Understanding risk and regulatory reform

References

• (Van) Aken, W. G. 1993. The Collection and use of Human Blood and Plasma in Europe. Council of Europe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breyer, S. 1993. Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bult, J. M. 2003. “Response to the Review ‘Paying for Blood Donation: Still a Risk?” Vox Sanguinis 85: 48. doi: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2003.00317.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckley, N., and H. Selin. 2004. “All Talk, Little Action: Precaution and European Chemicals Regulation.” Journal of European Public Policy 11: 78–105. doi: 10.1080/1350176042000164316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. 1996. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism and the Politics of Knowledge. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority. 2008. Press Release ‘Hyperactivity and Children’. EFSA.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, A. 2005. “The Emergence of EU Governance in Public Health: the Case of Blood Policy and Regulation.” In Health Governance in Europe: Issues, Challenges, and Theories, edited by M. Steffen, 134–152. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, E. A., and R. Bayer, eds. 1999. Blood Feuds: AIDS, Blood, AIDS, Blood and the Politics of Medical Disaster. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritier, A. 1999. Policy Making and Diversity in Europe: Escaping Deadlock. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Hervey, T. K., and J. V. McHale. 2005. “Law, Health and the European Union.” Legal Studies 25 (2): 228–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2005.tb00614.x
   Google Scholar
• Hornstein, D. 2003. “Reclaiming Environmental Law: A Normative Critique of Comparative Risk Analysis.” Columbia Law Review 92: 562–634. doi: 10.2307/1122954
   Google Scholar
• HCSCST (House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology). 2015. Oral Evidence GM Foods and the Application of the Precautionary Principle in Europe. London: Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• James, P., F. Kempler, and G. Pascal. 1999. A European Public Health and Food Authority: The Future of Scientific Advice in the EU. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policy Makers. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kingsbury, B., N. Krisch, R. Stewart, and J. B. Weiner. 2005a. “Global Governance as Administration-National and Transnational Approaches to Global Administration.” Law and Contemporary Problems 68 (3–4): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsbury, B., N. Krisch, and R. B. Stewart. 2005b. “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law.” Law and Contemporary Problems 68 (3–4): 16–62.
   Google Scholar
• Leikola, J., W. G. van Aken, C. Hogman, D. Lee, M. Muglia, and H. Schmitt. 1992. Plasma Products and European Self-Sufficiency: Collection, Preparation and Use. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, P., and S. Ward. 1998. British Environmental Policy and Europe: Politics and Policy in Transition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McGarity, T. 2003. “On the Prospect of Daubertizing Judicial Review of Risk Assessment.” Law and Contemporary Problems 66: 165–167.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, R. 2003. “Foreword.” Law and Contemporary Problems 66: 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Peel, J. 2004. Risk Regulation Under the WTO SPS Agreement: Science as an International Normative Yardstick? New York: University Law School.
   Google Scholar
• Raul, A., and J. Dwyer. 2003. “Regulatory Daubert: A Proposal to Enhance Judicial Review of Agency by Incorporating Daubert Principles Into Administrative Law.” Law and Contemporary Problems 66: 7–44.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeleer, N. 2002. Environmental Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scientific Committee on Medicinal Products and Medical Devices. 2000. Opinion on Quality and Safety of Blood. European Commission Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General. SANCO/SCMPMD/2000/2005 final.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, G. 1998. “Conserving the Emerald Tiger: The Politics of Environmental Regulation in Ireland.” Environmental Politics 7 (4): 53–74. doi: 10.1080/09644019808414422
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, G. 2009. “The Reconfiguration of Risk in the British State.” Public Policy and Administration 24: 379–398. doi: 10.1177/0952076709340509
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, G. 2011. “Risk and Financial Armageddon in Ireland: The Politics of the Galway Tent.” Political Quarterly 82 (4): 596–608. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2011.02239.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, G. 2012. “Risk, Prudence and the Politics of an Irish Financial Haircut: A Comment on the Honohan Report.” Administration 60 (2): 97–112.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, G., and M. Millar. 2002. “The Appliance of Science: The Politics of European Food Regulation and Reform.” Public Policy and Administration 17 (2): 125–146. doi: 10.1177/095207670201700208
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, G., and M. Millar. 2004. “The Politics of Food Regulation and Reform in Ireland.” Public Administration 13 (4): 125–146.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, G., and Martin Power. 2010. “Risk, science and blood: The politics of the haemophilia crisis in Ireland.” Health, Risk & Society 12 (6): 515–530. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=t713424479~tab=issueslist~branches=12 – v1212. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2010.515735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, G., and Martin Power. 2016. “Risk, Science and the Politics of the Blood Scandals in Ireland, Scotland, England and Finland.” Irish Studies in International Relations 27: 109–124.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. 2003. “The Hare and the Tortoise Revisited: The New Politics of Consumer and Environmental Regulation in Europe.” British Journal of Political Science 33: 557–580. doi: 10.1017/S0007123403000255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. 2012. The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety, and Environmental Risks in Europe and the United States. Washington, DC: Princeton University Press.U.S.A National Research Council, Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, (Red Book) National Academies Press. (1983).
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W. 2003. “The ‘Bad Science’ Fiction: Reclaiming the Debate Over the Role of Science in Public Health and Environmental Regulation.” Law and Contemporary Problems 66: 63–133.
   Google Scholar