Studying policy advisory systems: beyond the Westminster-bias?

References

• Aucoin, P. 2012. “New Political Governance in Westminster Systems: Impartial Public Administration and Management Performance at Risk.” Governance 25 (2): 177–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01569.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S. 2012. “The Challenges of Building Cosmopolitan Climate Expertise: The Case of Germany.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 3: 1–17. doi: 10.1002/wrna.100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum, S., and K. Schubert. 2013. Policy Analysis in Germany. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., and O. K. Pedersen. 2014. The National Origin of Policy Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, N. 1979. “The two-Communities Theory and Knowledge Utilization.” American Behavioral Scientist 22: 459–470. doi: 10.1177/000276427902200308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, J. 2016. Backrooms and Beyond: Partisan Advisers and the Politics of Policy Work in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, J., and J. Halligan. 2017. “Assessing 30 Years of Westminster Policy Advisory System Experience.” Policy Sciences 50 (1): 47–62. doi: 10.1007/s11077-016-9256-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, J., and M. Howlett. 2012. “Policy Formulation, Governance Shifts and Policy Influence: Location and Content in Policy Advisory Systems.” Journal of Public Policy 32 (2): 79–98. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X12000049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, J., and M. Howlett. 2013. “The Dual Dynamics of Policy Advisory Systems: The Impact of Externalization and Politicization on Policy Advice.” Policy and Society 32 (3): 187–197. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlström, C., B. G. Peters, and J. Pierre. 2011. Steering From the Centre: Strengthening Political Control in Western Democracies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eichbaum, C., and R. Shaw, eds. 2010. Partisan Appointees and Public Servants. An International Analysis of the Role of the Political Adviser. London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fobé, E., M. Brans, D. Vancoppenolle, and J. Van Damme. 2013. “Institutionalized Advisory Systems: An Analysis of Member Satisfaction of Advice Production and use Across 9 Strategic Advisory Councils in Flanders (Belgium).” Policy and Society 32 (3): 225–240. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraussen, B., and D. Halpin. 2017. “Think Tanks and Strategic Policy-Making: The Contribution of Think Tanks to Policy Advisory Systems.” Policy Sciences 50 (1): 105–124. doi: 10.1007/s11077-016-9246-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouglas, A. 2015. “Greek Ministerial Advisers: Policy Managers, Not Experts?” International Journal of Public Administration 38 (1): 15–27. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2014.949744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouglas, A., M. Brans, and S. Jaspers. 2017. “European Commissioner Cabinet Advisers: Policy Managers, Bodyguards, Stakeholder Mobilizers.” Public Administration 95 (2): 359–377. doi: 10.1111/padm.12301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grube, D. C., and C. Howard. 2016. “Is the Westminster System Broken Beyond Repair?” Governance 29 (4): 467–481. doi: 10.1111/gove.12230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1968. “Verwissenschaftlichte Politik und öffentliche Meinung.” In Haber- mas, Jürgen: Technik und Wissenschaft als ‘Ideologie’, 120–145. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Halffman, W., and R. Hoppe. 2005. “Science/Policy Boundaries: A Changing Division of Labour in Dutch Expert Policy Advice.” In Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making, edited by S. Maasen and P. Weingart, 135–151. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, J. 1995. “Policy Advice and the Public Sector.” In Governance in a Changing Environment, edited by B. G. Peters and D. T. Savoie, 138–172. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. 2008. “Wicked Problems in Public Policy.” Public Policy 3 (2): 110–118.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. 2016. “Toward More “Evidence-Informed” Policy Making?” Public Administration Review 76 (3): 472–484. doi: 10.1111/puar.12475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W., and J. Alford. 2015. “Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management.” Administration and Society 47 (6): 711–739. doi: 10.1177/0095399713481601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W., and K. Crowley. 2015. Policy Analysis in Australia. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., and A. Migone. 2013a. “Policy Advice Through the Market: The Role of External Consultants in Contemporary Policy Advisory Systems.” Policy and Society 32 (3): 241–254. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., and A. Migone. 2013b. “The Search for Substance: Externalization, Politicization and the Work of Canadian Policy Consultants 2006–2013.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 7: 1.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., and A. Migone. 2014. “Assessing Contract Policy Work: Overseeing Canadian Policy Consultants.” Public Money and Management 34 (3): 173–180. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2014.908007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustedt, T. 2018. “Policy Design and Policy Advisory Systems.” In Routledge Handbook on Policy Design, edited by M. Howlett and I. Mukherjee, 201–211. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hustedt, T., and H. Houlberg Salomonsen. 2014. “Ensuring Political Responsiveness: Politicization Mechanisms in Ministerial Bureaucracies.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 80 (4): 746–765. doi: 10.1177/0020852314533449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustedt, T., and H. Houlberg Salomonsen. 2017. “Political Control of Coordination? The Roles of Ministerial Advisers in Government Coordination in Denmark and Sweden.” Public Administration 95 (2): 393–406. doi: 10.1111/padm.12312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustedt, T., and S. Veit. 2017. “Policy Advisory Systems: Change Dynamics and Sources of Variation.” Policy Sciences 50 (1): 41–46. doi: 10.1007/s11077-016-9272-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2011. “Cosmopolitan Knowledge: Climate Science and Global Civic Epistemology.” In Oxford Handbook on Climate Change and Society, edited by J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, and D. Schlosberg, 129–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelstrup, J. Dahl. 2017. “Quantitative Differences in Think Tank Dissemination Activities in Germany, Denmark and the UK.” Policy Sciences 50 (1): 125–137. doi: 10.1007/s11077-016-9254-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krick, E. 2015. “Negotiated Expertise in Policy-Making: How Governments use Hybrid Advisory Committees.” Science and Public Policy 42 (4): 487–500. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scu069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maley, M. 2011. “Strategic Links in a cut-Throat World: Rethinking the Role and Relationships of Australian Ministerial Staff.” Public Administration 89 (4): 1469–1488. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01928.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGann, J. G. 2016. 2015 Global Go to Think Tank Index Report Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Nachiappan, K. 2013. “Think Tanks and the Knowledge–Policy Nexus in China.” Policy and Society 32 (3): 255–265. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutley, S. M., I. Walter, and H. T. O. Davis. 2007. Using Evidence: How Research can Inform Public Services. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Page, Edward. 2010. “Has the Whitehall Model Survived?” International Review of Administrative Sciences 76 (3): 407–423. doi: 10.1177/0020852310373004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, Edward. 2012. Policy without Politicians. Bureaucratic Influence in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, M., and J. Pierre. 2005. Challenges to State Policy Capacity: Global Trends and Comparative Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., and A. Barker. 1993. Advising West European Governments: Inquiries, Expertise and Public Policy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W., J. Wanna, and P. Weller, eds. 2009. Comparing Westminster. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saguin, K., M. Ramesh, and M. Howlett. 2018. “Policy Work and Capacities in a Developing Country: Evidence from the Philippines.” Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 40 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1080/23276665.2018.1436427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saint-Martin, D. 1998. “The new Managerialism and the Policy Influence of Consultants in Government: An Historical Institutionalist Analysis of Britain, Canada and France.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 11 (3): 319–356. doi: 10.1111/0952-1895.00074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour-Ure, C. 1987. “Institutionalization and Informality in Advisory Systems.” In Advising the Rulers, edited by W. Plouwden, 175–184. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, R., and C. Eichbaum. 2015. “Follow the Yellow Brick Road: New Directions in Studying Political Advisers in Executive Government.” International Journal of Public Administration 38 (1): 1–3. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2014.980910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, R., and C. Eichbaum, eds. 2018. Ministers, Minders and Mandarins. An International Study of Relationships at the Executive Summit of Parliamentary Democracies. Cheltenham: Edard Elgar. in press.
   Google Scholar
• The LSE GV314 Group. 2017. “Politicians in White Coats? Scientific Advisory Committees and Policy in Britain.” Public Policy and Administration. Early view. doi:10.1177/0952076717711746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Berg, C. F. 2017. “Dynamics in the Dutch Policy Advisory System: Externalization, Politicization and the Legacy of Pillarization.” Policy Sciences 50 (1): 63–84. doi: 10.1007/s11077-016-9257-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedung, E. 1997. Public Policy and Program Evaluation. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Veit, S., T. Hustedt, and T. Bach. 2017. “Dynamics of Change in Internal Policy Advisory Systems: the Hybridization of Advisory Capacities in Germany.” Policy Sciences 50 (1): 85–103. doi: 10.1007/s11077-016-9266-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veselý, A. 2013. “Externalization of Policy Advice: Theory, Methodology and Evidence.” Policy and Society 32 (3): 199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veselý, A., M. Nekola, and Ï E. Hejzlarova. 2016. Policy Analysis in the Czech Republic. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. 1979. “The Many Meanings of Research Utilization.” Public Administration Review 39 (5): 426–431. doi: 10.2307/3109916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar