Making sense of complexity in governance: the case of local public management in the City of Stockholm

References

• Ackoff, R. L. 1978. The Art of Problem Solving. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and R. Geyer. 2017. “‘Pragmatic Complexity’ a New Foundation for Moving Beyond ‘Evidence-Based Policy Making’?” Policy Studies 38 (2): 149–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. 2013. Complexity Economics: A Different Framework for Economic Thought (March). INET. New York: Institute for New Economic Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P. 1992. “The Ethnography of a Medical Setting: Reading, Writing, and Rhetoric.” Qualitative Health Research 2 (4): 451–474.
   Google Scholar
• Aucoin, P. 1990. “Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums.” Governance 3 (2): 115–137.
   Google Scholar
• Bankes, S. 2011. “The Use of Complexity for Policy Exploration.” In The SAGE Handbook of Complexity and Management, edited by P. Allen, S. Maguire, and B. McKelvey, 570–589. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baranger, M. 2000. Chaos, Complexity, and Entropy. Cambridge: New England Complex Systems Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Battiston, S., J. D. Farmer, A. Flache, D. Garlaschelli, A. G. Haldane, H. Heesterbeek, C. Hommes, C. Jaeger, R. May, and M. Scheffer. 2016. “Complexity Theory and Financial Regulation.” Science 351 (6275): 818–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, J. A. C., and C. Oliver. 1991. “Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality.” Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 187–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., and D. A. Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billis, D. 2010. “Towards a Theory of Hybrid Organizations.” In Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector: Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy, edited by D. Billis, 46–69. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Black, N. 2001. “Evidence Based Policy: Proceed with Care Commentary: Research Must Be Taken Seriously.” BMJ: British Medical Journal 323 (7307): 275–279.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, T. 2006. Placing Health: Neighbourhood Renewal, Health Improvement and Complexity. Bristol: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borah, P. 2011. “Conceptual Issues in Framing Theory: A Systematic Examination of a Decade’s Literature.” Journal of Communication 61 (2): 246–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., and E. Loeffler. 2009. Public Management and Governance. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2008. Social Research Methods. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. 1998. Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., and R. Geyer. 2017. “A Critical Discussion of Complexity Theory: How Does ‘Complexity Thinking’improve our Understanding of Politics and Policymaking?” Complexity, Governance and Networks 3 (2): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Capra, F. 1996. The Web of Life. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2000. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Casti, J. L. 1997. Would-Be Worlds. How Simulation Is Changing the Frontiers of Science. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, F. G. 2004. The Future of the Welfare State: Crisis Myths and Crisis Realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, D., and J. N. Druckman. 2007. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid. 2011a. “Complexity and Hybrid Public Administration—Theoretical and Empirical Challenges.” Public Organization Review 11 (4): 407–423.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid. 2011b. “Democracy and Administrative Policy: Contrasting Elements of New Public Management (NPM) and Post-NPM.” European Political Science Review 3 (1): 125–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comfort, L. K., and A. G. Cahill. 1985. Increasing Problem Solving Capacity between Organizations: The Role of Information in Managing the May 31, 1985 Tornado Disaster in Western Pennsylvania. Boulder, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., and K. E. Weick. 1984. “Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems.” Academy of Management Review 9 (2): 284–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, B., and D. Sumara. 2006. Complexity and Education: Inquiries into Learning, Teaching, and Research. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D. L., and M. C. Suchman. 2008. “Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby, 49–77. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln, eds. 2005. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, A., and V. Galaz. 2008. “Governance and Complexity—Emerging Issues for Governance Theory.” Governance 21 (3): 311–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, P., and N. Ellison. 2009. “‘We Nicked Stuff from all Over the Place’: Policy Transfer or Muddling Through?” Policy and Politics 37 (3): 389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 2004. Projects of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, A. 2005. “Mixed Welfare Systems and Hybrid Organizations: Changes in the Governance and Provision of Social Services.” International Journal of Public Administration 28 (9–10): 737–748.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S. 1989. Order without Design. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C., and P. M. Hirsch. 2005. “The Discourse of Globalization: Framing and Sensemaking of an Emerging Concept.” American Sociological Review 70 (1): 29–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. 2006. “Sense Making and the Emergence of a New Form of Market Governance: the Case of the European Defense Industry.” American Behavioral Scientist 49 (7): 949–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossestøl, K., E. Breit, T. A. Andreassen, and L. Klemsdal. 2015. “Managing Institutional Complexity in Public Sector Reform: Hybridization in Front-Line Service Organizations.” Public Administration 93 (2): 290–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavrilov, L. A., and P. Heuveline. 2003. “Aging of Population.” In The Encyclopedia of Population, 32–37. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gershenson, C., and F. Heylighen. 2005. “How Can We Think the Complex?” In Managing Organizational Complexity: Philosophy, Theory and Application Volume 3, edited by K. A. Richardson, 47–62. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, R. 2012. “Can Complexity Move UK Policy Beyond ‘Evidence-Based Policy Making’ and the ‘Audit Culture’? Applying a ‘Complexity Cascade’ to Education and Health Policy.” Political Studies 60 (1): 20–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilad, B., S. Kaish, and P. D. Loeb. 1984. “From Economic Behavior to Behavioral Economics: The Behavioral Uprising in Economics.” Journal of Behavioral Economics 13 (1): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., and K. Chittipeddi. 1991. “Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Strategic Change Initiation.” Strategic Management Journal 12 (6): 433–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. 2003. The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the new Left. 2nd Rev. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., and J. Russell. 2009. “Evidence-Based Policymaking: A Critique.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 52 (2): 304–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurr, T. R., and D. King. 1987. The State and the City. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hannan, M. T., and J. Freeman. 1977. “The Population Ecology of Organizations.” American Journal of Sociology 82 (5): 929–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haveman, H. A., and H. Rao. 2006. “Hybrid Forms and the Evolution of Thrifts.” American Behavioral Scientist 49 (7): 974–986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, P. 2008. “Complexity Theory and Evaluation in Public Management.” Public Management Review 10 (3): 401–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration 69 (1): 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horeth, M. 1999. “No Way Out for the Beast? The Unsolved Legitimacy Problem of European Governance.” Journal of European Public Policy 6 (2): 249–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hybels, R. C. 1995. “On Legitimacy, Legitimation, and Organizations: A Critical Review and Integrative Theoretical Model.” Academy of Management Proceedings 1995: 241–245. doi:10.5465/ambpp.1995.17536509.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, L. R. 2014. “The Contested Politics of Public Value.” Public Administration Review 74 (4): 480–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, G. 1990. “Sub-Governments, Policy Communities and Networks: Refilling the Old Bottles?” Journal of Theoretical Politics 2 (3): 319–338.
   Google Scholar
• Juarrero, A. 2011. “Causality and Explanation.” In The SAGE Handbook of Complexity and Management, edited by P. Allen, S. Maguire, and B. McKelvey, 155–163. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kautto, M. 1999. “Changes in age Structure, Family Stability and Dependency.” In Nordic Social Policy: Changing Welfare States, edited by M. Kautto, M. Heikkilä, B. Hvinden, S. Marklund, and N. Ploug, 54–78. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kernick, D. 2004. Complexity and Healthcare Organization: A View from the Street. Oxon: Radcliffe Medical Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, G., R. O. Keohane, and S. Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B. 1992. “The Social Construction of Protest and Multiorganizational Fields.” In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by A. D. Morris, and C. M. Mueller, 77–103. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J. F. M., and E.-H. Klijn. 2004. Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kostova, T., and S. Zaheer. 1999. “Organizational Legitimacy under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise.” Academy of Management Review 24 (1): 64–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz, C. F., and D. J. Snowden. 2003. “The New Dynamics of Strategy: Sense-Making in a Complex and Complicated World.” IBM Systems Journal 42 (3): 462–483.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K. 2014. “Social Construction and the Evidence-Based Drug Policy Endeavour.” International Journal of Drug Policy 25 (5): 948–951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, R. 2000. Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, S., P. Allen, and B. McKelvey. 2011. “Complexity and Management: Introducing the SAGE Handbook.” In The SAGE Handbook of Complexity and Management, edited by P. Allen, S. Maguire, and B. McKelvey, 1–26. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Marin, B., and R. Mayntz, eds. 1991. Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., and B. Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Misco, T. 2007. “The Frustrations of Reader Generalizability and Grounded Theory: Alternative Considerations for Transferability.” Journal of Research Practice 3 (1): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Mitleton-Kelly, E. 2003. “Ten Principles of Complexity and Enabling Infrastructures.” In Complex Systems and Evolutionary Perspectives on Organisations: The Application of Complexity Theory to Organisations, edited by E. Mitleton-Kelly, 23–50. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G., P. J. Frost, and L. R. Pondy. 1983. “Organizational Symbolism.” In Organizational Symbolism, edited by L. R. Pondy, P. J. Frost, G. Morgan, and T. C. Dandridge, 3–35. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, D., D. Czischke, and G. van Bortel. 2012. “Exploring the Meaning of Hybridity and Social Enterprise in Housing Organisations.” Housing Studies 27 (4): 405–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, A., and H. A. Simon. 1971. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nordic Centre for Welfare and Social Issues. 2013. The Nordic Welfare Model. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. OECD Regional Outlook 2011: Building Resilient Regions for Stronger Economies. Paris: The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Ormerod, P. 1998. Butterfly Economics. London: Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. 2006. “The New Public Governance?” Public Management Review 8 (3): 377–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. 2000. “Governance and Comparative Politics.” In Debating Governance. Authority, Steering, and Democracy, edited by J. Pierre, 36–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., and B. G. Peters. 2000. Governance, Politics, and the State. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Podolny, J. M., and K. L. Page. 1998. “Network Forms of Organization.