Decentralization and functional assignment in Indonesia: the case of health and education services

References

• Aboukhadijeh, Feross. 2012. “Chapter 3: American Federalism” Study Notes.org. Study Notes, LLC., November 17. Web. February 25, 2017. <https://www.apstudynotes.org/us-government/vocabulary/chapter-3-american-federalism/>.
   Google Scholar
• Aguma, K. C. 2012. “The Principle of Ultra Vires and the Local Authorities’ Decisions in England.” Master Thesis in Advanced Legal Studies, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, Junaid, S. Devarajan, S. Khemani, and Shah, S. 2005. Decentralization and Service Delivery. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3603. World Bank, Washington, DC. May.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, Ehtisham, and Ali Mansoor. 2002. Indonesia: Managing Decentralization. IMF Working Paper 136, Fiscal Affairs Department and Independent Evaluation Office, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., and L. Schroeder. 2003. “Sectoral Decentralisation and Intergovernmental Arrangements in Africa.” Public Administration and Development 23: 29–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ascher, William. 2007. “Policy Sciences Contribution to Analysis to Promote Sustainability.” Sustainability Science 2 (2): 141–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asthana, A. N. 2004. Corruption and Decentralization: Evidence from India’s Water Sector. http://www.waterintegritynetwork.net/index.php?option = com_mtree&task + att_download&link_id = 57&cf_id = 61.
   Google Scholar
• Ausland, A., and A. Tolmos. 2005. How to Secure the Aims of Decentralization in Peru by Improving Good Governance at the Regional Level. http://www.hiidunia.com/wpcontent/uploads/2011/09/Decentralization-and-Corruption-in-Peru.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Azfar, Omar, Tugrul Gurgur, Satu Kahkonen, Anthony Lanyi, and Patrick Meagher. 2000. Decentralization and Governance: An Empirical Investigation of Public Service Delivery in the Philippines. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, Center for Institutional Reform and the Informal Sector.
   Google Scholar
• Azfar, Omar, Satu Kahkonen, Anthony Lanyi, Patrick Meagher, and Diana Rutherford. 1999. Decentralization, Governance and Public Services: The Impact of Institutional Arrangements—A Review of the Literature. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, Center for Institutional Reform and the Informal Sector.
   Google Scholar
• Azfar, Omar, Satu Kahkonen, and Patrick Meagher. 2001. Conditions for Effective Decentralized Governance: A Synthesis of Research Findings. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, Center for Institutional Reform and the Informal Sector.
   Google Scholar
• Barankay, I., and B. Lockwood. 2007. “Decentralization and the Productive Efficiency of Government: Evidence From Swiss Cantons.” Journal of Public Economics 91: 1197–1218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berita Satu. 2015. Penyerapan Anggaran Rendah, Ini Penyebabnya. www.beritasatu.com/nasional/303100-penyerapan-anggaran-rendah-ini-penyebabnya.html
   Google Scholar
• Bilouseac, I., and P. Zaharia. 2010. “Decentralisation and Subsidiarity in the Management of Local Public Administration.” Fascicle of The Faculty of Economics and Public Administration 10 (1): 255–261.
   Google Scholar
• Blunt, P., and M. Turner. 2007. “Decentralization, Deconcentration, and Poverty Reduction in the Asia Pacific.” In Decentralizing Governance: Emerging Concepts and Practices, edited by G. S. Cheema, and D. A. Rondinelli, 115–131. Washington, DC: Brooking Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, N. 2006. “Federal Dynamics in Canada, the United States, and Switzerland: How Substates’ Internal Organization Affects Intergovernmental Relations.” The Journal of Federalism 36 (4): 471–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brillantes Jr., Alex B., and Nora G. Cuachon. 2002. Decentralization and Power Shift An Imperative for Good Governance: A Sourcebook on Decentralization Experiences in Asia. Volume I. CLRG Working Papers Series 2002/02.
   Google Scholar
• Brunet-Jailly, Emmanuel, and John Francis Martin. 2010. Local Government in a Global World: Australia and Canada in Comparative Perspective, 82–84. London: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheema, G. S., and D. A. Rondinelli. 2007. Decentralizing Governance: Emerging Concepts and Practices. Washington, DC: Brooking Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conyers, D. 2007. “Decentralization and Service Delivery: Lessons from Sub-Saharan Africa.” IDS Bulletin 38 (1): 18–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crook, R. 2003. “Decentralisation and Poverty Reduction in Africa: The Politics of Local-Central Relations.” Public Administration and Development 23 (1): 77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Mello, Luiz, and Matias Barenstein. 2001. Fiscal Decentralization and Governance: A Cross-Country Analysis. IMF Working Paper 71, Fiscal Affairs Department, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Faguet, J. P. 2004. “Does Decentralization Increase Government Responsiveness to Local Needs? Evidence From Bolivia.” Journal of Public Economics 88: 867–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrazzi, Gabriel, and Rainer Rohdewold. 2009. Functional Assignment in Multi-Level Government. Eschborn: GTZ.
   Google Scholar
• Hebert, L. J. 2011. “Tocqueville's “Administrative Decentralization” and the Catholic Principle of Subsidiarity.” The Catholic Social Science Review XVI: 241–258.
   Google Scholar
• Hiskey, J. T., and M. Seligson. 2003. “Pitfalls of Power to the People: Decentralization, Local Government Performance and System Support in Bolivia.” Studies in Comparative International Development 37 (4): 64–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G. W. 1974. “Intergovernmental Relations in Britain.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 416: 181–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahkhonen, Satu, and Anthony Lanyi. 2001. “Decentralization and Governance: Does Decentralization Improve Public Service Delivery?” PREM notes, no. 55 (June). World Bank, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Kalehmainen-Aitken, R. 1999. “Decentralization of the Health Sector.” In Decentralization Briefing Notes, edited by J. I. Litvack, and J. Seddon, 57–61. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Litvack, J. 1999. “Decentralization of Safety Nets.” In Decentralization Briefing Notes, edited by J. I. Litvack, and J. Seddon, 62–65. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Litvack, J. I., and J. Seddon. 1999. Decentralization Briefing Notes. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, E., and T. Esmail. 1999. “Natural Resources Management and Decentralization.” In Decentralization Briefing Notes, edited by J. I. Litvack, and J. Seddon, 77–82. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mahal, A., and V. Srivastava. 2000. People’s Participation, Decentralization and Delivery of Public Sector Services in India. National Council of Applied Economic Research Working Paper No. 71.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, K. 1999. “Decentralization of the Water Policy.” In Decentralization Briefing Notes, edited by J. I. Litvack, and J. Seddon, 72–76. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, K., and E. King. 1999. “Decentralization of the Education Sector.” In Decentralization Briefing Notes, edited by J. I. Litvack, and J. Seddon, 52–56. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nasution, A. 2016. Government Decentralization Program in Indonesia. ADBI Working Paper Series No. 601. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nickson, A. 2011. Where Is Local Government Going in Latin America? A Comparative Perspective. Working Paper No. 6, Swedish International Centre for Local Democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, Alan. 1994. International Handbook of Local and Regional Government: A Comparative Analysis of Advanced Democracies. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pramusinto, Agus. 2005. “The Dynamics of Change in Decentralization: Implications for Local Government-Business Relations, A Case Study of Decentralization in Sidoarjo, East Java, Indonesia.” PhD Thesis., Austalian National University, Canberra, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Pratikno. 2003. “Desentralisasi: Pilihan Yang Tidak Pernah Final.” In Jalan Terjal Reformasi Lokal, Dinamika Politik di Indonesia, edited by J. Schiller, 27–45. Yogyakarta: Program Pasca Sarjana Politik Lokal dan Otonomi Daerah, UGM.
   Google Scholar
• Rasyid, R. 2003. “Regional Autonomy and Local Politics in Indonesia.” In Local Power and Politics in Indonesia: Decentralization and Democratization, edited by E. Aspinal, and G. Fealy, 62–71. Singapore: ISEAS.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. 2007. “Introduction: Decentralising Service Delivery? Evidence and Policy Implications.” IDS Bulletin 38 (1): 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romeo, L. 2003. “The Role of External Assistance in Supporting Decentralization Reform.” Public Administration and Development 23 (1): 89–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rondinelli, Dennis A. 1983. “Implementing Decentralization Programmes in Asia: A Comparative Analysis.” Public Administration and Development 3 (3): 180–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rondinelli, Dennis A. 1986. “Extending Urban Services in Developing Countries: Policy Options and Organizational Choices.” Public Administration and Development 6 (1): 1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rondinelli, Dennis A. 1987. “Administrative Decentralization of Agricultural and Rural Development Programs in Asia: A Comparative Analysis.” In Agricultural Extension Worldwide, edited by W. M. Rivera, and S. G. Schram, 22–57. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Rondinelli, Dennis A. 1999. “What is Decentralization” In Decentralization Briefing Notes, edited by Litvack, Jennie and Seddon, Jessica, 2–5. WBI Working Papers. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Rondinelli, Dennis A., John R. Nellis, and G. Shabbir Cheema. 1983. Decentralization in Developing Countries: A Review of Recent Experience. World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 581. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Rondinelli, Dennis A., and Kenneth Ruddle. 1978. Urbanization and Rural Development: A Spatial Policy for Equitable Growth. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. 2003. “Decentralization: Conceptualization and Measurement.” Studies in Comparative International Development 38 (3): 32–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seabright, P. 1996. “Accountability and Decentralisation in Government: An Incomplete Contracts Model.” European Economic Review 40: 61–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon, J. 1999. “Decentralization of Infrastructure.” In Decentralization Briefing Notes, edited by J. I. Litvack, and J. Seddon, 66–71. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, Anwar. 1998. Balance, Accountability and Responsiveness: Lessons about Decentralization. Policy Research Working Paper 2021, World Bank, Operations Evaluation Department, Country and Regional Evaluation Division, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, C., and H. Zou. 2008. Fiscal Decentralization and Public Service Provision in China. CEMA Working Papers. Beijing: China Economics and Management Academy, Central University of Finance and Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Simeon, R. 2008. “Constitutional Design and Change in Federal Systems: Issues and Questions.” The Journal of Federalism 39 (2): 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. C. 1995. Decentralization: The Territorial Dimension of the State. George Allen and Unwinded Publisher Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Smoke, P. 2003. “Decentralisation in Africa: Goals, Dimensions, Myths and Challenges.” Public Administration and Development 23 (1): 7–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solé-Ollé, A., and A. Esteller-Moré. 2005. Does decentralization improve the efficiency in the allocation of public investment? Evidence from Spain. Working Paper 2005/5, Institut d’Economia de Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Southey, H. 2004. Judicial Review, A Practical Guide. Bristol: Jordan Publishing Limited. 39.
   Google Scholar
• Stegarescu, D. 2005. “Public Sector Decentralization: Measurement Concepts and Recent International Trends.” Fiscal Studies 26 (3): 301–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoa, R. 2014. “Subsidiarity in Principle: Decentralization of Water Resources Management.” Utrecht Law Review 10 (2): 31–45.
   Google Scholar
• Syaukani, H., A. Gaffar, and R. Rasyid. 2005. Otonomi Daerah Dalam Negara Kesatuan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
   Google Scholar
• Triandayani, L. N. D. 2011. Review Peraturan Pemerintah No. 38 Tahun 2007: Pembagian Urusan Pemerintahan antara Pemerintah, Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi, dan Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten/Kota dengan Menggunakan Model Managerial Grid, Policy Issues Paper No. 1, PGSP, UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Mark. 2002. “Whatever Happened to Deconcentration? Recent Initiatives in Cambodia.” Public Administration and Development 22 (4): 353–364.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP, UNICEF, UNCDF, UNESCO. Improving Local Service Delivery for the MDGs in Asia: Water and Sanitation Sector in Cambodia.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, H. W. R., and C. F. Forsyth. 2009. Administrative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 30.
   Google Scholar