Are inequalities in representation lower under compulsory voting?

References

• Achen, C. H. 1978. “Measuring Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 22: 475–510. doi: 10.2307/2110458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, Reuben M., and David A. Kenny. 1986. “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, Larry. 2016. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Guilded Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bashir, Omar S. 2015. “Testing Inferences about American Politics: A Review of the “Oligarchy” Result.” Research & Politics 2, doi:10.1177/205316801560889 doi: 10.1177/2053168015608896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Yosef, Jens Olav Dahlgaard, Jonas Hedegaard Hansen, and Kasper M. Hansen. 2019. “Core and Peripheral Voters: Predictors of Turnout Across Three Types of Elections.” Political Studies 67 (2): 348–366. doi: 10.1177/0032321718766246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, Sarah. 2009. Full Participation. A Comparative Study of Compulsory Voting. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, André, and Agnieszka Dobrzynska. 1998. “Turnout in Electoral Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 33: 239–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, André, Eric Guntermann, and Marc André Bodet. 2017. “Linking Party Preferences and the Composition of Government: A New Standard for Evaluating the Performance of Electoral Democracy.” Political Science Research and Methods 5: 315–331. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2015.78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branham, J. Alexander, Stuart N. Soroka, and Christopher Wlezien. 2017. “When Do the Rich Win?” American Political Science Review 66: 450–458.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, Richard A., and Benjamin I. Page. 1972. “Comment: The Assessment of Policy Voting.” American Political Science Review 66: 450–458. doi: 10.2307/1957788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunell, Thomas, and John DiNardo. 2004. “A Propensity Score Reweighting Approach to Estimate the Partisan Effects of Full Turnout in American Presidential Elections.” Political Analysis 12: 28–45. doi: 10.1093/pan/mph002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugarin, Mauricio, and Adriana Portugal. 2015. “Should Voting be Mandatory? The Effect of Compulsory Voting Rules on Candidates’ Political Platforms.” Journal of Applied Economics 18: 1–29. doi: 10.1016/S1514-0326(15)30001-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, Angus, Philip Converse, Warren Miller, and Donald Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cancela, Joao, and Benny Geys. 2016. “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Meta-Analysis of National and Subnational Elections.” Electoral Studies 42: 264–275. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepaluni, Gabriel, and F. Daniel Hidalgo. 2016. “Compulsory Voting can Increase Political Inequality: Evidence from Brazil.” Political Analysis 24: 273–280. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpw004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citrin, Jack, Eric Schickler, and John Sides. 2003. “What if Everyone Voted? Simulating the Impact of Increased Turnout in Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 47: 75–90. doi: 10.1111/1540-5907.00006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, Harold D., David Sanders, Marianne C. Stewart, and Paul Whiteley. 2004. Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by David E. Apter, 206–261. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dassonneville, Ruth, Fernando Feitosa, Marc Hooghe, Richard Lau, and Dieter Stiers. 2019. “Compulsory Voting Rules, Reluctant Voters and Ideological Proximity Voting.” Political Behavior 41: 1–22. doi: 10.1007/s11109-018-9448-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dassonneville, Ruth, and Marc Hooghe. 2017. “Voter Turnout Decline and Stratification: Quasi-Experimental and Comparative Evidence of a Growing Educational Gap.” Politics 37: 184–200. doi: 10.1177/0263395716674370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dassonneville, Ruth, Marc Hooghe, and Peter Miller. 2017. “The Impact of Compulsory Voting on Inequality and the Quality of the Vote.” West European Politics 40: 621–644. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2016.1266187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, Christopher. 2012. “Understanding Economic Biases in Representation: Income, Resources, and Policy Representation in the 110th House.” Political Research Quarterly 65: 938–951. doi: 10.1177/1065912911427450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enns, Peter K. 2015. “Reconsidering the Middle: A Reply to Martin Gilens.” Perspectives on Politics 13: 1072–1074. doi: 10.1017/S1537592715002339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferland, Benjamin. 2016. “Revisiting the Ideological Congruence Controversy.” European Journal of Political Research 55 (2): 358–373. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, Anthony. 2013. “Electoral and Policy Consequences of Voter Turnout: Evidence from Compulsory Voting in Australia.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 8: 159–182. doi: 10.1561/100.00012055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallego, Aina. 2007. “Unequal Political Participation in Europe.” International Journal of Sociology 37: 10–25. doi: 10.2753/IJS0020-7659370401
   Google Scholar
• Gallego, Aina. 2010. “Understanding Unequal Turnout: Education and Voting in Comparative Perspective.” Electoral Studies 29: 239–248. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2009.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallego, Aina. 2015. Unequal Participation Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giger, Nathalie, Jan Rosset, and Julian Bernauer. 2012. “The Poor Political Representation of the Poor in a Comparative Perspective.” Representation 48: 47–61. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2012.653238
   Google Scholar
• Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, Matt, and Jacek Stramski. 2010. “Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science 54: 90–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirczy, Wolfang. 1994. “The Impact of Mandatory Voting Laws on Turnout: A Quasi-Experimental Approach.” Electoral Studies 13: 64–76. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(94)90009-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, John D., and G. Bingham Powell. 1994. “Congruence Between Citizens and Policy-Makers in Two Visions of Liberal Democracy.” World Politics 46: 291–326. doi: 10.2307/2950684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, Torben, and David Soskice. 2006. “Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More than Others.” American Political Science Review 100: 165–181. doi: 10.1017/S0003055406062083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackman, Simon. 2001. “Compulsory Voting.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, edited by Neil J. Smelser and Paul B. Bates, 16314–16318. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kasara, Kimuli, and Pavithra Suryanarayan. 2015. “When Do the Rich Vote Less than the Poor and Why? Explaining Turnout Inequality across the World.” American Journal of Political Science 59: 613–627. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, Richard R., and David P Redlawsk. 1997. “Voting Correctly.” American Political Science Review 91: 585–598. doi: 10.2307/2952076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet. 1968. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leighley, Jan E., and Jonathan Nagler. 1992. “Socioeconomic Class Bias in Turnout, 1964–1988: The Voters Remain the Same.” American Political Science Review 86: 725–736. doi: 10.2307/1964134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leighley, Jan E., and Jonathan Nagler. 2013. Who Votes Now? Demographics, Issues, Inequality and Turnout in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz, Gabriel S. 2012. Follow the Leader? How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Mary Stegmaier. 2007. “Economic Models of the Vote.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by Russell J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, 518–537. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma. Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1996.” American Political Science Review 91: 1–14. doi: 10.2307/2952255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupu, Noam, and Zach Warner. 2017. Affluence and Congruence: Unequal Representation around the World. Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Marien, Sofie, Marc Hooghe, and Ellen Quintelier. 2010. “Inequalities in Non-Institutionalised Forms of Political Participation: A Multi-Level Analysis of 25 Countries.” Political Studies 58: 187–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00801.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, Mike, Jean-Philippe Gauvin, and Chris Chhim. 2015. “Refining Vote Choice in an Ethno-Regionalist Context: Three-Dimensional Ideological Voting in Catalonia and Quebec.” Electoral Studies 40: 14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Peter, and Ruth Dassonneville. 2016. “High Turnout in the Low Countries: Partisan Effects of the Abolition of Compulsory Voting in the Netherlands.” Electoral Studies 44: 132–143. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, W. C. 1999. “Austria.” In Semi-Presidentialism in Europe, edited by Robert Elgie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pacek, Alexander, and Benjamin Radcliff. 1995. “Turnout and the Vote for Left-of-Centre Parties: A Cross-National Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 25: 137–143. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400007109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, Costas. 2008. “The Calculus of Voting in Compulsory Voting Systems.” Political Behavior 30: 455–467. doi: 10.1007/s11109-008-9058-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, Mikael, Maria Solevid, and Richard Öhrvall. 2013. “Voter Turnout and Political Equality: Testing the ‘Law of Dispersion’ in a Swedish Natural Experiment.” Politics 33: 172–184. doi: 10.1111/1467-9256.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, Timothy. 2009. “Compulsory for Whom? Mandatory Voting and Electoral Participation in Brazil, 1986–2006.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 1: 97–122. doi: 10.1177/1866802X0900100105
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, Jan, Nathalie Giger, and Julian Bernauer. 2013. “More Money, Few Problems? Cross-Level Effects of Economic Deprivation on Political Representation.” West European Politics 36: 817–835. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.783353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selb, Peter, and Romain Lachat. 2009. “The More, the Better? Counterfactual Evidence on the Effects of Compulsory Voting on the Consistency of Party Choice.” European Journal of Political Research 48: 573–597. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01834.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, Jill. 2015. “Compulsory Voting and Political Knowledge: Testing a ‘Compelled Engagement’ Hypothesis.” Electoral Studies 40: 300–307. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shineman, Victoria Anne. 2018. “If You Mobilize Them, The Will Become Informed: Experimental Evidence that Information Acquisition is Endogenous to Costs and Incentives to Participate.” British Journal of Political Science 48: 189–211. doi: 10.1017/S0007123416000168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shugart, Mattew Søberg. 2005. “Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive and Mixed Authority Patterns.” French Politics 3: 323–351. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200087
   Google Scholar
• Singh, Shane. 2011. “How Compelling is Compulsory Voting? A Multilevel Analysis of Turnout.” Political Behavior 33: 95–111. doi: 10.1007/s11109-010-9107-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, Shane. 2015. “Compulsory Voting and the Turnout Decision Calculus.” Political Studies 63: 548–568. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, Shane. 2016. “Elections as Poorer Reflections of Preferences Under Compulsory Voting.” Electoral Studies 44: 56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, Shane P. 2018. “Compulsory Voting and Dissatisfaction with Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 843–854. doi: 10.1017/S0007123416000041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets, Kaat, and Carolien van Ham. 2013. “The Embarrassment of Riches? A Meta-Analysis of Individual-Level Research on Voter Turnout.” Electoral Studies 32: 344–359. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2012.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somer-Topcu, Zeynep. 2015. “Everything to Everyone: The Electoral Consequences of the Broad-Appeal Strategy in Europe.” American Journal of Political Science 59: 841–854. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, Stuart N., and Christopher Wlezien. 2008. “On the Limits to Inequality in Representation.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41: 319–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecker, Christian, and Markus Tausendpfund. 2016. “Multidimensional Government-Citizen Congruence and Satisfaction with Democracy.” European Journal of Political Research 55: 492–511. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tingsten, Herbert. 1937. Political Behavior: Studies in Election Statistics. London: P.S. King & Son.
   Google Scholar
• van der Eijk, Cees, and Marcel van Egmond. 2007. “Political Effects of Low Turnout in National and European Elections.” Electoral Studies 26: 561–573. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2006.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, Sidney, and Norman H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar