Fluctuating capacity of policy advice in Russia: testing theory in developing country context

References

• Blatter, Joachim, and Markus Haverland. 2012. “Causal-process Tracing.” In Designing Case Studies, 79–143. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bochenkov, S. 2009. “Determining the Factors Influence on Low Results of Use of School Graduates: Assessment of Impact of Motivation and Family Reasons.” Accessed 20 August 2016. https://www.google.ru/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwjm7qydz9DOAhWJGCwKHWAWD1YQFggcMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hse.ru%2Fdata%2F2010%2F05%2F31%2F1219940890%2Firo.ppt&usg=AFQjCNGMrjjlgxHOL9LfNhcCRD-RGMu9tA&sig2=oXALGYNMSPYSlp5qowVq_A&bvm=bv.129759880,d.bGg.
   Google Scholar
• Brint, Steven. 1990. “Rethinking the Policy Influence of Experts: From General Characterizations to Analysis of Variation.” Sociological Forum 5 (3): 361–385. doi: 10.1007/BF01115092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connaughton, Bernadette. 2010. “‘Glorified Gofers, Policy Experts or Good Generalists’: A Classification of the Roles of the Irish Ministerial Adviser.” Irish Political Studies 25 (3): 347–369. doi: 10.1080/07907184.2010.497636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, Jonathan, and Michael Howlett. 2012. “Policy Formulation, Governance Shifts and Policy Influence: Location and Content in Policy Advisory Systems.” Journal of Public Policy 32 (2): 79–98. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X12000049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, Jonathan, and Michael Howlett. 2013. “The Dual Dynamics of Policy Advisory Systems: The Impact of Externalization and Politicization on Policy Advice.” Policy and Society 32 (3): 187–197. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, Blaise. 1982. “Invisible Colleges and Information Transfer a Review and Commentary with Particular Reference to the Social Sciences.” Journal of Documentation 38 (3): 212–236. doi: 10.1108/eb026730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crotty, Jo, Sarah Marie Hall, and Sergej Ljubownikow. 2014. Post-Soviet Civil Society Development in the Russian Federation: The Impact of the NGO law.” Europe-Asia Studies 66 (8): 1253–1269. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2014.941697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daucé, Françoise. 2015. “The Duality of Coercion in Russia: Cracking Down on ‘Foreign Agents’.” Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 23 (1): 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Dobriakova, M. S., and Y. I. Kuzminov. 2009. “Unified State Exam and Enrollment in Universities. Average Score of Prospective Students, enrolled in Moscow Universities based on the Results of the Unified State Exam: August 2009” (in Russian). HSE Reports 2009–2010: 330–466. Moscow: Higher School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, William N. 1980. “The Two-communities Metaphor and Models of Knowledge Use: An Exploratory Case Survey.” Knowledge 1 (4): 515–536. doi: 10.1177/107554708000100403
   Google Scholar
• Education and Society. 2007. “Education and Society. Do Russia Ready to Invest in Its Future?” (in Russian). HSE Reports 2006–2008: 510–621. Moscow: Higher School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, Berit, and Alfred Kieser. 2002. “In Search of Explanations for the Consulting Explosion.” In The Expansion of Management Knowledge: Carriers, Flows, and Sources, edited by Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson and Lars Engwall, 47–73. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Alfred, Lisa McIntosh Sundstrom, and Laura A. Henry. 2016. “Russian Civil Society.” Russian Civil Society: A Critical Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Fleck, Ludwik. 1979. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flikke, Geir. 2016. “Resurgent Authoritarianism: The Case of ’Russia’s New NGO Legislation.” Post-Soviet Affairs 32 (2): 103–131. doi: 10.1080/1060586X.2015.1034981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokhberg, Leonid, and Tatiana Kuznetsova. 2011. “S&T and Innovation in Russia: Key Challenges of the Post-crisis Period.” Journal of East-West Business 17 (2–3): 73–89. doi: 10.1080/10669868.2011.634769
   Google Scholar
• Haas, Peter M. 1992. “Banning Chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic Community Efforts to Protect Stratospheric Ozone.” International Organization 46 (1): 187–224. doi: 10.1017/S002081830000148X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halligan, John. 1995. “Policy Advice and the Public Service.” In Governance in a Changing Environment, edited by B. Guy Peters and Donald J. Savoie, 138–172. Montreal: Canadian Centre for Management Development.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, John. 1998. “Policy Advice.” International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration 3: 1686–1688.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, Michael. 2019. “Comparing Policy Advisory Systems Beyond the OECD: Models, Dynamics and the Second-Generation Research Agenda.” Policy Studies 1–19. doi:10.1080/01442872.2018.1557626.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, Michael, Seck L. Tan, Andrea Migone, Adam Wellstead, and Bryan Evans. 2014. “The Distribution of Analytical Techniques in Policy Advisory Systems: Policy Formulation and the Tools of Policy Appraisal.” Public Policy and Administration 29 (4): 271–291. doi: 10.1177/0952076714524810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hufen, J. A. M., and Joop F. M. Koppenjan. 2014. “How Evidence Becomes Authoritative in Public Policy Implementation. Lessons from Three Dutch White Ravens.” Policy Studies 35 (3): 264–281. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2013.875148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakabadze, S. H., D. Zaytsev, N. Zviagina, and V. Karastelev. 2011. “Institute of Civil Participation: Test of Actors’ Activity.” Polis (bologna, Italy) 3 (123): 88–108.