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 57–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., and M. K. Ho. 2006. “Frames and Their Consequences.” In The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Studies, edited by R. E. Gooden, and C. Tilly, 187–209. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W. 1990. “Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organizations.” In Research in Organizational Behavior, edited by B. M. Staw, and L. Cummins, 295–336. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pratchett, L., and M. Wingfield. 1994. The Public Service Ethos in Local Government: A Research Report. London: CLD Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Reger, R. K., L. T. Gustafson, S. M. Demarie, and J. V. Mullane. 1994. “Reframing the Organization: Why Implementing Total Quality Is Easier Said Than Done.” Academy of Management Review 19 (3): 565–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 1988. Beyond Westminster and Whitehall: The Sub-Central Governments of Britain. London: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 1990. “Policy Networks: A British Perspective.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 2 (3): 293–317.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, K. A. 2011. “Complexity and Management: A Pluralistic View.” In The SAGE Handbook of Complexity and Management, edited by P. Allen, S. Maguire, and B. McKelvey, 366–381. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. 2000. “Wicked Problems and Network Approaches to Resolution.” International Public Management Review 1 (1): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. M., R. Jeffries, and L. Irani. 2008. “Sensemaking for the Rest of Us.” CHI Workshop on Sensemaking (October): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. 2003. Problem-solving Effectiveness and Democratic Accountability in the EU (MPIfG working paper No. 03/1). Econstor.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, V. 2012. “Governance and Complexity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Governance, edited by D. Levi-Faur, 129–142. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. 1949. TVA and the Grass Roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shotter, J., and H. Tsoukas. 2011. “Complex Thought, Simple Talk: An Ecological Approach to Language-Based Change in Organizations.” In The SAGE Handbook of Complexity and Management, edited by P. Allen, S. Maguire, and B. McKelvey, 333–348. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. 2013. Doing Qualitative Research. 4th ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöblom, S., K. Löfgren, and S. Godenhjelm. 2013. “Projectified Politics–Temporary Organisations in a Public Context.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 17 (2): 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., and S. R. Smith. 2015. “Theorizing Hybridity: Institutional Logics, Complex Organizations, and Actor Identities: The Case of Nonprofits.” Public Administration 93 (2): 433–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleegers, P., H. Wassink, K. van Veen, and J. Imants. 2009. “School Leaders’ Problem Framing: A Sense-Making Approach to Problem-Solving Processes of Beginning School Leaders.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 8 (2): 152–172.
   Google Scholar
• Sniderman, P. M., and S. M. Theriault. 2004. “The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing.” In Studies in Public Opinion, edited by W. E. Saris, and P. M. Sniderman, 133–165. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., and R. D. Benford. 1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization.” International Social Movement Research 1: 197–218.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., and R. D. Benford. 1992. “Master Frames and Cycles of Protest.” In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by A. Morris, and C. M. Mueller, 133–155. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. 2012. The Future Population of Sweden 2010–2060. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. 1998. “Governance as Theory: Five Propositions.” International Social Science Journal 50 (155): 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, K. M., and M. K. Christianson. 2013. “Managing for the Unexpected (Executive White Paper Series).” Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity. San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Termeer, C. J. A. M. 2009. “Barriers to New Modes of Horizontal Governance: A Sense-Making Perspective.” Public Management Review 11 (3): 299–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thietart, R.-A., and B. Forgues. 2011. “Complexity Science and Organization.” In The SAGE Handbook of Complexity and Management, edited by P. Allen, S. Maguire, and B. McKelvey, 53–64. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kersbergen, K., and F. Van Waarden. 2004. “‘Governance’ as a Bridge Between Disciplines: Cross-Disciplinary Inspiration Regarding Shifts in Governance and Problems of Governability, Accountability and Legitimacy.” European Journal of Political Research 43 (2): 143–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2007. “Governance, Complexity, and Democratic Participation.” The American Review of Public Administration 37 (1): 17–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldrop, M. M. 1992. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. London: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, W. 2004. “Some Critical Notes on ‘Governance.’” Studies in Political Economy 73 (1): 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P., and A. M. Khademian. 2008. “Wicked Problems, Knowledge Challenges, and Collaborative Capacity Builders in Network Settings.” Public Administration Review 68 (2): 334–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1993. “The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster.” Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (4): 628–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1995. “Sensemaking in Organizations.” In Foundations for Organizational Science, edited by P. J. Frost, A. S. Huff, B. Schneider, M. S. Taylor, and A. van de Ven, 39–56. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1999. “Sensemaking as an Organizational Dimension of Global Change.” In Organizational Dimensions of Global Change, edited by D. L. Cooperrider, and J. E. Dutton, 39–56. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar