How action research can make deliberative policy analysis more transformative

References

• Arrona, A., and M. Larrea. 2018. “Soft Resistance: Balancing Relationality and Criticality to Institutionalise Action Research for Territorial Development.” In Action Research in Policy Analysis: Critical and Relational Approaches to Sustainability Transitions, edited by K. P. R. Bartels, and J. M. Wittmayer, 134–152. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., J. M. Wittmayer, B. Pel, P. Weaver, A. Dumitru, A. Haxeltine, R. Kemp, et al. 2019. “Transformative Social Innovation and (Dis)Empowerment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 145: 195–206. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balázs, B., and G. Pataki. 2018. “Cooperative Research for Bottom-up Food Sovereignty and Policy Change.” In Action Research in Policy Analysis: Critical and Relational Approaches to Sustainability Transitions, edited by K. P. R. Bartels, and J. M. Wittmayer, 39–60. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, K. P. R., and J. M. Wittmayer. 2014. “Symposium Introduction: How Usable Knowledge Means in Action Research Practice.” Critical Policy Studies 8 (4): 397–406. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2014.957335
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, K. P. R., and J. M. Wittmayer. 2018. Action Research in Policy Analysis. Critical and Relational Approaches to Sustainability Transitions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. 2001. Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N., I. Katznelson, R. C. Lewontin, L. Nader, D. Montgomery, R. Ohmann, I. Wallerstein, et al. 1997. The Cold War and the University. New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, F. 2018. “Exploring the use of Audiovisual Media for Deliberation: Reframing Discourses on Vulnerabilities to Climate Change in Nepal.” In Action Research in Policy Analysis: Critical and Relational Approaches to Sustainability Transitions, edited by K. P. R. Bartels, and J. M. Wittmayer, 200–221. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Colebatch, H. K., and R. Hoppe. 2018. “Policy and the Theorising of Governing.” In Handbook on Policy, Process and Governing, edited by H. K. Colebatch, and R. Hoppe, 474–500. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, W. J. 2018. “‘Stage’ Theories of the Policy Process.” In Handbook on Policy, Process and Governing, edited by H. K. Colebatch, and R. Hoppe, 112–130. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., and J. Forester, eds. 1993. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., and H. Gottweis. 2012. “Introduction.” In The Argumentative Turn Revisited. Public Policy as Communicative Practice, edited by F. Fischer, and H. Gottweis, 1–27. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., and G. J. Miller, eds. 2006. Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods. Baton Rouge: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., D. Torgerson, A. Durnova, and M. Orsini. 2015. “Introduction to Critical Policy Studies.” In Handbook of Critical Policy Studies, edited by F. Fischer, D. Torgerson, A. Durnova, and M. Orsini, 1–24. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Flood, R. L., and N. R. A. Romm. 1996. “Diversity Management: Theory in Action.” In Critical Systems Thinking. Current Research and Practice, edited by R. L. Flood, and N. R. A. Romm, 81–92. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2001. Making Social Science Matter. Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J., M. Kuitenbrouwer, and D. Laws. 2019. “Enacting Reflective and Deliberative Practices in Action Research.” Policy Studies 40 (5): 456–475. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2019.1618445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, N., R. Ison, C. Blackmore, and K. Collins. 2019. “Revisiting Deliberative Policy Analysis Through Systemic co-Inquiry: Some Experiences From the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive in England.” Policy Studies 40 (5): 510–533. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2019.1618816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, Paolo. 2000. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, A. 2018. “Lipstick on a pig? Appreciative Inquiry in a Context of Austerity.” In Action Research in Policy Analysis: Critical and Relational Approaches to Sustainability Transitions, edited by K. P. R. Bartels, and J. M. Wittmayer, 159–174. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. J. 2007. “Pragmatic Action Research.” International Journal of Action Research 3 (1+2): 131–148.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. J. 2020. “Pragmatism: Linking Systems, Evolution, and Democratization in Participatory and Action Research.” In The Sage Handbook of Participatory Research and Inquiry, edited by D. Burns, J. Howard, S. Ospina. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. J., and M. Levin. 2007. Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J., J. Rotmans, and J. Schot. 2010. Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A., and H. Wagenaar. Eds. 2003. Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidelberg, R. L. 2017. “Public Administration and the Logic of Resolution.” Critical Policy Studies 11 (3): 272–290. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2016.1147364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J., and C. Bynner. 2018. “Cultivating ‘Sanction and Sanctuary’ in Scottish Collaborative Governance: Doing Relational Work to Support Communicative Spaces.” In Action Research in Policy Analysis: Critical and Relational Approaches to Sustainability Transitions, edited by K. P. R. Bartels, and J. M. Wittmayer, 91–110. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hepsø, V., and R. Botnevik. 2002. “Competence Development in a Community of Practice.” In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, edited by T. Binder, J. Gregory, I. Wagner. Malmö, Sweden: Participatory Design Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Hollmén, S. 2015. The Pedagogical Challenge of Interdisciplinary University Programs. Synnyt/Origin. Accessed 10 September 2019. https://wiki.aalto.fi/download/attachments/110559437/saija_hollmen.pdf?version=3&modificationDate=1452161431416&api=v2.
   Google Scholar
• Ison, R. 2017. Systems Practice: How to Act. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jhagroe, S. 2018. “Transition Scientivism: on Activist Gardening and co-Producing Transition Knowledge ‘From Below’.” In Action Research in Policy Analysis: Critical and Relational Approaches to Sustainability Transitions, edited by K. P. R. Bartels, and J. M. Wittmayer, 64–85. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen, J., and M. Larrea. 2017. “Moving Context From the Background to the Forefront of Policy Learning: Reflections on a Case in Gipuzkoa, Basque Country.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35 (4): 721–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenbach, J., and D. Smith. 2015. The Wisdom of Teams. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuitenbrouwer, M. 2018. “Getting Unstuck. The Reconstruction Clinic as Pragmatic Intervention in Controversial Policy Disputes.” In Action Research in Policy Analysis: Critical and Relational Approaches to Sustainability Transitions, edited by K. P. R. Bartels, and J. M. Wittmayer, 177–199. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Larrea, M., and A. Arrona. 2019. “Improving the Approach to Conflict in Action Research Through Deliberative Policy Analysis: A Territorial Development Case in the Basque Country.” Policy Studies 40 (5): 492–509. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2019.1618811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, M., and D. J. Greenwood. 2016. Creating a New Public University and Reviving Democracy. New York, NY: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y. 2019. “Deliberative Policy Analysis: Towards a Methodological Orientation.” Policy Studies 40 (5): 437–455. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2019.1618812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and H. Wagenaar. 2019a. “Revisiting Deliberative Policy Analysis.” Policy Studies 40 (5): 427–436. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2019.1618813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and H. Wagenaar. 2019b. “Conclusion: Building new Momentum for Deliberative Policy Analysis.” Policy Studies 40 (5): 580–583. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2019.1618814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E., and D. K. Cohen. 1979. Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving. New Haven/New York: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., N. Frantzeskaki, and F. Avelino. 2017. “Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 42: 599–626. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2018. Mission-oriented Research & Innovation in the European Union. A Problem-Solving Approach to Fuel Innovation-led Growth. Brussels: European Commission. Accessed 28 March 2019. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5b2811d1-16be-11e8-9253-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T. R. 2013. “Constructing Sustainability Science: Emerging Perspectives and Research Trajectories.” Sustainability Science 8: 279–293. doi: 10.1007/s11625-012-0180-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2003. “‘Mode 2’ Revisited: The new Production of Knowledge.” Minerva 41: 179–194. doi: 10.1023/A:1025505528250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojha, H. R., M. R. Banjade, and K. K. Shrestha. 2015. “Critical Action Research and Social Movements: Revitalizing Participation and Deliberation for Democratic Empowerment.” In Handbook of Critical Policy Studies, edited by F. Fischer, D. Torgerson, A. Durnova, and M. Orsini, 380–398. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Paredis, E., and T. Block. 2018. “Negotiating Space for Mild Interventions: Action Research on the Brink Between Social Movements and Government Policy in Flanders.” In Action Research in Policy Analysis: Critical and Relational Approaches to Sustainability Transitions, edited by K. P. R. Bartels, and J. M. Wittmayer, 113–131. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T., and A. Goldhammer. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1944. The Great Transformation. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L., and C. Durose. 2016. Designing Public Policy for Co-Production: Theory, Practice and Change. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169. doi: 10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., and D. Loorbach. 2009. “Complexity and Transition Management.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 13 (2): 184–196. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00116.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuitmaker, T. J. 2012. “Identifying and Unravelling Persistent Problems.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (6): 1021–1031. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. 2002. Policy Paradox. The Art of Political Decision Making. Revised Edition. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. 2000. Audit Cultures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Arend, S. 2018. “Really Imagined: Policy Novels as a Mode of Action Research.” In Action Research in Policy Analysis: Critical and Relational Approaches to Sustainability Transitions, edited by K. P. R. Bartels, and J. M. Wittmayer, 225–244. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eijnatten, F. M. 1993. The Paradigm That Changed the Work Place. Assen: Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2007. “Governance, Complexity, and Democratic Participation: How Citizens and Public Officials Harness the Complexities of Neighborhood Decline.” American Review of Public Administration 37 (1): 17–50. doi: 10.1177/0275074006296208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2015. “Transforming Perspectives: The Critical Functions of Interpretive Policy Analysis.” In Handbook of Critical Policy Studies, edited by F. Fischer, D. Torgerson, A. Durnova, and M. Orsini, 422–440. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2016. “Democratic Transfer: Everyday Neoliberalism, Hegemony and the Prospects for Democratic Renewal.” In Critical Reflections on Interactive Governance. Self-Organization and Participation in Public Governance, edited by J. Edelenbos, and I. Van Meerkerk, 93–119. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Wellmon, C. 2015. Organizing Enlightenment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, S., L. van Kerkhoff, and H. Wagenaar. 2019. “Beyond ‘Linking Knowledge and Action’: Towards a Practice-Based Approach to Transdisciplinary Sustainability Interventions.” Policy Studies 40 (5): 534–555. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2019.1618810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westling, E. L., and L. Sharp. 2018. “Both Critical and Applied? Action Research and Transformative Change in the UK Water Sector.” In In Action Research in Policy Analysis: Critical and Relational Approaches to Sustainability Transitions, edited by K. P. R. Bartels, and J. M. Wittmayer, 21–36. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wicks, P. G., and P. Reason. 2009. “Initiating Action Research Challenges and Paradoxes of Opening Communicative Space.” Action Research 7 (3): 243–262. doi: 10.1177/1476750309336715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmayer, J. M., and N. Schäpke. 2014. “Action, Research and Participation: Roles of Researchers in Sustainability Transitions.” Sustainability Science 9: 483–496. doi: 10.1007/s11625-014-0258-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. 2015. “Making Sense of Policy Practices: Interpretation and Meaning.” In Handbook of Critical Policy Studies, edited by F. Fischer, D. Torgerson, A. Durnova, and M. Orsini, 401–421. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar