Capacity, control, and content: the supply of think tank policy advice in India

References

• Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. 2013. “Economics Versus Politics: Pitfalls of Policy Advice.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 27 (2): 173–192. doi: 10.1257/jep.27.2.173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, Christina W. 2013. “Policy Analysis Styles in Brazil.” In Policy Analysis in Brazil. Bristol: Policy Press at University of Bristol, edited by J. Vaitsman, Lenaura Lobato, and J. M. Ribeiro, 27–38. Bristol: Policy Press at University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Boston, Jonathan. 1994. “Purchasing Policy Advice: The Limits to Contracting Out.” Governance 7 (1): 1–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.1994.tb00167.x
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, Barry. 1986. “The Credibility of Policy Analysis: Between Method and Use.” Policy Studies Journal 14 (4): 519–539. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1986.tb00358.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, Derick W, and Peter J Morgan. 2010. “Capacity and Capacity Development: Coping with Complexity.” Public Administration and Development 30 (1): 2–10. doi: 10.1002/pad.559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Elizabeth, Aprille Knox, Courtney Tolmie, Mary Kay Gugerty, Stephen Kosack, and Ashley Fabrizio. 2014. Linking Think Tank Performance, Decisions, and Context. Washington, DC: Results for Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Colebatch, Hal K, and Beryl A Radin. 2006. “Mapping the Work of Policy.” In The Work of Policy: An International Survey, edited by H. K. Colebatch, 217–226. Lanham: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Connaughton, Bernadette. 2010. “‘Glorified Gofers, Policy Experts or Good Generalists’: A Classification of the Roles of the Irish Ministerial Adviser.” Irish Political Studies 25 (3): 347–369. doi: 10.1080/07907184.2010.497636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, Jonathan, and Michael Howlett. 2012. “Policy Formulation, Governance Shifts and Policy Influence: Location and Content in Policy Advisory Systems.” Journal of Public Policy 32 (2): 79–98. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X12000049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, Jonathan, and Michael Howlett. 2013. “The Dual Dynamics of Policy Advisory Systems: The Impact of Externalization and Politicization on Policy Advice.” Policy and Society 32 (3): 187–197. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, Jonathan, and Matt Wilder. 2017. “Catching a Second Wave: Context and Compatibility in Advisory System Dynamics.” Policy Studies Journal 45 (1): 215–239. doi: 10.1111/psj.12133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraussen, Bert, and Darren Halpin. 2017. “Think Tanks and Strategic Policy-Making: The Contribution of Think Tanks to Policy Advisory Systems.” Policy Sciences 50 (1): 105–124. doi: 10.1007/s11077-016-9246-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluckman, Peter. 2014. “The Art of Science Advice to Government.” Nature 507 (7491): 163–165. doi: 10.1038/507163a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grindle, Merilee S, and John W Thomas. 1989. “Policy Makers, Policy Choices, and Policy Outcomes: The Political Economy of Reform in Developing Countries.” Policy Sciences 22 (3–4): 213–248. doi: 10.1007/BF00136320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, Peter M. 1992. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46 (1): 1–35. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halligan, John. 1995. “Policy Advice and the Public Service.” In Governance in a Changing Environment. Vol. 2, 138–172. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, Michael, and Benjamin Cashore. 2009. “The Dependent Variable Problem in the Study of Policy Change: Understanding Policy Change as a Methodological Problem.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 11 (1): 33–46. doi: 10.1080/13876980802648144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, Michael, Andrea Migone, and Seck L Tan. 2014. “Duplicative or Complementary? The Relationship Between Policy Consulting and Internal Policy Analysis in Canadian Government.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 47 (1): 113–134. doi: 10.1017/S0008423914000213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, Michael, and Joshua Newman. 2010. “Policy Analysis and Policy Work in Federal Systems: Policy Advice and its Contribution to Evidence-Based Policy-Making in Multi-Level Governance Systems.” Policy and Society 29 (2): 123–136. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, Michael, and Richard M Walker. 2012. “Public Managers in the Policy Process: More Evidence on the Missing Variable?” Policy Studies Journal 40 (2): 211–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00450.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustedt, Thurid, and Sylvia Veit. 2017. “Policy Advisory Systems: Change Dynamics and Sources of Variation.” Policy Sciences 50 (1): 41–46. doi: 10.1007/s11077-016-9272-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. 1982. “Professional Roles for Policy Analysts: A Critical Assessment.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 2 (1): 88–100. doi: 10.2307/3323652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelstrup, Jesper Dahl. 2017. “Quantitative Differences in Think Tank Dissemination Activities in Germany, Denmark and the UK.” Policy Sciences 50 (1): 125–137. doi: 10.1007/s11077-016-9254-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohli, Atul. 2004. State-directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krastev, Ivan. 2001. “Think Tanks: Making and Faking Influence.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 1 (2): 17–38. doi: 10.1080/14683850108454635
   Google Scholar
• Manwaring, Rob. 2017. “Understanding Impact in Policy Advisory Systems: The Australian Case of the “Thinker in Residence”.” International Journal of Public Administration 1–12. doi:10.1080/01900692.2017.1299177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur, Kuldeep. 2009. Policy Research Organisations in South Asia. New Delhi: Centre for the Study of Law and Governance, Jawaharlal Nehru University.
   Google Scholar
• Mathur, Navdeep, and Kuldeep Mathur. 2007. “Policy Analysis in India: Research Bases and Discursive Practices.” In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods, edited by F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, and M. Sidney, 630–670. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGann, James G. 2015. “2014 Global go to Think Tank Index Report.”
   Google Scholar
• McGann, James G. n.d.. “Profiles of Indian Think Tanks.” The Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Meltsner, Arnold J. 1976. Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Misztal, Barbara A. 2012. “Public Intellectuals and Think Tanks: A Free Market in Ideas?” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 25 (4): 127–141. doi: 10.1007/s10767-012-9126-3
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, Ishani, and Michael Howlett. 2015. “Who Is a Stream? Epistemic Communities, Instrument Constituencies and Advocacy Coalitions in Public Policy-Making.” Politics and Governance 3 (2): 65–75. doi: 10.17645/pag.v3i2.290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedley, Anthony. 2004. “Policy Transfer and the Developing-Country Experience Gap: Taking a Southern Perspective.” In Policy Transfer in Global Perspective, edited by M. Evans, 165–189. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pautz, Hartwig. 2011. “Revisiting the Think-Tank Phenomenon.” Public Policy and Administration 26 (4): 419–435. doi: 10.1177/0952076710378328
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. Guy, and Anthony Barker. 1993. Advising West European Governments: Inquiries, Expertise and Public Policy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prasser, Scott. 2006. “Providing Advice to Government.” Papers on Parliament. Canberra: Senate of Australia. http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/pops/*/link.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, Beryl A. 2000. Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of age. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saguin, Kidjie. 2018. “Policy Consulting in Developing Countries: Evidence From the Philippines.” Journal of Asian Public Policy 11 (2): 188–205. doi: 10.1080/17516234.2018.1462559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saguin, Kidjie, M. Ramesh, and Michael Howlett. 2018. “Policy Work and Capacities in a Developing Country: Evidence From the Philippines.” Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 40 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1080/23276665.2018.1436427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saint-Martin, Denis. 2004. Building the New Managerialist State: Consultants and the Politics of Public Sector Reform in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saint-Martin, Denis. 2005. “Management Consultancy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, edited by Ewan Ferlie, Laurence E. Lynn Jr, and Pollitt Christopher, 671–692. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, Rahul, N. N. Sharma, and Uday Jha. 2014. “Think Tanks, Research Influence and Public Policy in India.” Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective 18 (4): 289–297. doi: 10.1177/0972262914552173
   Google Scholar
• Snare, Charles E. 1995. “Windows of Opportunity: When and how can the Policy Analyst Influence the Policymaker During the Policy Process.” Review of Policy Research 14 (3–-4): 407–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1995.tb00719.x
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, Jayati. 2011. “Think Tanks in South Asia: Analysing the Knowledge–Power Interface.” Overseas Development Institute, January 1, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Diane. 1996. Capturing the Political Imagination: Think Tanks and the Policy Process. London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Diane. 2007. “Recycling Bins, Garbage Cans or Think Tanks? Three Myths Regarding Policy Analysis Institutes.” Public Administration 85 (2): 259–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00649.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg, Caspar F. 2017. “Dynamics in the Dutch Policy Advisory System: Externalization, Politicization and the Legacy of Pillarization.” Policy Sciences 50 (1): 63–84. doi: 10.1007/s11077-016-9257-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veit, Sylvia, Thurid Hustedt, and Tobias Bach. 2017. “Dynamics of Change in Internal Policy Advisory Systems: The Hybridization of Advisory Capacities in Germany.” Policy Sciences 50 (1): 85–103. doi: 10.1007/s11077-016-9266-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veselý, Arnošt. 2013. “Externalization of Policy Advice: Theory, Methodology and Evidence.” Policy and Society 32 (3): 199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, Carol H. 1979. “The Many Meanings of Research Utilization.” Public Administration Review 39 (5): 426–431. doi: 10.2307/3109916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellstead, Adam M, Richard C Stedman, and Michael Howlett. 2011. “Policy Analytical Capacity in Changing Governance Contexts: A Structural Equation Model (SEM) Study of Contemporary Canadian Policy Work.” Public Policy and Administration 26 (3): 353–373. doi: 10.1177/0952076710381933
   Google Scholar