   Google Scholar
• Kipping, Matthias, and Timothy Clark. “Researching Management Consulting: An Introduction to the Handbook.” The Oxford Handbook of Management Consulting. Oxford University Press. 2012-03-29. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199235049.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199235049-e-1.
   Google Scholar
• Kovaleva, G. 2009. USE in the System of Quality of Education Assessment (in Russian). Moscow: Institute of Content and Methods of Education of Russia Academy of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kuei-Tien, Chou. 2007. “Conflicts of Technology Policy and Governance Paradigm in a Knowledge-based Economy: A Case Analysis of the Construction of the Taiwan Biobank.” Issues & Studies 43 (3): 97–130.
   Google Scholar
• Levada-Center. 2016. The Attitudes Towards the USE of School-leavers of Moscow (in Russian). Accessed 12 July 2016. http://www.levada.ru/2009/09/20/ege-glazami-abiturientov-moskovskih-vuzov/.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, John Stuart. 1875. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence, and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. 9th ed. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, Richard A. 2009. Public Intellectuals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prasser, Scott. 2006. “Providing Advice to Government.” Papers on Parliament. Canberra: Senate of Australia. http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/pops/*/link.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, Michael J. 2007. “Soft Craft, Hard Choices, Altered Context: Reflections on 25 Years of Policy Advice in Canada.” In Policy Analysis in Canada, edited by Dobuzinskis Laurent, Howlett Michael, and Laycock David, 163–185. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/9781442685529.13.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, Susan Kaufman. 1973. “Decision-making in an Authoritarian Regime: Theoretical Implications from a Mexican Case Study.” World Politics 26 (1): 28–54. doi: 10.2307/2009916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, Robert, and Daniel McGillis. 1979. “Observations on the Role of Consultants in the Public Sector.” Public Administration Review 39 (3): 219–226. doi:10.2307/975942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Startsev, B. 2012. Chronicles of Education Policy in Russia: 1991–2011 (in Russian). Moscow: HSE.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Diane, and Andrew Denham. 2004. Think Tank Traditions: Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strategy. 2000. “Strategy-2010 of Development of Russian Federation till 2010” (in Russian). Accessed 20 August 2016. http://www.kommersant.ru/documents/Strat1.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Sundquist, James L. 1978. Research Brokerage: The Weak Link'in Lynn. Knowledge and Policy: The Uncertain Connection, 1126–1144. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• TASS. 2015. “Putin Agreed that the USE Need to be Developed” (in Russian). Accessed 15 July 2016. http://tass.ru/obschestvo/1908979.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, Jacob, B. Guy Peters, Jon Pierre, and Eva Sørensen. 2012. Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• WCIOM. 2016. The USE-2016: Myths and Reality (in Russian). Accessed 9 July 2016. http://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=115766.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, R. Kent. 1989. “The Changing World of Think Tanks.” PS: Political Science & Politics 22 (3): 563–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaytsev, D. 2010. Think Tanks in Political Process. Main Features and Assessment of Influence on Decision-Making [in Russian]. Saarbrucken. Germany: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zaytsev, Dmitry. 2012. “Analytical Communities in the Local Policy Process: Creating Self-identity.” International Journal of Business and Social Science 3 (5): 208–221.
   Google Scholar
• Zaytsev, Dmitry, and Nina Belyaeva. 2017. “Determinants of the Policy Impact of Analytical Communities in Russian Regions: Cases of Karelia, Tatarstan and Saratov.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 11 (2): 23–42. doi: 10.1515/cejpp-2016-0033
   Google Scholar