Revisiting demand, politicization and externalization in authoritarian political regimes: policy advisory system in Russian practices

References

• Belyaeva, N. 2011. “Analysts: ‘Consultants’ or ‘Independent Policy Actors’.” Politicka Misao 48 (5): 125–140.
   Google Scholar
• Brancati, D. 2014. “Democratic Authoritarianism: Origins and Effects.” Annual Review of Political Science 17: 313–326. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-052013-115248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhry, A., and P. Garner. 2007. “Do Governments Suppress Growth? Institutions, Rent-Seeking, and Innovation Blocking in a Model of Schumpeterian Growth.” Economics and Politics 19 (1): 5–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0343.2007.00301.x
   Google Scholar
• Collier, D., and S. Levitsky. 1997. “Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research.” World Politics 49 (3): 430–451. doi: 10.1353/wp.1997.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, J., and M. Howlett. 2012. “Policy Formulation Governance Shifts and Policy Influence: Location and Content in Policy Advisory Systems.” Journal of Public Policy 32 (2): 79–98. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X12000049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, J., and M. Howlett. 2013. “The Dual Dynamics of Policy Advisory Systems: The Impact of Externalization and Politicization on Policy Advice.” Policy and Society 32 (3): 187–197. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, J., and M. Wilder. 2015. “Catching a Second Wave: Context and Compatibility in Advisory System Dynamics.” Policy Studies Journal 45 (1): 215–239. doi: 10.1111/psj.12133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, W. 2007. “Policy Study and Development in Canada’s Political Parties.” In Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art, edited by L. Dobuzinskis, M. Howlett, and D. Laycock, 233–242. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dmitriev, M., and A. Yurtaev. 2010. “Strategy-2010: Plans and Results.” Forbes, May 28. http://www.forbes.ru/column/50383-strategiya-2010-plany-i-rezultaty.
   Google Scholar
• Dmitrieva, N. E., and A. B. Zhulin. 2017. Independent Evaluation of the Quality of Services in the Social Sphere: The Results of Expert Monitoring of Implementation in 2014–2016. Analytical Report. Part I. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Eichbaum, C., and R. Shaw. 2008. “Revisiting Politicization: Political Advisers and Public Servants in Westminster Systems.” Governance 21 (3): 337–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00403.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichbaum, C., and R. Shaw, eds. 2010. Partisan Appointees and Public Servants: An International Analysis of the Role of the Political Adviser. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Garant.Ru. Garant System. Federal Law of July 21, 2014 N 256-FZ. http://base.garant.ru/70701066/.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, V. 2006. “Perspectives of the Dominant Party in Russia.” Pro et Contra July–August: 62–71.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, V. 2009. “The Dynamics of Subnational Authoritarianism: Russia in a Comparative Perspective.” Social Sciences and the Present 3: 50–63.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, V., and A. Starodubtsev. 2016. “Opportunities and Constraints of Authoritarian Modernisation: Russian Policy Reforms of the 2000s.” Europe-Asia Studies 68 (1): 97–117. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2015.1113232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golos. 2011. “Map of Election Violations on December 4, 2011.” https://www.kartanarusheniy.org/2011-12-04.
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. 2008. “Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia.” Pro et Contra January–February: 22–35.
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. 2011. “Regional Roots of Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia.” Europe-Asia Studies 63 (4): 623–639. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2011.566427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halligan, J. 1995. “Policy Advice and the Public Sector.” In Governance in a Changing Environment, edited by B. Guy Peters, and Donald T. Savoie, 138–172. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. 2013. “Policy Work, Policy Advisory Systems and Politicization.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 7 (1): 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. 2015. “Policy Analytical Capacity: The Supply and Demand for Policy Analysis in Government.” Policy and Society 34 (3–4): 173–182. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. 2019. “Comparing Policy Advisory Systems: Models, Dynamics and a Research Agenda.” Policy Studies. doi:10.1080/01442872.2018.1557626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., and A. Migone. 2013. “Policy Advice through the Market: The Role of External Consultants in Contemporary Policy Advisory Systems.” Policy and Society 32 (3): 241–254. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HSE.ru. Strategy 2020: A New Growth Model - A New Social Policy. https://www.hse.ru/strategy2020.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov, M., S. Goryashko, and A. Pushkarskaya. 2014. “The Kremlin Entrusted Political Studies.” Kommersant, Aug. 7. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2540081.
   Google Scholar
• Kommersant. 2018. “The Centre for Strategic Development Proposed Seven Priorities for the Development of Russia until 2024.” https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3708688.
   Google Scholar
• Krastev, I., and S. Holmes. 2012. “An Autopsy of Managed Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 23 (3): 33–45. doi: 10.1353/jod.2012.0043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremlin.Ru. “Departments.” http://kremlin.ru/structure/administration/departments.
   Google Scholar
• Kremlin.Ru. Regulations on the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation. http://letters.kremlin.ru/info-service/acts/3.
   Google Scholar
• LentaRu. 2011. “Chronicle of voting.” December 5. https://lenta.ru/articles/2011/12/04/chrono/.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and L. Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magaloni, B. 2008. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manwaring, R. 2018. “Policy Advisory System: Understanding Political ‘Demand’.” In this issue. McFaul, M. 2000. “One Step Forward, Two Steps Back.” Journal of Democracy 11 (3): 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• McFaul, M. 2000. “One Step Forward, Two Steps Back.” Journal of Democracy 11 (3): 19–33. doi: 10.1353/jod.2000.0062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, Y. 2012. “The Era of Electoral Authoritarianism.” World Politics 64 (1): 161–198. doi: 10.1017/S0043887111000281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhametshina, E. 2015. “Presidential Grants for 2015 will be Received by Patriots and Foreign Agents. The Authorities are Trying to Tame Their Opponents, the Expert Notes.” Vedomosti, October 22. https://goo.gl/1Z9wXB.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhametshina, E. 2016. “Distributing Presidential Grants will be Closed to the Public Chamber Organization.” Vedomosti, Apr. 6. https://goo.gl/YRoz4V.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, C. 2007. “The Media.” In Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art, edited by L. Dobuzinskis, M. Howlett, and D. Laycock, 286–297. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagornykh, I. 2017. “The Municipal Filter Leaves Out Too Little.” Kommersant, Aug. 28. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3395829.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2007. “Political Advisers and Civil Servants in European Countries.” Sigma Papers, 38. OECD Publishing: Paris. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kml60qnxrkc-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2011. Ministerial advisors: Role, influence and management. doi:10.1787/9789264124936-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2017. Policy Advisory Systems: Supporting Good Governance and Sound Public Decision Making. OECD Public Governance Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264283664-en.
   Google Scholar
• Petrov, N., M. Lipman, and H. Hale. 2010. “Overmanaged Democracy in Russia: Governance Implications of Hybrid Regimes.” Carnegie Papers 106: 1–25. https://goo.gl/4e57g2. https://goo.gl/4e57g2.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, M. 2005. “Soft Craft, Hard Choices, Altered Context: Reflections on 25 Years of Policy Advice in Canada.” In Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art, edited by L. Dobuzinskis, M. Howlett, and D. Laycock, 95–106. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putin, V. 1999. “Russia at the Turn of the Millennium.” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, December 30. http://www.ng.ru/politics/1999-12-30/4_millenium.html.
   Google Scholar
• Putin, V. 2012. “The Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly.” December 12, 2012, 13:30. The Kremlin’s St George Hall, Moscow. Available at Official Internet Resources of the President of Russia: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/17118.
   Google Scholar
• Putin, V. 2015. “The Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly.” December 3, 13:00, The Kremlin’s St George Hall, Moscow. Available at Official Internet Resources of the President of Russia: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/50864.
   Google Scholar
• Putin, V. 2018. “The Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly.” March 1, 14:00, the Manezh Central Exhibition Hall, Moscow. Available at Official Internet Resources of the President of Russia: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/56957.
   Google Scholar
• Remington, T. 2013. “Parliament and the Dominant Party Regime.” In Return to Putin’s Russia: Past Imperfect, Future Uncertain, edited by S. Wegren, 45–62. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, O., and T. Remington. 2009. “Dominant Party Regimes and the Commitment Problem. The Case of “United Russia”.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (4): 501–526. doi: 10.1177/0010414008327426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RIA News. 2016. “United Russia” has a Constitutional Majority in the State Duma.” September 19. https://ria.ru/election2016/20160919/1477299900.html.
   Google Scholar
• Romer, T., and H. Rosenthal. 1978. “Political Resource Allocation, Controlled Agendas, and the Status Quo.” Public Choice 33 (4): 27–43. doi: 10.1007/BF03187594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russia Today. 2018. “To do Everything for Russia”: President Putin’s Speech at the Inauguration Ceremony. May 7. https://ru.rt.com/axr1.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, A., ed. 2006. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Shevtsova, L. 2000. “Can Electoral Autocracy Survive?” Journal of Democracy 11 (3): 36–39. doi: 10.1353/jod.2000.0064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpser, A. 2013. Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections: Theory, Practice, and Implications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, R., A. Lowry, and B. Wilkening. 2007. “Engineering Victory: Institutional Reform, Informal Institutions, and the Formation of a Hegemonic Party Regime in the Russian Federation.” Post-Soviet Affairs 23 (2): 118–137. doi: 10.2747/1060-586X.23.2.118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzdaltsev, A. 2016. “Authoritarianism.” In What is What in World Politics: A Dictionary-Reference, edited by M. V. Bratersky, 122–123. Moscow: Publishing House NRU HSE.
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, D. 2011. “Presidential Popularity in a Hybrid Regime: Russia under Yeltsin and Putin.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 590–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00500.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Berg, C. 2017. “Dynamics in the Dutch Policy Advisory System: Externalization, Politicization and the Legacy of Pillarization.” Policy Sciences 50 (1): 63–84. doi: 10.1007/s11077-016-9257-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedomosti. 2017. “The work of the Presidential Administration in 2018 will allocate about 16 billion rubles”. September 18. https://goo.gl/MrUomp.
   Google Scholar
• Veselý, A. 2013. “Externalization of Policy Advice: Theory, Methodology and Evidence.” Policy and Society 32 (3): 199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeden, L. 2008. Peripheral Vision: Publics, Power and Performance in Yemen. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M. 2008. “Expert-Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis.” Policy Studies Journal 36 (4): 615–635. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00287.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakovlev, A., L. Freikman, and A. Zolotov. 2016. Domestic and External Factors in the Development of Russia’s Economic Think Tank Sector. Series: BOFIT Policy Brief 3. Helsinki: Bank of Finland. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bof/handle/123456789/14096.
   Google Scholar
• Yurchenko, V. 2017. “The CEC has Published Financial Reports of Political Parties.” Novaya Gazeta, Jun. 3. https://goo.gl/zkzJat.
   Google Scholar
• Zaytsev, D., and N. Belyaeva. 2017. “Determinants of the Policy Impact of Analytical Communities in Russian Regions: Cases of Karelia, Tatarstan and Saratov.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 11 (2): 23–42. doi: 10.1515/cejpp-2016-0033
   Google Scholar