: 10.1080/13597560902957476
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., and A. Wille. 2010. Diplomademocratie: over de spanning tussen meritocratie en democratie. Den Haag: Prometheus-Bert Bakker.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, H. E. 1998. “Political Participation.” In Measures of Political Attitudes, edited by J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, and L. S. Wrightsman, 737–801. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cancela, J., and B. Geys. 2016. “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Meta-analysis of National and Subnational Elections.” Electoral Studies 42: 264–275. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEMR. 2013. Decentralisation at a Crossroads. Territorial Reforms in Europe in Times of Crisis. Brussels: Council of European Municipalities and Regions.
   Google Scholar
• Committee of the Regions. 2001. Voter Turnout at Regional and Local Elections in the European Union, 1990–2001. Brussels: Committee of the Regions.
   Google Scholar
• Dagger, R. 1981. “Metropolis, Memory, and Citizenship.” American Journal of Political Science 25 (4): 715–737. doi: 10.2307/2110760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. 1967. “The City in the Future Democracy.” American Political Science Review 61 (4): 953–970. doi: 10.2307/1953398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A., and E. R. Tufte. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Ceuninck, K., and K. Steyvers. 2014. Doet de grootte ertoe? Een vergelijkend onderzoek naar de factoren voor succes en/of falen van hervormingen aan de lokale schaal. Derde rapport. Leuven: Bestuurlijke Organisatie Slagkrachtige Overheid.
   Google Scholar
• De Rynck, F., J. Voets, and E. Wayenberg. 2011. “Schalen in België.” Bestuurskunde 20 (4): 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, M. S. 2000. “The Rise and Fall of Decentralization: A Comparative Analysis of Arguments and Practices in European Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 38 (2): 193–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denters, B., M. J. Goldsmith, A. Ladner, P. Mouritzen, and L. Rose. 2014. Size and Local Democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz-Serrano, L., and A. Rodríguez-Pose. 2015. “Decentralization and the Welfare State: What Do Citizens Perceive?” Social Indicators Research 120 (2): 411–435. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0599-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, J., and E. Amnå. 2012. “Political Participation and Civic Engagement: Towards a New Typology.” Human Affairs 22 (3): 283–300. doi: 10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1
   Google Scholar
• Fleurke, F., and R. Willemse. 2004. “Approaches to Decentralization and Local Autonomy: A Critical Appraisal.” Administrative Theory and Praxis 26 (4): 523–544.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, J., L. Baker, and C. Dawes. 2008. “Genetic Variation in Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 102 (2): 233–248. doi: 10.1017/S0003055408080209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, S. 2014. “Is It Time to Update the Definition of Political Participation? Political Participation in Britain: The Decline and Revival of Civic Culture.” Parliamentary Affairs 67 (2): 495–505. doi: 10.1093/pa/gss094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad, M. A. 2007. Politics and Volunteering in Japan: A Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajnal, L., and P. Lewis. 2003. “Municipal Institutions and Voter Turnout in Local Elections.” Urban Affairs Review 38 (5): 645–668. doi: 10.1177/1078087403038005002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, F. 2009. “Democratie in Zwitserland: Een voorbeeld voor Nederland?” Bestuurskunde 18 (4): 58–69.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbing, J. R., and E. Theiss-Morse. 2002. “The Perils of Voice: Political Involvement's Potential to Delegitimate.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Hickson, K. 2013. “The Localist Turn in British Politics and its Critics.” Policy Studies 34 (4): 408–421. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2013.822700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlepas, N. 2015. “Is It the Twilight of Decentralization? Testing the Limits of Functional Reforms in the Era of Austerity.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82 (2): 273–290. doi: 10.1177/0020852315581994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2010. Decentralisation and the Localism Bill: An Essential Guide. London: The Stationery Office London.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons. 2009. The Balance of Power: Central and Local Government. London: The Stationary Office Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, M., L. Stoker, and J. Bowers. 2009. “Politics Across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined.” Journal of Politics 71 (3): 782–799. doi: 10.1017/S0022381609090719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuffer, N. 2015. “Is the Propensity of a Local Government to Reform Dependent on its Local Autonomy? Evidence from Switzerland.” Paper presented at The IRSPM Conference 2015, Panel C101 – Special Interest Group in Local Governance, April 30, Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., and E. Wayenberg. 2015. “Institutional Impact Assessment in Multi-Level Systems: Conceptualizing Decentralization Effects From a Comparative Perspective.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82 (8): 233–254.
   Google Scholar
• Ladner, A. 2011. “Switzerland: Subsidiarity, Power-Sharing, and Direct Democracy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe, edited by J. Loughlin, F. Hendriks, and A. Lidström, 196–220. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ladner, A., N. Keuffer, and H. Baldersheim. 2015. Final Report. Tender No 2014.CE.16.BAT.031: Self-rule Index for Local Authorities (Release 1.0). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Laffin, M. 2016. “Planning in England: New Public Management, Network Governance or Post-Democracy?” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82 (2): 354–372. doi: 10.1177/0020852315581807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibfritz, W. 2009. Fiscal Federalism in Belgium (Vol. 743). Parijs: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, W. 2013. “Federalism: The Case of Switzerland.” International Relations and Diplomacy 1 (3): 177–188.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, G., and R. Muir. 2010. “Localism Under new Labour.” The Political Quarterly 81 (s1): S96–S107. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2010.02223.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelsen, C., P. Boenisch, and B. Geys. 2014. “(De) Centralization and Voter Turnout: Theory and Evidence from German Municipalities.” Public Choice 159 (3-4): 469–483. doi: 10.1007/s11127-013-0061-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minas, R., S. Wright, and R. van Berkel. 2012. “Decentralization and Centralization: Governing the Activation of Social Assistance Recipients in Europe.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 32 (5-6): 286–298. doi: 10.1108/01443331211236989
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Interior. 2013. Evaluation of the Local Government Reform. Kopenhagen: Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Interior.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, S. 2015. Theorising Decentralisation. Comparative Evidence from Sub-National Switzerland. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. 2000. “City Size and Civic Involvement in Metropolitan America.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 361–373. doi: 10.2307/2586017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, K. 2014. “Decentralisaties in het lokaal bestuur: bestuurlijke lessen uit Denemarken.” Beleid en Maatschappij 41 (1): 80–88. doi: 10.5553/benm/138900692014041001013
   Google Scholar
• Pommer, E., and P. Van Houwelingen. 2015. “Public Administration.” In Public Sector Achievement in 36 Countries, edited by B. Goderis, 255–305. Den Haag: The Netherlands Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Raijmakers, L. 2014. Motieven voor decentralisatie. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Remmer, K. 2010. “Political Scale and Electoral Turnout: Evidence from the Less Industrialized World.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (3): 275–303. doi: 10.1177/0010414009352638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rühli, L. 2012. Gemeindeautonomie zwischen Illusion und Realität: Gemeindestrukturen und Gemeindestrukturpolitik der Kantone; Kantonsmonitoring 4. Zürich: Avenir Suisse.
   Google Scholar
• RvS. 2009. Decentraal moet, tenzij het alleen centraal kan. Den Haag: Raad van State.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. 2003. “Decentralization: Conceptualization and Measurement.” Studies in Comparative International Development 38 (3): 32–56. doi: 10.1007/BF02686198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. 1903. “The Metropolis and Mental Life.” In The Blackwell City Reader, edited by G. Bridge, and S. Watson (2002), 11–19. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Theocharis, Y. and Van Deth, J. 2016. The Continuous Expansion of Citizen Participation: A new Taxonomy. European Political Science Review: 1–24. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S1755773916000230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolbert, C. J., R. S. McNeal, and D. A. Smith. 2003. “Enhancing Civic Engagement: The Effect of Direct Democracy on Political Participation and Knowledge.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 3 (1): 23–41. doi: 10.1177/153244000300300102
   Google Scholar
• Ulbig, S. 2008. “Voice Is Not Enough.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (3): 523–539. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfn030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, N., K. Gregorowicz, and E. Groenendyk. 2009. “Efficacy, Emotions and the Habit of Participation.” Political Behavior 31 (3): 307–330. doi: 10.1007/s11109-008-9076-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vammalle, C., and H. Blöchliger. 2010. Local Government Reform in Denmark (2002–2007). Parijs: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Van Deth, J. 2014. “A Conceptual map of Political Participation.” Acta Politica 49 (3): 349–367. doi: 10.1057/ap.2014.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houwelingen, P. 2017. “Political Participation and Municipal Population Size: A Meta-Study.” Local Government Studies 43 (3): 408–428. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2017.1300147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houwelingen, P., A. Boele, and P. Dekker. 2014. Burgermacht op eigen kracht? Een brede verkenning van ontwikkelingen in burgerparticipatie. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S., and N. H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S., K. Schlozman, and H. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vetter, A. 2007. Local Politics: A Resource for Democracy in Western Europe?: Local Autonomy, Local Integrative Capacity, and Citizens’ Attitudes Toward Politics. London: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• White, S. 2011. Government Decentralizaton in the 21st Century. Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, L. 1938. “Urbanism as a Way of Life.” Journal of Sociology 44 (1): 1–24.
   Google Scholar